Jump to content

Lara Trump version of "I won't back down" being shadowbanned y'all

Gil Bang

By Gil Bang
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 45991

Posted
Posted

Well, the auto-tuning is obvious, and not for effect.  It's pretty much a non-starter that offers nothing of substance.

Lara Trump "Won't Back Down"

 

 

Contrast it with Tom Petty singing the same song right after 9/11, when his seething anger was palatable.  God, I miss Tom.  Anyone who willingly associates with the Trump klan can go fuck themselves.

 

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bullneck

Bullneck 19184

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, FirstTimeCaller said:

Did the Petty estate approve the use of his song? Can you just cover someone else's work and put it out there? 

My guess is his is a version Petty's estate said the Trumps were banned from using at events.  But anyone can cover a song so she's doing that skirt that rule.

I listened to her sing.  She sounds like she singing it for the first time, ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Bullneck said:

My guess is his is a version Petty's estate said the Trumps were banned from using at events.  But anyone can cover a song so she's doing that skirt that rule.

I listened to her sing.  She sounds like she singing it for the first time, ever.

This true? I figured small cover bands or the dude playing at a restaurant did so simply because they were too small to be noticed. Someone can just cover anything, put it out and make money off it? Isn't that just making a copy of someone's artwork and passing it off as your own?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nice Guy Eddie

Nice Guy Eddie 13515

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, FirstTimeCaller said:

This true? I figured small cover bands or the dude playing at a restaurant did so simply because they were too small to be noticed. Someone can just cover anything, put it out and make money off it? Isn't that just making a copy of someone's artwork and passing it off as your own?

Side comment but when a band plays a cover at a bar (or concert), it’s actually the bar that owes licensing fees to the artists that created it. Im sure the fees are frequently not paid but the bar would be liable.

Luke Combs didn’t get permission from Tracy Chapman in recording and releasing Fast Car. In public comments, she doesn’t appear to be mad about and apparently is getting paid very well now and in the future. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RDCanecutter

RDCanecutter 26454

Posted
Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, Bookman said:

God they're so fucking whiny.

Ah, you listened to her song too.

 

My favorite touch was the occasional Cartoon Southern pronunciation, followed up by several words of Non-Southern Woman Rattling On the Phone.

NAW I WAWANT back down, NAW I WAWANT back down.

Edited by RDCanecutter
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TexasEd

TexasEd 8067

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, Bullneck said:

My guess is his is a version Petty's estate said the Trumps were banned from using at events.  But anyone can cover a song so she's doing that skirt that rule.

I listened to her sing.  She sounds like she singing it for the first time, ever.

Donald wanted to use it at his campaign rallies and got shut down so Lara records a cover and then Trump can convert campaign donations to royalty payments to his daughter.  

11 hours ago, G650 said:

You have to pay royalties.

Trumps don't pay their bills unless its converting Charity golf money to club revenue at inflated prices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
miguelito

miguelito 11266

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, RDCanecutter said:

Ah, you listened to her song too.

 

My favorite touch was the occasional Cartoon Southern pronunciation, followed up by several words of Non-Southern Woman Rattling On the Phone.

NAW I WAWANT back down, NAW I WAWANT back down.

Dude, "Southern Accent(s)" was right there for you.

Edited by miguelito
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hermanator

Hermanator 7120

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, TexasEd said:

Donald wanted to use it at his campaign rallies and got shut down so Lara records a cover and then Trump can convert campaign donations to royalty payments to his daughter.  

Trumps don't pay their bills unless its converting Charity golf money to club revenue at inflated prices.

It's funny that Trump will attempt to overthrow the government and make himself dictator and now face multiple criminal prosecutions but he was afraid to just play a song and say "sue me, get in line". 

On 10/5/2023 at 12:53 AM, jimmyjazz said:

Well, the auto-tuning is obvious, and not for effect.  It's pretty much a non-starter that offers nothing of substance.

Lara Trump "Won't Back Down"

 

 

Contrast it with Tom Petty singing the same song right after 9/11, when his seething anger was palatable.  God, I miss Tom.  Anyone who willingly associates with the Trump klan can go fuck themselves.

 

I'd never seen that performance before. It still has Howie Epstein who left the band due to uncontrolled heroin addiction and died from it probably about a year after 9/11. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 45991

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Pato del Muerto said:

I think you guys have used up all of the petty song titles you can on your posts. It’s the end of the line. 

I need to know if you're gonna have a breakdown over it.  Could be time for a change of heart.

  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31510

Posted
Posted

Sometimes, rights to songs are handled by an agency like Harry Fox, and obtaining a license to cover a song is highly "mechanical" (as opposed to mechanical royalities, which are per-public-performance royalties).

Other times, the musician in question withdraws from any agency like Harry Fox and you have to go directly to them and they may exercise some discretion as to whether they "like" the cover or cover artist.

No idea which way "Won't Back Down" or Petty's songs generally are handled.  Given this, I might guess Harry Fox.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 45991

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Sometimes, rights to songs are handled by an agency like Harry Fox, and obtaining a license to cover a song is highly "mechanical" (as opposed to mechanical royalities, which are per-public-performance royalties).

Other times, the musician in question withdraws from any agency like Harry Fox and you have to go directly to them and they may exercise some discretion as to whether they "like" the cover or cover artist.

No idea which way "Won't Back Down" or Petty's songs generally are handled.  Given this, I might guess Harry Fox.

I would venture a slightly-educated guess that 99% of major-label releases are handled for BMI/ASCAP/SESAC via Harry Fox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 10 months later...
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 89737

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Hornius Emeritus said:

I'm guessing she felt she had to release it now because in three months she might be an afterthought.

The fact that it was about firefighters (well they were in the video) makes me think they threw this together in light of the JD Vance fiasco where he got booed by firefighters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...