Jump to content

Israel-Hamas war thread


Brisketexan

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Rex Kramer said:

Funny, that quote is used constantly by Palestinian and Arab leaders, and pro Palestinian protestors. Likud isn’t above reproach by any stretch, but this contrarian what aboutism is hilarious. 

It's not contrarian whataboutism.  It's a fucking mirror.  That blanket supporters of everything Israel does should look into.

Palestinians chanting "to the river to the sea" (meaning "drive all jews out of the levant") and committing heinous violence against Israeli and jewish civilians....engenders rage, a violent response, and pure hatred....and UNDERSTANDABLY SO.  THAT'S THE NATURAL RESPONSE TO SUCH THINGS.

Being that it's the natural response to such things....why on earth would one expect that it wouldn't work exactly the same in both directions.  When Israelis, including influential figures within the actual government, say and do the exact same things....why wouldn't we expect Palestinians to react the same way?

And....IF our goal is to eliminate/sharply limit future violent action against Israeli and jewish people....how does this approach accomplish that, in the actual strategic long-term?  How is this not cutting one of Hydra's heads off (immensely satisfying) only to see one or more grow back in its place (so...not so satisfying)?

I'd like to see the Israeli state continue, surviving and indeed thriving.  

I'd like to see Israeli and jewish people be mostly safe from terrorism and violence (I say "mostly" because I'm a realist -- we live in a violent world, there will always be some bad actors out there, but it can indeed be minimized).

I'd like to see Palestinian people live safe and decent lives, surviving and indeed thriving, probably in an actual Palestinian state of some sort.

I'd like to see Palestinian people be mostly safe from terrorism and violence (I say "mostly" because I'm a realist -- we live in a violent world, there will always be some bad actors out there - some of them "internal" and homegrown, but it can indeed be minimized).

 

What Hamas did on October 7th ultimately did not further those goals.  It helped create new generational hatred.

Much of what Israel has done since October 7th ultimately did not further those goals.  It's helping create new generational hatred.

 

Rational people want us to get off of this deranged and horrific round-and-round-we-go merry go-round.....yet Palestinian and Israeli leadership are just making the merry go-round spin faster and faster and faster.  What baffles many of us is how anyone who purports to want a future of peace and security could call this current path "winning."

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, bolverk said:

I didn't think I needed to spell it out for you explicitly. The demand for smuggled-in weapons stems from the oppressive conditions Gazans have been living under since 1967. That's the fuel that feeds the fire. It's simple human psychology. Fuck, take a look at how Americans reacted to the beginning of the pandemic when they thought that an oppressive government was keeping them from going to Applebees or Supercuts. We, collectively, freaked the fuck out, marched in the streets with ARs, barged into state capitols, tried to kidnap governors, etc.

Ironically, those are the same conditions under which other assholes can take power for themselves. In this case, Hamas, which I'm obviously no fan of and which you should be aware of since I know you lurk the CR thread where I've pasted articles about Hamas's own oppression of the Gazans, including those that compare them to the Stasi and how Palestinians living in Gaza have protested against them.

Now, as to the Gazan infrastructure questions. Sure, Hamas is a wholly corrupt organization that has diverted international funding intended for humanitarian purposes. We expect that from corrupt autocrats to amass wealth and retain power. But you should also remember that groundwater is the only source for that strip of desert, and Israel has been limiting how much water can be pumped. Not only that, Israel controls the distribution of power and telecom within Gaza and disrupts their services at will.

Ok. Now do Egypt. 

  • Like 1
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

It's not contrarian whataboutism.  It's a fucking mirror.  That blanket supporters of everything Israel does should look into.

Palestinians chanting "to the river to the sea" (meaning "drive all jews out of the levant") and committing heinous violence against Israeli and jewish civilians....engenders rage, a violent response, and pure hatred....and UNDERSTANDABLY SO.  THAT'S THE NATURAL RESPONSE TO SUCH THINGS.

Being that it's the natural response to such things....why on earth would one expect that it wouldn't work exactly the same in both directions.  When Israelis, including influential figures within the actual government, say and do the exact same things....why wouldn't we expect Palestinians to react the same way?

And....IF our goal is to eliminate/sharply limit future violent action against Israeli and jewish people....how does this approach accomplish that, in the actual strategic long-term?  How is this not cutting one of Hydra's heads off (immensely satisfying) only to see one or more grow back in its place (so...not so satisfying)?

I'd like to see the Israeli state continue, surviving and indeed thriving.  

I'd like to see Israeli and jewish people be mostly safe from terrorism and violence (I say "mostly" because I'm a realist -- we live in a violent world, there will always be some bad actors out there, but it can indeed be minimized).

I'd like to see Palestinian people live safe and decent lives, surviving and indeed thriving, probably in an actual Palestinian state of some sort.

I'd like to see Palestinian people be mostly safe from terrorism and violence (I say "mostly" because I'm a realist -- we live in a violent world, there will always be some bad actors out there - some of them "internal" and homegrown, but it can indeed be minimized).

 

What Hamas did on October 7th ultimately did not further those goals.  It helped create new generational hatred.

Much of what Israel has done since October 7th ultimately did not further those goals.  It's helping create new generational hatred.

 

Rational people want us to get off of this deranged and horrific round-and-round-we-go merry go-round.....yet Palestinian and Israeli leadership are just making the merry go-round spin faster and faster and faster.  What baffles many of us is how anyone who purports to want a future of peace and security could call this current path "winning."

Well 6-5 is a "winning season." ask aggy.

  • Haha 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bolverk said:

I don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Are you trying to move the goalposts again?

Do you or don't you support a fully sovereign Palestinian state? Yes or no.

If he wants a comparison, please do Mexico, Sudan, Burma and a few other places the world deals with while you are at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, bolverk said:

I don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Are you trying to move the goalposts again?

Do you or don't you support a fully sovereign Palestinian state? Yes or no.

You had a long post about how Israel was holding back Gazan development. Gaza has another border, with Egypt. I thought that was worth noting, during all the speculation about Arab state stepping in and helping with necessary services- there isn’t really anything stopping them now. I guess they figure the UNRWA and Israel got it. 
 
As to your question-I support a sovereign liberal democracy Palestinian nation. As I posted before, I don’t think the world needs another aggressive authoritarian state (but, that might be what we get). 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

It's not contrarian whataboutism.  It's a fucking mirror.  That blanket supporters of everything Israel does should look into.

Nope. You are both sides-ing the fuck out of this and I won’t let you do it. You’re trying way too hard. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, statsman said:

You had a long post about how Israel was holding back Gazan development. Gaza has another border, with Egypt. I thought that was worth noting, during all the speculation about Arab state stepping in and helping with necessary services- there isn’t really anything stopping them now. I guess they figure the UNRWA and Israel got it. 
 
As to your question-I support a sovereign liberal democracy Palestinian nation. As I posted before, I don’t think the world needs another aggressive authoritarian state (but, that might be what we get). 

The Arabs would prefer a safer Palestine than all of them as refugees. They would rather send money in than have them come out. They do not need to while Israel and to a lesser degree the international community (not just the UNRWA, the US has unilateral projects in both the West Bank and Gaza, primary development led by USAID) prop up the governments. They get to scream about injustice in public while cutting deals with Israelis in Europe. It feeds the street so the focus is on that vs. they corrupt nature of their own governments. It is also important to note we toss around the word Arab like we do Latino. There is a major difference among them. A Syrian is not a Yemeni who is not a Algerian who is not an Egyptian but they all talk shit about Israel and hate the Saudis.

The Arab nations, led probably by the GCC, could create the utility infrastructure for Gaza and probably turn a profit. But there lies 1 big issue to this that is overlooked. The brain drain. Are there electrical engineers who can maintain something built? With the Israeli control of imports, what port do you use? Ideally it would be based out of Egypt and an overland corridor, but the fear is under the current conditions the Palestinians would go south into the Sinai to escape both Israel and Hamas.

There are quite a few aggressive authoritarian states the world, including the US deals with. You could argue under the Likud Israel is led by an authoritarian party. Authoritarian does not mean a dictator. So lets start with Russia. Yep, up until Ukraine we all dealt with them, and some western companies and non-western countries we like continue to do so. India and China. Currently we can add El Salvador under Bukele, Hungary under Orban, South Africa under the ANC in South Africa, Egypt with the fall of the Muslim Brotherhood (Hamas' buddy), etc.... Shit, add the PRI in Mexico.

Creating a Palestinian state, as noted, would be a nation against a nation if they attacked. If Hamas is the leadership, well it is still a nation-state. The world would expect them to behave like one. Now they can play the Occupied Territory card all they want with no action against them. take it away from them.

Using the Kurds as an example. Post Saddam, though they do no allow Kurdistan to be an independent nation, does give them a lot more say in their day to day lives. Relations really changed. So much that the Kurds saved Iraq's ass from ISIS. Then look at Turkey. They are dicks to the Kurds, so the PKK blows up shit in Turkey. I would prefer to see an independent Kurdistan. But by giving them more of a voice and recognition (there is a US Consulate in Erbil) the animosity in less than one generation has decreased.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, statsman said:

You had a long post about how Israel was holding back Gazan development. Gaza has another border, with Egypt. I thought that was worth noting, during all the speculation about Arab state stepping in and helping with necessary services- there isn’t really anything stopping them now. I guess they figure the UNRWA and Israel got it. 
 
As to your question-I support a sovereign liberal democracy Palestinian nation. As I posted before, I don’t think the world needs another aggressive authoritarian state (but, that might be what we get). 

They know exactly what you mean. But you know Egypt won’t get shade from “reasonable” people. A sovereign liberal democratic Palestine would never happen in my children’s lifetimes. In their poorly defined pipe dream, Palestine would be iron fist ruled by corrupt leaders, and become a serious threat to Israel in short order.  Israel would react predictably, shut those savages down, and the world would cry foul. Every one of these motherfuckers posting here knows it. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Rex Kramer said:

They know exactly what you mean. But you know Egypt won’t get shade from “reasonable” people. A sovereign liberal democratic Palestine would never happen in my children’s lifetimes. In their poorly defined pipe dream, Palestine would be iron fist ruled by corrupt leaders, and become a serious threat to Israel in short order.  Israel would react predictably, shut those savages down, and the world would cry foul. Every one of these motherfuckers posting here knows it. 

As long as they are occupied they do not have to answer to the world. Make them behave if they want aid. We do that to kim jong dick fuck. we were doing that to Iran. We do it to Venezuela. Why do we give in to Gaza? Cuz they can rightfully play the occupied status.

Look, no one on this board bitched if Israel blew up a building full of Hamas/Hezbollah/IRG in Lebanon, Gaza, West Bank or Syria. I think the discussion is don't fucking hit the hospital. Hold your troops to international standards. Don't bend to their level. Hold individuals who do bend down to the Hamas level, desecrate bodies, rape, etc accountable like the US and UK did to our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan and currently the Canadians and Aussies are doing to theirs for crimes committed by individuals. And what Taliban and Iraqi insurgents of the various sects did was atrocious.

In Israel's case it has the appearance that this is State sponsored and led.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rex Kramer said:

They know exactly what you mean. But you know Egypt won’t get shade from “reasonable” people. A sovereign liberal democratic Palestine would never happen in my children’s lifetimes. In their poorly defined pipe dream, Palestine would be iron fist ruled by corrupt leaders, and become a serious threat to Israel in short order.  Israel would react predictably, shut those savages down, and the world would cry foul. Every one of these motherfuckers posting here knows it. 

It's absolutely hilarious that he doesn't see that this is pure racism. Palestinians/Arabs can't be reasonable. They're orcs. It's in their DNA, don't you see? They're "savages". The only reason he isn't saying "sand n*****s" is he would get banned. It's the same reason he would never acknowledge or answer any questions about the IDF soldiers that raped Palestinian prisoners to death. He thinks they're less than human, straight up, and those kinds of retaliatory actions are acceptable. If you engage him on this topic in any way, you have to understand that his position is purely based on racism. That he's as dumb as a fucking hammer is just icing on the cake.

1 hour ago, Rex Kramer said:

Nope. You are both sides-ing the fuck out of this and I won’t let you do it. You’re trying way too hard. 

This post made me laugh so hard I nearly dropped my phone. Seriously the dumbest person on Surly. The mental gymnastics are incredible.

e: Sorry, I won't address Rex anymore it's just too goddamn funny to pass up sometimes.

Edited by Brian Fantana
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, bolverk said:

Israel controls all utilities in Gaza, including water, electricity, and telecoms, and they've rationed the shit out of it in punitive measures to the extent that Gazans have been made to suffer -- even in times of peace. In addition, Gazan fishermen have not even been allowed to fish in their own territorial waters nor have Palestinians been allowed access to their own gas fields in the Mediterranean Sea. They've been under a near-total blockade (no scare quotes needed) for two decades. 

Now, imagine whether more Gazans would've moderated and not felt the need to resort to armed revolt if there were no blockade. I guess we'll never know...

Every functional state requires the ability to control their borders, land, resources and freedom of movement. I am quite certain that the natural gas reserves that sit under gazan territorial waters are involved in the calculus of all the parties involved. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. You are both sides-ing the fuck out of this and I won’t let you do it. You’re trying way too hard. 

Your sputtering rage posting is interesting to watch.
Especially when it leads you to post something as utterly stupid as this. I don’t have to “try” at all. I LITERALLY can quote “from the river to the sea” from both Hamas leadership and Israeli leadership. No “trying” at all - it’s just sitting there for anyone with open eyes to point out.
Some posters on this thread have had the honesty to admit their goal: complete ethnic cleansing if all Palestinians from the levant. Significant voices in Israeli leadership have said the same. Kinda funny that you call for all of the actions to accomplish that…but then say that’s not your goal. Just finish the thought. You’ll feel better, and you won’t have to keep lying to the rest of us.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:


Your sputtering rage posting is interesting to watch.
Especially when it leads you to post something as utterly stupid as this. I don’t have to “try” at all. I LITERALLY can quote “from the river to the sea” from both Hamas leadership and Israeli leadership. No “trying” at all - it’s just sitting there for anyone with open eyes to point out.
Some posters on this thread have had the honesty to admit their goal: complete ethnic cleansing if all Palestinians from the levant. Significant voices in Israeli leadership have said the same. Kinda funny that you call for all of the actions to accomplish that…but then say that’s not your goal. Just finish the thought. You’ll feel better, and you won’t have to keep lying to the rest of us.

There it is.  The ethnic cleansing advocacy accusation.  I love it.  I have not heard Israeli leadership use that phrase.  Only terrorists and their idiot supporters.  There is no comparison, yet you make it.

 

3 hours ago, InkaUtexas said:

Make them behave if they want aid.

I suggest they demonstrate they can behave under competent home rule leadership before granting them a fucking state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suggest they demonstrate they can behave under competent home rule leadership before granting them a fucking state.

Huh. I imagined it when the national security minister said this stuff:

“We cannot withdraw from any territory we are in in the Gaza Strip. Not only do I not rule out Jewish settlement there, I believe it is also an important thing,” Ben Gvir said in a faction meeting on Monday.

The war presents an “opportunity to concentrate on encouraging the migration of the residents of Gaza,” Ben Gvir told reporters and members of his far-right Otzma Yehudit party, calling such a policy “a correct, just, moral and humane solution.”


He has said similar shit before and since. He’s not the only Israeli official to do so. And he’s FAR from the only Israeli to do so; many Israelis have openly advocated for removal of all Palestinians from Gaza and settlement of the area by Israelis.

Like I said, I don’t have to try at all. There is a material and vocal movement in Israel to remove all Palestinians from Gaza. Their statements are out there, loud and proud. I’m not sure why that bothers you so.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:


Huh. I imagined it when the national security minister said this stuff:

“We cannot withdraw from any territory we are in in the Gaza Strip. Not only do I not rule out Jewish settlement there, I believe it is also an important thing,” Ben Gvir said in a faction meeting on Monday.

The war presents an “opportunity to concentrate on encouraging the migration of the residents of Gaza,” Ben Gvir told reporters and members of his far-right Otzma Yehudit party, calling such a policy “a correct, just, moral and humane solution.”


He has said similar shit before and since. He’s not the only Israeli official to do so. And he’s FAR from the only Israeli to do so; many Israelis have openly advocated for removal of all Palestinians from Gaza and settlement of the area by Israelis.

Like I said, I don’t have to try at all. There is a material and vocal movement in Israel to remove all Palestinians from Gaza. Their statements are out there, loud and proud. I’m not sure why that bothers you so.

I mean Bibi has literally said the words out loud. He doesn't wanna know, you're not gonna get through that fat head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Rex Kramer said:

There it is.  The ethnic cleansing advocacy accusation.  I love it.  I have not heard Israeli leadership use that phrase.  Only terrorists and their idiot supporters.  There is no comparison, yet you make it.

 

I suggest they demonstrate they can behave under competent home rule leadership before granting them a fucking state.

The American Colonies went through a lot less, and we revolted.

Building a state with competent home rule requires a bit of time and some fucking breathing room. Maybe the ability to make your own trade deals? Purchase your own food?

I get it. You don't want the Palestinians to disappear. You just want them to disappear from Gaza/West Bank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:


Huh. I imagined it when the national security minister said this stuff:

“We cannot withdraw from any territory we are in in the Gaza Strip. Not only do I not rule out Jewish settlement there, I believe it is also an important thing,” Ben Gvir said in a faction meeting on Monday.

The war presents an “opportunity to concentrate on encouraging the migration of the residents of Gaza,” Ben Gvir told reporters and members of his far-right Otzma Yehudit party, calling such a policy “a correct, just, moral and humane solution.”


He has said similar shit before and since. He’s not the only Israeli official to do so. And he’s FAR from the only Israeli to do so; many Israelis have openly advocated for removal of all Palestinians from Gaza and settlement of the area by Israelis.

Like I said, I don’t have to try at all. There is a material and vocal movement in Israel to remove all Palestinians from Gaza. Their statements are out there, loud and proud. I’m not sure why that bothers you so.

You’ve got to be fucking kidding me. No money quote refrained by millions of antisemites. No context (was this during the current invasion?). No link. You’re wasting my time. 

 

9 minutes ago, InkaUtexas said:

The American Colonies went through a lot less, and we revolted.

Building a state with competent home rule requires a bit of time and some fucking breathing room. Maybe the ability to make your own trade deals? Purchase your own food?

I get it. You don't want the Palestinians to disappear. You just want them to disappear from Gaza/West Bank.

Terrible analogy. Did we lob millions of rockets over the Atlantic?  Did we have able leadership?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m on my phone, dude. You can look it up. Yes, it was during the current war.

And yes, Bibi has used the exact term (“from the river to the sea”).

FFS, now you’re just being a dishonest piece of shit. Israelis, including Israeli leadership, have plainly called for Palestinians to be gone from Gaza. You know…the literal definition of ethnic cleansing. And you contort yourself by saying “ahh, but that was on a Tuesday, and today’s a Friday!”, or some similar stupid shit. Jesus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

I’m on my phone, dude. You can look it up. Yes, it was during the current war.

And yes, Bibi has used the exact term (“from the river to the sea”).

FFS, now you’re just being a dishonest piece of shit. Israelis, including Israeli leadership, have plainly called for Palestinians to be gone from Gaza. You know…the literal definition of ethnic cleansing. And you contort yourself by saying “ahh, but that was on a Tuesday, and today’s a Friday!”, or some similar stupid shit. Jesus.

First, I didn’t know bibi said that. Second, what you posted did NOT say that. Third, his quotes at the very least make sense given itd be more humane if a temporary migration while they do what they need to do. Fourth, talk of Gaza settlements and Bibi’s quote are totally tone deaf and should be beneath them. Finally, there is zero comparison to what was quoted and the use of “from the river to the sea” phrase by the other side. Totally disingenuous at best and you’re desperate to portray Israel as the bad guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Rex Kramer said:

You’ve got to be fucking kidding me. No money quote refrained by millions of antisemites. No context (was this during the current invasion?). No link. You’re wasting my time. 

 

Terrible analogy. Did we lob millions of rockets over the Atlantic?  Did we have able leadership?

WE stole cannon and bombarded an English City on Colonial Soil. Ya know, Boston. We attacked a seperate colony. Ya know, Modern Canada. We raided British commerce at sea. Quite a bit. Leadership yes, able, well in some areas. There was quite a bit of speculation, corruption, etc.

Have you ever read history and sat back and thought about it? And I offered a reading suggestion, a book that is pretty Pro Israel and I agree with the premise. You did not comment on it. You also did not say if you agreed the Palestinians should not be there.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Rex Kramer said:

itd be more humane if a temporary migration while they do what they need to do.

Jurassic Park Ian Malcom GIF

Like the Seminole Indians. We promise we will let you come on back, just let us build on it for a few years. We will even have casinos for you.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, I didn’t know bibi said that. Second, what you posted did NOT say that. Third, his quotes at the very least make sense given itd be more humane if a temporary migration while they do what they need to do. Fourth, talk of Gaza settlements and Bibi’s quote are totally tone deaf and should be beneath them. Finally, there is zero comparison to what was quoted and the use of “from the river to the sea” phrase by the other side. Totally disingenuous at best and you’re desperate to portray Israel as the bad guy.

I’m not desperate to portray Israel as the bad guy. My posting history on this and related threads has consistently stated that I strongly support Israel’s right to exist, its right to self defense, its right to respond to Oct 7 - I’m not gonna rehash all of that here for the 30th time just because you have blinders on.
Likewise, I’ve been unambiguous in my judgment of Hamas and hezbollah.

I actually want Israel to end up in a good place.

And I also have open eyes and ears that have seen both rhetoric and action from Israel that fall dead-on on the ethnic cleansing square in the board. Israel shouldn’t do that. It’s wrong, it hurts their cause…all the things that quite a few folks other than me have noted. And you dismiss it with a hand wave. Read the discussion, found easily with a cursory google search, regarding Ben Gvir’s remarks. They were not made in the context of “maybe it would be nice if the Palestinians took a little vacation while we kill Hamas, then they can come back.”” Dude. Come on. Stop.
Oh, and those are just Ben Gvir’s remarks. There are plenty of other Israelis directly calling for the removal of all Palestinians from Gaza, to be replaced by Jewish settlers. They aren’t hidden - they’ve given tv interviews saying just that, FFS.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, InkaUtexas said:

WE stole cannon and bombarded an English City on Colonial Soil. Ya know, Boston. We attacked a seperate colony. Ya know, Modern Canada. We raided British commerce at sea. Quite a bit. Leadership yes, able, well in some areas. There was quite a bit of speculation, corruption, etc.

Have you ever read history and sat back and thought about it? And I offered a reading suggestion, a book that is pretty Pro Israel and I agree with the premise. You did not comment on it. You also did not say if you agreed the Palestinians should not be there.

Revolutionary War analogy is terrible. I didn’t comment because I haven’t read the book and have nothing to say. If Palestinians can cease firing rockets and committing terror then of course they can stay. 

1 hour ago, InkaUtexas said:

Jurassic Park Ian Malcom GIF

Like the Seminole Indians. We promise we will let you come on back, just let us build on it for a few years. We will even have casinos for you.

I was attempting to understand the rationale for the words he chose, which makes some sense (in a vacuum; I know what that guy wants) in the context of a war. That particular quote is a far cry from “from the river to the sea.”

54 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:


I’m not desperate to portray Israel as the bad guy. My posting history on this and related threads has consistently stated that I strongly support Israel’s right to exist, its right to self defense, its right to respond to Oct 7 - I’m not gonna rehash all of that here for the 30th time just because you have blinders on.
Likewise, I’ve been unambiguous in my judgment of Hamas and hezbollah.

I actually want Israel to end up in a good place.

And I also have open eyes and ears that have seen both rhetoric and action from Israel that fall dead-on on the ethnic cleansing square in the board. Israel shouldn’t do that. It’s wrong, it hurts their cause…all the things that quite a few folks other than me have noted. And you dismiss it with a hand wave. Read the discussion, found easily with a cursory google search, regarding Ben Gvir’s remarks. They were not made in the context of “maybe it would be nice if the Palestinians took a little vacation while we kill Hamas, then they can come back.”” Dude. Come on. Stop.
Oh, and those are just Ben Gvir’s remarks. There are plenty of other Israelis directly calling for the removal of all Palestinians from Gaza, to be replaced by Jewish settlers. They aren’t hidden - they’ve given tv interviews saying just that, FFS.

I know your posting history on the matter. You’re critical of Hamas, and fair to Israel where it’s obviously merited. But you spend more time going to great lengths to show the board you’re more critical of Israel, and you lose your way with bad sub-points. See above on my full thoughts on the Ben Gvir quote. Your equivalency on the quote you mentioned is a terrible point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:


I’m not desperate to portray Israel as the bad guy. My posting history on this and related threads has consistently stated that I strongly support Israel’s right to exist, its right to self defense, its right to respond to Oct 7 - I’m not gonna rehash all of that here for the 30th time just because you have blinders on.
Likewise, I’ve been unambiguous in my judgment of Hamas and hezbollah.

I actually want Israel to end up in a good place.

And I also have open eyes and ears that have seen both rhetoric and action from Israel that fall dead-on on the ethnic cleansing square in the board. Israel shouldn’t do that. It’s wrong, it hurts their cause…all the things that quite a few folks other than me have noted. And you dismiss it with a hand wave. Read the discussion, found easily with a cursory google search, regarding Ben Gvir’s remarks. They were not made in the context of “maybe it would be nice if the Palestinians took a little vacation while we kill Hamas, then they can come back.”” Dude. Come on. Stop.
Oh, and those are just Ben Gvir’s remarks. There are plenty of other Israelis directly calling for the removal of all Palestinians from Gaza, to be replaced by Jewish settlers. They aren’t hidden - they’ve given tv interviews saying just that, FFS.

Human beings are shades of grey. Rex consistently has, and is right now, showing a very basic human tendency to try and analyze everything in a very black and white way. Grey is too complex and too uncertain. Black and white is simpler, even if it's not a true reflection of reality. It's a very simple, yet very powerful, defense mechanism called splitting in therapeutic terms.

In some ways, I'm sympathetic to his point of view. It's much easier, as a denizen of a Western country, to view Israel as an unambiguous good that must be championed and Palestinians (and by extension, the Arab world at large) as an unambiguous bad that must be destroyed. Drilling down past the surface, past what we've all been fed by Western media for our entire lives (or in Armybrat's case, a small percentage of his) uncovers a lot of uncomfortable truths about the situation in Israel, and the region in general, that paint everyone involved (including us, especially us) with many different shades of grey. At some point, it becomes far too difficult to view the conflict in such black and white terms.

Most people are either content to simply lap up the mixture of truths, half-truths, deflections, and flat out bald-faced lies that Western media feeds us, and shove every actor involved into neat little black and white boxes. I try to stay as informed as I have time to in order to keep myself seeing the shades of grey rather than the black and white. I try to take as optimistic an approach as I can to the future of Israel and occupied Palestine, but it's difficult to say the least. Most people, again, choose to see only the black and white and conclude that some kind of nebulously defined total victory is necessary, hence the multiple posters in this thread that advocate for ethnic cleansing with their full chest (some without even realizing it, it seems). As if repeating the mistakes of the past is a way to a better future.

I will say that I greatly appreciate @InkaUtexas's posting, yours, @bolverk and others, and @956 Worldwide though we frequently disagree. Inka in particular is extremely well read on the subject and the history of the region and I enjoy his insights every day. You yourself held a fairly black and white view of this subject nearly a year ago, albeit a more sympathetic and humane view than a lot of other people do, but you're smart/humble enough to seek out knowledge that may alter your world view when you're unsure of yourself. People like Rex purposefully avoid knowledge that may alter their world view, because it's too upsetting. I don't even necessarily fault them all that much for it, because it is a demonstrably hard thing to do. Hell, I should know, 15-20 years ago I was a dumbass central TX hillbilly, listening to Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Mark fuckin' dumbshit Levin. Hooting and hollering when we were slaughtering a million people in Iraq based on a pure lie. I don't even like to think about all the dumb shit I believed.

This is not to place myself on a pedestal above. I have plenty of faults, blind spots, and knowledge gaps. I learn shit every day reading this board. I am usually very bad at articulating my thoughts in a way that isn't frequently abrasive or otherwise difficult to digest by others. I frequently think I'm a lot more well read on a particular aspect of X subject than I am, and often have to stop and take a break to better inform myself or collect myself. I wish I had a fraction of your, or Inkas, or @SL Xpress, or any number of other posters' ability to elucidate my thoughts in any sort of consistently palatable way.

Anyway, I have no idea why I wrote this post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Rex Kramer said:

Revolutionary War analogy is terrible. I didn’t comment because I haven’t read the book and have nothing to say. If Palestinians can cease firing rockets and committing terror then of course they can stay.

No it is not. so ask WHY do they fire rockets? Israel has Iron Dome, backed by plenty of US support. I am great with that. It sucks they need it. And in the past they have taken these systems  out but assasinating the humans behind bringing them in. Israel has worked with Sudan (a Muslim nation) and Egypt (Muslim and Arab) to interdict the crap coming from Iran. Syria, well we all want Al Asad to fall into a deep as hole. Sucks he is holding on.

Read it is what I suggested. I did not think you had, and few have. I read it when working on a legal project about the use of force in Afghanistan. We learned that fire and forget drones pissed off more Afgans than did good and adopted parts of the early Israeli liquidation program. Yeah, i know, a non-threatening word for blowing the shit out of an asshole. To take out a launcher location when identified (and it did not have to be in active firing mode) it was blown up. But it was a hell fire vs. a 1000 lb bomb. One is targeted, the other flattens a block.

I don't see anyone saying Israel should not retaliate. They, and me are saying, do it more tactically. I mean, don't tell people to go to a certain safe area, and then bomb it cuz there was a small group of HAMAS dicks. They are everywhere. I concede it. Shoot them in the face. Is that not why your infantry is there? Do you snipe with a 120MM tank gun?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Brian Fantana said:

Human beings are shades of grey. Rex consistently has, and is right now, showing a very basic human tendency to try and analyze everything in a very black and white way. Grey is too complex and too uncertain. Black and white is simpler, even if it's not a true reflection of reality. It's a very simple, yet very powerful, defense mechanism called splitting in therapeutic terms.

In some ways, I'm sympathetic to his point of view. It's much easier, as a denizen of a Western country, to view Israel as an unambiguous good that must be championed and Palestinians (and by extension, the Arab world at large) as an unambiguous bad that must be destroyed. Drilling down past the surface, past what we've all been fed by Western media for our entire lives (or in Armybrat's case, a small percentage of his) uncovers a lot of uncomfortable truths about the situation in Israel, and the region in general, that paint everyone involved (including us, especially us) with many different shades of grey. At some point, it becomes far too difficult to view the conflict in such black and white terms.

Most people are either content to simply lap up the mixture of truths, half-truths, deflections, and flat out bald-faced lies that Western media feeds us, and shove every actor involved into neat little black and white boxes. I try to stay as informed as I have time to in order to keep myself seeing the shades of grey rather than the black and white. I try to take as optimistic an approach as I can to the future of Israel and occupied Palestine, but it's difficult to say the least. Most people, again, choose to see only the black and white and conclude that some kind of nebulously defined total victory is necessary, hence the multiple posters in this thread that advocate for ethnic cleansing with their full chest (some without even realizing it, it seems). As if repeating the mistakes of the past is a way to a better future.

I will say that I greatly appreciate @InkaUtexas's posting, yours, @bolverk and others, and @956 Worldwide though we frequently disagree. Inka in particular is extremely well read on the subject and the history of the region and I enjoy his insights every day. You yourself held a fairly black and white view of this subject nearly a year ago, albeit a more sympathetic and humane view than a lot of other people do, but you're smart/humble enough to seek out knowledge that may alter your world view when you're unsure of yourself. People like Rex purposefully avoid knowledge that may alter their world view, because it's too upsetting. I don't even necessarily fault them all that much for it, because it is a demonstrably hard thing to do. Hell, I should know, 15-20 years ago I was a dumbass central TX hillbilly, listening to Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Mark fuckin' dumbshit Levin. Hooting and hollering when we were slaughtering a million people in Iraq based on a pure lie. I don't even like to think about all the dumb shit I believed.

This is not to place myself on a pedestal above. I have plenty of faults, blind spots, and knowledge gaps. I learn shit every day reading this board. I am usually very bad at articulating my thoughts in a way that isn't frequently abrasive or otherwise difficult to digest by others. I frequently think I'm a lot more well read on a particular aspect of X subject than I am, and often have to stop and take a break to better inform myself or collect myself. I wish I had a fraction of your, or Inkas, or @SL Xpress, or any number of other posters' ability to elucidate my thoughts in any sort of consistently palatable way.

Anyway, I have no idea why I wrote this post.

Cuz you touch yourself.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And quick note after Fantana's post. He should read the book as well. It gives a good look into how evil the anti-Israel dicks are, how well organized, how committed, and how they do use the civilians. They hide in plain site for the most part. It would be a great bathroom book for @Brisketexan. He could go through it after a few late night Taco Bell visits.

@Brian Fantana you mention Western Media. Do you think Al Jazeera does not push an agenda? The Hamas leaders live in Doha. AJ is owned by the government of Qatar. Good, independent media does not really exist. From anyside, so read them all and as you said, go gray.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, InkaUtexas said:

No it is not. so ask WHY do they fire rockets? Israel has Iron Dome, backed by plenty of US support. I am great with that. It sucks they need it. And in the past they have taken these systems  out but assasinating the humans behind bringing them in. Israel has worked with Sudan (a Muslim nation) and Egypt (Muslim and Arab) to interdict the crap coming from Iran. Syria, well we all want Al Asad to fall into a deep as hole. Sucks he is holding on.

Read it is what I suggested. I did not think you had, and few have. I read it when working on a legal project about the use of force in Afghanistan. We learned that fire and forget drones pissed off more Afgans than did good and adopted parts of the early Israeli liquidation program. Yeah, i know, a non-threatening word for blowing the shit out of an asshole. To take out a launcher location when identified (and it did not have to be in active firing mode) it was blown up. But it was a hell fire vs. a 1000 lb bomb. One is targeted, the other flattens a block.

I don't see anyone saying Israel should not retaliate. They, and me are saying, do it more tactically. I mean, don't tell people to go to a certain safe area, and then bomb it cuz there was a small group of HAMAS dicks. They are everywhere. I concede it. Shoot them in the face. Is that not why your infantry is there? Do you snipe with a 120MM tank gun?

Colonialist revolution is a really really bad analogy. On the rest of your post, okay?  I don’t disagree, necessarily, with anything you wrote.  I’ll read the book, but I think you have me confused with someone else. Are you mistaking me for someone that cannot be critical of Israel, or the way they’ve conducted their Gaza campaign?  Because we were talking about the fantasy of Israel granting Palestinians a state, I was starting to argue why it would never happen, and now you’re treating me as if I’m IDF and jerk off to Bibi or something. I don’t get it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, InkaUtexas said:

And quick note after Fantana's post. He should read the book as well. It gives a good look into how evil the anti-Israel dicks are, how well organized, how committed, and how they do use the civilians. They hide in plain site for the most part. It would be a great bathroom book for @Brisketexan. He could go through it after a few late night Taco Bell visits.

@Brian Fantana you mention Western Media. Do you think Al Jazeera does not push an agenda? The Hamas leaders live in Doha. AJ is owned by the government of Qatar. Good, independent media does not really exist. From anyside, so read them all and as you said, go gray.

 

I will, I already ordered it lol. And yeah, you're 100% right, every media outlet has an agenda. I try to do exactly that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...