Jump to content

SaaS Consulting on the Side


Dbeasy

Recommended Posts

I’m doing some management consulting for investors evaluating a SaaS company. There may be an opportunity for someone to provide a little bit of SaaS technical consulting on the side. Might be a few hours at a solid hourly rate. 

The person needs to have solid SaaS architectural expertise with Azure. Specifically, understands the trade-offs between SaaS on IaaS vs PaaS on Azure. If interested or know someone interested, DM me. It’s a nice way to make a few bucks without a lot of work. 

Whoever I use might get used again for other engagements. 

Edited by Dbeasy
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Handcruser said:

I’d be happy to help - this is right up my alley.

What is Azure though? And can you clarify what you mean when you say “expertise”?

Azure , in middle-earth, was considered the greatest Orc and self proclaimed King of Moria.  He is claimed to have killed the Dwarven King Thror, but himself was ultimately brought down by Thorin, Dwalin, Fili, and KIli, in the Battle of the Five Armies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I patiently wait for a cloud guru to emerge from the ether, this company made a surprising statement about SaaS business applications. They said it is extremely rare, even still today, for business applications to not have different versions of SaaS software for different customers. I haven't paid much attention the last few years, but I was under the impression that many multi-tenant business applications in the cloud today are one version of software delivered to all clients and that eliminated the need to manage multiple versions.  They update the single version, and customers are automatically on the new and only version. Wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Dbeasy said:

While I patiently wait for a cloud guru to emerge from the ether, this company made a surprising statement about SaaS business applications. They said it is extremely rare, even still today, for business applications to not have different versions of SaaS software for different customers. I haven't paid much attention the last few years, but I was under the impression that many multi-tenant business applications in the cloud today are one version of software delivered to all clients and that eliminated the need to manage multiple versions.  They update the single version, and customers are automatically on the new and only version. Wrong?

I administer Salesforce for my company and as far as I'm aware all customers are on the same version of it except for the few weeks they spend rolling out the upgrade to each of their instance groups. 

Of course you're still able to target older api's with some custom code and flows and web service calls but the instances themselves are upgraded together automatically. 

Edited by Viper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Dbeasy said:

While I patiently wait for a cloud guru to emerge from the ether, this company made a surprising statement about SaaS business applications. They said it is extremely rare, even still today, for business applications to not have different versions of SaaS software for different customers. I haven't paid much attention the last few years, but I was under the impression that many multi-tenant business applications in the cloud today are one version of software delivered to all clients and that eliminated the need to manage multiple versions.  They update the single version, and customers are automatically on the new and only version. Wrong?

Depends on the company. Some companies have a consulting/customization arm and with some customers will have them on a special version or won't upgrade them due to the upgrade breaking the custom code. Other companies may have built their software for customers to install on their hardware, then moved to a hosted model, but install a separate instance for each customer so they may have many versions running at the same time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Celery Man said:

It’s pronounced “ah-zhur” rhymes with badger btw

That's how I pronounce it but [semi serious] if you pronounce it differently, and do that with authority, a lot of folks will automatically think you're smart and start pronouncing it that way; and, [100% serious] MSFT don't GAF how you pronounce it and they actually encourage different pronunciations.  There's a video out there of Satya saying this of which I'm too lazy to look up and link.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, shakahorn said:

That's how I pronounce it but [semi serious] if you pronounce it differently, and do that with authority, a lot of folks will automatically think you're smart and start pronouncing it that way; and, [100% serious] MSFT don't GAF how you pronounce it and they actually encourage different pronunciations.  There's a video out there of Satya saying this of which I'm too lazy to look up and link.

I agree with you about everything you are saying and also anyone who pronounces it differently with confidence will continue to be wrong since it is an actual word with a correct pronunciation. Just imo, people who say “ahz-you-or” sound fucking stupid, but that’s kind of a separate point. Dumb name for a cloud platform.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/20/2023 at 12:41 PM, blacklab said:

Depends on the company. Some companies have a consulting/customization arm and with some customers will have them on a special version or won't upgrade them due to the upgrade breaking the custom code. Other companies may have built their software for customers to install on their hardware, then moved to a hosted model, but install a separate instance for each customer so they may have many versions running at the same time. 

This is correct.  Invision follows this model.  They provide different versions for special customers because platform version updates may increase cost of ownership:  re-skilling/up-skilling/compliance governance/business architecture changes.   They'll maintain legacy versions in separate cloud accounts as long as you agree to long-term service agreements. 

Edited by Shaggy3.0
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/20/2023 at 5:54 PM, Dbeasy said:

While I patiently wait for a cloud guru to emerge from the ether, this company made a surprising statement about SaaS business applications. They said it is extremely rare, even still today, for business applications to not have different versions of SaaS software for different customers. I haven't paid much attention the last few years, but I was under the impression that many multi-tenant business applications in the cloud today are one version of software delivered to all clients and that eliminated the need to manage multiple versions.  They update the single version, and customers are automatically on the new and only version. Wrong?

Some clients still want different versions of the same application, eg for different teams. Vendors will provide them on different images on the client tenant. And there are always companies slower to adopt new versions than others, regardless of where/how the application is hosted. 

The ease of application management and deployment through cloud is more for end users than for the vendors. Vendors still have to juggle different versions/branches. 

This one’s free. Next one pls wire treefiddy to my IBAN

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you should think about other cloud-specific related factors.  Did the company build apps/platform solutions using cloud-specific services, or is their offering portable?  You mentioned Azure, which is #2.  AWS pwns.  Do your investors envision a near/long term multi-cloud strategy to lower cost and only user "best of breed" services?  Honestly, lots of variables to consider so you should develop a scoring/value criteria "score card" to guide your assessment.

 

This is also free.  BTW, I'm just a plumber.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/20/2023 at 11:59 AM, shakahorn said:

That's how I pronounce it but [semi serious] if you pronounce it differently, and do that with authority, a lot of folks will automatically think you're smart and start pronouncing it that way; and, [100% serious] MSFT don't GAF how you pronounce it and they actually encourage different pronunciations.  There's a video out there of Satya saying this of which I'm too lazy to look up and link.

It is a color, specifically the color of the sky. There is only one way to pronounce it. There can only be one, except if you are British. Then it is a colour. And you should be beaten.

Edited by Bevo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...