Jump to content

NBA 2023-24

shadow_operative

By shadow_operative
in Basketball

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

cmontexas
cmontexas

Giddey averaging 15 on and off the court

Baboontyme
Baboontyme

The new tv wall setup is starting to take place. That's 250" of NBA. Probably 1/4 of what Kendra Lust has had, if that 

Aqua Buddha
Aqua Buddha

Still can't get it out of my head.  Once I saw it, I couldn't unsee it:

Posted Images

aggie08

aggie08 21854

Posted
Posted

Say what you will about today's NBA, but it's pretty cool to see a home crowd going crazy at the end of a 14-3 run to see their team pull within [checks notes] 20, feeling like they still have a decent chance to pull this one out...which they do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Michael Knight

Michael Knight 13239

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Make em eat Taco Bell said:

overemphasis on the 3 leads to massive variations in scores.  Need to do somethign about the 3, make it 33 feet or something. 

Make the midrange shot be worth 3 and the 3 pt line is worth 2 and 3 ft from the line gives the other team 1 point

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
aggie08

aggie08 21854

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, Make em eat Taco Bell said:

overemphasis on the 3 leads to massive variations in scores.  Need to do somethign about the 3, make it 33 feet or something. 

There are several good arguments to be made about the over-reliance on 3s being detrimental to the game.

"Let's make it so big leads are safe, and viewers can comfortably turn their televisions off at halftime" isn't one of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Make em eat Taco Bell

Make em eat Taco Bell 1549

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, aggie08 said:

There are several good arguments to be made about the over-reliance on 3s being detrimental to the game.

"Let's make it so big leads are safe, and viewers can comfortably turn their televisions off at halftime" isn't one of them.

it's moreso that the better team can easily lose a game with overemphasis on this freak tool. Obviously it's a choice to jack up 48 a game, still it's much variance in outcomes. It's also very ugly and one dimensional. I'm fine with banning it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ztejas

ztejas 44299

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, Make em eat Taco Bell said:

it's moreso that the better team can easily lose a game with overemphasis on this freak tool.

Yet we still see the best teams make the Finals every season. In the past 15 years we've had one weird Finals winner (2011) and I'd argue one weird Finals participant (2023).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UpperWestside

UpperWestside 6285

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, MNLonghornFUKM said:

Wolves get Scott Foster tonight

 

 


Well it was a fun run while it lasted but the extenders gonna take it from here


For those who forgot, foster reffed the game Rudy made the “make money” hand gesture towards.


A game Jarrett Allen had 21 FT attempts by himself

 

I think Minnesota wins tonight because they’re better. Phoenix would need something even more overwhelming than a free throw parade to win. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ztejas

ztejas 44299

Posted
Posted

Not nearly as disappointing as that horseshit take to the rim with 30 secs left.

Screenshot_20240428_210434_ESPN.thumb.jpg.59896e0b30112266cbba973e3b883989.jpg

1 hour ago, Make em eat Taco Bell said:

Luka - Brunson - Porzingas >>> Luka - Kyrie - others 

Too bad they couldn't make that work, would've been special.

Kyrie is a lot better off ball than Brunson.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
gsoda3

gsoda3 3364

Posted
Posted
Luka - Brunson - Porzingas >>> Luka - Kyrie - others 
Too bad they couldn't make that work, would've been special.
It would've been Luka, brunson, KP, Finney smith, and a bunch of role players. We'd have to score 130 every game just to be in it. Who's the leader on that team? It ain't Jason Kidd. Also we would've been in cap hell way past the first apron.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ztejas

ztejas 44299

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CurlyDumps said:

image.png.30e327d62c4440061d63389e268c6ce6.png

Ishbia has nothing to do with that contract.

2 minutes ago, Message Board User said:

For the next three seasons too.

It has to be the worst contract in the league. 

Dude just had to be bad tonight and he was atrocious. 

Woof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ztejas

ztejas 44299

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, CurlyDumps said:

No, but he has everything to do with trading for it.

It's amazing that they got rid of Sarver then found a worse owner. 

They have no options for next season. Beal is immovable. They could trade Durant but then you're back into rebuilding mode with Booker closing in on 30.

4 minutes ago, CurlyDumps said:

 

 

They for sure would have won tonight without him. It's almost inconceivable that Little and Okogie would have been worse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...