Jump to content

THE College Football Playoff Rankings Thread [MICH,WASH,TEX,ALA]


texifornia

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

so we’ve had 2 weeks and a billions posts and now that all the games are done, we still have no fucking clue what’s going to happen?!?

My guess is:

UM

UW

FSU

UT

I don’t see the committee leaving the undefeated P5 champs out and I think the committee respects the h2h over Bama as well as how dominant we’ve looked the last 2 weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Michigan

2. Washington

3. Florida State

4. Texas

I’m not sure the playoff committee has the balls to leave out an undefeated power 5 conference champion, but it would probably be better for the playoff ratings if they did, and I believe that might be an unspoken criteria in their decision making.  I mean, when it comes to eyeballs watching the playoff, Michigan v Bama and Washington v Texas is sexier than any scenario that includes Florida State, especially w/o their QB, and ratings matter to sponsors

Edited by Steelers Roll Left
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rickylovesweed said:

Don't tell Wilcox the troll. 

 

this woman has been on radio shows (XM) and podcasts saying UT would be left out if Bama beat UGA.. said she doesn't care what happened in September when a first year starter in his 2nd game lost and the committee will feel the same.  She even said that if FSU lost, UGA would be the 4 seed over UT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, gofuckyourself said:

If I hear that fucking "that ain't the same Alabama team" narrative again I'm going to murder someone.

It isn't the same Texas team either fuckers. Just maybe they're better too recently?

Just last week Bama needed a 30 yard TD pass at the end to beat Auburn. It is hard to make a case that they have turned into this juggernaut since we beat them.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, hook me said:

so we’ve had 2 weeks and a billions posts and now that all the games are done, we still have no fucking clue what’s going to happen?!?

My guess is:

UM

UW

FSU

UT

I don’t see the committee leaving the undefeated P5 champs out and I think the committee respects the h2h over Bama as well as how dominant we’ve looked the last 2 weeks.

This analysis is flawed because there's no accounting for Bo Nix's completion percentage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rickylovesweed said:

This is the national narrative from almost everyone. Between FSU and Bama. 

And these are ESPN's top headlines

  • Tide beat UGA, then state CFP case: We belong
  • Smart: Georgia still among 'the best four teams'
  • FSU goes with freshman Glenn in ACC title game
  • TCU stuns G'town as officials can't overturn shot
  • Texas exits Big 12 with title, makes case for CFP
Just now, MonkeyDoughnut said:

Honestly the committee has one of the easiest years with 3 undefeated teams and the 2 remaining power 5 teams having played each other.

Yeah, but you're talking logic, we're talking about college football.

And the CFP committee can fuck around this year and then say "oh, my bad, well we're going to 12 next year so no worries, it won't happen again!"

  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MonkeyDoughnut said:

Honestly the committee has one of the easiest years with 3 undefeated teams and the 2 remaining power 5 teams having played each other.

They keep saying it's really difficult this year...

The difficulty they are referring to is SEC not getting in. That's it. That's the only difficulty in figuring out this, and as you note there is ample reason and logic to do so. 

It's not difficult, just unique.

Edited by BurntEyes
  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, closetohumping said:

Dari is a sooner btw

 

which means if we’re left out shit will hit fans

 

 

 

Liucci is saying the same thing. That our H2H win over Bama should get us in. 

aggys and sooners even recognize the obvious here. That H2H over Bama should be the deciding factor when you're comparing similar resumes and that's an actual fucking criteria the committee prioritizes. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, wild_turkey said:

They should be excluded purely because of their tomahawk chop and cultural insensitivity. And they play in a terrible conference against bad competition.

I’m pretty sure they have the support of the Seminole nation.

Of course, this is according to my FSU friend.

Edited by Coelenterate Fuccboi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Thiefery said:

this woman has been on radio shows (XM) and podcasts saying UT would be left out if Bama beat UGA.. said she doesn't care what happened in September when a first year starter in his 2nd game lost and the committee will feel the same.  She even said that if FSU lost, UGA would be the 4 seed over UT

It’s a dumb chick, dismiss.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

And these are ESPN's top headlines

  • Tide beat UGA, then state CFP case: We belong
  • Smart: Georgia still among 'the best four teams'
  • FSU goes with freshman Glenn in ACC title game
  • TCU stuns G'town as officials can't overturn shot
  • Texas exits Big 12 with title, makes case for CFP

Yeah, but you're talking logic, we're talking about college football.

And the CFP committee can fuck around this year and then say "oh, my bad, well we're going to 12 next year so no worries, it won't happen again!"

Their original headline was that Bama "awaits the CFP" like they are guaranteed to be in. We know who they are backing during this politicking..

IMG_20231202_212658.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Rickylovesweed said:

Clay Travis is an idiot but I think he frames this well. 

 

The problem with the “best” is that it takes a lot of eye test into account. They fell flat on their face putting Oregon in front of both Texas and Bama. There was plenty of evidence for Texas/Bama but somehow completion percentage was in play? Having bama jump over an undefeated FSU would make them look stupid imo. They’re going with more deserving so they can save face. Maybe they will go full out “deserving” and put the undefeated teams ahead of us and in return we can kick the shit out of Michigan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MonkeyDoughnut said:

Honestly the committee has one of the easiest years with 3 undefeated teams and the 2 remaining power 5 teams having played each other.

I agree. Three are in and easy. You got head to head of the three 1 loss teams. Easy. Done. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...