Game Week Thread Week 14, 2023, Texas v Washington, College Football Playoff Edition

[ChickenNuggets 1661]

Not sure if posted but I heard on one of the $9.95ers that X has lingering ankle issues... Please baby jesus... 

 

[The_Great_Hornsby 3598]

12 minutes ago, ChickenNuggets said:

Not sure if posted but I heard on one of the $9.95ers that X has lingering ankle issues... Please baby jesus... 

 

I think X is less needed for a game like this than for Bama or Michigan. That being said, this is probably a red herring because I saw him running around just fine in local broadcast video from a day ago. 

[El Squared 1852]

23 hours ago, Jersey Man10 said:

Billy can choke on a dick

he has, but sadly .....was revived....

[Smax 3800]

Always admired how UT teams of all sports have humbly gone about winning from the underdog position.  This seems to be lining up just like the Shoe at night, 2005 Rose Bowl, winning at Tuscaloosa, and the just recent Women's Vball Championship.  Embrace the hate and go on about your business, Horns.

Are we undeedog in this? Seems wvwrytime I catch a talking head talking about the sugar they pick us to win. ESPN has us a 64% chance to win

[The_Great_Hornsby 3598]

Just now, Smax said:

7 hours ago, pyrohornIII said:

Always admired how UT teams of all sports have humbly gone about winning from the underdog position.  This seems to be lining up just like the Shoe at night, 2005 Rose Bowl, winning at Tuscaloosa, and the just recent Women's Vball Championship.  Embrace the hate and go on about your business, Horns.

Are we undeedog in this? Seems wvwrytime I catch a talking head talking about the sugar they pick us to win. ESPN has us a 64% chance to win

Klatt picked Washington

[MotownHorn 1904]

1 hour ago, Stringer said:

Just tried this and it is 20% up to $25.  Not going to get you very far on tickets.  Every bit helps, but not a huge savings..

I suggest TickPick if y'all are looking for deals. In my experience it's the cheapest secondary market site

[troph 25227]

8 minutes ago, Smax said:

7 hours ago, pyrohornIII said:

Always admired how UT teams of all sports have humbly gone about winning from the underdog position.  This seems to be lining up just like the Shoe at night, 2005 Rose Bowl, winning at Tuscaloosa, and the just recent Women's Vball Championship.  Embrace the hate and go on about your business, Horns.

Are we undeedog in this? Seems wvwrytime I catch a talking head talking about the sugar they pick us to win. ESPN has us a 64% chance to win

Vegas has us to win but all the talk is WA picking apart our secondary. Sure sounds like we are the underdog. But truth is both locker rooms are turning whatever they can into motivation.  And the super secret truth is motivation from external sources really shouldn’t be needed here.  

[Doc Daneeka 6793]

25 minutes ago, ChickenNuggets said:

Not sure if posted but I heard on one of the $9.95ers that X has lingering ankle issues... Please baby jesus... 

 

He said in response to a direct question that he isn’t 100% but he’s getting there. Maybe in 10 days, it sounds like.  

[troph 25227]

5 hours ago, sushihorn said:

OU had 5 sacks against a very mobile Qb after averaging less than half that during the season. By the same token, their own pass pro was hamstrung when they were flagged for form tackling rushers. Arizona’s 3 sacks were above their season average plus they forced half a season worth of INTs and 5 games worth of fumble recoveries, one of which was virtually an interception and another due to pressure on the QB. 

This didn’t affect KSU much. They only had 1 sack, though again they faced a running QB. Nor do the Wildcats use a lot of drop back passing so they’ve never relied on holding as a pass pro technique. Texas is in a similar position for different reasons. The Horns make heavy use of play action, moving pockets, bootleg action and other misdirection.

For that reason, I don’t see holding enforcement affecting our offense.  Look at KSU, KU, Tech and WVU, not the Land Thieves. Slightly less time to throw might mean fewer deep shots but that hurts UW a lot more than it hurts us.

 

But Washington is one of the most penalized teams aren’t they? No bias against holding calls should bode well for the horns DL. 

 

Edited December 30, 2023 by troph

[troph 25227]

Trice kinda running his mouth. Kinda predicting a physical domination, says the Texas offense is nothing to worry about. Fuck these hoes.

[Doc Daneeka 6793]

1 minute ago, troph said:

Trice kinda running his mouth. Kinda predicting a physical domination, says the Texas offense is nothing to worry about. Fuck these hoes.

If his path to success is physically dominating Texas, his season ends very soon. 

[Smax 3800]

Vegas has us to win but all the talk is WA picking apart our secondary. Sure sounds like we are the underdog. But truth is both locker rooms are turning whatever they can into motivation.  And the super secret truth is motivation from external sources really shouldn’t be needed here.  

Interesting, not trying to be argumentative, but in my leisurely watching CFB over the holidays, I never heard WA being picked to win

[Murfdogg21 4563]

8 hours ago, Mikey4 said:

It is sort of magical that our players and coaches all have scores to settle in this game. If we make it to the NC vs Bama, we'd have a score to settle from 2009 as well.

I highly doubt any current Texas player or coach is motivated by what happened in a game 14 years ago. Maybe Sam Ehlinger if he was still on the team. 
 

But wow if a team won its conference and beat three other P5 conference champs in the same season! 

[pyrohornIII 4846]

10 minutes ago, Smax said:

23 minutes ago, troph said:

Vegas has us to win but all the talk is WA picking apart our secondary. Sure sounds like we are the underdog. But truth is both locker rooms are turning whatever they can into motivation.  And the super secret truth is motivation from external sources really shouldn’t be needed here.  

Interesting, not trying to be argumentative, but in my leisurely watching CFB over the holidays, I never heard WA being picked to win

You're right in a way, but there's a ton of clickbait writers and halftime has-beens who are being edgy in coming up with all these ways UW will surprise and defeat UT.  Some of them caveat it with the "Texas is talented, but" line, then get into whatever their secret insight is.  These guys are always trying to make a name for themselves for being a bright analyst who sees things others overlook. 

So, while it's not that we're the underdogs, but more like the easiest to upset.  And there's merit to that as well, since our team has stumbled in big games before more often than not recently.   I would bet as we get closer to gametime, we'll see more people picking UW to win.   They have nothing to lose.  If Texas wins, it was because they were supposed to.  If UW wins, then they look super smart in picking them.  

 

[JBJ 3827]

In that regard, the underdog always get more talk.  "What does X have to do to beat Y?"  "If X can BLANK, they can make it a game."  It's been the same commentary before all of our games this year.

[Doc Daneeka 6793]

15 minutes ago, pyrohornIII said:

You're right in a way, but there's a ton of clickbait writers and halftime has-beens who are being edgy in coming up with all these ways UW will surprise and defeat UT.  Some of them caveat it with the "Texas is talented, but" line, then get into whatever their secret insight is.  These guys are always trying to make a name for themselves for being a bright analyst who sees things others overlook. 

So, while it's not that we're the underdogs, but more like the easiest to upset.  And there's merit to that as well, since our team has stumbled in big games before more often than not recently.   I would bet as we get closer to gametime, we'll see more people picking UW to win.   They have nothing to lose.  If Texas wins, it was because they were supposed to.  If UW wins, then they look super smart in picking them.  

 

 Michigan is favored over Alabama. That’s the easiest “upset.”

 But, yeah, the “sure, the favorite was supposed to win, don’t blame me” vs. “look at me picking the upset” trope is tiresome. 

[BurntOrange&White 41864]

Is the current spread still -4 us?

[Doc Daneeka 6793]

2 minutes ago, BurntOrange&White said:

Is the current spread still -4 us?

Yes, with maybe a -4.5 around. 

Edited December 30, 2023 by Doc Daneeka

[LTtxfan 50005]

28 minutes ago, pyrohornIII said:

You're right in a way, but there's a ton of clickbait writers and halftime has-beens who are being edgy in coming up with all these ways UW will surprise and defeat UT.  Some of them caveat it with the "Texas is talented, but" line, then get into whatever their secret insight is.  These guys are always trying to make a name for themselves for being a bright analyst who sees things others overlook. 

So, while it's not that we're the underdogs, but more like the easiest to upset.  And there's merit to that as well, since our team has stumbled in big games before more often than not recently.   I would bet as we get closer to gametime, we'll see more people picking UW to win.   They have nothing to lose.  If Texas wins, it was because they were supposed to.  If UW wins, then they look super smart in picking them.  

 

Some of the clickbait...    SIAP

Underdog Washington Huskies hoping to 'smack' Texas Longhorns

Andrea Adelson,  ESPN   Dec 29, 2023

Quote

NEW ORLEANS -- For the second straight game, Washington players are scratching their heads and asking themselves the same question: "We're underdogs again?"

Despite being undefeated and ranked higher than Oregon in the Pac-12 championship game, Washington was a 9.5-point underdog going into that one. The Huskies then went out and beat Oregon for the second time this season, clinching a 13-0 record and a spot in the College Football Playoff.

Now, No. 2 Washington is undefeated and ranked ahead of No. 3 Texas (12-1). Yet, the Longhorns are 4-point favorites heading into the College Football Playoff semifinal at the Allstate Sugar Bowl on Monday night. It should also be noted that Washington beat Texas last year in the Alamo Bowl.

"I think it's crazy," Washington edge rusher Bralen Trice said Friday during media availability. "Just the level of disrespect we get, I can't really understand it, but it helps us because it makes us have our backs against the wall as we go into these games, ready to play even harder because we are the underdogs. You don't take anything for granted out there. We're grateful to be in the position we're at because of the hard work we put in. We can be the underdog. We can be on top, and we'll come out with the win."

Trice later told ESPN that "I want to go out there and smack them. You know, I don't want it to be a close game. I want it to be pretty lopsided in our favor.

"And I think that's what we're going to go out there and do, because I know the mindset that my guys on my team have going into this game. I think it's a huge part of what's going to make us successful in this game is our mindset based off of what people been saying."

When asked why he thought Washington continued to be treated like an underdog despite all the wins, Trice simply said, "I don't know. I couldn't tell you."

There is one theory that Trice eventually said could account for the disrespect Washington feels: playing on the West Coast. The Pac-12 had a six-year playoff drought before Washington made it.

"It definitely has a part to do with that," Trice said. "We're the first Pac-12 team to be in the Sugar Bowl. That's a great feeling because we're going to come out here and leave our mark and take a win."

Plus, the Huskies had to endure several close calls this season. In the three games before the Pac-12 title game, Washington won each by a touchdown or less. That includes a 24-21 victory over Washington State in the regular-season finale, in which the Huskies needed a field goal with no time left to win.

Trice said the entire team feels frustrated being labeled an underdog. But cornerback Dominique Hampton took a more practical approach when asked about it.

"We've been in that position all year, and we've just got to go out and prove it again," he said.

Just a year ago in the Alamo Bowl, despite having injuries and opt-outs, Texas went into the game as a 3-point favorite. Washington won 27-20 as Michael Penix Jr. threw for 287 yards and two touchdowns in what would be a preview for things to come this season.

Both teams have been asked questions about whether their game last season helps preparations heading into Monday night. Texas has repeatedly said it is a far better team on its offensive and defensive lines, prompting a back-and-forth between T'Vondre Sweat and Penix during their availability Thursday.

After Sweat called Washington just another offensive line, Penix said, "We're not playing the 49ers' or Eagles' D-line so we'll be good."

When Trice was asked whether he saw comments from Texas about its offensive line believing it is in much better position than it was during their bowl game last year, he said, "I didn't read up on it too much, but they think they're great. I think we're greater."

 

 

[troph 25227]

54 minutes ago, Smax said:

1 hour ago, troph said:

Vegas has us to win but all the talk is WA picking apart our secondary. Sure sounds like we are the underdog. But truth is both locker rooms are turning whatever they can into motivation.  And the super secret truth is motivation from external sources really shouldn’t be needed here.  

Interesting, not trying to be argumentative, but in my leisurely watching CFB over the holidays, I never heard WA being picked to win

I don’t say picked to win, most haven’t come out and predicted yet. That’s the next few days. But the dominate discussion has been talented WA receivers vs Texas weakest link its secondary.  That’s not the topic of discussion that says Texas is the fav.

[troph 25227]

Just now, LTtxfan said:

Some of the clickbait...    SIAP

Underdog Washington Huskies hoping to 'smack' Texas Longhorns

Andrea Adelson,  ESPN   Dec 29, 2023

 

That was the quote I was talking about. Texas guys are talking about how great WA is etc. sark got the saban prep manual and is following it.

[NeverMarryAStripper 22300]

Texas has avenged every loss from last year except the Alamo Bowl.  Washington is next on the list.

[horn_of_the_morning 999]

 

[troph 25227]

4 minutes ago, horn_of_the_morning said:

 

TL;DW

[Herpa Derpa 6343]

I wanted to beat Washington.

Now, I want to destroy them in every single facet of the game.

May Sark and the boys feel the same.

[Pig Bellmont 8886]

2 hours ago, Pancho said:

 

 

Love how they gloss over that Dillon Gabriel didn’t play. And ou still almost came back

[Pig Bellmont 8886]

Some writers picks at the Athletic 

[DaysOff 8209]

None of those people look like experts.

[ztejas 44227]

[Dbeasy 15596]

2 hours ago, Pancho said:

 

 

Good grief what a bunch of morons. OU had to start a true freshman QB who had never started a game before and he had FIVE turnovers. You think that might have mattered a bit, you purple dick heads?

[troph 25227]

1 minute ago, Dbeasy said:

Good grief what a bunch of morons. OU had to start a true freshman QB who had never started a game before and he had FIVE turnovers. You think that might have mattered a bit, you purple dick heads?

At least one of them said as much. 

[jw4381 3249]

3 hours ago, Pancho said:

 

 

I can’t remember what I was going to write. 

[MIkeHoncho 2023]

12 hours ago, Longboard Horn said:

Penix, have you not learned from ISU, Tech and Okie State's failures? NSIAP

 

Washington planning on a LOT of screens.   Penix trying to make the guys angry and not thinking about the screen. 

[Nivek 17415]

The more I read and hear from Washington fans or talking heads, the more I am convinced they don’t actually watch football games.

They are acting like they have been plagued with injuries. It’s really funny reading their comments.

[TexEx15 17951]

47 minutes ago, ztejas said:

[Rio Don 104]

This is beginning to feel like one of those games where the post-game is every talking head rolling out their favorite cliches about football being won on the lines. I like our side of that conversation.

 

[The Ace of Aces 5377]

This to me feels like it might end up a Texas blowout victory. Washington seems dismissive to a point of being worried .  

[austinnt 7]

Thought I'd share, found this cool article where they used team and player stats for Texas and Washington and had ChatGPT simulate the game. To save a click, Texas wins big 38-17 and they have Michigan beating Bama 27-20.

If you want to read how it thinks the game shakes out, here's the link to the ChatGPT simulation.

Really hoping for a Texas-Michigan final! Good luck with Washington

[sushihorn 3249]

Casual fans and shallow analysts focus on offense and especially on spectacular big plays. The long jump balls by Penix and company are tailor made to appeal to this crowd. Same for the over focus on the 2 games against an undisciplined UO making people think Washington will run the ball well.

When we look at line play and running game, those less understood aspects are definitely against UW. No one has run on Texas other than OU and they needed to get most of their rushing yardage from the QB position. Even the most optimistic see Penix as a borderline serviceable runner, not someone who is going to require a dedicated spy. 

The UW DL plays very conservative in run defense. It’s gap sound but tough to convert into a pass rush if there is play action. There’s a good reason why they get relatively few sacks and TFLs. Considering the number of pass attempts they have faced, 19 sacks is a very small number. 

Their OL will try to run enough power and inside zone to keep our DTs at home. But they will probably rely on runs outside the tackles to produce drive sustaining yards. We all saw how easily Oregon surrendered the edge at the line and how often Arizona did the same in the Alamo. That Husky O-Line is going to face a totally different challenge trying to kick out DL who are already shooting gaps. 

[Murfdogg21 4563]

33 minutes ago, austinnt said:

Thought I'd share, found this cool article where they used team and player stats for Texas and Washington and had ChatGPT simulate the game. To save a click, Texas wins big 38-17 and they have Michigan beating Bama 27-20.

If you want to read how it thinks the game shakes out, here's the link to the ChatGPT simulation.

Really hoping for a Texas-Michigan final! Good luck with Washington

Sounds like Jonathan Brooks is going to have a kick ass Sugar Bowl!

[freyguy 4368]

I'm loving reading about the faux disrespect/victimization the Huskies are trying to manufacture.  

Underdog Washington Huskies hoping to 'smack' Texas Longhorns

[ousux 5639]

We’re icy whites

*Stormtrooper whites

"icy whites" is some marketing bullshit from either Nike or Adidas, can't remember which but doesn't matter.

[ousux 5639]

Maybe it was just me, but in Sark's sugar bowl presser I couldn't help but be distracted by the CFP logo giving Sark little horns on his head. Hopefully a sign the cajun voodoo is already working for us.
 

I'm more impressed by the fact I can't remember the last time I saw a BigXII logo on any of our coaches or players. Well done

Edit- unclear if we'll have to wear the jersey patch for the game, hope not though.

[sushihorn 3249]

I’m struggling to control my optimism. CFB is largely confined to regional cells, isolated from each other. It’s hard to compare records, stats or even SoS when there are virtually no common opponents and few second degree comparisons until the end of the year. Now we are getting data  

Frankly, Texas’ opponents have performed much better than Washington’s have. The difference has been so great that it’s tempting to regard UW’s season stats as fools gold. I’m more focused on the defensive results which are less likely to be severely skewed by a few opt outs than offenses. And frankly the PAC-12 slate plus Boise have looked bad. 

Arizona smacked Oklahoma’s scout team but they gave up over 200 rushing yards and 350 passing yards to a Freshman quarterback seeing his first real action and a 3rd string tailback playing behind a salvage yard O-Line. 363 yards passing and 111 on the ground doesn’t look that impressive now, does it?

Boise faced UCLA which UW did not this year. The Bruins had slightly lower offensive output than Washington but with a hugely different distribution. UCLA had 280 rushing to (78) for UW and 230 to (478) passing. Oregon St gave up 110 rushing 162 passing to UW vs 232 and 236 to the Domers. Cal surrendered 256 passing to Texas Tech vs to (389) for UW and 128 to (140) rushing.

Utah v Northwestern: 225 (332) passing, 65 (125) rushing

USC v Louisville: 141 (256) passing, 220 (316) rushing

Oregon vs Liberty TBD

TL;DR - With a bunch of decent teams matching up, UW’s offense looks pretty comparable to their schedule’s bowl matchups. Their offensive results are clearly superior to Louisville and Northwestern but inferior to ND. Running results are very similar to TTU and OU’s replacements but way below UCLA. Not suggestive of anything more than an average ground attack.

 

Edited December 30, 2023 by sushihorn
Added summary

[Cajun 11777]

Texas wins 34 - 27.  Close game throughout.

[Bert Orange 1173]

I just dreamt I knew where the last golden ticket was. We got this. 

[MontereyMX 954]

19 hours ago, Spider2YBanana said:

We may have some luck on our side, fellas. Bevp XV's sister, Sugar (named after the Sugar Bowl this year) was born 3 days ago, 1 day after Christmas. 

Hook Em, Sugar 🤘

pics of sister?

[Herpa Derpa 6343]

1 hour ago, MontereyMXmuthafucka said:

pics of sister?

NSFW

Spoiler

Edited December 30, 2023 by Herpa Derpa

[MontereyMX 954]

12 minutes ago, Herpa Derpa said:

  Hide contents

 

oh yes !!!!!

[Elmer_Fudd 22994]

2 hours ago, Bert Orange said:

I just dreamt I knew where the last golden ticket was. We got this.