Jump to content

Joe Biden 2024 thread - Dark Brandon Where Art Thou?


StassneyHorn

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

Yep. CNN jumps on every poll that shows Donnie winning, no matter how shitty it is.

Csb/ the director of UT’s controversial right wing think tank/center made a funny quip about presidential polling from obscure corners.  Iona, Quinnipac, Suffolk, and Monmouth.  You won’t know if you’re reading reliable polling or the four auto berth play in games for March Madness. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Snake Diggity said:

It’s the clearest anecdote I have seen of how fucking stupid those people are.  I know several people who did it.  And these are people who also believe anyone disfiguring a private business with graffiti and shit should be shot.

But it really is amazing to me how every major policy complaint about Biden from those fuckers has been addressed.  Inflation.  Boom, fixed.  Dependence on foreign oil.  Boom, fixed.  Economic growth.  Boom, fixed.  And now he’s got congress agreed to a deal to address the border.

It's almost like Dems always come in to clean up the shit that Republicans break every single time they are in charge.  Every.   Single.  Time.

  • Hook 'Em 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

 

I don't think I ever heard the term "black unemployment" and stats prior to Trumps team trying to use it as a campaign talking point. Do they provide other demographics statistics too? How are the Cubans doing? Maybe pacific Islanders are at their apex of employment? Might as well take the idea and run with it, "jobs jobs jobs" always makes voters happy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think I ever heard the term "black unemployment" and stats prior to Trumps team trying to use it as a campaign talking point. Do they provide other demographics statistics too? How are the Cubans doing? Maybe pacific Islanders are at their apex of employment? Might as well take the idea and run with it, "jobs jobs jobs" always makes voters happy. 

The Pacific Islanders would be doing a lot better but for a few bad apples from the Marshall Islands. Bastards.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/1/2024 at 6:44 AM, Goofyboy said:

Why do you get to decide what is and is not a national emergency? Three soldiers were killed on American soil by a foreign entity. That needs to be dealt with swiftly before it becomes an all out war. I’d say avoiding another all out war IS an emergency.

He's right though that the War Powers Resolution is a gigantic punt by Congress so they can let the President wage war without having to declare an unpopular war.

There's a tension, probably deliberate, between Congress' power to declare war and the President's CINC power to order troops into places and into action.  Checks and balances and shit, but congressional punt.

Edited by TwiceHorn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's right though that the War Powers Resolution is a gigantic punt by Congress so they can let the President wage war without having to declare an unpopular war.
There's a tension, probably deliberate, between Congress' power to declare war and the President's CINC power to order troops into places and into action.  Checks and balances and shit, but congressional punt.

Yes, it was.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The handwringing over the pause in permitting new LNG export facilities while we still double our capacity in the next few years seems even more like an overreaction now, AND new projects that will also export from Mexico won't be affected. All the while, our NATO/EU allies look to be set. So, again, depending on the length of this pause, I don't see this as being that big of a problem. 

How the U.S. Became the World’s Biggest Gas Supplier

image.png.140e2d9a69621ab67e21a17e25c7982b.png

In just eight years, the United States has rocketed from barely selling any gas overseas to becoming the world’s No. 1 supplier, a remarkable shift that has profited oil and gas companies and strengthened American influence abroad. But climate activists worry that soaring exports of liquefied natural gas could make global warming worse.

Last month, the Biden administration said it would pause the permitting process for new facilities that export liquefied natural gas in order to study their impact on climate change, the economy and national security. Even with the pause, the United States is still on track to nearly double its export capacity by 2027 because of projects already permitted and under construction. But any expansions beyond that are now in doubt.

At the core of the debate over whether to allow more exports is a thorny question: With governments across the globe pledging to transition away from fossil fuels, how much more natural gas does the world need?

America’s gas export boom initially caught many policymakers by surprise. In the early 2000s, natural gas was relatively scarce at home, and companies were spending billions of dollars to build terminals to import gas from places like Qatar and Australia.

Fracking changed all that. In the mid-2000s, U.S. drillers perfected methods to unlock vast reserves of cheap natural gas from shale rock. At the same time, natural gas prices began spiking elsewhere in the world, especially after Japan shut down its nuclear plants in the wake of the Fukushima reactor meltdown in 2011 and began demanding more fuel.

That led to a stunning reversal. American companies, led by Cheniere Energy, began spending billions more to convert import terminals into export terminals, and shipments of U.S. gas to other countries began to surge.

‘Major demand growth’
Natural gas is most easily transported by pipeline. To send it across oceans, the gas must be chilled to 260 degrees Fahrenheit below zero, turning it into a liquid. The process of making and shipping liquefied natural gas adds complexity and cost, but if the difference between U.S. natural gas prices and overseas prices is big enough, it is profitable.

“It comes down to economics,” said Kenneth Medlock, senior director at the Center for Energy Studies at Rice University. “Production just keeps growing in the United States, which keeps prices low. And then we keep seeing major demand growth in the rest of the world.”

The export boom has transformed America’s role in energy geopolitics.

image.png.67e98bf40258de6928912bd7e4e4cc79.png

Europe has become the biggest importer of American gas in recent years, enabling the continent to slash by more than half its reliance on Russian gas since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

In the future, Europe is expected to curb its appetite for gas by adding more renewable energy sources like wind and solar power. The main growth markets for natural gas are expected to be fast-growing Asian countries such as China, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Vietnam that want to use the fuel for electricity, heating or industrial purposes.

But as U.S. exports keep skyrocketing, critics have raised concerns about the climate change impact of transporting and selling more gas around the world.

A complex climate question
The last time the Energy Department studied this issue, in 2019, it concluded that U.S. liquefied natural gas often produced fewer greenhouse gas emissions than other types of coal or gas used around the world. That meant that more exports could actually be beneficial for climate change if U.S. gas replaced those other fossil fuels. (When gas is scarce, some countries like Pakistan and Bangladesh have recently opted to burn more coal instead.)

But some environmentalists have disputed those conclusions, arguing that the analysis didn’t fully account for all the planet-warming methane leaks that can accompany natural gas production, and that it didn’t study whether a glut of gas might displace cleaner renewable energy rather than coal. The Energy Department is expected to study these questions while it puts permits for new projects on hold.

In the meantime, the U.S. gas boom is far from over, even with the permitting pause.

image.png.e42c7acde50e025cd672d9ff38ec3de4.png

Since 2016, U.S. energy companies have built seven large facilities in Texas, Louisiana, Maryland and Georgia that can export around 11.4 billion cubic feet of liquefied natural gas per day, according to the Energy Information Administration.

Another five projects along the Gulf Coast are already permitted and under construction and will be able to export an additional 9.7 billion cubic feet per day by 2027 — nearly doubling America’s export capacity. Three more facilities are currently being built in Mexico that will receive U.S. gas by pipeline and then ship it abroad.

The pause, however, could affect nearly a dozen proposed projects in the United States and Mexico that, if built, could boost export capacity by another 10 billion cubic feet per day, according to research by Clearview Energy Partners, a consulting firm. Whether those projects ultimately go forward remains to be seen.

With so many projects locked in, experts say it will be crucial to ensure that methane leaks from gas production are kept as low as possible. (The Biden administration has put forward several new regulations on methane.) “This is an area where we can actually deliver an emissions win, maybe more so than delaying or even killing a future supply project,” said Ben Cahill, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “Because it’s what we do with the emissions on the projects that we know are with us today.”

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, bolverk said:

The handwringing over the pause in permitting new LNG export facilities while we still double our capacity in the next few years seems even more like an overreaction now, AND new projects that will also export from Mexico won't be affected. All the while, our NATO/EU allies look to be set. So, again, depending on the length of this pause, I don't see this as being that big of a problem. 

How the U.S. Became the World’s Biggest Gas Supplier

image.png.140e2d9a69621ab67e21a17e25c7982b.png

In just eight years, the United States has rocketed from barely selling any gas overseas to becoming the world’s No. 1 supplier, a remarkable shift that has profited oil and gas companies and strengthened American influence abroad. But climate activists worry that soaring exports of liquefied natural gas could make global warming worse.

Last month, the Biden administration said it would pause the permitting process for new facilities that export liquefied natural gas in order to study their impact on climate change, the economy and national security. Even with the pause, the United States is still on track to nearly double its export capacity by 2027 because of projects already permitted and under construction. But any expansions beyond that are now in doubt.

At the core of the debate over whether to allow more exports is a thorny question: With governments across the globe pledging to transition away from fossil fuels, how much more natural gas does the world need?

America’s gas export boom initially caught many policymakers by surprise. In the early 2000s, natural gas was relatively scarce at home, and companies were spending billions of dollars to build terminals to import gas from places like Qatar and Australia.

Fracking changed all that. In the mid-2000s, U.S. drillers perfected methods to unlock vast reserves of cheap natural gas from shale rock. At the same time, natural gas prices began spiking elsewhere in the world, especially after Japan shut down its nuclear plants in the wake of the Fukushima reactor meltdown in 2011 and began demanding more fuel.

That led to a stunning reversal. American companies, led by Cheniere Energy, began spending billions more to convert import terminals into export terminals, and shipments of U.S. gas to other countries began to surge.

‘Major demand growth’
Natural gas is most easily transported by pipeline. To send it across oceans, the gas must be chilled to 260 degrees Fahrenheit below zero, turning it into a liquid. The process of making and shipping liquefied natural gas adds complexity and cost, but if the difference between U.S. natural gas prices and overseas prices is big enough, it is profitable.

“It comes down to economics,” said Kenneth Medlock, senior director at the Center for Energy Studies at Rice University. “Production just keeps growing in the United States, which keeps prices low. And then we keep seeing major demand growth in the rest of the world.”

The export boom has transformed America’s role in energy geopolitics.

image.png.67e98bf40258de6928912bd7e4e4cc79.png

Europe has become the biggest importer of American gas in recent years, enabling the continent to slash by more than half its reliance on Russian gas since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

In the future, Europe is expected to curb its appetite for gas by adding more renewable energy sources like wind and solar power. The main growth markets for natural gas are expected to be fast-growing Asian countries such as China, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Vietnam that want to use the fuel for electricity, heating or industrial purposes.

But as U.S. exports keep skyrocketing, critics have raised concerns about the climate change impact of transporting and selling more gas around the world.

A complex climate question
The last time the Energy Department studied this issue, in 2019, it concluded that U.S. liquefied natural gas often produced fewer greenhouse gas emissions than other types of coal or gas used around the world. That meant that more exports could actually be beneficial for climate change if U.S. gas replaced those other fossil fuels. (When gas is scarce, some countries like Pakistan and Bangladesh have recently opted to burn more coal instead.)

But some environmentalists have disputed those conclusions, arguing that the analysis didn’t fully account for all the planet-warming methane leaks that can accompany natural gas production, and that it didn’t study whether a glut of gas might displace cleaner renewable energy rather than coal. The Energy Department is expected to study these questions while it puts permits for new projects on hold.

In the meantime, the U.S. gas boom is far from over, even with the permitting pause.

image.png.e42c7acde50e025cd672d9ff38ec3de4.png

Since 2016, U.S. energy companies have built seven large facilities in Texas, Louisiana, Maryland and Georgia that can export around 11.4 billion cubic feet of liquefied natural gas per day, according to the Energy Information Administration.

Another five projects along the Gulf Coast are already permitted and under construction and will be able to export an additional 9.7 billion cubic feet per day by 2027 — nearly doubling America’s export capacity. Three more facilities are currently being built in Mexico that will receive U.S. gas by pipeline and then ship it abroad.

The pause, however, could affect nearly a dozen proposed projects in the United States and Mexico that, if built, could boost export capacity by another 10 billion cubic feet per day, according to research by Clearview Energy Partners, a consulting firm. Whether those projects ultimately go forward remains to be seen.

With so many projects locked in, experts say it will be crucial to ensure that methane leaks from gas production are kept as low as possible. (The Biden administration has put forward several new regulations on methane.) “This is an area where we can actually deliver an emissions win, maybe more so than delaying or even killing a future supply project,” said Ben Cahill, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “Because it’s what we do with the emissions on the projects that we know are with us today.”

The hand wringing started with a poster that recently changed jobs into the LNG industry.  I can see how that would skew one’s perception on things.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the same 3 posters that yell Democrats are killing the energy industry in the O&G thread with zero evidence. One poster gets so upset by the internets, they have a meltdown and demand their account be deleted, only to come back a week later and pretend nothing happened. These are not serious people. Put them all on ignore. 

 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I don't get it.  I was assured by the smartest people that we shut down all O&G production in this country and then threatened ERCOT with a literal gun to their heads to rely solely on unreliable Sun & Wind for power?  

I must have missed have missed the carrier pigeon memo.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, that's a Grade A Gotcha.  Two guys in the same position, both of whom he has presumably met during his time in service, and whose last names start with "M".

SENILE!!! DEMENTIA!!!  Woman, squirrel, camera, tits, window!

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jimmyjazz said:

Yeah, that's a Grade A Gotcha.  Two guys in the same position, both of whom he has presumably met during his time in service, and whose last names start with "M".

SENILE!!! DEMENTIA!!!  Woman, squirrel, camera, tits, window!

#covfeve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Y'all are weird. That video is bad. I'd rather have Joe Biden entombed like Lenin running the country than the other guy, but I'm not going to try to deflect or make excuses.

Newflash: Joe Biden is old. He's still kicked ass so far and I'm happy to vote for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, FirstTimeCaller said:

Y'all are weird. That video is bad. I'd rather have Joe Biden entombed like Lenin running the country than the other guy, but I'm not going to try to deflect or make excuses.

Newflash: Joe Biden is old. He's still kicked ass so far and I'm happy to vote for him.

Newsflash: the other guy's old man gaffes are worse.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, David Dennison said:

Whose are worse? Biden's or Trump's?

Be honest.

Do you really think anything is going to be accomplished arguing this point?

It is fucking hilarious you desperately want to argue it, and quite telling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, David Dennison said:

Whose are worse? Biden's or Trump's?

Be honest.

If we're talking about mental stuff (and not gaffes as in "I'll be a dictator" and other insane shit Trump spouts), then I think the actual gaffes are equal. Biden sounds worse, however, as Trump just spits out whatever comes to mind instead of actually stopping to think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

Whose are worse? Biden's or Trump's?

Be honest.

LOL he is never ever going to acknowledge Trump's

"What's the point of arguing? YOU'RE SO DESPERATE FOR A GOTCHA" 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Incredulity said:

Do you really think anything is going to be accomplished arguing this point?

It is fucking hilarious you desperately want to argue it, and quite telling.

Old fuck vs old fuck that tried to overthrow our democracy.  

You guys are running possibly the only man on the planet who could lose to Biden.  This is your Hillary 2016 moment, and every Biden gaffe for the next four years will be your team's fault for refusing to provide sane Americans with a logical alternative.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Chuckie Finster said:

Old fuck vs old fuck that tried to overthrow our democracy.  

You guys are running possibly the only man on the planet who could lose to Biden.  This is your Hillary 2016 moment, and every Biden gaffe for the next four years will be your team's fault for refusing to provide sane Americans with a logical alternative.

Don’t forget, the incumbent old fuck doesn’t go around bragging about taking cognitive tests while declaring Nikki Haley was responsible for security on Jan 6

Biden makes gaffes and confuses names. He doesn’t go around telling everyone he’s in perfect health and perfect mental acuity while speaking nonsense and gibberish at the same time 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Js1 said:

He doesn’t go around telling everyone he’s in perfect health and perfect mental acuity while speaking nonsense and gibberish at the same time 

When would he do that?  There are numerous occasions over the last 4 years where he shuffles off the stage after blabbering something incoherent, then complains about "they are going to be mad at me".

 

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/4446630-biden-wont-sit-for-interview-with-cbs-before-super-bowl/

Biden won’t sit for interview with CBS before Super Bowl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • immamac changed the title to Joe Biden 2024 thread - Dark Brandon Strikes Again
  • immamac changed the title to Joe Biden 2024 thread - Dark Brandon Where Art Thou?


×
×
  • Create New...