Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, BurgleBro said:

That was the second half after Quinn had thrown for 78 yards and we were still somehow tied. 

Because we were running the ball. And had a short field.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
Just now, Hondo said:

Sark's will always have the same weakness.  He's a brilliant schemer and play-caller, so he simply cannot force himself to run left, run right, run middle all game long, no matter how effective it is.

True and to be fair that’s rarely what will work especially at this point in the season. WA is a weird mix of NFL offense and just ok defense. So in the end I think it’s a weakness we can work with.

Posted
Just now, TornACL said:

We ran it 28 times for 6.2 per carry. 

Don’t bother Surly with stuff like this when we are in spiritual winter.  Now is the time to lash out and gnash teeth.  

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 2
Posted

The biggest difference between Sark and khakis when it comes to running the ball is Sark would never run on 2nd and 14, even against a shaky run D.  We'd get two straight QE passes.  Committing to the run means committing to the run.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
Just now, bschoolprof said:

The biggest difference between Sark and khakis when it comes to running the ball is Sark would never run on 2nd and 14, even against a shaky run D.  We'd get two straight QE passes.  Committing to the run means committing to the run.  

One of Sark’s flaws is patience. DeBoer said as much after the Alamo bowl. Running as opposed to a quick strike when your QB isn’t riding on a heater. That is one of his flaws. No matter. We will be back next year damnit! We will be back. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
1 minute ago, bschoolprof said:

The biggest difference between Sark and khakis when it comes to running the ball is Sark would never run on 2nd and 14, even against a shaky run D.  We'd get two straight QE passes.  Committing to the run means committing to the run.  

Eh, we've definitely had some long runs on second and third and long this year. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Hondo said:

Sark will always have the same weakness.  He's a brilliant schemer and play-caller, so he simply cannot force himself to run left, run right, run middle all game long, no matter how effective it is.

Sark thinks UM should go 5 wide empty next series 

  • Haha 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Hondo said:

Sark will always have the same weakness.  He's a brilliant schemer and play-caller, so he simply cannot force himself to run left, run right, run middle all game long, no matter how effective it is.

Also might have fumbled 8 times instead of 4  if they did….  Rage!!

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, Rockethorn1978 said:

No penalty they called a “timeout”. Can we have one season where we have refs that like us as much as they love fucking Washington? JFC.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...