2024 Presidential Election Thread - Let's keep the party going.

[BehoId, The Underminer! 11,669]

Biggest loser: G Elliot for having a model that said this is still a coin toss when things were so bad in fact that historic changes have to happen.

[linux 1,660]

Just now, Texaus said:

Wish the clamoring for anyone in particular would stop and just agree all in on whomever comes out as nominee. 

This is our only hope, I am not kidding the election will now be decided in the next few weeks.

[David Dennison 18,925]

Just now, linux said:

This is our only hope, I am not kidding the election will now be decided in the next few weeks.

It's over. It's Harris.

[Michael Knight 12,989]

3 minutes ago, MonkeyDoughnut said:

If it's Harris, there cannot be enough debates before election day. She will crush him in every debate. She should demand allowing for interruptions and fact checking and just go to town on him letting him make a fool of himself.

No way trump agrees to debate

[tx 3 putt 77,112]

2 minutes ago, MonkeyDoughnut said:

If it's Harris, there cannot be enough debates before election day. She will crush him in every debate. She should demand allowing for interruptions and fact checking and just go to town on him letting him make a fool of himself.

Trump - Biden was the democratically chosen D presidential candidate, and I’ll respect that by not debating the illegal candidate !

 

no way Trump shows up to another debate

 

😂😂😂😂

[DixonHur 11,342]

2 minutes ago, immamac said:

Pete needs to be the face of the campaign.

Are you insane.  It's gonna tough enough winning in America with a woman at the top of the ticket and you think putting a gay man front and center is the answer?

[tx 3 putt 77,112]

Just now, Michael Knight said:

No way trump agrees to debate

[Hank Kingsley 20,986]

1 minute ago, David Dennison said:

Countdown to voters being reminded of the full on racism from the Republicans.

fify 

 

[Js1 85,437]

Just now, Michael Knight said:

No way trump agrees to debate

Not a chance 

[Dbeasy 15,072]

For those that are criticizing this move, I get it. It’s a tough call. He might have been able to rally and win. However, the stakes are huge. They are as big as they’ve been in our country’s history. 

I found in business over the years that trying to band-aid a problem rarely if ever worked. And that’s where the Democrats were until today. I’ve always found that going ahead and ripping off the bandaid and taking bold action with strong leadership usually resulted in far better outcomes. Embrace this bold action and let’s get behind Harris and WIN!

[Macanudo 12,990]

This has to be the weirdest Presidential election ever.   Former President running again who has spent the last 5 years fending off legal issues and impeachments.  Oh, and who also just had an attempt made on his life.   Trump alone makes this a whackadoodle election.  Now throw in the incumbent pulling an LBJ and this election has gone plaid.  

[troph 24,874]

4 minutes ago, MonkeyDoughnut said:

If it's Harris, there cannot be enough debates before election day. She will crush him in every debate. She should demand allowing for interruptions and fact checking and just go to town on him letting him make a fool of himself.

Yes and when he says no she needs town hall every Thursday night on cnn, msnbc and get on fox if they will let her and just ransack his ass.

[Francisco 2.0 32,395]

3 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

Countdown to full on racism from the Republicans.

"countdown"?

 

 

[wildcat09 29,355]

Any big money donors who don’t immediately come out in support of Kamala should get drone strikes.

[yoladu 4,094]

2 minutes ago, Js1 said:

Put the youth on display against Diaper Don

Great point. Now the issue of Age/Dementia falls squarely on the other candidate, not yours.

[Hank Kingsley 20,986]

Just now, tx 3 putt said:

He definitely doesn't want to debate. But he'll be forced to when they lose all momentum and polls start tightening up. 

 

[Beantown Express 2.0 6,559]

Just now, tx 3 putt said:

Trump - Biden was the democratically chosen D presidential candidate, and I’ll respect that by not debating the illegal candidate !

 

no way Trump shows up to another debate

 

😂😂😂😂

Then the next words out of Harris is, “ Trump is a chickenshit afraid of a woman.  Do you really want someone afraid of a woman as your President?”  They need to go after that fuckstick with everything they’ve got.  

[Biff Tannen 45,692]

5 minutes ago, Js1 said:

maybe a businessman like Cuban 

[jimmyjazz 45,981]

2 minutes ago, Michael Knight said:

No way trump agrees to debate

That's where I am.  He will couch it as he is mightily offended at the audacity of the Dems for putting someone on the ticket who the voters didn't support.

[Firemans4Horn 18,112]

Just now, wildcat09 said:

Any big money donors who don’t immediately come out in support of Kamala should get drone strikes.

Completely legal for Biden to authorize these now. #scotus

[Francisco 2.0 32,395]

Just now, Hank Kingsley said:

He definitely doesn't want to debate. But he'll be forced to when they lose all momentum and polls start tightening up. 

 

 

Trump will want the terms of the Biden debate agreement; otherwise he isn't going to take the chance.

[linux 1,660]

3 minutes ago, Thatguy said:

and a lot of people are going to vote for her because they want a woman to finally be prez. Best believe she is going full undertaker on Roe. I am curious to see how this plays out. I can see it being a wash for either depending on how the speeches go as we pedal down the road.

Women don't vote for women, I mean there is a lean of course, but things like urban rural divide is x10000 more relevant than gender identity politics.

[Js1 85,437]

CNN: donors are back on board 

[tx 3 putt 77,112]

Pete needs to be the lead attack dog, then supporting team members 

[Firemans4Horn 18,112]

Just now, linux said:

Women don't vote for women, I mean there is a lean of course, but things like urban rural divide is x10000 more relevant than gender identity politics.

Lol, wrong. 

[Pancho 44,860]

CNN: Big dollar donors have started reaching back out since the letter 

[Hank Kingsley 20,986]

1 minute ago, jimmyjazz said:

That's where I am.  He will couch it as he is mightily offended at the audacity of the Dems for putting someone on the ticket who the voters didn't support.

He'll try that but it won't work. 

 

[strangulation! 1,716]

5 minutes ago, Js1 said:

Mentioned Kelly

Pretty big step up from Austin city council to VP

[Pancho 44,860]

 

[Francisco 2.0 32,395]

 

 

 

[Biff Tannen 45,692]

3 minutes ago, Macanudo said:

ormer President running again who has spent the last 5 years fending off legal issues

Convicted on 34 felonies.

[Sawbonz 27,580]

27 minutes ago, Pimphand said:

Just here to laugh and laugh and laugh as you Stockholm syndrome bitches continue to worship and appreciate your tormentors & captors.

Keep it up

This you?

 

 

 

Get fucked simp

[troph 24,874]

It will be Harris it has to be Harris there is no better time to put a woman at the lead of the ticket than now.

the victory lap for Biden will be so much better than the drumbeat of age.

Harris will fuck trump’s shit up on the trail. Grab Shapiro and secure the blue wall and call it a day.

not sure about governing I’m worried about that - gravely. But it is what it is.

dems and Biden fucked up a lot of this from 3.5 years ago until yesterday, but today a good decision was made based on where it all stands.

let’s fucking go.

[Js1 85,437]

Just now, Biff Tannen said:

Convicted on 34 felonies.

Oldest nominee in history, 34 felonies, 3 more criminal trials

[Incredulity 11,675]

2 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

He definitely doesn't want to debate. But he'll be forced to when they lose all momentum and polls start tightening up. 

 

This.  I wouldn’t count on a Kamala verbal take down of anyone.  Now if she can stand there and let Trump be a buffoon without letting off a half dozen bizarre counter-logical cackles she could succeed in a debate.

[Bozo_Casanova 26,495]

Biggest winner: Maya Rudolph 

 

[Pancho 44,860]

 

[Brisketexan 105,161]

Now the hard part. Saddle up and say your prayers, we have a nation to save. 

Oh…you adorable thing. The last decade or so has shown us that either there isn’t a god…or he hates us.

*checks user name*

Perfection. Needed that prediction source to make me feel comfortable.

Let’s. Fucking. Go.

And also…this. I don’t care what the odds are, how shitty it looks. Time to metaphorically raise the black flag and start slitting throats.

Yeah…I’d happily nominate Isbell for something, BUT…that dumb SOB blew his thing with Amanda Shires, so can we really trust his judgment?

Pretty big step up from Austin city council to VP

Oh…so you HAVE been paying. Attention to this timeline.

[David Dennison 18,925]

Just now, Incredulity said:

This.  I wouldn’t count on a Kamala verbal take down of anyone.  Now if she can stand there and let Trump be a buffoon without letting off a half dozen bizarre counter-logical cackles she could succeed in a debate.

She could just insinuate he's too old and addled for the job.

[troph 24,874]

3 minutes ago, linux said:

Women don't vote for women, I mean there is a lean of course, but things like urban rural divide is x10000 more relevant than gender identity politics.

Dobbs will change that you watch. 

[Francisco 2.0 32,395]

In other news, Jonathan Turley opines:

 

 

 

[Js1 85,437]

Just now, Francisco 2.0 said:

In other news, Jonathan Turley opines:

 

 

 

The GOP is now gonna focus on this instead. I think it will backfire to keep attacking him after he bowed out 

[Biff Tannen 45,692]

1 minute ago, Brisketexan said:

Time to metaphorically raise the black flag and start slitting throats.

[Hank Kingsley 20,986]

On 7/16/2024 at 12:10 PM, Hank Kingsley said:

The real path is only with Kamala. And saying "anyone else" feels really disingenuous as you know she is the only option with so little time remaining.

Nominating Kamala means: 

1. The Democratic Party is being proactive, instead of depending on reactive fantasies that Trump will bury himself somehow. A sign to all Americans that the party is truly concerned for the future of this country. Trump and all of his bootlickers don't think the Dem party has the balls to do it. It will rattle hem. 

2. The age issue completely gets flipped. American voters will have their blinders removed and have the chance to see the age issues and mental decline and overall ridiculousness of Trump due to the stark contrast with Kamala. 

3. Reinvigorates party enthusiasm and fundraising. She can seamlessly run on the Biden administration platform.

4. Easier to convince and remind voters of the threats to women's rights when Kamala is the face of the campaign

5. Kamala getting nominated is the only chance to get Trump into another debate, and she has the ability to perform well. If Trump refused to debate her, it will hurt him with some voters. Frankly, I think he'd have to debate her. The optics would be terrible for him otherwise. And as we've all seen, optics REALLY matters to voters.

 

EDIT: All of the above is also taking into consideration that if Biden dropped out, he would say shit like "This is a decision that I made with my family" blah blah blah. He wasn't forced out, that he realizes this is the best path to victory and best thing for our country. 

 

The path to instant momentum and reinvigoration wasn't hard to see. Now it's gonna play out. LFG. 

 

[Pancho 44,860]

 

[Underdog 28,725]

5 minutes ago, Js1 said:

CNN: donors are back on board 

Y'all are welcome... 

[troph 24,874]

1 minute ago, Js1 said:

The GOP is now gonna focus on this instead. I think it will backfire to keep attacking him after he bowed out 

Yeah because the funeral memorial has already begun, don’t insult the guy when he’s already died will be the response.

[David Dennison 18,925]

2 minutes ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

In other news, Jonathan Turley opines:

 

 

That's good concern trolling.

[Pancho 44,860]

Endorsements for Harris by dems in congress starting to roll in

[tx 3 putt 77,112]

18 minutes ago, Js1 said:

Who gives a shit what they say. You care way too much what the Rs are going to do 

muddy the waters , control the narrative 

the R’s goal  for this week - every talking head asking if this all legal or not 

doesn’t matter if it is or isn’t, but plant those seeds that this nominee is ‘illegal’ 

They’re trying to win an election with a simpleton on top of their ballot. Distract distract distract. R’s are going to come out swinging, they smell blood in the water