Jump to content

2024 Presidential Election Thread - Let's keep the party going.


bolverk

Recommended Posts

Just now, mdmost said:

He was on Fox News Sunday at the start of the week. He'll be on The View next week. 

He also did an event with Bill Clinton in Georgia, a few of his own solo rallies and he has an event with Obama to open up in person early voting in Wisconsin 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mdmost said:

He was on Fox News Sunday at the start of the week. He'll be on The View next week. 

Hey should replace Gaffigan on SNL. But play it straight. Cast members calling him Jim, etc. Might not get any new votes but it would be funny.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Fudge Nuggets said:

Speaking of vanishing acts, is Walz still alive?  I haven’t seen or heard shit from him since the VP debate. Granted I’ve been a bit swamped since then so may have missed it. 

Multiple campaign events/rallies each day (primarily swing states) plus interviews.  He was on Rich Eisen this week, Smartless the week before, the View next week  

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TexEx15 said:

11 A woman[a] should learn in quietness and full submission. 12 I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet.

Proud incel gonna incel 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TexEx15 said:

11 A woman[a] should learn in quietness and full submission. 12 I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet.

As much as I'd like to punch him in the face, I'd much rather see my daughter high kick him in the nuts. On top of poetic justice, that would definitely justify all this money going to dance.

  • Hook 'Em 8
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TexEx15 said:

11 A woman[a] should learn in quietness and full submission. 12 I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet.

Admittedly the online collegiate presence is minuscule in the grander internet scene but I recently I went out with my bro and his friend who moved to Austin for work from the Middle East. I told him the anti suffrage movement is alive and well online and not just with incel trash, there are serious “college educated” people from multiple SEC boards that champion the abolishment of the 19th amendment.

He didn’t believe me. And that’s fair to be honest. But I’ve seen enough on tiger droppings, texags, and hornfans (RIP) to know that even if it is a small subset of posters, they’re never called out. Very much falls in line with the few bad apples bad cop observation: sure not that many cops will commit a bad shoot, plant evidence, extort money, etc. But it’s not those assholes I’m worried about, it’s the pieces of shit that look the other way. And when posters on those sites say the country was lost when the 19th passed, nobody bats an eye or contradicts them. Hell they don’t need to be just contradicted, they need to be told to go fuck themselves and shut the fuck up for their stupid ass nonsense. But I’ve never seen a peep.

We need to win this election. The handmaids tale shit is getting a little too real

Edited by achooloco
  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, aggie08 said:

Arnold Palmer is rolling over in his grave having this fuck bring him up in one of his stupid fucking rallies. Go slobber all over Jack's knob. He's into it.

You know, I'm betting Jack Nicklaus is taking this well, great guy that he is.  

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Firemans4Horn said:

Amazing that Trump/Cruz have nothing besides punching down on Trans people. 
 

fucking losers. 

It does say a lot though - it means they aren't getting traction with their base on any other issues - economy, the border, Kamala's race, etc.

All they have is trans people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, achooloco said:

To be fair, is that good? Bad? Numbers are just social constructs without more! (Sorry it’s halftime and I’m drunk and salty)

I'll do a break down on numbers once the data dumps hits tomorrow morning (the dump hits between 1 and 5 am local time).  Basically, right now it all points to good news.  We know historically that the early vote heavily favors a Democratic turnout.  The biggest takeaway as of this morning was that women had outvoted men by 130k, which we know is also generally in our favor, and outpaces 2020.  The information that is released is not partisan in nature, i.e., it doesn't distinguish between R, D, or Indy votes.  With that in mind, the best we can do is make educated guesses based on prior history.  

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, achooloco said:

To be fair, is that good? Bad? Numbers are just social constructs without more! (Sorry it’s halftime and I’m drunk and salty)

My ignorant, drunk and salty reply is that only one candidate seems to have enthusiasm right now. If lots of people are enthusiastically voting, then more of that enthused share are going to be for Harris.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, achooloco said:

To be fair, is that good? Bad? Numbers are just social constructs without more! (Sorry it’s halftime and I’m drunk and salty)

Quote

More than 129,000 voters have registered in Georgia since President Joe Biden dropped out of the 2024 race, which could be a good sign for Vice President Kamala Harris.

The generally understood belief is that people who registered to vote for the first time are motivated to vote - in that election at least.  Coupled with the increase in female demographic new registration - and increase number of female early voters - it points toward good news for Democrats.

It does not tell us whether it will be good enough news.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

The generally understood belief is that people who registered to vote for the first time are motivated to vote - in that election at least.  Coupled with the increase in female demographic new registration - and increase number of female early voters - it points toward good news for Democrats.

It does not tell us whether it will be good enough news.

There's a reason all the PACs have been trying to tailor their pro-Trump messages to black men. Their data is telling them it could be the difference, and the fact Kamala's campaign has been returning fire in that arena tells me there's probably something to that. Someone is betting big on transphobia being a motivating or demoralizing factor.

1 minute ago, atomheartbevo said:

MAGA: Donald Trump talks about Arnold Palmer's dick size just like me!

We'll have forgotten all about this by Monday, by the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gatorubet said:

My ignorant, drunk and salty reply is that only one candidate seems to have enthusiasm right now. If lots of people are enthusiastically voting, then more of that enthused share are going to be for Harris.

From your message board fingers to god’s ears. We need to win but this stress is unhealthy. Salud! (As I drink to forget the 30-15 loss)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BamaATL said:

I'll do a break down on numbers once the data dumps hits tomorrow morning (the dump hits between 1 and 5 am local time).  Basically, right now it all points to good news.  We know historically that the early vote heavily favors a Democratic turnout.  The biggest takeaway as of this morning was that women had outvoted men by 130k, which we know is also generally in our favor, and outpaces 2020.  The information that is released is not partisan in nature, i.e., it doesn't distinguish between R, D, or Indy votes.  With that in mind, the best we can do is make educated guesses based on prior history.  

Judge Judy Ain'T Got Time For That GIF - Clock Watch Hurry Up - Discover &  Share GIFs

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...