Jump to content
Jordan Washington chats with Bobby for Burnt Ends ×

2024 Presidential Election Thread - Let's keep the party going.

bolverk

By bolverk
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 52k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Js1

    3663

  • Pancho

    1131

  • tx 3 putt

    1100

  • Red Five

    962

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Chult86
Chult86

I don't post all that often, though don't mistake that for not enjoying this board's discourse, OUsucks/Texags point and laughs, and quality original content on a frequent basis. I haven't felt t

Frank The Tank
Frank The Tank

I’m a thread lurker and really only jump in for some sarcasm here and there. But, as an attempt at sincerity and to help get things back on track, here we go: I was generally raised as a republic

Francisco 2.0
Francisco 2.0

Posted Images

Bullneck

Bullneck 18628

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Red Five said:More importantly, AOC is looking shockingly rude on MSNBC right now.

There’s a place in this world for men who can’t or won’t follow the rules. 
 

also, please post as I’m at THE WORLDS MOS BORING HS FOOTBALL GAME right now. And I was at the Jets game last as well

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Js1

Js1 82718

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Mo Horn said:

And it won't change one fucking vote

MAGAs will be walking around San Fran, stabbing themselves with needles and having unprotected gay sex, to get it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Js1

Js1 82718

Posted
Posted

Lol the CEO of Susquehanna polling just got into a Twitter spat with Adam Carlson because Susquehanna RT’d Kari Lake cheering on of their polls. Very professional and nonpartisan…. 🙄 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tuco

Tuco 5020

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

No offense, but I can only assume you’re being willfully obtuse here.

No, he's not.  You are doing what a lot of people do: you see a problem and you attribute the cause as something you see as deficient.  But, if there was really a cause and effect between these problems and that deficiency, if Trump was winning this voting block due to economic policy, nobody would be talking about "white working class" - it would just be "working class."  Full stop.  It's absurd to pretend that this is an economic policy issue.  I would love to see more progressive policies.  But, the House candidate my wife worked for four years ago was a Medicare for All proponent, in a district that went to Biden, and she lost by 5 points.  The people prefer Biden's moderate economic policies.  It's why you don't hear M4A discussed at all this cycle.  It lost.  In part, because the blue collar labor union members were against it.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
quigley

quigley 1161

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, aggie08 said:

I'm sorry none of us care about Nevada, Jon.

I care about NV. We need Jacky Rosen to win the Senate seat in NV.

As has been stated by @Js1 and several others. Ticket-splitting is becoming less common. Would rather not have to rely on Trump-Rosen ticket-splitters to get Jacky back to Washington.

A good Harris performance in NV makes me feel better about Rosen's chances. (I think Rosen and Harris win with Rosen having a bigger margin).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SydneyCarton

SydneyCarton 47195

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

johnson has just admitted trump is killing the CHIPS and Science act ….

 

This is the shit I don’t understand. Ignoring the inevitable Brisket post. Why would anyone want to repeal that act? There is no upside, even political or perception based, to gutting that act and costing jobs. Even billionaires are making bank off that act. So why would it even be a discussion?

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Js1

Js1 82718

Posted
Posted
Just now, SydneyCarton said:

This is the shit I don’t understand. Ignoring the inevitable Brisket post. Why would anyone want to repeal that act? There is no upside, even political or perception based, to gutting that act and costing jobs. Even billionaires are making bank off that act. So why would it even be a discussion?

They will undo anything good Biden did and re-pass it as the DONALD J TRUMP CHIPS ACT THAT IS BETTER THAN BRANDON’s

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Born to Run

Born to Run 6242

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, SydneyCarton said:

This is the shit I don’t understand. Ignoring the inevitable Brisket post. Why would anyone want to repeal that act? There is no upside, even political or perception based, to gutting that act and costing jobs. Even billionaires are making bank off that act. So why would it even be a discussion?

To dismantle whatever the previous Dem administration did consequences be damned.  It's thier entire ethos.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WelfareBuysMyWeed

WelfareBuysMyWeed 5249

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Jive Turkey said:

Simple Trump thinks the guy is saying "who cares" about Biden.  no dumbass, he's making fun of you for still talking about Joe Biden WHO ISN'T YOUR OPPONENT.

this reminds me of that town hall meeting he did with a bunch of CEOs where he called him "Gavin Newscum" and the interviewer interrupted, "newsome" and Trump didn't get that he was calling him out. He started laughing and was like "this is the first time anybody has corrected me, I know his name" and the interviewer was saying "It's just that there's a crowd of CEOs out here who would be ousted immediately for referring to a rival CEO like that" and Trump didn't get it. He wasn't correcting him because he thought Trump didn't know his name, he was correcting his decorum and Trump was clueless as hell.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Francisco 2.0

Francisco 2.0 31691

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

This is the shit I don’t understand. Ignoring the inevitable Brisket post. Why would anyone want to repeal that act? There is no upside, even political or perception based, to gutting that act and costing jobs. Even billionaires are making bank off that act. So why would it even be a discussion?

Because a democratic president signed it into law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bullneck

Bullneck 18628

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

This is the shit I don’t understand. Ignoring the inevitable Brisket post. Why would anyone want to repeal that act? There is no upside, even political or perception based, to gutting that act and costing jobs. Even billionaires are making bank off that act. So why would it even be a discussion?

Because Trump didn’t think of it first. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Saint Austin

Saint Austin 732

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Willfully Horn said:

Interesting article from the Daily Beast about mounting pressure on shrub Bush to endorse Harris. 

“During a live interview that aired Friday on The New Yorker Radio Hour podcast, Liz Cheney said, “I can’t explain why George W. Bush hasn’t spoken out, but I think it’s time, and I wish that he would.””

Shrub’s daughter is all in with Harris. Of course she is.

 

 

 

https://www.thedailybeast.com/resizer/v2/IGYLHUXDCBG2TPUUTLDLGPYZO4.jpg?auth=dc5491d5d536a929242432da817d5584718ffb67dc54011d4e0f832624504612&width=1440&height=810

image.jpeg

Is it possible that W offered to endorse Kamala, but she declined it for fear it might alienate the far-left, leading them to stay home?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WelfareBuysMyWeed

WelfareBuysMyWeed 5249

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, gmr548 said:

THIS.

GWB left office with disapproval pushing 70%. Trump or Biden could only dream of that. To the extent his endorsement would swing anyone, it's at least as likely to help Trump as it is Harris.

It's also very possible he is voting Trump, because he fucks with the whole tax cuts and privatization over everything line of thinking.

The Bush family hates Trump, remember what he did to Jeb? W is also on record as telling Michelle Obama that Trump's inauguration was "some weird shit." W without a doubt is not voting for Trump. He should man up and tell people.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
chainsaw

chainsaw 9496

Posted
Posted
Just now, Saint Austin said:

Is it possible that W offered to endorse Kamala, but she declined it for fear it might alienate the far-left, leading them to stay home?

Dick Cheney's more hated than W, so I'm not sure that makes a lot of sense

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Born to Run

Born to Run 6242

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, chainsaw said:

Mexicans in particular seem to have become more Trumpy, which might be what's going on in NVAZ

And South Texas. We ceded a traditionally Blue South Texas Corridor with a booming population and have done Nothing to course correct.  It's infuriating. We need a statewide candidate that is Allred/ Munchin light but Latino that also hunts and can look authentic doing so like Gov Ann whilst quoting George Straight with Flaco Jimenez endorsement.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
gmr548

gmr548 16276

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Js1 said:

Aggy

I always try to remind our Trumpy posters that they're aligning with Texags, hoping that might make them see the light. It does not. 

sigh

23 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

Video

 

 

9 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

This is the shit I don’t understand. Ignoring the inevitable Brisket post. Why would anyone want to repeal that act? There is no upside, even political or perception based, to gutting that act and costing jobs. Even billionaires are making bank off that act. So why would it even be a discussion?

I don't think it'll matter much electorally because anyone engaged enough to catch a Mike Johnson soundbite probably already voted. Still, what an own goal; also, the bill got 64 Senate votes. I'm pretty skeptical they could pass a repeal.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
gmr548

gmr548 16276

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, WelfareBuysMyWeed said:

The Bush family hates Trump, remember what he did to Jeb? W is also on record as telling Michelle Obama that Trump's inauguration was "some weird shit." W without a doubt is not voting for Trump. He should man up and tell people.

If so, then I return to the rest of my post: he should keep his mouth shut because he's unpopular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Born to Run

Born to Run 6242

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, WelfareBuysMyWeed said:

The Bush family hates Trump, remember what he did to Jeb? W is also on record as telling Michelle Obama that Trump's inauguration was "some weird shit." W without a doubt is not voting for Trump. He should man up and tell people.

There is always a first for everything.  Lifelong coward painting picts of those he had killed to assuage his guilt and doing jack shit to improve quality of life for those he merely maimed. Coward ass coward.

  • Like 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hermanator

Hermanator 6579

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, mooseoutfront said:

I very rarely carry a gun on my person when I’m not out in the woods, but with all the nut bags around here I’ll be packing for a few weeks no matter who wins. 

Yep, starting tonight I'm carrying my .40 for at least a week. Usually leave it at home. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Evil Bill Obrien

Evil Bill Obrien 2878

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Saint Austin said:

Is it possible that W offered to endorse Kamala, but she declined it for fear it might alienate the far-left, leading them to stay home?

Could see this being the case, and if so as we all expected, W being the hero we deserve, but not the one we need right now...

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tx 3 putt

tx 3 putt 74850

Posted
Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

This is the shit I don’t understand. Ignoring the inevitable Brisket post. Why would anyone want to repeal that act? There is no upside, even political or perception based, to gutting that act and costing jobs. Even billionaires are making bank off that act. So why would it even be a discussion?

 

it’s not the TRUMP CHIPS and Science Act, but absolutely no reason for him to drop that news pre election 

plus Chinese investors have promised something, is my guess. dear leader needs his cut

Edited by tx 3 putt
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...