2024 Presidential Election Thread - Let's keep the party going.

[Pato del Muerto 52,114]

5 minutes ago, Red Five said:

"We're joining Trump's rally, already in progress. Let's listen to what he has to say."

Dotard: "Yeah so anyway, I've been a democrat pretty much my entire life. You see that (R) next to my name? It's there because I knew I could convince rubes into voting for me. Rubes, like all of you people. But yeah, where was I. Oh yeah, elect me and a lot of people are going to be cashing in favors. I mean, A LOT. Like half a BILLION dollars worth. It will pretty much ruin this country forever."

(wild applause) 

Anchor to panelists:  what do you suppose he means when he says that?

[Js1 83,618]

1 minute ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Anchor to panelists:  what do you suppose he means when he says that?

NYT: Trump's brutal honesty is a huge contrast to Biden's restraint.  We explore why Trump's honestly about his plans to be America's Putin has some voters in this rural Ohio diner excited to vote for him and why this could be what America needs.

[Goredho 17,180]

On 3/12/2024 at 2:42 PM, Make em eat Taco Bell said:

larger macro polls show whites are becoming more Democrat while minorities becoming more Republican. 

Trump does a pretty good job of marketing himself as the candidate of the aggrieved and disenfranchised.  He will say anything to anyone to make them feel like he's their champion and will cure their ills.  That he is so strongly courting African Americans tells me he's got no more room to grow a base within white America.  Someone involved in his political strategy has done the math and see that if he's going to win, he  needs the aggrieved and disenfranchised minorities, too.

[Red Five 40,449]

9 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Anchor to panelists:  what do you suppose he means when he says that?

(that one conservative guy who is always on who has an immensely punchable face) "Look, you can't listen to what he says.... Just vote for him, ok? Geez." 

[chainsaw 9,668]

1 hour ago, David Dennison said:

 

[Js1 83,618]

Quote

Trump's RNC officially kills the GOP's mail-in voter effort

The Trump-branded Republican Party is less interested in promoting voting by mail than in legal challenges aimed at voting systems.

But please proceed

[tx 3 putt 75,521]

😂😂😂😂😂😂

 

[David Dennison 17,800]

So here's an example of some polling going on right now.

 

Edited March 14 by David Dennison

[Js1 83,618]

So bad polling. Got it 

[David Dennison 17,800]

3 minutes ago, Js1 said:

So bad polling. Got it 

Democratic panic to follow.

[Pato del Muerto 52,114]

So 57% of undecideds are not independent?  
 

15% of respondents don’t know who they will vote for but felt compelled to opt in and complete the survey anyway?

[David Dennison 17,800]

BTW, the February inflation talking points just dropped.

[Nice Guy Eddie 13,317]

On 3/13/2024 at 1:05 AM, tx 3 putt said:

Trump had full control for 2 full years 2017-2019

POTUS
SCOTUS
HOUSE
SENATE
DOJ

Immigration bills passed = 0
Borders closed = 0
Wall money = 0
Illegal immigration soared up to a new record in 2019

Tax cuts for billionaires = 1
 

🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

The man was preoccupied with Infrastructure Week. Why can't you understand that!

[tx 3 putt 75,521]

 

[tx 3 putt 75,521]

Another free ad ….

 

[Beantown Express 2.0 6,527]

19 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

 

Why would anybody want to end early voting?  I for one don't want to stand in line for hours on election day when I don't have to, and I still get my right to vote.  What is wrong with the Republican party?  What else will they get rid of?  Are abortions, contraception and LGBQT rights next?  

Edited March 14 by Beantown Express 2.0

[4th&Five 41,242]

3 minutes ago, Beantown Express 2.0 said:

Why would anybody want to end early voting?  I for one don't want to stand in line for hours on election day when I don't have to, and I still get my right to vote.  What is wrong with the Republican party?  What else will they get rid of?  Are abortions, contraception and LGBQT rights next?  

[Chuckie Finster 22,342]

21 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

Another free ad ….

 

Genuinely cannot put into words how much this man infuriates me.  The level of narcissism and stupidity is almost incomprehensible, as is his cult following.  So very depressing that THIS dipshit is the guy people are willing to die for.

[Nice Guy Eddie 13,317]

3 minutes ago, Beantown Express 2.0 said:

Why would anybody want to end early voting?  I for one don't want to stand in line for hours on election day when I don't have to and I still get my right to vote.  What is wrong with the Republican party?  What else will they get rid of?  Is abortions , contraception and LGBQT rights next?  

Overall Dems seem to win the early vote. The GOP is now about picking the people who will be allowed to vote. It's not easy to flat out stop Dems from voting, so its going to be about making it difficult for them to vote in the manner they prefer to vote.

[Beantown Express 2.0 6,527]

Just now, Nice Guy Eddie said:

Overall Dems seem to win the early vote. The GOP is now about picking the people who will be allowed to vote. It's not easy to flat out stop Dems from voting, so its going to be about making it difficult for them to vote in the manner they prefer to vote.

I know.  I was being sarcastic with that post.  It is infuriating to take something away that makes improves the voting experience because half the country are a bunch of dumb asses that vote for these pieces of shit.  

[Js1 83,618]

1 minute ago, Beantown Express 2.0 said:

I know.  I was being sarcastic with that post.  It is infuriating to take something away that makes improves the voting experience because half the country are a bunch of dumb asses that vote for these pieces of shit.  

This is a strategy to continue to sow doubt about the integrity of the election.

E-Day counted first: BIG Republican lead
Mail continues to be counted slowly throughout the night and erases that lead into a Dem lead: FRAUD!!!!!

[David Dennison 17,800]

14 minutes ago, Beantown Express 2.0 said:

I know.  I was being sarcastic with that post.  It is infuriating to take something away that makes improves the voting experience because half the country are a bunch of dumb asses that vote for these pieces of shit.  

I keep waiting for Texas to eliminate early voting.

[YGIFS 19,445]

After all these years, the RNC still doesn't understand what a large percentage of their voters send in ballots by mail.  

Say what you will about Texas voter suppression, our early voting windows are pretty substantial.  You basically have two full weeks (minus Sunday) from 7:00a-7:00p to vote.  Now registration and locations can be a pain in the ass, but the hours are there to work around.  But yeah, they're gonna compress that at some point real soon.

How is Trump going to end early voting?  Our federal elections are run by states which are implemented by counties.  I guess he'd try an Executive Order just dropping it all, but that's a tall task even for Commander Dipshit.  

I keep looking at these Fox News interviews with Lara Trump and trying to pick who I hate the most.  And between Lara, Laura Ingram, and Anne Coulter...I gotta tell ya'...it's a three-horse race

[Js1 83,618]

6 minutes ago, YGIFS said:

After all these years, the RNC still doesn't understand what a large percentage of their voters send in ballots by mail.  

Say what you will about Texas voter suppression, our early voting windows are pretty substantial.  You basically have two full weeks (minus Sunday) from 7:00a-7:00p to vote.  Now registration and locations can be a pain in the ass, but the hours are there to work around.  But yeah, they're gonna compress that at some point real soon.

How is Trump going to end early voting?  Our federal elections are run by states which are implemented by counties.  I guess he'd try an Executive Order just dropping it all, but that's a tall task even for Commander Dipshit.  

I keep looking at these Fox News interviews with Lara Trump and trying to pick who I hate the most.  And between Lara, Laura Ingram, and Anne Coulter...I gotta tell ya'...it's a three-horse race

But remember, they don't want federalized elections.  

[YGIFS 19,445]

2 minutes ago, Js1 said:

But remember, they don't want federalized elections.  

Yes, see but what this Executive Order presupposes is what if the state elections were federalized so we could de-federalize them from the states by federalizing their inability to de-federalize?  

Hmmmm?  Ever think of that smart guy?  

[Js1 83,618]

Just now, YGIFS said:

Yes, see but what this Executive Order presupposes is what if the state elections were federalized so we could de-federalize them from the states by federalizing their inability to de-federalize?  

 

[gmr548 16,315]

1 hour ago, David Dennison said:

I keep waiting for Texas to eliminate early voting.

Yep. I remember the absolute meltdown when Abbott let his sanity slip out from undercover and added a third week of early voting in 2020. Next action on that will be in the other direction, and only applicable to counties with a population of n-1, where n = the population of Dallas County.

[Js1 83,618]

4 hours ago, David Dennison said:

So here's an example of some polling going on right now.

 

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/03/05/online-opt-in-polls-can-produce-misleading-results-especially-for-young-people-and-hispanic-adults/
 

Online opt-in polls can produce misleading results, especially for young people and Hispanic adults

In particular, several recent studies have documented large errors in online opt-in surveys due to the presence of so-called “bogus respondents.” These respondents do not answer questions sincerely; instead, they attempt to complete surveys with as little effort as possible to earn money or other rewards.

Studies have shown that bogus respondents can cause opt-in surveys to overestimate rare attitudes and behaviors, such as ingesting bleach to protect against COVID-19, belief in conspiracies like Pizzagate or support for political violence.

At Pew Research Center, we’ve found that this type of overreporting tends to be especially concentrated in estimates for adults under 30, as well as Hispanic adults. Bogus respondents may be identifying this way in order to bypass screening questions that might otherwise prevent them from receiving a reward, though the precise reasons are difficult to pin down. Whatever the underlying cause, the result can be unreliable estimates for those groups.

[Biff Tannen 45,208]

7 hours ago, David Dennison said:

 

Not sure why we need to insult Cameron.

[tx 3 putt 75,521]

3 hours ago, David Dennison said:

I keep waiting for Texas to eliminate early voting.

abbott and paxton aren’t idiots

[YGIFS 19,445]

When Aaron was in Meadow'sLand, Let My 'ChillesHeel Go!  

[gmr548 16,315]

23 minutes ago, Js1 said:

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/03/05/online-opt-in-polls-can-produce-misleading-results-especially-for-young-people-and-hispanic-adults/
 

Online opt-in polls can produce misleading results, especially for young people and Hispanic adults

In particular, several recent studies have documented large errors in online opt-in surveys due to the presence of so-called “bogus respondents.” These respondents do not answer questions sincerely; instead, they attempt to complete surveys with as little effort as possible to earn money or other rewards.

Studies have shown that bogus respondents can cause opt-in surveys to overestimate rare attitudes and behaviors, such as ingesting bleach to protect against COVID-19, belief in conspiracies like Pizzagate or support for political violence.

At Pew Research Center, we’ve found that this type of overreporting tends to be especially concentrated in estimates for adults under 30, as well as Hispanic adults. Bogus respondents may be identifying this way in order to bypass screening questions that might otherwise prevent them from receiving a reward, though the precise reasons are difficult to pin down. Whatever the underlying cause, the result can be unreliable estimates for those groups.

The scientific term is the texags effect

[David Dennison 17,800]

26 minutes ago, Js1 said:

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/03/05/online-opt-in-polls-can-produce-misleading-results-especially-for-young-people-and-hispanic-adults/
 

Online opt-in polls can produce misleading results, especially for young people and Hispanic adults

In particular, several recent studies have documented large errors in online opt-in surveys due to the presence of so-called “bogus respondents.” These respondents do not answer questions sincerely; instead, they attempt to complete surveys with as little effort as possible to earn money or other rewards.

Studies have shown that bogus respondents can cause opt-in surveys to overestimate rare attitudes and behaviors, such as ingesting bleach to protect against COVID-19, belief in conspiracies like Pizzagate or support for political violence.

At Pew Research Center, we’ve found that this type of overreporting tends to be especially concentrated in estimates for adults under 30, as well as Hispanic adults. Bogus respondents may be identifying this way in order to bypass screening questions that might otherwise prevent them from receiving a reward, though the precise reasons are difficult to pin down. Whatever the underlying cause, the result can be unreliable estimates for those groups.

We're on the same page.

[tx 3 putt 75,521]

 

[HenryJames 65,562]

1 hour ago, Js1 said:

Online opt-in polls can produce misleading results, especially for young people and Hispanic adults

[tx 3 putt 75,521]

10 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

 

This appears to be a realization of the far right’s goal of focusing the Republican Party on election-related “lawfare,” that is legal challenges designed to restrict ballot access and undercut election systems in ways that make it harder to vote. Back in 2022, I reportedthat this vision was behind right-wing lawyer Harmeet Dhillon’s long-shot bid to become RNC chair. Dhillon insisted that the RNC needed to hire an army of lawyers to lob legal challenges ahead of the 2024 elections.

[Js1 83,618]

Marc Elias:

[tx 3 putt 75,521]

1 minute ago, Js1 said:

Marc Elias:

 

[StassneyHorn 6,446]

If the 70 year olds want to wait in line, let them wait in line. With no chair. No shade. No drinks. No bathrooms.

[David Dennison 17,800]

1 hour ago, StassneyHorn said:

If the 70 year olds want to wait in line, let them wait in line. With no chair. No shade. No drinks. No bathrooms.

What a country.

[tx 3 putt 75,521]

Free ad ….

 

[Gap03 3,191]

14 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

What a country.

I'm told that's the way democracy is supposed to work ... at least in Georgia.  

[TheStoicPaisano 9,840]

18 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

Free ad ….

 

That sweater vest would pair well with Meatball's boots.

[Gatorubet 29,763]

3 hours ago, tx 3 putt said:

[Horn Under a Bad Sign 20,304]

Y'all need to read this. I have no idea if this is true but ... holy shit if Seth Abramson is right about this stuff.


https://sethabramson.substack.com/p/breaking-news-trump-zuckerberg-musk

 

[Longhorn_Fan68 33,723]

16 hours ago, tx 3 putt said:

Free ad ….

 

I thought these motherfuckers want all the babies and that we're woefully underpopulated. which fucking way is it?

[tx 3 putt 75,521]

1 minute ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

I thought these motherfuckers want all the babies and that we're woefully underpopulated. which fucking way is it?

Only couples selected by maga gqp can have ivf 

[4th&Five 41,242]

 

[YGIFS 19,445]

It's okay Mike, you're in a safe place.  You can say how you really feel.

My goodness Pence, you really are suffering from battered woman's syndrome.  He tacitly ordered people to murder you on live television and you went on for three years with the whole narrative of, "But you don't know what it's like when we're alone!"  I guess this is a step forward in your recovery so wish the best from one asshole to another.  Wish you well.  But you do realize they will be hunting you until the end of your days.  At least you got a bad-ass security detail until they rotate out with Trump loyalists in which case, well.  You know.  

['stache 21,589]

He'll bend the knee soon enough. They all fucking do.