Jump to content

Bernie Sanders 2020 Watch

Dropout

By Dropout
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

washparkhorn

washparkhorn 9934

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, bad_teammate said:

The lesson to learn from Biden is that you need people who are enthusiastic about you.

Bloomberg does not have those and he cannot ever have those.  People hate him.

Agree. 

Bloomberg resonates with the Establishment who wants to protect their status quo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 4.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Hank Scorpio
Hank Scorpio

When Bernie is president only the rich children will be put in cages. 

Johnny Sack
Johnny Sack

Watching you commie fucks lose this election is going to be enjoyable. 

Longhorn_Fan68
Longhorn_Fan68

it is really, really stupid that in the richest country in the world people are dying from lack of insulin. it's unconscionable, really.

Posted Images

washparkhorn

washparkhorn 9934

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, workswithseed said:

I don't think so, I actually think things have calmed down since early 2019. 

That could be bias, and I could be totally wrong. I just don't think that lots of people are gonna shoot each other after this election.

A Bloomberg Nomination will shatter the Democratic Party. Billionaire autocrat v. Billionaire autocrat is a recipe for revolution - with the have nots fighting the have nots who for some reason want an aristocracy to lord over them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GSU&UT

GSU&UT 1798

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

PoshJitteryKitfox-size_restricted.gif

People complaining about Bernie Bros online being mean to them. If Bernie becomes the frontrunner then they have no reason to play nice since the idea is that they aren't held hostage to another candidate.

Will is being tongue in cheek though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
workswithseed

workswithseed 2033

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, washparkhorn said:

A Bloomberg Nomination will shatter the Democratic Party. Billionaire autocrat v. Billionaire autocrat is a recipe for revolution - with the have nots fighting the have nots who for some reason want an aristocracy to lord over them. 

It'll strengthen the moderates, and repulse the progressives. Maybe you meant civil war within the party. It's been a cold war with each side asking to not nuke the whole party if thier candidate wins.

Ha, this guy has a video of almost every political situation.

 

 

Edited by workswithseed
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bad_teammate

bad_teammate 13132

Posted
Posted

*is the DNC*

*can't run a caucus*

*gives my friend's stoner son an app development contract that ruins democracy*

*finally finds replacement for Jeffrey Epstein "cheese pizza" hookup*

*plants false stories about any candidate to the left of J. Edgar Hoover*

"Actually, you owe me your loyalty no matter what."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hank Scorpio

Hank Scorpio 17721

Posted
Posted

I admit, I let the hype get to me and was hoping for a complete and hugely lopsided Bernie victory with multiple fatalities. But winning Iowa is a big first step to destroying everything this country stands for and enslaving the ruling class, which is what this is really all about. Onward to New Hampshire, comrades. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bad_teammate

bad_teammate 13132

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Hank Scorpio said:

I admit, I let the hype get to me and was hoping for a complete and hugely lopsided Bernie victory with multiple fatalities. But winning Iowa is a big first step to destroying everything this country stands for and enslaving the ruling class, which is what this is really all about. Onward to New Hampshire, comrades. 

Same. I went to bed mad and woke up despirited.

The obvious problem is that I consume too much politics-related media and participate in too much politics-related social media. This is clear and everyone can tell and it's bad for me.

But am I going to stop? LOL FUCK YOU WORLD I LOVE ALL THE BRAIN DISEASES! IT'S GOOD, ACTUALLY!

This is Kamala Harris's campaign lead.

Bernie may end up winning in ALL 3 fucking metrics.

GET THIS BREAD, COMMIE GRANDPA!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
washparkhorn

washparkhorn 9934

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, PenelopeWitherspoon said:

I've always liked Bernie. I dont agree with his economic stances, but at the end of the day, I admire him having integrity and sticking to his beliefs.

However, he sits in Congress as an Independent. Why run as the Democratic nominee????

It's a good question. Bernie Sanders is a Democratic Party member. He agrees to the loyalty oath to support the nominee. That is required of every candidate. 

Sanders and the Democratic Party have worked together for years. He is an FDR-Democrat or more modernly called a progressive. Schumer and Reid endorsed his Senate run. He is known for protecting the interests of humans against the onslaught of corporate and special interest legislation. 

If he ran as an independent, there would be no chance for Democratic Nominee to win. That is just the demographics of the Democratic Party - which is made up of progressives and liberals. He knows an independent run would cause the Democratic Party to lose a generation of progressives and doom the Party irrelevance. No one wants that. 

There are two lanes in the Democratic Party - the Progressive and the liberal (Establishment).

There is a conservative/former Republican wing, but it is miniscule. And there is a VIP special access lane for Bloomberg.

The former-Republican wing has an ideologic belief system incompatible with Democratic Party values.

The Progressives and the Establishment all subscribe to Democratic Party values. They are the two peas in the Democratic Party pod. We don't want to lose that - ever. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bad_teammate

bad_teammate 13132

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, PenelopeWitherspoon said:

However, he sits in Congress as an Independent. Why run as the Democratic nominee????

The northeast has a much longer history of third parties caucusing with major parties and independents caucusing in major parties. It's not a big deal and it doesn't really mean anything.

Here's where party membership matters...

1) "Can I rely on your vote?"

Bernie's a reliable vote for Democrats and always has been. He could call himself Spicy Taco Party Candidate and it doesn't change the reality of his actual support for progressive legislation.

2) "Will you work with me on legislation?"

See above.

3) "Will you raise money for me?"

This is the big one for DC snakes, and it's where Bernie breaks apart. He is not going to do the rubber chicken circuit for the DNC. He's not going to pretend to like talking to vultures and scumbags and oligarchs. He's not going to play ball with the fatcats.

This is why "HE'S NOT A REAL DEMOCRAT!" people hate him, because he sees corruption within the party and rejects that corruption. So those who have embraced the corruption hate him for his "purity" and mock him for his values, consistency, and forthrightness.

Votes? He's your guy and he's with you as reliably as someone who calls themselves a Democrat.
Sucking Bill Gates's dick? You can do that on your own, he ain't helping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PenelopeWitherspoon

PenelopeWitherspoon 19092

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, washparkhorn said:

It's a good question. Bernie Sanders is a Democratic Party member. He agrees to the loyalty oath to support the nominee. That is required of every candidate. 

Sanders and the Democratic Party have worked together for years. He is an FDR-Democrat or more modernly called a progressive. Schumer and Reid endorsed his Senate run. He is known for protecting the interests of humans against the onslaught of corporate and special interest legislation. 

If he ran as an independent, there would be no chance for Democratic Nominee to win. That is just the demographics of the Democratic Party - which is made up of progressives and liberals. He knows an independent run would cause the Democratic Party to lose a generation of progressives and doom the Party irrelevance. No one wants that. 

There are two lanes in the Democratic Party - the Progressive and the liberal (Establishment).

There is a conservative/former Republican wing, but it is miniscule. And there is a VIP special access lane for Bloomberg.

The former-Republican wing has an ideologic belief system incompatible with Democratic Party values.

The Progressives and the Establishment all subscribe to Democratic Party values. They are the two peas in the Democratic Party pod. We don't want to lose that - ever. 

 

7 hours ago, bad_teammate said:

The northeast has a much longer history of third parties caucusing with major parties and independents caucusing in major parties. It's not a big deal and it doesn't really mean anything.

Here's where party membership matters...

1) "Can I rely on your vote?"

Bernie's a reliable vote for Democrats and always has been. He could call himself Spicy Taco Party Candidate and it doesn't change the reality of his actual support for progressive legislation.

2) "Will you work with me on legislation?"

See above.

3) "Will you raise money for me?"

This is the big one for DC snakes, and it's where Bernie breaks apart. He is not going to do the rubber chicken circuit for the DNC. He's not going to pretend to like talking to vultures and scumbags and oligarchs. He's not going to play ball with the fatcats.

This is why "HE'S NOT A REAL DEMOCRAT!" people hate him, because he sees corruption within the party and rejects that corruption. So those who have embraced the corruption hate him for his "purity" and mock him for his values, consistency, and forthrightness.

Votes? He's your guy and he's with you as reliably as someone who calls themselves a Democrat.
Sucking Bill Gates's dick? You can do that on your own, he ain't helping.

I appreciate both of these answers.  Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bad_teammate

bad_teammate 13132

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, Cheeseweasel said:

Yeah, that's not a bug, it's a feature.

That's not "harassment".

Yep, just someone who is refusing to read basic social cues either out of a general social ignorance or a white person's feeling of primacy.

Doesn't look like a winning strategy for that Warren caucuser.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cheeseweasel

Cheeseweasel 26437

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, bad_teammate said:

Yep, just someone who is refusing to read basic social cues either out of a general social ignorance or a white person's feeling of primacy.

Doesn't look like a winning strategy for that Warren caucuser.

Agreed. But isn't the point of a caucus to try to convince people to move to your candidate? Should you do that by ESP?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...