Elon Musk: Officially a fraud and piece of shit. Official or unofficial war criminal?

[atomheartbevo 89,842]

2 hours ago, workswithseed said:

Facebook isn't that far away.

Yeah, but you can only trawl your old high school graduating class's page for so long before your spouse finds out or your classmates start talking. Or you start running out of available classmates.

[workswithseed 2,123]

6 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

Yeah, but you can only trawl your old high school graduating class's page for so long before your spouse finds out or your classmates start talking. Or you start running out of available classmates.

He never said a thing about screwing them.

[atomheartbevo 89,842]

1 minute ago, workswithseed said:

He never said a thing about screwing them.

Neither did I.

[McCroskey 1,492]

11 minutes ago, Chopper said:

"looking at the other traits you can pretty much put any career member of Congress or politician in there and all would qualify for all four remaining traits."

You're like an idiot machine that keeps on repeating versions of the stupid talking points its heard over the years. 

I'm sorry I'm not as enlightened as you, but keep your finger clicking on that neg rep...it's doing you wonders.  Notice I haven't hit you once.

[Sawbonz 27,614]

3 minutes ago, McCroskey said:

I'm sorry I'm not as enlightened as you, but keep your finger clicking on that neg rep...it's doing you wonders.  Notice I haven't hit you once.

Have you ever taken an IQ test?

[McCroskey 1,492]

4 minutes ago, Sawbonz said:

Have you ever taken an IQ test?

No.

[956 Worldwide 34,802]

7 hours ago, McCroskey said:

"you people."  LOL.

I don't disagree with you, "normal" has long been billionaires wielding tremendous influence behind the scenes, which absolutely includes the targeting of specific laws, industries, people, and positions they don't like or that challenge their philosophies or ways of life.  It is very different this time being put on full display.  We shall see what difference it amounts to, personally I don't think a lot happens.

I don’t understand what you’re arguing. Are you trying to say that in the past,  Bill Gates or Warren Buffet advocated behind the scenes for the execution of NSC staffers they had beef with?  Is this based on anything other than repeat viewings of House of Cards?  

[Hefeweizen 5,339]

8 hours ago, Sawbonz said:

Have you ever taken an IQ test?

Blutarsky?

[McCroskey 1,492]

1 hour ago, 956 Worldwide said:

I don’t understand what you’re arguing. Are you trying to say that in the past,  Bill Gates or Warren Buffet advocated behind the scenes for the execution of NSC staffers they had beef with?  Is this based on anything other than repeat viewings of House of Cards?  

Honestly, how would anyone ever really know but no, that's not what I'm saying happened in the past nor do I remotely worry about any real form of literal human executions happening now because someone interpreted something wrong and created a "scary sounding" narrative that's gone viral.  What I'm saying is that both parties have always been heavily influenced by billionaires and even in this election cycle, more billionaires supported Kamala at last check than did Trump, and it really wasn't close.

[Captainant 27,847]

4 minutes ago, McCroskey said:

Honestly, how would anyone ever really know but no, that's not what I'm saying happened in the past nor do I remotely worry about any real form of literal human executions happening now because someone interpreted something wrong and created a "scary sounding" narrative that's gone viral.  What I'm saying is that both parties have always been heavily influenced by billionaires and even in this election cycle, more billionaires supported Kamala at last check than did Trump, and it really wasn't close.

Man you really need to not get your information exclusively from Twitter. Pronghorn out front shoulda told ya 

[TwiceHorn 31,582]

9 hours ago, Chopper said:

What in the actual fuck is wrong with you? 

Well, he's not wrong.  We got to get the money out of politics somehow.

I'm not even 100% sure he's a Trump supporter, but he clearly believes that "we" (opposite of "you people") are overreacting to the threat Trump poses.  I'd like to believe that too, because Trump is this unique and bizarre combo of overgrown toddler and savant and you kind of never know which one you're going to get.

He was mostly ineffectual in his first term, because he REALLY didn't know what he was doing.  Now he kind of does.  I am more worried about the manipulators and ideologues than the incompetents that mostly comprise his cabinet picks.  But it's probably the assistants and deputies that get more shit done than the Secretaries.  And that's scary.

[TwiceHorn 31,582]

Funny thing about Musk, I can't wholly discount the success he has had with multiple and diverse ventures.  Something is going on with that guy, although I don't know what, exactly.

But, for the last few years, he seems to have changed.  He espouses this crazy hard work, yet for years now seems to be putting in less than 100 hour weeks shitposting on twatterx.  I find it difficult to believe that the more recent Musk brings anything of value to a business, besides money.

[atomheartbevo 89,842]

https://www.pcgamer.com/gaming-industry/elon-musk-says-too-many-game-studios-are-owned-by-giant-corporations-so-his-giant-corporation-is-going-to-start-a-studio-to-make-games-great-again/

Elon Musk says too many game studios are owned by giant corporations so his giant corporation is going to start a studio to 'make games great again'

Quote

X owner Elon Musk has taken a brief break from posting racism, transphobia, and conspiracy theory nonsense to say that gaming has become too "woke" because the industry is dominated by massive corporations, and so he is going to use his own massive corporation to start a new game studio powered by AI "to make games great again!"

Quote

Musk's latest outburst came in response to Dogecoin co-creator Billy Markus, who said he doesn't understand how game developers and journalists have become "so ideologically captured," particularly given that gamers—real gamers, one must assume—"have always rejected dumb manipulative BS, and can tell when someone is an outsider poser."

"Too many game studios that are owned by massive corporations," said Musk, the owner of X, SpaceX, and Tesla, whose personal net worth is somewhere north of $322 billion. "xAI is going to start an AI game studio to make games great again!" Lest there be any doubt about his motivations, Musk wrote in another post, "Can't they just make good games and skip the woke lecture?"

Edited 5 hours ago by atomheartbevo

[NoName 16,409]

1 hour ago, atomheartbevo said:

https://www.pcgamer.com/gaming-industry/elon-musk-says-too-many-game-studios-are-owned-by-giant-corporations-so-his-giant-corporation-is-going-to-start-a-studio-to-make-games-great-again/

Elon Musk says too many game studios are owned by giant corporations so his giant corporation is going to start a studio to 'make games great again'

He's absolutely going to do an AI generated game that is horrific and has both bad reviews on steam and meta critic and gets pulled from the market.

It's going to be so broken.

I'm here for it. Video game development is HARD
 

[Rex Kramer 1,371]

18 hours ago, Captainant said:

I'm quoting musk

Why are you paying attention to an assclown?  Why are you on Twitter?  He is winning. 

[atomheartbevo 89,842]

28 minutes ago, NoName said:

He's absolutely going to do an AI generated game that is horrific and has both bad reviews on steam and meta critic and gets pulled from the market.

It's going to be so broken.

I'm here for it. Video game development is HARD

Given that his AI is trained on Twitter, it’s going to be racist as fuck.

[NoName 16,409]

40 minutes ago, NoName said:

He's absolutely going to do an AI generated game that is horrific and has both bad reviews on steam and meta critic and gets pulled from the market.

It's going to be so broken.

I'm here for it. Video game development is HARD
 

Incredible 

Great news. Doesn't like doing woke crime in video games but is ok with crime in real life?

 

 

[Hefeweizen 5,339]

He should hire Curt Schilling to run his game studio.

[atomheartbevo 89,842]

18 minutes ago, Hefeweizen said:

He should hire Curt Schilling to run his game studio.

[Chopper 17,295]

4 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Well, he's not wrong.  We got to get the money out of politics somehow.

I'm not even 100% sure he's a Trump supporter, but he clearly believes that "we" (opposite of "you people") are overreacting to the threat Trump poses.  I'd like to believe that too, because Trump is this unique and bizarre combo of overgrown toddler and savant and you kind of never know which one you're going to get.

He was mostly ineffectual in his first term, because he REALLY didn't know what he was doing.  Now he kind of does.  I am more worried about the manipulators and ideologues than the incompetents that mostly comprise his cabinet picks.  But it's probably the assistants and deputies that get more shit done than the Secretaries.  And that's scary.

This was his statement to which you quoted my response:  "DC is still MOSTLY made up of lobbyists, that needs to change."

Looking at its most basic meaning, it's absolutely fucking asinine. DC isn't in fact "mostly lobbyists." It's a city with more residents than the state of Wyoming but with zero electoral votes. Are there many lobbyists who work there? Sure. Do they form even a majority of its people? No. I'd wager most of the registered lobbyists don't even live within the DC limits.

On a larger scope, there's the implication that we need to get rid of lobbyists. The purpose of lobbying is to petition government. It's based on the constitutional rights to free speech and petition the government. You're not going to get rid of lobbyists. More people and organizations than "lobbyists" petition government. Elon Musk, for example, isn't a lobbyist. Neither is the National Organization for Women. Elonia wasn't acting as a lobbyist when he and his apartheidist fiends spent almost a Billion dollars to elect a convicted fraudster, an adjudged rapist and a fascist who already tried once to overthrow the US government. Lobbying isn't the issue. Our country's biggest issues are at the core of the basic definition of Democracy. 

The republican controlled Supreme Court in a series of decisions over several years has absolutely decimated any realistic possibility of getting HUGE money out of politics. People and businesses have almost zero limits on spending in elections. It would take a huge leap and almost essentially require the annihilation of cunts like Elonia, his billionaire friends, and a good portion of the republican members of the US Senate and House. Drumpf's friends are the types who buy legislators, and who get 3/4-regarded fucks like Tommy Tuberville elected because he'll always vote their way. Notice I am purposely leaving out Bill Gates and the scary Jewish guys your man named, who are not at all in the same fight for direct influence and dominance. Equating those people is not only wrong it's incredibly ignorant. 

Edited 1 hour ago by Chopper

[mchookem 16,412]

18 hours ago, atomheartbevo said:

Who knew the public town square of discussion on the internet consists of a lot of profiles of women with unnaturally smooth skin telling you that their pussy is in their bio?

 

 

[956 Worldwide 34,802]

3 hours ago, Rex Kramer said:

Why are you paying attention to an assclown?  Why are you on Twitter?  He is winning. 

Unfortunately Musk has purchased his way to the right hand of the president-elect, resulting in an appointment to an extra-governmental organization charged with fundamentally dismantling multiple institutions.  His tweets about fighter jets knocked close to 4% off the value of a major defense contractor’s stock. It’s real life, although your take is very much in line with the type of people who treat politics and national security like a TV show you can turn off.  They end up being extremely irresponsible with their civic liberties.