Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Honestly I won’t be mad if they leave us out. Every year teams whine and cry about being left out for someone else, dicky v comes on and “it’s a travestyyyyy babbbyyy” about some school that missed out on being an 11 seed and getting beat the first weekend. Our coach fucking blows is the biggest issue Texas had. Maybe don’t lose to fucking South Carolina at the very least and we wouldn’t be in this situation to begin with. Q1 wins vs OOC sos arguments are fucking dumb. Who cares. Fucking win 2 more conference games and we’re not arguing about shit. I wanna go to the tourney but I’m not upset if we don’t. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 2
Posted
13 hours ago, ATXbronco said:

When's the signing deadline for the 2025 class?
Crazy to see Texas ranked way down at #74 overall.

https://247sports.com/Season/2025-Basketball/CompositeTeamRankings/

 

Aggies are #34, for reference.

 

Thank you, John for being our only 2025 commit.  You might get some early playing time.

image.thumb.png.5dbe44ce4fa75efa69319423610c9e1e.png

If anything, this is the thing that will bury RT. He won't have players unless they're Portal.

Posted

Seth Davis gets it. 

https://x.com/SethDavisHoops/status/1900667773019181481

I forgot tweets don't post anymore but here's what Seth Davis tweeted. 

"This loss drops Texas to 7-11 vs Quad 1. UNC is 1-11. I don't understand why anyone would have the Heels ahead of the Longhorns no matter what happens vs Duke. Also Xavier is 2-9 v Q1, Indiana is 4-13, SDSU is 3-6. I think the Horns are in."

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted (edited)

And not just under .500, we are 6-12. It’s not like 8-10, our conf winning % is .333

We spent YEARS mocking SEC bias in postseason bids and now we demand to be included bc we are 6-12 in conf play, but in the SEC now

 

Edited by Js1
Posted
Just now, Js1 said:

Q1 wins is not the end all, be all. We are under 500 in conf play and a horrible NCSOS. Zero non-conf wins of note 

The committee has emphasized many times they don't prioritize conference record due to unbalanced schedules and disparities in strength of conferences.

It's why a 6-18 aggy softball team made the postseason in '22. 

Posted
Just now, Rickylovesweed said:

The committee has emphasized many times they don't prioritize conference record due to unbalanced schedules and disparities in strength of conferences.

It's why a 6-18 aggy softball team made the postseason in '22. 

And that team should not have gotten a bit. Neither should we at this point - maybe if we beat UConn or scheduled a little tougher in non-conf play, but we did the exact thing we make fun of teams for doing, stacking wins against cupcakes and then being under .500 in conf play 

Posted
Just now, Js1 said:

And not just under .500, we are 6-12. It’s not like 8-10, our conf winning % is .333

We spent YEARS mocking SEC bias in postseason bids and now we demand to be included bc we are 6-12 in conf play, but in the SEC now

 

Yeah, but that's why we should get in.

The committee has never prioritized conference record. Now we should be punished for it? I won't be mad if we get left out because if you're on the bubble that's your fault but reality is our resume is clearly good enough to get in based on the objective data the committee says they prioritize. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

This is why we will likely get in or should get in based on the metrics the committee prioritizes. https://www.ncaa.org/news/2025/3/10/media-center-debunking-ncaa-tournament-myths.aspx

1) Myth No. 3: Winning 20 games guarantees a tournament spot
Reality: There is no magic number of wins that automatically secures an NCAA tournament bid. The committees evaluate the quality of a team's wins and losses rather than focusing solely on win totals. A team with 20 or more wins but a weak schedule or few Quadrant 1 victories may still be left out, while a team with fewer wins but a strong resume of quality victories could earn an at-large bid.
 
Myth No. 10: A winning conference record ensures a bid
Reality: Having a winning record in conference play does not automatically result in a tournament bid. The committees look at each team's complete body of work in their evaluations. A team with a 10-8 record in a weak conference may be left out, while a team with an 8-10 record with significant Quadrant 1 wins could still make the cut.
 
It's really clear they prioritize Quad 1 wins. At least that's what they promote. 
Posted
21 minutes ago, Pancho said:

We are the 3rd team out of the latest bracketology

Just saw that. What changed after the aggy win for us to move down in his eyes? Texas and unc lost yesterday and both dropped. I figured we would need one more win to make us a lock and not just the aggy win. Either way we fucked ourselves during conference play. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Rockethorn1978 said:

Just saw that. What changed after the aggy win for us to move down in his eyes? Texas and unc lost yesterday and both dropped. I figured we would need one more win to make us a lock and not just the aggy win. Either way we fucked ourselves during conference play. 

We have 15 losses.

We should miss the tournament.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
5 minutes ago, Rickylovesweed said:

Also of note, no team in the NET era with at least 7 Quad one wins has ever missed the tournament.

We would be the first team in the NET era to miss the tournament with at least 7 quad one wins. 

Sounds like good drama for the Entertainment folks.

Posted
3 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

How many 15 loss teams have received at large bids since over the last 30 years?

Besides Michigan State last season?

Should I do the checking or do you want to?

  • Haha 5
Posted
39 minutes ago, Js1 said:

And not just under .500, we are 6-12. It’s not like 8-10, our conf winning % is .333

We spent YEARS mocking SEC bias in postseason bids and now we demand to be included bc we are 6-12 in conf play, but in the SEC now

 

Who here is demanding to be included? I dont think anyone here cares all that much. Should we be in, yes. Will we be in, probably. Will I care if we arent in? No

Posted
1 minute ago, Slacks said:

Besides Michigan State last season?

Should I do the checking or do you want to?

My bad .. that 15 includes the tourney loss. They lost 14 prior.

Posted
Just now, Slacks said:

Besides Michigan State last season?

Should I do the checking or do you want to?

Yup, teams with a bunch of losses make the tournament every year.

Do you want a 11 loss Xavier or 13 loss North Carolina team to make it over us simply because they played in a much easier conference and beat absolutely nobody all year. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Slacks said:

Besides Michigan State last season?

Should I do the checking or do you want to?

Looks like 19-14 West Virginia was a 9 seed in 2023 

So for at least the last 2 tournaments a team with 14 losses was a 9 seed 

Edited by MotownHorn
Posted
1 minute ago, Rickylovesweed said:

Yup, teams with a bunch of losses make the tournament every year.

Do you want a 11 loss Xavier or 13 loss North Carolina team to make it over us simply because they played in a much easier conference and beat absolutely nobody all year. 

Those teams notwithstanding, do you honestly believe this Texas team deserves a bid?

 

Posted
Just now, David Dennison said:

Those teams notwithstanding, do you honestly believe this Texas team deserves a bid?

 

yes, our resume is better than the teams on the bubble based on the metrics the committee says they prioritize.

The bubble sucks. Do you think these teams are final 4 type teams? UNC is 1-12 against Q1 teams but you would rather them make the tournament with their 13 losses?

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, David Dennison said:

Those teams notwithstanding, do you honestly believe this Texas team deserves a bid?

 

It doesnt matter if we do or dont. When you get down to the last few teams, none of them deserve a bid lol. Just let the chips fall where they may. We have Tre Johnson, an NBA caliber talent and they will want to showcase him on national TV for a play in game. We will get in. Book it. 

Posted
Just now, The_Great_Hornsby said:

It doesnt matter if we do or dont. When you get down to the last few teams, none of them deserve a bid lol. Just let the chips fall where they may. We have Tre Johnson, an NBA caliber talent and they will want to showcase him on national TV for a play in game. We will get in. Book it. 

True. I just want to know with 100% certainty that we're getting a new coach.

The tournament leaves that door open.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Rickylovesweed said:

yes, our resume is better than the teams on the bubble based on the metrics the committee says they prioritize.

The bubble sucks. Do you think these teams are final 4 type teams? UNC is 1-12 against Q1 teams but you would rather them make the tournament with their 13 losses?

I just want a new coach. Both of those teams are pretty, pretty, pretty meh.

At least we have Tre Johnson, so a Sweet Sixteen run isn't out of the realm of possibility.

And that means Rodney Terry is back.

#Conflicted

Posted
Just now, David Dennison said:

I just want a new coach. Both of those teams are pretty, pretty, pretty meh.

At least we have Tre Johnson, so a Sweet Sixteen run isn't out of the realm of possibility.

And that means Rodney Terry is back.

#Conflicted

I want a new coach too but I'll never be one to argue against us making the tournament especially in this context.

Xavier and UNC have beaten absolutely nobody all year. It's insane anybody thinks they should get in over us. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

I just want a new coach. Both of those teams are pretty, pretty, pretty meh.

At least we have Tre Johnson, so a Sweet Sixteen run isn't out of the realm of possibility.

And that means Rodney Terry is back.

#Conflicted

Sweet 16 and he doesnt keep his job. I am not even sure an elite 8 run would allow him to keep it. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

I just want a new coach. Both of those teams are pretty, pretty, pretty meh.

At least we have Tre Johnson, so a Sweet Sixteen run isn't out of the realm of possibility.

And that means Rodney Terry is back.

#Conflicted

There isn't going to be a sweet 16 run 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
Just now, Rickylovesweed said:

Sweet 16 isn't happening because if we do make the tournament we're almost certainly going to have to play a first 4 game.

So 3 games in a short amount of time assuming we even advance that far. 

When is the last time Texas played their best ball for 3 straight games? Not once this season. lol

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Js1 said:

Q1 wins is not the end all, be all. We are under 500 in conf play and a horrible NCSOS. Zero non-conf wins of note 

Getting back to this, Q1 wins aren't "the end all" but definitely the most important factor in selection. At least in past years.

When aggy missed the tournament in '22 the reasoning given by the NCAA selection chair was the 4-10 Q1 record for aggy. Specifically, they didn't win enough Q1 games.

They were the 1st team out that year. 

 

Edited by Rickylovesweed
Posted

Sweet 16? Lmao. RT sucks and he didn’t build a sweet 16 roster. We don’t have the team to make it that far. At some point our shitty offensive identity of one on one bullshit will assist us to a loss. If we even get in and I don’t think we will, I’ll be surprised if we win 1 game much less the 3 it will take to make the S16. 

Posted
Just now, Rockethorn1978 said:

Sweet 16? Lmao. RT sucks and he didn’t build a sweet 16 roster. We don’t have the team to make it that far. At some point our shitty offensive identity of one on one bullshit will assist us to a loss. If we even get in and I don’t think we will, I’ll be surprised if we win 1 game much less the 3 it will take to make the S16. 

Very unlikely it happens but weird shit happens in the tournament. Which is why you always want to make it. 

We would play a mediocre team in the first 4, then a 4 or 5 seed in the round of 64, then pray for an upset so we get an easy opponent in the round of 32. 1 first round upset and you're potentially only playing one top 30 caliber team in those 3 gmaes. 

Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, Rockethorn1978 said:

Sweet 16? Lmao. RT sucks and he didn’t build a sweet 16 roster. We don’t have the team to make it that far. At some point our shitty offensive identity of one on one bullshit will assist us to a loss. If we even get in and I don’t think we will, I’ll be surprised if we win 1 game much less the 3 it will take to make the S16. 

I think we absolutely have a sweet 16  roster. We don’t have a sweet 16 coach.

Edited by Hank_Hill
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

I just want a new coach. Both of those teams are pretty, pretty, pretty meh.

At least we have Tre Johnson, so a Sweet Sixteen run isn't out of the realm of possibility.

And that means Rodney Terry is back.

#Conflicted

There should be no conflict. The only thing he can do to keep his job is take us further in the tournament than we’ve been in decades; which would be fucking awesome and worthy of another year.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
45 minutes ago, The_Great_Hornsby said:

Sweet 16 and he doesnt keep his job. I am not even sure an elite 8 run would allow him to keep it. 

When was the last time a coach was fired after leading his team to the Sweet Sixteen? Tubby Smith at Minnesota?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Hank_Hill said:

I think we absolutely have a sweet 16  roster. We don’t have a sweet 16 coach.

No we don’t. We have no big men. Larry and Kent both suck. Mark and kaluma were great pick ups. Pope is so inconsistent it’s mind blowing. Our coach sucks at preparing and making in game adjustments and he can’t build a roster that makes sense because he doesn’t even have a identity to build around.

Just now, David Dennison said:

When was the last time a coach was fired after leading his team to the Sweet Sixteen? Tubby Smith at Minnesota?

Nc state made the final four and gets fired the next year. Let’s stop being pussies about having to keep guys around because of the optics.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

This team will be lucky to make the tournament 

This team is not winning 3 games to make the sweet 16 (bc we’ll be a play-in team)

Texas being in the play-in should be an auto firing. How embarrassing 

  • Hook 'Em 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...