Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Andrew- I’m so happy for you Gabe 

me- Shit- did l inadvertently text you instead of my wife when I was talking about looking hot with big boobs and wanting to bang last night

Andrew- uh- no- they called Forest Whitley up 

me- that’s way better than banging my wife  we need to do an emergency podcast right now  

him- it’s 1:30 and I’m in the middle of meetings  

me- I’m on a sidewalk in front of the whitehouse- we should still do this  

I don’t think he gets the importance of today  

 

Edited by Wulaw Horn
  • Like 2
  • Haha 6
Posted
3 minutes ago, n64ra said:

It's bad for the setup pitcher and the closer to both have ERAs north of 9.3, right?

Only if you presuppose the setup pitcher and closer aren’t supposed to give up ~1 run per inning 

Posted
1 hour ago, Wulaw Horn said:

Andrew- I’m so happy for you Gabe 

me- Shit- did l inadvertently text you instead of my wife when I was talking about looking hot with big boobs and wanting to bang last night

Andrew- uh- no- they called Forest Whitley up 

me- that’s way better than banging my wife  we need to do an emergency podcast right now  

him- it’s 1:30 and I’m in the middle of meetings  

me- I’m on a sidewalk in front of the whitehouse- we should still do this  

I don’t think he gets the importance of today  

 

Can't see the Forrest for the trees? 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Scraps said:

Not sure i agree with that

The ball hit the railing. So stupid that we have the HR line going UP on the railing from the Crawford Boxes. Just make a HR the same height as the Crawford Boxes the entire outfield. Fucking remnant of the Tal’s Hill screwy aesthetic that needs to be completely flushed.

Edited by Macklemore
Posted (edited)

I could understand if they couldn't tell if it hit anything else and wouldn't reverse the call, but 'confirming it' is bullshit.

OK that was a crazy ricochet off Acuna on Pena's popup..

Edited by wood
Posted
I could understand if they couldn't tell if it hit anything else and wouldn't reverse the call, but 'confirming it' is bullshit.
OK that was a crazy ricochet off Acuna on Pena's popup..
hit the top of the yellow rail thats it.

Ball hits top of wall on yellow and comes back into play its a double. We literally just had that happen a few games back.

So how is a ball that hits that yellow line and bounces into field not a double? Just because the yellow line is in a dumbass spot shouldn't change the ruling unless something specific in MMP ground rules.

It did not hit the back wall or railing from the angle I am at

I was trying to find a good replay to confirm what I saw but they all shut off before showing it in slo mo.

What are the two Space City dorks saying about it?

dc9aadb3aa21bb6a1ad9ba6e7fdca4a1.jpg
Posted
4 minutes ago, Scraps said:

hit the top of the yellow rail thats it.

Ball hits top of wall on yellow and comes back into play its a double. We literally just had that happen a few games back.

So how is a ball that hits that yellow line and bounces into field not a double? Just because the yellow line is in a dumbass spot shouldn't change the ruling unless something specific in MMP ground rules.

It did not hit the back wall or railing from the angle I am at

I was trying to find a good replay to confirm what I saw but they all shut off before showing it in slo mo.

What are the two Space City dorks saying about it?

dc9aadb3aa21bb6a1ad9ba6e7fdca4a1.jpg

It hit the relentless sign on the ricochet 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Scraps said:

hit the top of the yellow rail thats it.

Ball hits top of wall on yellow and comes back into play its a double. We literally just had that happen a few games back.

So how is a ball that hits that yellow line and bounces into field not a double? Just because the yellow line is in a dumbass spot shouldn't change the ruling unless something specific in MMP ground rules.

It did not hit the back wall or railing from the angle I am at

I was trying to find a good replay to confirm what I saw but they all shut off before showing it in slo mo.

What are the two Space City dorks saying about it?

dc9aadb3aa21bb6a1ad9ba6e7fdca4a1.jpg

What you said.

 

Kalas after hearing the ump say : “call is confirmed. It’s a home run.”

 

”no it’s not?!”

 

 

I do want an explanation after the game

 

i also want our manager to go out and get an explanation real time, but alas 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Scraps said:

hit the top of the yellow rail thats it.

Ball hits top of wall on yellow and comes back into play its a double. We literally just had that happen a few games back.

So how is a ball that hits that yellow line and bounces into field not a double? Just because the yellow line is in a dumbass spot shouldn't change the ruling unless something specific in MMP ground rules.

It did not hit the back wall or railing from the angle I am at

I was trying to find a good replay to confirm what I saw but they all shut off before showing it in slo mo.

What are the two Space City dorks saying about it?
 

100%, I agree. IMHO it didn't hit anything else outside the field and should have been a GR 2B. Now they just clarified that the ruling merely stands and is not confirmed. Which is still incorrect, but I can at least live with the logic.

  • Like 1
Posted
It hit the relentless sign on the ricochet 
Yeah definitely didnt see that. If thats thw case then easy homer call. Chas reaction didnt make it seem like it hit it either

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...