Can we agree on the no Bulverism rule?

[Bozo_Casanova 26284]

Seems like a good rule

[RDCanecutter 26282]

You only dislike Bulverism because of your anger at anything having to do with freedom.

[hpslugga 4044]

Good luck with that one

[HornGrandioso 22]

Next, Bozo will want to impose a no strawmen rule because he wants to ban all argument and dissent like Hitler did. 

 

 

[ROFL BOX 6647]

Only if I can mansplain everything to the Bulverists.

[bernorange 8348]

You don't own me! (Don't taze me, bro!)

[Mo Horn 8807]

 I'm gonna assume you're wrong, and let me explain why... surly gonna surly. 

[pyrohornIII 4809]

isn't that surly gonna surl?

 

[InkaUtexas 25523]

Whats wrong with Bulivar? 

[High Plains Drifter 10978]

wtf is bulverism

[Anastasis 23394]

I like @bolverk and don't know why you want to ban him already. 

[FondrenRoad 4378]

15 minutes ago, High Plains Drifter said:

wtf is bulverism

If High Plains Drifter said it, it must be wrong.  

[RDCanecutter 26282]

The next worthless shoplifting child molester who protests ad hominem attacks will be mocked.

[Brisketexan 104628]

All the best whores are found on the Bulivard.

[hpslugga 4044]

When I say let's go to a place live Bulivia, let's go to a place like Bulivia.

[bolverk 29403]

3 hours ago, Anastasis said:

I like @bolverk and don't know why you want to ban him already. 

I can totally understand why pale goth chicks and stabby witches with A cups aren't everyone's cup of tea, but why the hell you gotta call on my banning, Bozo?

Hell, fuck it.

Fatwa on all the playa clowns! You will rue the day, Bozo. I said it, RUE.THE.DAY.

[SmokeyTheBear 5562]

The Shag Surl was built on a foundation of bulverism. Without it, there is no us, no Shag Surl. Why do you hate us? 

[kevwun 15653]

You can have my bulverism when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.

[Biff Tannen 45499]

3 minutes ago, bolverk said:

I can totally understand why pale goth chicks and stabby witches with A cups aren't everyone's cup of tea, but why the hell you gotta call on my banning, Bozo?

Hell, fuck it.

Fatwa on all the playa clowns! You will rue the day, Bozo. I said it, RUE.THE.DAY.

Rue the day?  Who talks like that?

[bolverk 29403]

4 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

Rue the day?  Who talks like that?

[Bozo_Casanova 26284]

3 hours ago, Biff Tannen said:

Rue the day?  Who talks like that?

You just stole my joke because you don’t want Bolverk to find love.

[washparkhorn 9935]

Can we all agree Trickle Down (tax cuts for the rich) is a bullshit theory? 

https://academic.oup.com/ser/article/20/2/539/6500315?login=false

Abstract

The last 50 years has seen a dramatic decline in taxes on the rich across the advanced democracies. There is still fervent debate in both political and academic circles, however, about the economic consequences of this sweeping change in tax policy.
 

This article contributes to this debate by utilizing a newly constructed indicator of taxes on the rich to identify all instances of major tax reductions on the rich in 18 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries between 1965 and 2015.

We then estimate the average effects of these major tax reforms on key macroeconomic aggregates.

We find tax cuts for the rich lead to higher income inequality in both the short- and medium-term. In contrast, such reforms do not have any significant effect on economic growth or unemployment.

Our results therefore provide strong evidence against the influential political–economic idea that tax cuts for the rich ‘trickle down’ to boost the wider economy.

[Blotto 23434]

13 minutes ago, washparkhorn said:

Can we all agree Trickle Down (tax cuts for the rich) is a bullshit theory? 

Agree??? Major lulz.

Half of us have always known Trickle Down was fucking bullshit. Its the single biggest contributor to the income/wealth inequality in this country, which is the biggest driving force behind all of the problems in this country. The rich get richer while everyone else gets fucking pissed and is looking for someone to blame. 

The other half of the country will be too busy sucking orange cock in anticipation of future tax cuts for the rich to bother reading your fancy words.

Edited August 10, 2022 by Blotto

[Post Oak 20187]

4 year bump.  I love this place

[Biff Tannen 45499]

6 minutes ago, Post Oak said:

4 year bump.  I love this place

I just like that the bump has nothing to do with the subject of the thread.  I think.  What is bulverism anyway?

[gmr548 16517]

Can we all agree Trickle Down (tax cuts for the rich) is a bulshit theory?

FIFY

['stache 21774]

1 hour ago, washparkhorn said:

Can we all agree Trickle Down (tax cuts for the rich) is a bullshit theory? 

https://academic.oup.com/ser/article/20/2/539/6500315?login=false

Abstract

The last 50 years has seen a dramatic decline in taxes on the rich across the advanced democracies. There is still fervent debate in both political and academic circles, however, about the economic consequences of this sweeping change in tax policy.
 

This article contributes to this debate by utilizing a newly constructed indicator of taxes on the rich to identify all instances of major tax reductions on the rich in 18 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries between 1965 and 2015.

We then estimate the average effects of these major tax reforms on key macroeconomic aggregates.

We find tax cuts for the rich lead to higher income inequality in both the short- and medium-term. In contrast, such reforms do not have any significant effect on economic growth or unemployment.

Our results therefore provide strong evidence against the influential political–economic idea that tax cuts for the rich ‘trickle down’ to boost the wider economy.

So I see Duh Magazine has expanded from medicine to economics as well?

[washparkhorn 9935]

3 hours ago, Blotto said:

The other half of the country will be too busy sucking orange cock in anticipation of future tax cuts for the rich to bother reading your fancy words.

Not that I disagree (because I agree with you), but this is an example of Bulverism. 

PPP was trickle down.  Art Laffer continues to speak at Chamber of Commerce meetings. Trump’s tax cuts for the wealthy were trickle down and remain on the books. 

Trickle down economics a big lie, fake news, bullshit. The data is clear. Anyone subscribing to supply-side economics from Reagan and Thatcher to Larry Kudlow and Trump are not heroes. They are/were bullshit artists making money for their rich donors.