Jump to content

Transfer Cycle 2024-2025 - A Panoply of Dipshits, Running Amok

closetojumping

By closetojumping
in 🤫$9.95🤫

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Teryor
Teryor

Need their depth chart at WR but also HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

CashMcCoy
CashMcCoy

Spence is in  

Ricky's one-hitter
Ricky's one-hitter

Posted Images

Teryor

Teryor 5002

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, victory88 said:

Man, I’d take their WRs.  They were abusing our DBs.  That Moore kid is the first WR that made Manny look like he needed to see the bench.  

I assumed Wesco might be the target since it feels like we conceded Singleton

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RomaVicta

RomaVicta 30578

Posted
Posted

It's interesting that some of the TexAg-gies insist that all the 2022 guys who aren't performing well for the Aggies must be busts. I think, seriously, that it might be a good subject for research by a journalist or maybe a sports scholar. 

What brought those recruits to A&M? I mean look into the spectrum of influences obviously including money but what were the player expectations when they arrived in College Station? What were the other draws?

How did they perform while at A&M?

Did the unruly 5-stars arrive as such (likely) and did the environment culture there propel them further beyond acceptable conduct? 

How many were actual busts in the end no matter where they played? Why did they choose their new schools (see above) and what impact did choosing a school where they didn't stay actually have on them?

Same questions for those who went on to do well. 

I know someone here will give simple answers to those questions ("money" to all of them would be probably least imaginative), but I'd like to know if it's more complex. I suspect it is. I'm not confident that sportswriters are the ones to sift through complication. They're largely dullards.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
Sock Monkey

Sock Monkey 746

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
14 minutes ago, RomaVicta said:

It's interesting that some of the TexAg-gies insist that all the 2022 guys who aren't performing well for the Aggies must be busts. I think, seriously, that it might be a good subject for research by a journalist or maybe a sports scholar. 

What brought those recruits to A&M? I mean look into the spectrum of influences obviously including money but what were the player expectations when they arrived in College Station? What were the other draws?

How did they perform while at A&M?

Did the unruly 5-stars arrive as such (likely) and did the environment culture there propel them further beyond acceptable conduct? 

How many were actual busts in the end no matter where they played? Why did they choose their new schools (see above) and what impact did choosing a school where they didn't stay actually have on them?

Same questions for those who went on to do well. 

I know someone here will give simple answers to those questions ("money" to all of them would be probably least imaginative), but I'd like to know if it's more complex. I suspect it is. I'm not confident that sportswriters are the ones to sift through complication. They're largely dullards.

You sound like the man for the job.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Atticus

Atticus 4214

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, texifornia said:

He's got ties to OU (a gf and maybe something else) that meant he didn't give us the time of day as a recruit. We'd need something to change.

It was his sister, and they had the inside track on him because of that. She is now at UNT, but Wesco has fully drank the Dabo koolaid. I would be absolutely shocked if he transferred out already

  • Hook 'Em 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rickylovesweed

Rickylovesweed 15503

Posted
Posted (edited)

Peter Woods is a monster when healthy. Our gameplan was to run away from him yesterday.

He's the most talented DT in the portal and would be a huge get. Clemson also mishandled Woods this year trying to play him at DE for a lot of snaps when he's clearly a DT. 

Edited by Rickylovesweed
  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
closetojumping

closetojumping 65409

Posted
  • Author
  • Popular Post
Posted
32 minutes ago, Rickylovesweed said:

Peter Woods is a monster when healthy. Our gameplan was to run away from him yesterday.

He's the most talented DT in the portal and would be a huge get. Clemson also mishandled Woods this year trying to play him at DE for a lot of snaps when he's clearly a DT. 

Hold up. Woods is already in the portal? 

If he does enter, he’s the difference maker that they were keeping their powder dry for, I would assume. That would make a great defense next year dominant, given who is coming back already. 

  • Hook 'Em 9
  • Like 2
  • Drool 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rickylovesweed

Rickylovesweed 15503

Posted
Posted
Just now, closetojumping said:

Hold up. Woods is already in the portal? 

If he does enter, he’s the difference maker that they were keeping their powder dry for, I would assume. That would make a great defense next year dominant, given who is coming back already. 

I thought it was from a more official account so maybe he isn't. I think this fan account was just reacting to Woods tweet last night.

I don't think it would be a shocker if Woods enters though. Clemson played him out of position this year and their DC is very meh. Woods transferring has been rumored on their boards for a few weeks.

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
FreeHorn

FreeHorn 1324

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

The WR from Clemson is locked in with Clemson. He not goi g anywhere right now. 
 

Woods hasn’t officially hit the portal, but he is the guy our 9.99 people have been hinting about for a while, especially IT.  I wish they could keep their mouths shut cause there are a few Clemson folks who  don’t believe there is anything to worry about with losing Woods. 
 

Woods’ camp isn’t happy with his usage. He is a DT, not an edge. 

  • Hook 'Em 12
  • Like 1
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
FreeHorn

FreeHorn 1324

Posted
Posted
Just now, Red Five said:

He's like 6'2" 320 lbs right? Why are they messing around with him outside like that?

They had some injuries outside, so they decided to just try to play their best four linemen. He is really athletic so in certain formations they play him outside at edge cause they had better depth at DT versus DE. It’s not full time, but enough snaps for him to show concern about being played incorrectly. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ClubWhatever

ClubWhatever 12302

Posted
Posted
Just now, Rickylovesweed said:

Their defensive coordinator isn't any good. 

I was sitting in front of two Clemson fans.  They wanted him fired and badmouthed him the whole game.  After Blue's long run they were trashing the defensive call, where Clemson stacked the line and had nobody deep.  Thats the play where Sark said Quinn changed the play so I guess they were right.

  • Hook 'Em 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bevo

Bevo 13874

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, Vito Andolini said:

“Peter Woods” is an even better porn name than Buck Naked or even Gil Bang.

I know a guy named Drew Steel - Mormon - Great porn name - He's an oral surgeon, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TexasRenegade

TexasRenegade 2610

Posted
Posted
59 minutes ago, Red Five said:

He's like 6'2" 320 lbs right? Why are they messing around with him outside like that?

The sake reason we played Cedric Woodard at DE in 1999.  Lack of dline depth try to get your best 4 dlinemen on the field. 

 

That said, Humphrey, Rogers, Hampton, Woodard was a great dline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...