Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, ChemicalHorn said:

It’s also one play when looking at it through the scheme of NFL. Fucking painful for us. Not sure if Quinn was just getting ball out quick but that ugly motherfucker had a quiet night before that play.

The Cowboys drafted that scrub Guyton in the first. Good chance Williams will be drafted high (1/2 round) if he declares.

OT is also probably at its highest premium in the NFL in recent memory. The lack of high end tackle talent is a known issue around the league. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

The same “experts” that claim a player isn’t ready will tell you that Shedeur Sanders is a Top 3 pick.  He sucks.  He won’t do shit in the NFL.  He’s slow and has a weak arm.  He’s hyped because the media loves Coach Prime.  

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, Red Five said:

He was very far from 100% last night. This is kind of shitty.

Swing and a miss. Nothing to do with injury, it was bad technique from start to finish. He hesitated because of a LB that was already accounted for by Hutson, took a false step and just got beat straight up.

He's not ready for the NFL and it's incredibly obvious. 

 

Edited by satyanash
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Fuck You 1
  • Rage+1 5
Posted
2 minutes ago, Harvdog said:

The same “experts” that claim a player isn’t ready will tell you that Shedeur Sanders is a Top 3 pick.  He sucks.  He won’t do shit in the NFL.  He’s slow and has a weak arm.  He’s hyped because the media loves Coach Prime.  

I think he could be a really good pro but going to a dumpster fire like the Titans or Browns will not end well.

Posted
18 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Yes. And my post conveys that I thought the same for Williams. 

Ah I got you. Not what I thought at first. We're belaboring that last 4th down but he had a really rough night last night overall. Not the first time Sawyer just smoked him.

OL and QB are the two positions that benefit most from coming back an extra year. I think he could certainly use one to clean up his game. He's going to have an extremely rough rookie year if he declares. But if the NFL is still telling him first round he should obviously go get that bag. Will be interesting.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 hours ago, CosmoDog said:

We need a jumbo running back whose only mission in life is short yardage.

Or even a full back Neanderthal. Or a troglodyte.

Anything to help Sark call simple power runs when needed.

I grow tired of the cute & ineffective red zone play calling.

Sark needs to find someone to play the role of a traditional fullback in goalline sets that’s not just a defensive lineman. I think Baxter and Gibson with another year in the S&C program can be good short yardage backs, but they need someone in front of them to help clear the way.

Posted

Tigerdroppings has a couple of pages all thinking Derek Williams is about to portal to them.  Looks like a bunch of wishful thinking and the LSU On3 mod (Dixon) shot it down.  

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Elmer_Fudd said:

Tigerdroppings has a couple of pages all thinking Derek Williams is about to portal to them.  Looks like a bunch of wishful thinking and the LSU On3 mod (Dixon) shot it down.  

Considering Williams is out for the season, it doesn't make sense for him to wait until the last game to go to the portal. If he was leaving, he would have been in the portal already.

Edited by Danimal
Posted
56 minutes ago, satyanash said:

 

So two accounts of guys I've never heard of. Dane Brugler has him as a late 1st/early 2nd guy. Brugler's probably the best draft guy out there.

  • Hook 'Em 6
Posted
1 hour ago, Tex-19 said:

Now that the season is over, does anyone have the full story on Bond? Was his disappearance really all injury-related or did he get in the dog house? He suited up for almost every game but became essentially non-existent and started getting outsnapped by Wingo who didn't do that much either.

It was also surprising to see Vasek suddenly getting real snaps last night. Has he played all year? Interesting time to throw him in there. Didn't watch him closely but seemed like he played well. Might be able to pencil him into the 2-deep next year.

Also, I withdraw my previous surprise about looking for a portal OG. Please get that USC guy. 

 

I also remember seeing a lot of Alex January in the first quarter, which was surprising. If they like him enough to play him in that game, maybe that explains why they haven't gone hard after another DT (yet). 

Bond won't come back but he should. He wasn't the same player after the ankle injury. Before the OU game, he was considered a first rounder. I can't imagine that he still is and one more solid season would really help his draft stock - especially if he's using his speed to get open and catch long passes from Arch. I feel Cam Williams could also really benefit from one more college season. But he's got that first round grade so he pretty much has to go. Would love to get Golden back as well but I can't imagine that happens either. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
20 minutes ago, utexas8 said:

 

 


I don’t see bond coming back at all.

 


I’m not sure we even want Bond back. For the cost we need a lot more production out of a veteran wide receiver. Taaffe coming back is a bit of a surprise. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted

Yea if we had options, it would be great to move on from Bond. But if he comes back without it breaking the bank, we could really use his speed element and he would hopefully know the offense better next year. 

Posted

I mean, when healthy he was a key to the offense. Let the ankle heal up and he’s absolutely worth keeping. Not sure why he would come back if he’s getting 1/2 grades.

  • Hook 'Em 8
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Red Five said:

He was very far from 100% last night. This is kind of shitty.

Last night wasn't the first time he's been clowned or abused by a dynamic edge player. Not that I'm making any predictions regarding his draft stock, but it's a legitimate criticism.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
48 minutes ago, utexas8 said:

 

 


I don’t see bond coming back at all.

 

He could be correct but I'm not gonna put much stock in a guy who covers the Cowboys for the Star Telegram knowing what's going on with Texas players. 

  • Like 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, Post Oak said:

He could be correct but I'm not gonna put much stock in a guy who covers the Cowboys for the Star Telegram knowing what's going on with Texas players. 

He was at 247 for years on the Texas beat

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, satyanash said:

Swing and a miss. Nothing to do with injury, it was bad technique from start to finish. He hesitated because of a LB that was already accounted for by Hutson, took a false step and just got beat straight up.

He's not ready for the NFL and it's incredibly obvious. 

 

I know this is like Christmas morning for you, but I think it's likely that being injured affected his play (which wasn't great). 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
23 minutes ago, Thiefery said:

I would love if Bond returned.. He was our biggest weapon when healthy.. He ran good routes and was explosive in screen/jet sweeps. 


You just saw what a healthy Bond did against Ohio St. I think we should spend that money elsewhere, IMO. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
11 minutes ago, Newy25 said:


You just saw what a healthy Bond did against Ohio St. I think we should spend that money elsewhere, IMO. 

The time Quinn missed + the time Bond missed clearly affected their rhythm. Golden and Helm became the top options with Moore sliding in as third and Bond never reasserted himself in the offense afterward. I think if we saw him back next year you would see a completely different result with Arch.

  • Hook 'Em 7
Posted
21 minutes ago, Newy25 said:


You just saw what a healthy Bond did against Ohio St. I think we should spend that money elsewhere, IMO. 

His health was mismanaged the entire season. I don’t buy that he’s been anywhere near healthy since September

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
6 hours ago, SuckitKevin said:

A big running back won’t solve the goal line issues if the O line allows penetration. For all the talk of our awesome offensive line, they haven’t been dominant this year. We have to be able to move people when we’re at the 1.

The problem was the OL was incongruent. The left tackle was all world at everything. Then LG and C were finesse stretch zone blockers who couldn't drive forward in the run against most teams. Then the RG and RT were power blocking maulers who struggled in the zone reach blocks. 

It's why I don't understand not having a separate package for short yardage with Hutson at center and Neto at LG. Get a full line of power blocking maulers to go to in those situations. That should have been obvious this time last year since the 2023 team had the same issue. 

That said, I don't know if they tried but just didn't feel it worked well. Would love to know if they ever tried. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
4 hours ago, cmontexas said:

I love the thing we do every year where we trash our player because we want him to come back

Tough love isn’t it? Lol

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Hank_Hill said:

Is he 100%? Hard to say. Jeremiah Smith also had 3 yards against Texas last night, they should spend that money elsewhere.


That’s wonderful logic. Smith dominated college football all season. Bond has been a complete non factor even with healthy in the second half of the season. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, Newy25 said:


That’s wonderful logic. Smith dominated college football all season. Bond has been a complete non factor even with healthy in the second half of the season. 

When was he both healthy and a non factor in the second half of the season? 

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Newy25 said:


I’m not sure we even want Bond back. For the cost we need a lot more production out of a veteran wide receiver. Taaffe coming back is a bit of a surprise. 

He was injured all year. The chance to catch passes from Manning is an opportunity he wont pass up. 

  • Fuck You 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Red Five said:

The one where he jumped and the ball bounced off his hands?

The one where he jumped to slow down his speed and had to reach behind him to try and get the ball? If that had been thrown on target and in stride it's a 45 yard gain. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
  • Fuck You 5
Posted
Just now, The_Great_Hornsby said:

The one where he jumped to slow down his speed and had to reach behind him to try and get the ball? If that had been thrown on target and in stride it's a 45 yard gain. 

I think you’re wrong but have no energy to back that up. I hate football right now 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, The_Great_Hornsby said:

The one where he jumped to slow down his speed and had to reach behind him to try and get the ball? If that had been thrown on target and in stride it's a 45 yard gain. 

I don't remember that happening but I was pretty drunk last night. I just remember the one obvious drop where Herbstreit said "Why is he even jumping there?". 

  • Haha 1
Posted

 

Ignore the stupid ass take saying it was an embarrassing drop. Look at that throw. If he hits him in stride it may have even been a TD. He clearly threw it behind him. Should Bond have caught it, maybe? Should the throw have been better, absolutely. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Fuck You 12
Posted

Surly 9.95 poster: The football board is a dumpster fire. 

 

Also Surly 9.95 poster: Listen to my hot take that would fit right in on the football board. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 4

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...