Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

[Michael Knight 12977]

15 minutes ago, Revolution512 said:

And the Dems are getting sucked into a game they can’t win. That has me worried. You don’t have to spend your time fighting this moron, he’s mostly ineffective the rest of the way. Build it up and whiff, he’s gonna win again.

You're wrong

[Revolution512 1487]

50 minutes ago, Michael Knight said:

You're wrong

It’s happened before. But opinions are facts in this thread

[Michael Knight 12977]

3 minutes ago, Revolution512 said:

It’s happened before. But opinions are facts in this thread

All Democrats want is someone who will fight back, thats why shes so popular

[Underdog 28629]

On 5/15/2019 at 4:24 PM, Hugo Stiglitz said:

 

You go girl! 

[Revolution512 1487]

42 minutes ago, Michael Knight said:

All Democrats want is someone who will fight back, thats why shes so popular

Which is wrong.....she stands no chance. She’s rarely right. I like the fight but wow 

[RDCanecutter 26441]

45 minutes ago, Michael Knight said:

All Democrats want is someone who will fight back, thats why shes so popular

So, Alexandria of Arc?

[Hugo Stiglitz 23367]

3 minutes ago, Revolution512 said:

Which is wrong.....she stands no chance. She’s rarely right. I like the fight but wow 

Username does not check out.

[williemackgarza 1826]

There are thousands of children in concentration camps we've set up for immigrants and multiple children have died in those camps.

American kids, even colored ones, have died while in state child services custody all over america, for many years. Obviously no reps give a shit. Yet no dems have given a shit either, where are the protests and marching for them? Why im sayin its all political bullshit.
But I do wonder what aoc or you think of what should happen to these illegal children? Just let them in?
If its so dangerous in cages for illegal kids here, then why are their parents still bringing them or sending them here.
If you leave your kid alone in an unattended car or house, or expose them to certain dangerous situations at a young age, you can be charged with endangering a child and could lose custody of your kid.
Let an illegal bring or send an unaccompanied child across the dangerous border and what happens to those parents? Not a fucking thing.
These rules were in effect under Obama too. The current irrigation system is broken, any idiot can see it. We need to fix it. Yet its a hot topic issue the dems wanna avoid for votes sake.
Cages? Those are dem talking points.
I guess just open all the border up? Fire all the BP? Let the cartels have free reign?
What would you do to solve it?

[Thetexashammer 1062]

7 hours ago, wildcat09 said:

There are thousands of children in concentration camps we've set up for immigrants and multiple children have died in those camps.

Point taken. We should release them back into Mexico without food, water, or medical care.

[longhornsftmfw 129]

American kids, even colored ones, have died while in state child services custody all over america, for many years. Obviously no reps give a shit. Yet no dems have given a shit either, where are the protests and marching for them? Why im sayin its all political bullshit.
But I do wonder what aoc or you think of what should happen to these illegal children? Just let them in?
If its so dangerous in cages for illegal kids here, then why are their parents still bringing them or sending them here.
If you leave your kid alone in an unattended car or house, or expose them to certain dangerous situations at a young age, you can be charged with endangering a child and could lose custody of your kid.
Let an illegal bring or send an unaccompanied child across the dangerous border and what happens to those parents? Not a fucking thing.
These rules were in effect under Obama too. The current irrigation system is broken, any idiot can see it. We need to fix it. Yet its a hot topic issue the dems wanna avoid for votes sake.
Cages? Those are dem talking points.
I guess just open all the border up? Fire all the BP? Let the cartels have free reign?
What would you do to solve it?

Can’t tell if troll or just dumb. “Kids in cages” = Dem talking points but “mah cartels!!” = fine.

[Js1 85334]

Did he just call them colored? Grandpa, is that you? 

Edited May 18, 2019 by Js1

[cmontexas 3271]

Gotta fix that irrigation system

[bolverk 29672]

8 hours ago, williemackgarza said:

 

The amount of misdirection and misinformation in this post is absolutely astounding. Good God, I hope it's only a matter of ignorance and not the result of intentional obfuscation.

[Enchubben 5510]

8 hours ago, Thetexashammer said:

Point taken. We should release them back into Mexico without food, water, or medical care.

No but we shouldn’t be incentivizing them to make that trek in the first place where hundreds die each year before making it to our detention facilities. But we all know saving lives isn’t the ultimate goal here for democrats; if it was, the border wall would have been built already. 

[David Dennison 18858]

1 minute ago, Enchubben said:

No but we shouldn’t be incentivizing them to make that trek in the first place where hundreds die each year before making it to our detention facilities. But we all know saving lives isn’t the ultimate goal here for democrats; if it was, the border wall would have been built already. 

A border wall won't save lives.

[wildcat09 29354]

9 hours ago, Thetexashammer said:

Point taken. We should release them back into Mexico without food, water, or medical care.

“Actually the concentration camps are for their own good” is a great nazi take.

[wildcat09 29354]

9 hours ago, Thetexashammer said:

Point taken. We should release them back into Mexico without food, water, or medical care.

“Actually the concentration camps are for their own good” is a great nazi take.

[leaf 685]

What page has her topless pics.  Too lazy to read all 161 pages.

 

Thanks

[Enchubben 5510]

3 hours ago, David Dennison said:

A border wall won't save lives.

You are certainly entitled to your opinion.

It hasn’t been built to know for sure, but i think there are logical arguments for how it would that aren’t a stretch.

[Dirk X West 772]

1 hour ago, Enchubben said:

It hasn’t been built to know for sure, but i think there are logical arguments for how it would that aren’t a stretch.

Not worth mentioning what those might be, though?

[Enchubben 5510]

4 hours ago, Dirk X West said:

Not worth mentioning what those might be, though?

If you’re less likely to make it across due to a massive wall, there are less people trying. Thus, less people that run the chance of dying any number of ways trying to cross illegally including but not limited to dehydration, hyperthermia, rape and violence etc.

[jimmyjazz 45945]

7 minutes ago, Enchubben said:

If you’re less likely to make it across due to a massive wall, there are less people trying. Thus, less people that run the chance of dying any number of ways trying to cross illegally including but not limited to dehydration, hyperthermia, rape and violence etc.

Or, bear with me here . . . more murdered in Honduras, etc.

[hobbes2702 13033]

6 hours ago, Enchubben said:

You are certainly entitled to your opinion.

It hasn’t been built to know for sure, but i think there are logical arguments for how it would that aren’t a stretch.

There are no logical arguments in favor of a border wall. None.

[henrygandorf 29191]

2 minutes ago, hobbes2702 said:

There are no logical arguments in favor of a border wall. None.

whatever.

it worked in game of thrones almost all the way til the end.

[Hugo Stiglitz 23367]

Actually it never worked in Game of Thrones 

[David Dennison 18858]

58 minutes ago, Enchubben said:

If you’re less likely to make it across due to a massive wall, there are less people trying. Thus, less people that run the chance of dying any number of ways trying to cross illegally including but not limited to dehydration, hyperthermia, rape and violence etc.

They won't be any less likely to make it across. Because there will be massive amounts of gaps.

[hobbes2702 13033]

1 minute ago, David Dennison said:

They won't be any less likely to make it across. Because there will be massive amounts of gaps.

Well only if they have a dragon to melt some holes in the wall. 

[henrygandorf 29191]

i think the odds of dragons showing up are about the same as the odds of a wall being completed at our southern border.

[jimmyjazz 45945]

1 minute ago, henrygandorf said:

i think the odds of dragons showing up are about the same as the odds of a wall being completed at our southern border.

Well yeah, because Democrats.

[Enchubben 5510]

24 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

They won't be any less likely to make it across. Because there will be massive amounts of gaps.

Well yea, when democrats fight the funding for an appropriate wall that doesn’t result in massive gaps. The idea is to lessen the amount of these gaps so the spots where there is a gap can reasonably be controlled.

9 minutes ago, henrygandorf said:

i think the odds of dragons showing up are about the same as the odds of a wall being completed at our southern border.

Sadly, I think you are right. 

1 hour ago, hobbes2702 said:

There are no logical arguments in favor of a border wall. None.

Good point. I take back my logical point above and concede to your statement of fact with no supporting evidence.

[David Dennison 18858]

1 minute ago, Enchubben said:

Well yea, when democrats fight the funding for an appropriate wall that doesn’t result in massive gaps. The idea is to lessen the amount of these gaps so the spots where there is a gap can reasonably be controlled.

It's not the Democrats. It's private land owners. They tell the government to go fuck themselves. Republicans are usually on board with that.

Edited May 19, 2019 by David Dennison

[hobbes2702 13033]

3 minutes ago, Enchubben said:

Well yea, when democrats fight the funding for an appropriate wall that doesn’t result in massive gaps. The idea is to lessen the amount of these gaps so the spots where there is a gap can reasonably be controlled.

Sadly, I think you are right. 

Good point. I take back my logical point above and concede to your statement of fact with no supporting evidence.

Yea we should totally steal land from Texas ranchers to build something that won’t work.

[hobbes2702 13033]

4 minutes ago, Enchubben said:

Well yea, when democrats fight the funding for an appropriate wall that doesn’t result in massive gaps. The idea is to lessen the amount of these gaps so the spots where there is a gap can reasonably be controlled.

Sadly, I think you are right. 

Good point. I take back my logical point above and concede to your statement of fact with no supporting evidence.

What was your logical point? The one that was immediately refuted? Or the one that is illogical because we can’t exactly police the massive swaths of desert that the border runs through?

[tx 3 putt 76956]

fucking gringos, mexican dragons are real 

 

[Onboard 2.0 9083]

16 minutes ago, hobbes2702 said:

What was your logical point? The one that was immediately refuted? Or the one that is illogical because we can’t exactly police the massive swaths of desert that the border runs through?

 

[ChickenSandwich 9836]

2 hours ago, jimmyjazz said:

Or, bear with me here . . . more murdered in Honduras, etc.

So annex the continent. Got it. 

[ChickenSandwich 9836]

2 hours ago, hobbes2702 said:

There are no logical arguments in favor of a border wall. None.

Yeah. The illegal criminal deported 5 times begs to differ 

Also, your fantasy land of banning guns is useless when they can pass unimpressed through our non existent border and we also create a black market for said illegal firearms making them extremely valuable. 

Edited May 19, 2019 by ChickenSandwich

[jimmyjazz 45945]

Which direction are guns crossing the border, generally speaking?

[SaucyJack 3488]

This guy knows:

 

[hobbes2702 13033]

23 minutes ago, ChickenSandwich said:

Yeah. The illegal criminal deported 5 times begs to differ 

Also, your fantasy land of banning guns is useless when they can pass unimpressed through our non existent border and we also create a black market for said illegal firearms making them extremely valuable. 

A wall doesn’t stop that person. Try again.

Have I advocated banning guns? Ever? I doubt it since I’m pro second amendment and believe that if a law abiding citizen wants a gun a they can own it pending a thorough background check. In recent years I have come around to requiring some sort of license to own certain weapons. Good effort though

Edited May 19, 2019 by hobbes2702

[SKJ 1311]

27 minutes ago, ChickenSandwich said:

Yeah. The illegal criminal deported 5 times begs to differ 

Also, your fantasy land of banning guns is useless when they can pass unimpressed through our non existent border and we also create a black market for said illegal firearms making them extremely valuable. 

What the fuck does this even mean? You think cartels are hurting for firearms?

American firearms ?

 

 

[williemackgarza 1826]

The amount of misdirection and misinformation in this post is absolutely astounding. Good God, I hope it's only a matter of ignorance and not the result of intentional obfuscation.

[David Dennison 18858]

1 hour ago, ChickenSandwich said:

Yeah. The illegal criminal deported 5 times begs to differ 

Also, your fantasy land of banning guns is useless when they can pass unimpressed through our non existent border and we also create a black market for said illegal firearms making them extremely valuable. 

A wall isn't going to stop that guy.

[williemackgarza 1826]

Did he just call them colored? Grandpa, is that you? 

AOC called them colors.
I was just following her lead

[workswithseed 2104]

3 hours ago, David Dennison said:

It's not the Democrats. It's private land owners. They tell the government to go fuck themselves. Republicans are usually on board with that.

This is actually why I'm against the wall

[workswithseed 2104]

1 hour ago, williemackgarza said:

 

Seems like the abortion argument 

[ChickenSandwich 9836]

It’s actually the Democratic political platform. 2 years in and we are still waiting for their first accomplishment. 

[ChickenSandwich 9836]

2 years non stop that Trump has been KGB since 87, and are shocked when proven false that the general public no longer gives you the benefit of the doubt that obstructing a fake investigation is a big deal. 

[Thetexashammer 1062]

A lot of the "fairy tales" that we used to tell our kids are still relevant today. For example, the boy who cried wolf.

[Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand 13585]

32 minutes ago, ChickenSandwich said:

2 years non stop that Trump has been KGB since 87, and are shocked when proven false that the general public no longer gives you the benefit of the doubt that obstructing a fake investigation is a big deal. 

Well, the Attorney General disagrees with you. He also agrees with you.