Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

[David Dennison 18,656]

1 minute ago, Johnny Sack said:

I’m sure your your privileged white male sympathy and understanding is what they really need.   

Or a millionaire grandfather.

That helps, too.

[elfenix 34,171]

2 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

with illegal drugs or weapons in your car.  Otherwise, driving while black isn’t really going to impact your future.  

cops would never lie or plant evidence

[jimmyjazz 45,557]

1 minute ago, Johnny Sack said:

I’m sure your your privileged white male sympathy and understanding is what they really need.   

It doesn't hurt.  What also doesn't hurt is my money, my time, and my vote, to cancel out yours.

[Johnny Sack 8,397]

Just now, David Dennison said:

Or a millionaire grandfather.

That helps, too.

You should feel bad about your privilege and lecture others on their privilege.  Because that’s what the poor need.  

[elfenix 34,171]

*don't apply for a mortgage while black

[Johnny Sack 8,397]

Just now, jimmyjazz said:

It doesn't hurt.  What also doesn't hurt is my money, my time, and my vote, to cancel out yours.

You give a lot to the poor?  I hope so.  

[jimmyjazz 45,557]

Just now, Johnny Sack said:

You should feel bad about your privilege and lecture others on their privilege.  Because that’s what the poor need.  

You should feel bad about the prices you charge for shitty produce.

[David Dennison 18,656]

Just now, Johnny Sack said:

You should feel bad about your privilege and lecture others on their privilege.  Because that’s what the poor need.  

The poor need a more egalitarian distribution of societal wealth.

I vote for that every chance I get. I love it when your taxes go up.

[Johnny Sack 8,397]

Just now, jimmyjazz said:

You should feel bad about the prices you charge for shitty produce.

Don’t sell produce. And no one in my family has for decades.  You want to doxx me so bad, you butthurt liberal pussy.  

[Johnny Sack 8,397]

Just now, David Dennison said:

The poor need a more egalitarian distribution of societal wealth.

I vote for that every chance I get. I love it when your taxes go up.

Keep voting.  I’m fine

[David Dennison 18,656]

Just now, Johnny Sack said:

Keep voting.  I’m fine

Why are you so bitter?

[elfenix 34,171]

*don't live in a poor neighborhood

[jimmyjazz 45,557]

2 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

Don’t sell produce. And no one in my family has for decades.  You want to doxx me so bad, you butthurt liberal pussy.  

You doxxed yourself you fucking idiot.  I'm just referring back to the halcyon days when you bragged about your inheritance.

[Johnny Sack 8,397]

1 minute ago, David Dennison said:

Why are you so bitter?

I’m not. But I will respond when being attacked for stating obvious truths.  You libs won’t address the merits, 

[Johnny Sack 8,397]

1 minute ago, jimmyjazz said:

You doxxed yourself you fucking idiot.  I'm just referring back to the halcyon days when you bragged about your inheritance.

What post was that?  Should be easy to find Jimmy.  

[Bama Chick 28,596]

Thanks for the BeetleJuice, Gil.

[David Dennison 18,656]

Just now, Johnny Sack said:

I’m not. But I will respond when being attacked for stating obvious truths.  You libs won’t address the merits, 

Because they aren't truths. They are arbitrary rules that the privileged class knows it doesn't have to follow. See, Donald J. Trump and Johnny Sack.

[Johnny Sack 8,397]

Just now, David Dennison said:

Because they aren't truths. They are arbitrary rules that the privileged class knows it doesn't have to follow. See, Donald J. Trump and Johnny Sack.

Well, I follow all those rules.  And I’m not poor.  

[elfenix 34,171]

2 hours ago, Johnny Sack said:

Well, I follow all those rules.  And I’m not poor.  

you were never going to be poor.

the stress of being poor literally changes your body chemistry.  and you've never experienced that.  but you sit there in your tear down in not river oaks telling poor people that they just need to make better decisions.  never once acknowledging that the stress of being poor proscribes those decisions to begin with. 

Edited July 17, 2019 by elfenix

[David Dennison 18,656]

Just now, Johnny Sack said:

Well, I follow all those rules.  And I’m not poor.  

You aren't poor because you were born into wealth.

[Johnny Sack 8,397]

3 minutes ago, elfenix said:

you were never going to be poor.

the stress of being poor literally changes your body chemistry.  and you've never experienced that.  but you sit there in your tear down in not river oaks telling poor people that they just need to make better decisions.  never once acknowledging that the stress of being poor prescribes those decisions to begin with. 

And you tell them they are oppressed victims.  You think that’s a healthy message?

or maybe do you want them to stay that way for political purposes?

Edited July 17, 2019 by Johnny Sack

[David Dennison 18,656]

4 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

And you tell them they are oppressed victims.  You think that’s a healthy message?

or maybe do you want them to stay that way for political purposes?

Just like the political party you support wants them to stay that way for political purposes by oppressing them.

Weird.

[Johnny Sack 8,397]

1 minute ago, David Dennison said:

Just like the political party you support wants them to stay that way for political purposes by oppressing them.

Weird.

No.  I want every able bodied American working and making good choices.  Paying people not to work or making it easier for them not to work is horrible policy.  

Amazing how despite no access to welfare, non English speaking illegals can manage to work enough to feed themselves and send money back home.  Wonder why that is?

[Incredulity 11,564]

Just now, Johnny Sack said:

No.  I want every able bodied American working and making good choices.  Paying people not to work or making it easier for them not to work is horrible policy.  

Amazing how despite no access to welfare, non English speaking illegals can manage to work enough to feed themselves and send money back home.  Wonder why that is?

A modicum of self respect.

[David Dennison 18,656]

1 minute ago, Johnny Sack said:

No.  I want every able bodied American working and making good choices.  Paying people not to work or making it easier for them not to work is horrible policy.  

Amazing how despite no access to welfare, non English speaking illegals can manage to work enough to feed themselves and send money back home.  Wonder why that is?

No, you don't. You want white people to stay in charge. That's why you vote the way you do.

[Johnny Sack 8,397]

Just now, David Dennison said:

No, you don't. You want white people to stay in charge. That's why you vote the way you do.

I voted for Hispanic Rafael Cruz.  You voted for Robert O’Rourke — the poster boy for white male privilege.  

[David Dennison 18,656]

1 minute ago, Johnny Sack said:

I voted for Hispanic Rafael Cruz.  You voted for Robert O’Rourke — the poster boy for white male privilege.  

Ted Cruz is a racist white male.

[Incredulity 11,564]

Just now, David Dennison said:

Ted Cruz is a racist white male.

A White Mexican Canadian

[David Dennison 18,656]

Just now, Incredulity said:

A White Mexican Canadian

Mexican?

LOL

[Hugo Stiglitz 23,356]

The Sack is back! 

[elfenix 34,171]

3 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

Just like the political party you support wants them to stay that way for political purposes by oppressing them.

Weird.

yeah that's a really weird claim in the current era of blaming immigrants and (((globalists))) for the market having left behind much of small town america

 

1 minute ago, Johnny Sack said:

No.  I want every able bodied American working and making good choices.  Paying people not to work or making it easier for them not to work is horrible policy.  

Amazing how despite no access to welfare, non English speaking illegals can manage to work enough to feed themselves and send money back home.  Wonder why that is?

the people who would make a dangerous journey and leave home and family thousands of miles behind for an uncertain shot at a better life are remarkable people?  wow, who would have thought that?!?

 

Just now, Incredulity said:

A White Mexican Canadian

[David Dennison 18,656]

1 minute ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

The Sack is back! 

Johnny Sack's rules for being born successfully white are an internet treasure.

[workswithseed 2,036]

11 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

Johnny Sack's rules for being born successfully white are an internet treasure.

I like that you're so racist to think people of color need the white man to help them out. You must love the thought of colonial Africa to help them out.

[Gil Bang 25,898]

48 minutes ago, elfenix said:

*don't apply for a mortgage while black

Don't apply for a rental unit in a Trump building while black

[David Dennison 18,656]

3 minutes ago, workswithseed said:

I like that you're so racist to think people of color need the white man to help them out. You must love the thought of colonial Africa to help them out.

They'd probably be happy if the white man would treat them like white people.

[TexArcher 37,508]

48 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

And you tell them they are oppressed victims.  You think that’s a healthy message?

or maybe do you want them to stay that way for political purposes?

Since you don't support keeping people poor for political purposes, you obviously support raising the minimum wage to $15/hr, right?

[Johnny Sack 8,397]

15 minutes ago, TexArcher said:

Since you don't support keeping people poor for political purposes, you obviously support raising the minimum wage to $15/hr, right?

No. $200 an hour.  Minimum. 

[workswithseed 2,036]

28 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

They'd probably be happy if the white man would treat them like white people.

I bet the Dutch are saying the same thing.

[workswithseed 2,036]

8 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

No. $200 an hour.  Minimum. 

I remember when blacklab said $1,000 an hour. I wonder why no one agreed with his fake assestment?

[Longhorn_Fan68 33,843]

This thread got sack'd

[elfenix 34,171]

Speaking of welfare, this looks like a really interesting read:

In the 1970s, Ronald Reagan villainized a Chicago woman for bilking the government. Her other sins—including possible kidnappings and murders—were far worse.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/history/2013/12/linda_taylor_welfare_queen_ronald_reagan_made_her_a_notorious_american_villain.html

[TtomTerrific 200]

ahhhh...the JimmyJazz model in full swing

1. Completely run out of ideas

2. Recklessly and indiscrimiantly accuse everyone of racism.

3. Allow for those supporting AOC and her pals' "victimization" to somehow fill the void of the vacated "Mueller Report"

4. ???????

5. Wonder why Trump is the President, will be the President again prior to his daughter becoming the President. 

 

My God are the Dems fucking stupid. ...and I really wish that they weren't, but this is off the rails now and it is not getting back on track in my lifetime.

Y'all are even canabalizing each other now and calling Pelosi a racist....forcing her to get up in front of the House in order to call everyone else a racist.

This is what happens when the JimmyJazzes are allowed a modicum of exposure....the light comes on and the truth comes out.

 

Thanks alot, assholes. 

Edited July 17, 2019 by TtomTerrific
Jazzes

[TtomTerrific 200]

12 hours ago, TtomTerrific said:

 

Jimmy's reckless trading on racism for perceived political benifit has ruined the country for the next two generations at least.

Edited July 17, 2019 by TtomTerrific
double post...

[Bama Chick 28,596]

Speaking of welfare, this looks like a really interesting read:

In the 1970s, Ronald Reagan villainized a Chicago woman for bilking the government. Her other sins—including possible kidnappings and murders—were far worse.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/history/2013/12/linda_taylor_welfare_queen_ronald_reagan_made_her_a_notorious_american_villain.html

There’s a fantastic podcast about this woman and how Reagan’s vilification of her turned into the dog whistle trope that’s still with us today.

It’s called “The Queen”.

[Hugo Stiglitz 23,356]

Lmao

[achooloco 1,066]

More people involved and caring about our political future is a net positive but considering the republicans and their leadership are now the party of bigoted dickheads, I’m fairly certain nobody is gonna beat aoc, and right now I’m not exactly a huge supporter of hers. Her celebrity focus is a legit knock on her but she is getting shit done (or at least trying to; can more real Americans please call out the traitor trump?!) on the national level so it evens out. 

Also the article quotes the candidate as implying aoc hasn’t done anything for her area, you can’t claim that without backing it up. I’d hope that post trump people would believe in facts but odds are we won’t. Sad days. 

[DigglerontheHoof 21,061]

Sack would benefit from a good ass whuppin’.

[Onboard 2.0 9,083]

19 minutes ago, achooloco said:

More people involved and caring about our political future is a net positive but considering the republicans and their leadership are now the party of bigoted dickheads, I’m fairly certain nobody is gonna beat aoc, and right now I’m not exactly a huge supporter of hers. Her celebrity focus is a legit knock on her but she is getting shit done (or at least trying to; can more real Americans please call out the traitor trump?!) on the national level so it evens out. 

Also the article quotes the candidate as implying aoc hasn’t done anything for her area, you can’t claim that without backing it up. I’d hope that post trump people would believe in facts but odds are we won’t. Sad days. 

What precisely has she gotten done ?  She's made a high profile splash so far. She's some really great egalitarian thoughts on government that I agree with, but so far that's all they've been thoughts, and words in front of the mic.

[Onboard 2.0 9,083]

2 minutes ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

Sack would benefit from a good ass whuppin’.

You offering ?

[achooloco 1,066]

43 minutes ago, Onboard 2.0 said:

What precisely has she gotten done ?  She's made a high profile splash so far. She's some really great egalitarian thoughts on government that I agree with, but so far that's all they've been thoughts, and words in front of the mic.

Right, lot of publicity but off the top of my head reps should be conducting hearings, proposing bills, voting. Think she’s done that. 

But the main point for me is that the candidate is saying aoc has done nothing. I’d  like the person making accusations and opposing aoc to back them up with facts and not just make trumpian claims.