Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

with illegal drugs or weapons in your car.  Otherwise, driving while black isn’t really going to impact your future.  

cops would never lie or plant evidence

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Johnny Sack said:

I’m sure your your privileged white male sympathy and understanding is what they really need.   

It doesn't hurt.  What also doesn't hurt is my money, my time, and my vote, to cancel out yours.

  • Fuck You 1
Posted
Just now, David Dennison said:

Or a millionaire grandfather.

That helps, too.

You should feel bad about your privilege and lecture others on their privilege.  Because that’s what the poor need.  

Posted
Just now, Johnny Sack said:

You should feel bad about your privilege and lecture others on their privilege.  Because that’s what the poor need.  

You should feel bad about the prices you charge for shitty produce.

  • Like 1
  • Fuck You 1
Posted
Just now, Johnny Sack said:

You should feel bad about your privilege and lecture others on their privilege.  Because that’s what the poor need.  

The poor need a more egalitarian distribution of societal wealth.

I vote for that every chance I get. I love it when your taxes go up.

Posted
Just now, jimmyjazz said:

You should feel bad about the prices you charge for shitty produce.

Don’t sell produce. And no one in my family has for decades.  You want to doxx me so bad, you butthurt liberal pussy.  

Posted
Just now, David Dennison said:

The poor need a more egalitarian distribution of societal wealth.

I vote for that every chance I get. I love it when your taxes go up.

Keep voting.  I’m fine

Posted
2 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

Don’t sell produce. And no one in my family has for decades.  You want to doxx me so bad, you butthurt liberal pussy.  

You doxxed yourself you fucking idiot.  I'm just referring back to the halcyon days when you bragged about your inheritance.

  • Fuck You 1
Posted
1 minute ago, David Dennison said:

Why are you so bitter?

I’m not. But I will respond when being attacked for stating obvious truths.  You libs won’t address the merits, 

Posted
1 minute ago, jimmyjazz said:

You doxxed yourself you fucking idiot.  I'm just referring back to the halcyon days when you bragged about your inheritance.

What post was that?  Should be easy to find Jimmy.  

Posted
Just now, Johnny Sack said:

I’m not. But I will respond when being attacked for stating obvious truths.  You libs won’t address the merits, 

Because they aren't truths. They are arbitrary rules that the privileged class knows it doesn't have to follow. See, Donald J. Trump and Johnny Sack.

Posted
Just now, David Dennison said:

Because they aren't truths. They are arbitrary rules that the privileged class knows it doesn't have to follow. See, Donald J. Trump and Johnny Sack.

Well, I follow all those rules.  And I’m not poor.  

  • Like 1
  • Fuck You 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Johnny Sack said:

Well, I follow all those rules.  And I’m not poor.  

you were never going to be poor.

the stress of being poor literally changes your body chemistry.  and you've never experienced that.  but you sit there in your tear down in not river oaks telling poor people that they just need to make better decisions.  never once acknowledging that the stress of being poor proscribes those decisions to begin with. 

Edited by elfenix
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, elfenix said:

you were never going to be poor.

the stress of being poor literally changes your body chemistry.  and you've never experienced that.  but you sit there in your tear down in not river oaks telling poor people that they just need to make better decisions.  never once acknowledging that the stress of being poor prescribes those decisions to begin with. 

And you tell them they are oppressed victims.  You think that’s a healthy message?

or maybe do you want them to stay that way for political purposes?

Edited by Johnny Sack
Posted
4 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

And you tell them they are oppressed victims.  You think that’s a healthy message?

or maybe do you want them to stay that way for political purposes?

Just like the political party you support wants them to stay that way for political purposes by oppressing them.

Weird.

Posted
1 minute ago, David Dennison said:

Just like the political party you support wants them to stay that way for political purposes by oppressing them.

Weird.

No.  I want every able bodied American working and making good choices.  Paying people not to work or making it easier for them not to work is horrible policy.  

Amazing how despite no access to welfare, non English speaking illegals can manage to work enough to feed themselves and send money back home.  Wonder why that is?

Posted
Just now, Johnny Sack said:

No.  I want every able bodied American working and making good choices.  Paying people not to work or making it easier for them not to work is horrible policy.  

Amazing how despite no access to welfare, non English speaking illegals can manage to work enough to feed themselves and send money back home.  Wonder why that is?

A modicum of self respect.

Posted
1 minute ago, Johnny Sack said:

No.  I want every able bodied American working and making good choices.  Paying people not to work or making it easier for them not to work is horrible policy.  

Amazing how despite no access to welfare, non English speaking illegals can manage to work enough to feed themselves and send money back home.  Wonder why that is?

No, you don't. You want white people to stay in charge. That's why you vote the way you do.

Posted
Just now, David Dennison said:

No, you don't. You want white people to stay in charge. That's why you vote the way you do.

I voted for Hispanic Rafael Cruz.  You voted for Robert O’Rourke — the poster boy for white male privilege.  

  • Haha 1
  • Fuck You 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

Just like the political party you support wants them to stay that way for political purposes by oppressing them.

Weird.

yeah that's a really weird claim in the current era of blaming immigrants and (((globalists))) for the market having left behind much of small town america

 

1 minute ago, Johnny Sack said:

No.  I want every able bodied American working and making good choices.  Paying people not to work or making it easier for them not to work is horrible policy.  

Amazing how despite no access to welfare, non English speaking illegals can manage to work enough to feed themselves and send money back home.  Wonder why that is?

the people who would make a dangerous journey and leave home and family thousands of miles behind for an uncertain shot at a better life are remarkable people?  wow, who would have thought that?!?

 

Just now, Incredulity said:

A White Mexican Canadian

d6O.gif

  • Like 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

Johnny Sack's rules for being born successfully white are an internet treasure.

I like that you're so racist to think people of color need the white man to help them out. You must love the thought of colonial Africa to help them out.

Posted
3 minutes ago, workswithseed said:

I like that you're so racist to think people of color need the white man to help them out. You must love the thought of colonial Africa to help them out.

They'd probably be happy if the white man would treat them like white people.

Posted
48 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

And you tell them they are oppressed victims.  You think that’s a healthy message?

or maybe do you want them to stay that way for political purposes?

Since you don't support keeping people poor for political purposes, you obviously support raising the minimum wage to $15/hr, right?

Posted
15 minutes ago, TexArcher said:

Since you don't support keeping people poor for political purposes, you obviously support raising the minimum wage to $15/hr, right?

No. $200 an hour.  Minimum. 

Posted (edited)

ahhhh...the JimmyJazz model in full swing

1. Completely run out of ideas

2. Recklessly and indiscrimiantly accuse everyone of racism.

3. Allow for those supporting AOC and her pals' "victimization" to somehow fill the void of the vacated "Mueller Report"

4. ???????

5. Wonder why Trump is the President, will be the President again prior to his daughter becoming the President. 

 

My God are the Dems fucking stupid. ...and I really wish that they weren't, but this is off the rails now and it is not getting back on track in my lifetime.

Y'all are even canabalizing each other now and calling Pelosi a racist....forcing her to get up in front of the House in order to call everyone else a racist.

This is what happens when the JimmyJazzes are allowed a modicum of exposure....the light comes on and the truth comes out.

 

Thanks alot, assholes. 

Edited by TtomTerrific
Jazzes
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, TtomTerrific said:

 

Jimmy's reckless trading on racism for perceived political benifit has ruined the country for the next two generations at least.

Edited by TtomTerrific
double post...
Posted
Speaking of welfare, this looks like a really interesting read:


In the 1970s, Ronald Reagan villainized a Chicago woman for bilking the government. Her other sins—including possible kidnappings and murders—were far worse.


http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/history/2013/12/linda_taylor_welfare_queen_ronald_reagan_made_her_a_notorious_american_villain.html

There’s a fantastic podcast about this woman and how Reagan’s vilification of her turned into the dog whistle trope that’s still with us today.

It’s called “The Queen”.
Posted

More people involved and caring about our political future is a net positive but considering the republicans and their leadership are now the party of bigoted dickheads, I’m fairly certain nobody is gonna beat aoc, and right now I’m not exactly a huge supporter of hers. Her celebrity focus is a legit knock on her but she is getting shit done (or at least trying to; can more real Americans please call out the traitor trump?!) on the national level so it evens out. 

Also the article quotes the candidate as implying aoc hasn’t done anything for her area, you can’t claim that without backing it up. I’d hope that post trump people would believe in facts but odds are we won’t. Sad days. 

Posted
19 minutes ago, achooloco said:

More people involved and caring about our political future is a net positive but considering the republicans and their leadership are now the party of bigoted dickheads, I’m fairly certain nobody is gonna beat aoc, and right now I’m not exactly a huge supporter of hers. Her celebrity focus is a legit knock on her but she is getting shit done (or at least trying to; can more real Americans please call out the traitor trump?!) on the national level so it evens out. 

Also the article quotes the candidate as implying aoc hasn’t done anything for her area, you can’t claim that without backing it up. I’d hope that post trump people would believe in facts but odds are we won’t. Sad days. 

What precisely has she gotten done ?  She's made a high profile splash so far. She's some really great egalitarian thoughts on government that I agree with, but so far that's all they've been thoughts, and words in front of the mic.

Posted
43 minutes ago, Onboard 2.0 said:

What precisely has she gotten done ?  She's made a high profile splash so far. She's some really great egalitarian thoughts on government that I agree with, but so far that's all they've been thoughts, and words in front of the mic.

Right, lot of publicity but off the top of my head reps should be conducting hearings, proposing bills, voting. Think she’s done that. 

But the main point for me is that the candidate is saying aoc has done nothing. I’d  like the person making accusations and opposing aoc to back them up with facts and not just make trumpian claims.  



×
×
  • Create New...