Jump to content

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

markstanco

By markstanco
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 13k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

henrygandorf
henrygandorf

oh, and to add, let's offer up a 'comparable' analogy reversal and see how it fits.  who's the aoc of the right?  jim jordan?  matt gaetz? this is basically like if there was a huge earthquake he

henrygandorf
henrygandorf

some people see 99% and consider that absolutism.  i am one of those people. this is not your wife grabbing your cell phone that you left in the other room.  this is not a quick favor.  this is a

RomaVicta
RomaVicta

Yes, of course. She is the only woman or woman of color the left right (edit) focuses their ire on. There are no other examples. Great point. It's really all intellectual and rational. And usually ver

Posted Images

RomaVicta

RomaVicta 29907

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, Thetexashammer said:

OK I read it. The moral standard was "not Hillary". That was the only choice, correct?

You can be a good president and an immoral person. That I would even need to point this out is absurd, but absurdity abounds amongst the Surlistani villagers. 

So you won't answer the specific question. You hide behind inapt counterattack and getting huffy. Amateur operative to the core.

9a52cb80f4ac267521c18dd2f4ceab4f.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Thetexashammer

Thetexashammer 1062

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, RomaVicta said:

To be clear, you approve of the grabbing pussy aspect of Trump that has led more than a dozen women to accuse him of sexual assault, another to describe a rape, and another to describe rape as a girl?

Show me where I "approved" of anything. If you know how to read, you understand that none of it is morally acceptable and that's exactly what I said. However, as a TDS sufferer, and I have to keep saying, you lack the ability to understand english. So I will repeat my statement.

There have been lots of bad people who were presidents. Probably most of them. Didn't like it when Clinton was President, don't like it now. 

Everyone agrees Trump isn't a good guy. Why won't you take yes for an answer? He's obviously a dirt bag. We would be completely in agreement about how despicable he is if you didn't go crazy with fake, over the top politicized bullshit. 

You and your fellow TDS sufferers are going to get Trump reelected. Use your brain, the constant stream of unhinged hatred, Russia hoaxes, impeachment porn, and the never ending drumbeat of race baiting isn't a good look and won't get a Dem elected. It's makes the left look ridiculous.

Edited by Thetexashammer
  • Like 1
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
David Dennison

David Dennison 18856

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Thetexashammer said:

You and your fellow TDS sufferers are going to get Trump reelected. Use your brain, the constant stream of unhinged hatred, Russia hoaxes, impeachment porn, and the never ending drumbeat of race baiting isn't a good look and won't get a Dem elected. It's makes the left look ridiculous.

You knowingly support a racist piece of shit. You're going to vote for him again even though you know he's a racist piece of shit.

That makes you a bad person.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 45916

Posted
Posted

Fuck the racist angle.  He's gonna vote for Trump even when he knows Trump is in bed with multiple enemies of the US.

Texashammer, it's people like you that make the thought of a civil war a little less . . . well, you know.  Burn in hell, trash.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RomaVicta

RomaVicta 29907

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Thetexashammer said:

Show me where I "approved" of anything. If you know how to read, you understand that none of it is morally acceptable and that's exactly what I said. However, as a TDS sufferer, and I have to keep saying, you lack the ability to understand english. So I will repeat my statement.

There have been lots of bad people who were presidents. Probably most of them. Didn't like it when Clinton was President, don't like it now. 

Everyone agrees Trump isn't a good guy. Why won't you take yes for an answer? He's obviously a dirt bag. We would be completely in agreement about how despicable he is if you didn't go crazy with fake, over the top politicized bullshit. 

You and your fellow TDS sufferers are going to get Trump reelected. Use your brain, the constant stream of unhinged hatred, Russia hoaxes, impeachment porn, and the never ending drumbeat of race baiting isn't a good look and won't get a Dem elected. It's makes the left look ridiculous.

You're sophistry is third rate. Hang around smarter people and hone your skills.

You suggest approval by defending Trump then you cowardly retreat into, "we all know he's a bad guy."  You don't give a fuck about this country or you have no understanding of it or both.

You're a bomb throwing ideologue. Adios.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Smax

Smax 3800

Posted
Posted
Show me where I "approved" of anything. If you know how to read, you understand that none of it is morally acceptable and that's exactly what I said. However, as a TDS sufferer, and I have to keep saying, you lack the ability to understand english. So I will repeat my statement.
There have been lots of bad people who were presidents. Probably most of them. Didn't like it when Clinton was President, don't like it now. 
Everyone agrees Trump isn't a good guy. Why won't you take yes for an answer? He's obviously a dirt bag. We would be completely in agreement about how despicable he is if you didn't go crazy with fake, over the top politicized bullshit. 
You and your fellow TDS sufferers are going to get Trump reelected. Use your brain, the constant stream of unhinged hatred, Russia hoaxes, impeachment porn, and the never ending drumbeat of race baiting isn't a good look and won't get a Dem elected. It's makes the left look ridiculous.
Ignore them as there is no reasoning with them. If you arent a far left socialist ready to tear down what this country was built upon you're a racists
  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hpslugga

hpslugga 4058

Posted
Posted (edited)
47 minutes ago, Smax said:
8 hours ago, Thetexashammer said:
Show me where I "approved" of anything. If you know how to read, you understand that none of it is morally acceptable and that's exactly what I said. However, as a TDS sufferer, and I have to keep saying, you lack the ability to understand english. So I will repeat my statement.
There have been lots of bad people who were presidents. Probably most of them. Didn't like it when Clinton was President, don't like it now. 
Everyone agrees Trump isn't a good guy. Why won't you take yes for an answer? He's obviously a dirt bag. We would be completely in agreement about how despicable he is if you didn't go crazy with fake, over the top politicized bullshit. 
You and your fellow TDS sufferers are going to get Trump reelected. Use your brain, the constant stream of unhinged hatred, Russia hoaxes, impeachment porn, and the never ending drumbeat of race baiting isn't a good look and won't get a Dem elected. It's makes the left look ridiculous.

Read more  

Ignore them as there is no reasoning with them. If you arent a far left socialist ready to tear down what this country was built upon you're a racists

That’s just another word/concept that you haven’t the foggiest clue what it means. You’re bullshitting and not very good at concealing it, either.

Edited by hpslugga
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Onboard 2.0

Onboard 2.0 9083

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 8/3/2019 at 11:50 AM, RomaVicta said:

To be clear, you approve of the grabbing pussy aspect of Trump that has led more than a dozen women to accuse him of sexual assault, another to describe a rape, and another to describe rape as a girl?

Further, are you absolving any President of the United States of having a moral standard by which to be judged fit for office?

Please answer those questions.

"Answers" that don't count:

  1. Firing a question back at me about the Dems you name.
  2. Saying you're just asking questions to hunt out hypocrisy.
  3. Returning to any form of both sides argument when a question is clearly put to you specifically.
  4. Changing the subject altogether.

This is your chance to actually express what you believe rather than throw a bomb. It's Hammer Time!

That's pretty much what the DNC did when Bill Clinton ran.  Clintons history was littered with charges of sexual assault, and the DNC, and women's rights groups in particular said we stand by our man.  Hillary helped him bury the corpses, but damn if she wasn't for women's rights at the time.....

Edited by Onboard 2.0
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Onboard 2.0

Onboard 2.0 9083

Posted
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, Pam Cummings said:

BUT HILLARY!!!!!!

Yeah, that's what it was, but it was Bill Clinton, not Hillary.  Or maybe it was just hypocrisy.  

I know that's a much bigger word than "but", so I know it's going right over your little pointy head.

Edited by Onboard 2.0
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RomaVicta

RomaVicta 29907

Posted
Posted
56 minutes ago, Onboard 2.0 said:

That's pretty much what the DNC did when Bill Clinton ran.  Clintons history was littered with charges of sexual assault, and the DNC, and women's rights groups in particular said we stand by our man.  Hillary helped him bury the corpses, but damn if she wasn't for women's rights at the time.....

He had a history of philandering when he ran. He did not have a history of assault as you assert. 

I don't give the lies of the American Spectator any weight at all.

Further, this is actually irrelevant to the discussion. The question is who is alright with it. Unless your post is to be taken as saying you use what you believe about Bill Clinton to be your standard, the issue is skirted.

If I believed Bill Clinton was a rapist, I wouldn't give him a thought as a candidate. Even the Paula Jones story, which I believe to be generally true, doesn't come anywhere near rape or assault.

The comparison between Clinton and Trump is just a comfort teddy bear for those who won't face up to the fact that they support a White Supremacist party and president who is attacking American Institutions and America's place in the world.

Take off the jersey, man. Your team isn't what you want to believe it is. You don't have to become a lib, but you can't really want to be part of Trump can you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Onboard 2.0

Onboard 2.0 9083

Posted
Posted
Just now, RomaVicta said:

He had a history of philandering when he ran. He did not have a history of assault as you assert. 

I don't give the lies of the American Spectator any weight at all.

Further, this is actually irrelevant to the discussion. The question is who is alright with it. Unless your post is to be taken as saying you use what you believe about Bill Clinton to be your standard, the issue is skirted.

If I believed Bill Clinton was a rapist, I wouldn't give him a thought as a candidate. Even the Paula Jones story, which I believe to be generally true, doesn't come anywhere near rape or assault.

The comparison between Clinton and Trump is just a comfort teddy bear for those who won't face up to the fact that they support a White Supremacist party and president who is attacking American Institutions and America's place in the world.

Take off the jersey, man. Your team isn't what you want to believe it is. You don't have to become a lib, but you can't really want to be part of Trump can you?

Yes he did have a sorted history prior to his first run, and by his second election run the charges of sexual assault, and rape had been put forth by 3 or was it 4 women.

I don't think it's alright regardless of the party affiliation.  Team ?  How many times have you crossed party lines to vote  ?  I've done it as recently as our last election here in Va. I've crossed party lines many times over the years (mostly at the state level). No I don't like Trump, never have. I like the Clintons a lot less. He'll probably be gone in 2020, and we'll go on business as usual. That's our strength.

My point is both parties will overlook their candidates sexual history issues when they talk out of their asses about protecting womens rights, and Hillary did exactly that when she helped destroy any woman who came forward.  Now it's looking like Bill IS indeed a pedophile, so the smoke surrounding his his entire career has flames.

 

Really, P. Jones story doesn't meet the standards for assault ?  Put your wife or daughter in that role and let's talk again.  How about him groping K. Willey within days of her husbands death in the WH ?? Nothing there but hi jinx ?  Right ?  Was that not considered sexual assault ?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FondrenRoad

FondrenRoad 4378

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Onboard 2.0 said:

Yes he did have a sorted history prior to his first run, and by his second election run the charges of sexual assault, and rape had been put forth by 3 or was it 4 women.

I don't think it's alright regardless of the party affiliation.  Team ?  How many times have you crossed party lines to vote  ?  I've done it as recently as our last election here in Va. I've crossed party lines many times over the years (mostly at the state level). No I don't like Trump, never have. I like the Clintons a lot less. He'll probably be gone in 2020, and we'll go on business as usual. That's our strength.

My point is both parties will overlook their candidates sexual history issues when they talk out of their asses about protecting womens rights, and Hillary did exactly that when she helped destroy any woman who came forward.  Now it's looking like Bill IS indeed a pedophile, so the smoke surrounding his his entire career has flames.

 

Really, P. Jones story doesn't meet the standards for assault ?  Put your wife or daughter in that role and let's talk again.  How about him groping K. Willey within days of her husbands death in the WH ?? Nothing there but hi jinx ?  Right ?  Was that not considered sexual assault ?  

Sordid.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RomaVicta

RomaVicta 29907

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Onboard 2.0 said:

Yes he did have a sorted history prior to his first run, and by his second election run the charges of sexual assault, and rape had been put forth by 3 or was it 4 women.

I don't think it's alright regardless of the party affiliation.  Team ?  How many times have you crossed party lines to vote  ?  I've done it as recently as our last election here in Va. I've crossed party lines many times over the years (mostly at the state level). No I don't like Trump, never have. I like the Clintons a lot less. He'll probably be gone in 2020, and we'll go on business as usual. That's our strength.

My point is both parties will overlook their candidates sexual history issues when they talk out of their asses about protecting womens rights, and Hillary did exactly that when she helped destroy any woman who came forward.  Now it's looking like Bill IS indeed a pedophile, so the smoke surrounding his his entire career has flames.

 

Really, P. Jones story doesn't meet the standards for assault ?  Put your wife or daughter in that role and let's talk again.  How about him groping K. Willey within days of her husbands death in the WH ?? Nothing there but hi jinx ?  Right ?  Was that not considered sexual assault ?  

I haven't voted for a Republican since Ronald Reagan. The GOP is a lock step hate engine that was solidified with his smiling, idiot face stretched across it. Even good GOPs were systematically forced to kowtow.

You say you've crossed party lines, but you never make the same kind of posts about GOPs as you do Dems. Saying you don't like Trump is as far as you will go even while you're posting about the evil Dems or the evil history of the evil Dems.

You're not a bot or a Russian, but your response above is typical of your position. The libs are wicked. If a GOP is found to be wicked, you post about Dem hypocrisy instead of the issue at hand. Those are avoidances.

I don't think it's alright regardless of the party affiliation.  Team ?  How many times have you crossed party lines to vote  ?

Never once do you condemn Trump. You talk Clinton. You do both sides. You cast yourself as the holy arbitrator of hypocrisy which the Dems are guilty of!

I honestly don't think you recognize the rut your thinking is in. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Onboard 2.0

Onboard 2.0 9083

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, RomaVicta said:

I haven't voted for a Republican since Ronald Reagan. The GOP is a lock step hate engine that was solidified with his smiling, idiot face stretched across it. Even good GOPs were systematically forced to kowtow.

You say you've crossed party lines, but you never make the same kind of posts about GOPs as you do Dems. Saying you don't like Trump is as far as you will go even while you're posting about the evil Dems or the evil history of the evil Dems.

You're not a bot or a Russian, but your response above is typical of your position. The libs are wicked. If a GOP is found to be wicked, you post about Dem hypocrisy instead of the issue at hand. Those are avoidances.

I don't think it's alright regardless of the party affiliation.  Team ?  How many times have you crossed party lines to vote  ?

Never once do you condemn Trump. You talk Clinton. You do both sides. You cast yourself as the holy arbitrator of hypocrisy which the Dems are guilty of!

I honestly don't think you recognize the rut your thinking is in. 

Y'all do enough criticizing for both of us.  Did you criticize Bill Clinton for his rape, and sexual assault allegations, apparently you don't think he ever did sexually assaulted anyone (SEE:  Your P. Jones comments), did you criticize him for the Chinese national campaign fund scandal, or any of the other shady things they tried to pull ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anastasis

Anastasis 23469

Posted
Posted

Pelosi don't fuck around when it comes to bringing her own to heel.

https://nypost.com/2019/08/03/feds-probing-aocs-chief-of-staff-saikat-chakrabarti-after-sudden-resignation/

 

The feds are looking into possible campaign finance misdeeds by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s chief of staff and lead rainmaker, who suddenly resigned Friday, federal sources told The Post.

The inquiry centers on two political action committees founded by Saikat Chakrabarti, the top aide who quit along with Ocasio-Cortez spokesman Corbin Trent, the sources said. Trent left to join the congresswoman’s 2020 re-election campaign.

The brash Chakrabarti, who masterminded Ocasio-Cortez’s campaign and steered her proposed Green New Deal, had caused uproar in the halls of Congress with a series of combative tweets that contributed to a rift between his rookie boss and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RomaVicta

RomaVicta 29907

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Onboard 2.0 said:

Y'all do enough criticizing for both of us.  Did you criticize Bill Clinton for his rape, and sexual assault allegations, apparently you don't think he ever did sexually assaulted anyone (SEE:  Your P. Jones comments), did you criticize him for the Chinese national campaign fund scandal, or any of the other shady things they tried to pull ?

Sigh

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rougarou

Rougarou 594

Posted
Posted
Just now, wildcat09 said:

Future mass shooters of America club, right there.

Worse.

Mass shooters are disenfranchised and marginalized. These guys are the franchised. These are the future managers and VP's and CEO's who will further privilege, etc. These are Covington Catholic-types, not loner weirdo types.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RomaVicta

RomaVicta 29907

Posted
Posted (edited)

They like beer. What's more American than that? They still like beer. They're not going to allow Bill and Hillary Clinton to smear their good names. This is just fun that they have no recollection of. They're not choking her and touching her genitals, they would never do that.

At least they've got Moscow Mitch shirts on, another black eye for that POS.

Edited by RomaVicta
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...