Jump to content

Transfer Portal Development - Feedback Needed


Recommended Posts

1. full name of transfer portal entries w/ position, height, weight, age, b-day, HS, hometown, previous team(s), HS composite ranking, current portal ranking, contact/no-contact status, high-light film, scheduled visit(s), current relatives at other schools or in pro-sports and where parents attended college or university

2. team rankings

3. projected destination

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What Gerry Says: This is where you insert what Gerry says about the player. 😄

Bobby’s Need-ometer (a 1-10 ranking of how important the player is to the Texas class). He can provide context on whether it’s a positional need or if that particular transfer is just that dude.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://ontexasfootball.com/recruiting-2025/lance-jackson-r24/

So this stuff will be the basis of the player entity, this is specific to the portal portion of it. It's good feedback to add other things to the player entity, but box scores/stats etc aren't really portal related they are stats related (there will be a stats db later on too don't worry)

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Soliver465 said:

Estimated NIL cost/impact/requirements, something along those lines.

the tower would likely appreciate the entire burnt orange $9.95 ecosystem staying out of this.....

.... until a "mainstream" entity opens fire ....

and then game on.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure how or if it should be included by a breakdown of schools competing vs potential NIL issues with others already committed would be an interesting barometer on a glance.

In case that's clear as mud.

John Holmes

Port A Cholas HS

Tight End

6' and 10"

*Please Grove

Leader:

aggie (1 likely NIL commit)

Others:

2) LSU (8 likely NIL commits)

3) Texas (20 likely NIL commits)

4) Alabama (12 likely NIL commits)

5) Oregon (46 likely NIL commits)

 

  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rather than consensus 5 star for example - I would rather see a line with their coming out of high school National Position rank, State Position Rank, games played in each season, and key injuries.  This would show the predicted potential, the actual production, and any physical reason why that production might not be as expected.

 

You are going to have only a couple kinds of kids in the portal. Great players looking for a bigger paycheck.  Players who did not reach their potential for whatever reason, who are looking for a fresh start(thus my desire for injury info).  Head Cases.  And lastly talented kids from Texas who were enticed elsewhere and now just want to get closer to home. It would be awesome if we knew dollar amounts being tossed out, but at Texas does that really matter?  We can match anyone if the kid is good enough! But an "Ask" vs "Bid" would be very, very interesting.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • immamac unpinned this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...