Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Offensively, I want to see our guards drive the paint more and use our bigs to seal off defenders.

Holle was getting torched by the quicker guards for LSU and also SoCar. Which forced our bigs to rotate late and pick up fouls. I’m not saying she needs to sit, but Vic should practice more lineups the next 2 weeks with Preston and Lee getting more minutes at guard. Need their quickness in the later rounds

Also need Vic to tell Lee if she’s open, shoot it. She can make them. and if you miss, you have teammates who are excellent at rebounding misses 

  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted
1 hour ago, Js1 said:

Offensively, I want to see our guards drive the paint more and use our bigs to seal off defenders.

Holle was getting torched by the quicker guards for LSU and also SoCar. Which forced our bigs to rotate late and pick up fouls. I’m not saying she needs to sit, but Vic should practice more lineups the next 2 weeks with Preston and Lee getting more minutes at guard. Need their quickness in the later rounds

Also need Vic to tell Lee if she’s open, shoot it. She can make them. and if you miss, you have teammates who are excellent at rebounding misses 

That is what jumped off the page to me.  Holle is an intelligent, high effort, team oriented defender, but she simply lacks the athleticism to stay in front of quicker guards.  She was the focal point LSU and SoCar used to break down the Texas defense.  It is very hard to play excellent team defense and stay out of foul trouble when you are consistently allowing dribble penetration, and Holle was getting blown by constantly.  It would be one thing is she made up for it by being a mismatch on offense, but all she can do is swing the ball and launch threes.  The very reason why she can't stay in front of quick guards is the very same reason why she can't drive on offense.  I love Holle and she's a great Longhorn, but she is more suited as a 7th player in a rotation role for a championship team.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
5 minutes ago, TommysTinyTowels said:

Phelia being healthy all year would have changed the rotations. Would have alleviated some issues.

 

Sad A Christmas Story GIF by filmeditor

Posted
3 hours ago, Js1 said:

Offensively, I want to see our guards drive the paint more and use our bigs to seal off defenders.

Holle was getting torched by the quicker guards for LSU and also SoCar. Which forced our bigs to rotate late and pick up fouls. I’m not saying she needs to sit, but Vic should practice more lineups the next 2 weeks with Preston and Lee getting more minutes at guard. Need their quickness in the later rounds

Also need Vic to tell Lee if she’s open, shoot it. She can make them. and if you miss, you have teammates who are excellent at rebounding misses 

Dead on, Js1. Other than holding SCar to a poor shooting percentage and dominance by Jones and Oldacre, these were strategic underpinnings of the win at home.

Posted
55 minutes ago, TommysTinyTowels said:

Phelia being healthy all year would have changed the rotations. Would have alleviated some issues.

 

Certainly would have helped with outside shooting. Teams wouldn't be able to sag back in a 2-3/2-1-2 zone if Phelia/Holle or Phelia/Lee were on the court most of the time. That would then open up the interior to feed the bigs. 

Get Phelia healthy and back, get Chavez on campus, and secure a portal big to spell Oldacre and next year looks very promising. One can dream all these variables align...

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
Just now, MuellerHorn said:

Certainly would have helped with outside shooting. Teams wouldn't be able to sag back in a 2-3/2-1-2 zone if Phelia/Holle or Phelia/Lee were on the court most of the time. That would then open up the interior to feed the bigs. 

Get Phelia healthy and back, get Chavez on campus, and secure a portal big to spell Oldacre and next year looks very promising. One can dream all these variables align...

Also assuming she comes in like Booker, and the comparisons are all there, you can play more lineups with Booker at the 1 and Crump coming in to play SF

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted

Disappointed to see the voting coaches followed the AP’s lead. They moved us down to 5th as well. I guess they fell victim to recency bias, too. Hopefully, the selection committee won’t.

Coaches Poll

  • Rage+1 1
Posted
3 hours ago, 86txex said:

Disappointed to see the voting coaches followed the AP’s lead. They moved us down to 5th as well. I guess they fell victim to recency bias, too. Hopefully, the selection committee won’t.

Coaches Poll

Like many here, I believe the committee won't fall victim to recency bias, BUT what are the alternatives where a two seed makes more competitive sense for Texas?

For instance, if we land a one seed but get UConn as our two, I'm not sure that's better than being the first two in USC's region.

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, MuellerHorn said:

Like many here, I believe the committee won't fall victim to recency bias, BUT what are the alternatives where a two seed makes more competitive sense for Texas?

For instance, if we land a one seed but get UConn as our two, I'm not sure that's better than being the first two in USC's region.

Texas being a 2 would be ridiculous. And yes it doesn't really affect the EE matchup but in the SS you are playing a 3 instead of a 4. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, ztejas said:

Texas being a 2 would be ridiculous. And yes it doesn't really affect the EE matchup but in the SS you are playing a 3 instead of a 4. 

I agree with you. I merely wanted to post the question to see what the ideal scenario may look like.

Posted

The committee killing us for losing by 19 to SoCar and pushing us to a 2, but rewarding SoCar, who lost by a billion at home to UConn, with the #1 overall seed, would be some bullshit

I don't think the committee weighs a conf tournament title loss as much as the media/coach voting.  Voting is nothing but a week to week, what did you do in your last game thing.  The committee's job is to look at our entire body of work, including our 14 Q1 wins, SEC regular season co-championship, 15 game win streak, etc. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted

I’d rather be a 2 with USC as the 1 than be a 1 with UConn as the 2.

UConn isn’t the same UConn as before but they are the favorites to win the NC for a reason. 

I just want to break through and get to the FF

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, Pancho said:

I’d rather be a 2 with USC as the 1 than be a 1 with UConn as the 2.

UConn isn’t the same UConn as before but they are the favorites to win the NC for a reason. 

I just want to break through and get to the FF

Finally someone who will engage my hypothetical. 

And again, y’all, I agree that given cumulative résumés of the five schools under consideration for a one seed, Texas should clearly get one. I would just really like to avoid UConn prior to the F4. 

Edited by MuellerHorn
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted (edited)

Who’s to say UConn wouldn’t be a one seed and USC the first two seed, with us a one seed of course. UConn is number one in net rankings this week I believe, with USC at 6th.

Edited by 86txex
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, 86txex said:

Who’s to say UConn wouldn’t be a one seed and USC the first two seed, with us a one seed of course. UConn is number one in net rankings this week I believe, with USC at 6th.

Also entirely possible. 

  • Hook 'Em 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...