Jump to content

FINAL 2024 CFB polls/rankings - Texas #3/ #4 /#3 (CFP/AP/Coaches)


Recommended Posts

Posted
15 minutes ago, RomaVicta said:

The checked teams would be credible wins, but the unchecked teams could drop out of or to the bottom of the top 25 if they lose one game. It's a strange year. Only a few teams, including us, have been consistently good. I include Ole Miss because I think a win over them means more than their ranking indicates.

Agree with your overall point but not sure why you excepted ole miss.  They never wins anything of significance

Posted
32 minutes ago, Basil said:


I enjoy an aggy meltdown as much as anybody but the mental gymnastics they go through to prove is Texas is mid, hasn’t beaten anyone and will probably lose to aggy are something else. The polls are no doubt giving them fits.

When a team is much better than the other teams they play it looks like they haven't played anyone good.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Haha 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, tbone_ said:

In fairness, none of our opponents other than maybe CSU have anyone on their roster who can actually play quarterback.

Didn’t see and highlights of the miss state game with GA. Did they run or throw to get their 31 pts?

I’m not dogging our results at all. Just making an observation.

ULM is 5-1 

 


Their freshmen RB is someone we should lure to the portal

Posted
Just now, troph said:

It’s not the most important statistic but weeks at number 1 in the AP is kind of a thing I’m glad to be racking up a few weeks this season. If I recall VY 05 was always 2nd? 

Yep. Was never #1 in the AP poll until the last one.

Posted
5 minutes ago, troph said:

It’s not the most important statistic but weeks at number 1 in the AP is kind of a thing I’m glad to be racking up a few weeks this season. If I recall VY 05 was always 2nd? 

Winsipedia tracks this as a relevant stat and will also show the dates in history in which the ranking occurred, for those interested in looking more closely. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, InkaUtexas said:

Dumbasses. I am sure an armored regiment and an overflight of F-14's could make the AAC paper pushers think about it.

I think they’d probably use F-18 Super Hornets these days. Maverick and Goose ain’t walking through that door 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted

All F-14s were trashed, save for a few gutted museum pieces, didn't want to allow a black market for their parts since the only other operator is Iran.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, linux said:

All F-14s were trashed, save for a few gutted museum pieces, didn't want to allow a black market for their parts since the only other operator is Iran.

We got one back when Mav got that bag of ass airborne off a taxiway.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 4
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, RomaVicta said:

Just looking at this top 25, there really aren't that many somebodies you can play.

image.png.eb536c4b51df30081d58034c13336558.png

The checked teams would be credible wins, but the unchecked teams could drop out of or to the bottom of the top 25 if they lose one game. It's a strange year. Only a few teams, including us, have been consistently good. I include Ole Miss because I think a win over them means more than their ranking indicates.

Why does ole miss mean more than their ranking? Because they beat furman, mid tenn st, wake, GA southern, and SC? Because they played an overrated LSU team close?

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 minute ago, heso said:

Why does ole miss mean more than their ranking? Because they beat furman, mid tenn st, wake, GA southern, and SC? Because they played an overrated LSU team close?

Maybe he has a crush on Lane Kiffin 

Posted
1 hour ago, Grande Mart said:

I think they’d probably use F-18 Super Hornets these days. Maverick and Goose ain’t walking through that door 

Fine, use the B model F-35. Don't care what they use, change the damn rules. Fly over it with some Corsairs. Still more firepower than the ACC.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
Posted

I’ll tell you what, Diego Pavia can play quarterback.  The Vandy defense won’t stand up vs the Texasrunning game, much less Sark’s schemes and wizardry but Vandy is a better team, and a better coached team right now than several SEC teams and AP top 25 teams.  I’ll be glad to eat this post after the Horns win in Nashville by 24 or more.  First, neuter them Dawgs and their coach poaching coach.  These are some Vegas line beating Horns!  My guys are 85% out of it but have a prayer if there’s a rspid and major turnaround.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, RomaVicta said:

Just looking at this top 25, there really aren't that many somebodies you can play.

image.png.eb536c4b51df30081d58034c13336558.png

The checked teams would be credible wins, but the unchecked teams could drop out of or to the bottom of the top 25 if they lose one game. It's a strange year. Only a few teams, including us, have been consistently good. I include Ole Miss because I think a win over them means more than their ranking indicates.

call-inside-house.gif

Posted
2 hours ago, closetojumping said:

Winsipedia tracks this as a relevant stat and will also show the dates in history in which the ranking occurred, for those interested in looking more closely. 

We have a lot of people who are going to get really scared about this game. Gonna need a mud hole post (and yeah- I know Georgia is too good for a traditionally mud hole post but we got one for Bama last year). 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
It’s not the most important statistic but weeks at number 1 in the AP is kind of a thing I’m glad to be racking up a few weeks this season. If I recall VY 05 was always 2nd? 

I thought we broke through to #1 one week, then went back. Am I making shit up?
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, tbone_ said:


I thought we broke through to #1 one week, then went back. Am I making shit up?

This will be our third week out of four at 1 this year. 

Edited by troph
Posted
5 minutes ago, troph said:

This will be our third week out of four at 1 this year. 

I think it’s 4 out of 5. 

 

18 minutes ago, Wulaw Horn said:

We have a lot of people who are going to get really scared about this game. Gonna need a mud hole post (and yeah- I know Georgia is too good for a traditionally mud hole post but we got one for Bama last year). 

One is coming. I thought about OU, but just couldn’t muster the personal concern. One is coming for this week, though. I’ve outlined the whines and rebuttals in my head already. 

  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted
2 hours ago, heso said:

Why does ole miss mean more than their ranking? Because they beat furman, mid tenn st, wake, GA southern, and SC? Because they played an overrated LSU team close?

Remove the check. It's no matter to me. They just seem more formidable than the dog shit around them in the polls. Mebbe I'm wrong.

Posted
1 minute ago, utee94 said:

As I recall, that season USC and Texas went 1 and 2 wire to wire.  So the first, last, and only time Texas was #1, was in the final poll.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2005_NCAA_Division_I-A_football_rankings

 

Yes. According to the AP. But, one week we jumped them in the BCS, and the media acted like we’d forced them to watch their daughter star in a snuff film. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
9 minutes ago, DoobieWah said:

Well remember, that 2005 USC team was considered one of the most formidable fighting forces in history, so of course they would be ranked #1 until VY brought the thunder. 

I still think they were the better team

Fight On Fired Up GIF by USC Trojans

  • Fuck You 2
Posted
51 minutes ago, TonyTexas said:

Kurt, same dumbass, different newspaper . 
 

IMG_1685.jpeg

I'd love to see him try to defend this. Or maybe he's just trying to give Finebaum an aneurysm

Posted
38 minutes ago, chainsaw said:

I'd love to see him try to defend this. Or maybe he's just trying to give Finebaum an aneurysm

Or he’s trying to generate outrage and clicks. Wannabe contrarian dipshit. I love the look on Sarkisian’s face when this clown asks a question. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Wulaw Horn said:

He really is fucking stupid. 

Fortunately for him, there are people even stupider, who apparently believe that hiring him to write stupid shit is a good way to keep newspapers relevant.

Posted
On 10/13/2024 at 3:26 PM, troph said:

It’s not the most important statistic but weeks at number 1 in the AP is kind of a thing I’m glad to be racking up a few weeks this season. If I recall VY 05 was always 2nd? 

Yeah this is our 4th week as AP #1 this season that ties the entire Mack Brown regieme (1 week 2005, 3 weeks 2008)

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
  • Rage+1 5
Posted

2024 4 weeks
2008 3 weeks
2005 1 week
1984 2 weeks
1981 1 week
1977 6 weeks
1970 6 weeks
1969 4 weeks
1965 3 weeks
1964 3 weeks
1963 9 weeks
1962 2 weeks
1961 2 weeks
1946 1 week
1941 2 weeks
 

  • Hook 'Em 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...