Jump to content

2024 CFB polls/rankings - Texas #3/ #3 /#3 (CFP/AP/Coaches)


TKthunder2

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, thunderlounge said:


I never suggested the ccg was the ONLY way for auto-bids.

But 2 teams going head to head for it is certainly more “exciting” than no ccg. 
 

And, as the obvious has been pointed out multiple times, conferences like money.

 

Yeah, I'd much rather who makes a playoff and their seeding in said playoff be determined by on field head to head rather than Kirk fuckhead Boles and similar idiots. I don't understand why anyone wouldn't. I mean, I guess we could skip the entire regular season, see what the poll voters think and start the season with playoffs in December.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BurntEyes said:

Yeah, I'd much rather who makes a playoff and their seeding in said playoff be determined by on field head to head rather than Kirk fuckhead Boles and similar idiots. I don't understand why anyone wouldn't. I mean, I guess we could skip the entire regular season, see what the poll voters think and start the season with playoffs in December.

It's the wrong thread but I think ultimately that's what we will get once all the realignment stuff is done. See the BIG/SEC partnership and OOC scheduling that is being worked on.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, BurntOrange&White said:

It's the wrong thread but I think ultimately that's what we will get once all the realignment stuff is done. See the BIG/SEC partnership and OOC scheduling that is being worked on.


Agreed. End game will not have polls factored in. Good.

Here’s your path, can you make it happen. Period. 
 

Fuck kurt. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BurntOrange&White said:

It's the wrong thread but I think ultimately that's what we will get once all the realignment stuff is done. See the BIG/SEC partnership and OOC scheduling that is being worked on.

I agree it's going that way eventually. It will take probably 4-5 years for the dust to settle but the polls will slowly factor out. At least that's what I'm reading in the tea leaves.

/thread off tracking

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, n64ra said:

I'm waiting for the day the conferences expand their conference football playoffs. They already run conference tournaments before March Madness and the College World Series.

They wouldn't do that. BIG/SEC are already pushing for 4 guaranteed spots in the CFP. The 12 team format is only for the next two years. I'd bet it expands to 16 beyond that with BIG/SEC getting 8 combined guaranteed spots + potential for at larges. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BurntOrange&White said:

They wouldn't do that. BIG/SEC are already pushing for 4 guaranteed spots in the CFP. The 12 team format is only for the next two years. I'd bet it expands to 16 beyond that with BIG/SEC getting 8 combined guaranteed spots + potential for at larges. 

why-not-both-why-not.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/27/2024 at 11:50 AM, satyanash said:

Still at #6 in the Coaches' Poll: https://sportsdata.usatoday.com/football/ncaaf/coaches-poll/2024-2025/2024-10-27

  1. Oregon (53)
  2. Georgia (1)
  3. Penn State
  4. Ohio State
  5. Miami FL
  6. Texas
  7. Tennessee
  8. Clemson
  9. Notre Dame
  10. Iowa State
  11. Texas A&M
  12. BYU
  13. Indiana
  14. Alabama
  15. Kansas State
  16. LSU
  17. Pittsburgh
  18. Ole Miss
  19. Boise State
  20. SMU
  21. Army
  22. Washington State
  23. Missouri
  24. Illinois
  25. Memphis

Miami, who plays literally no one, being ahead of us is absolutely hilarious. Clemson is going to go full on Sing Sing shower rape on them. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BurntEyes said:

I called out someone spelling his name wrong and realized I made a mistake too in the first post (weird auto correct) so called myself out as well.

I'm just saying to feel free to misspell Kunt Bowels' name any time and any way you want.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BurntEyes said:

I called out someone spelling his name wrong and realized I made a mistake too in the first post (weird auto correct) so called myself out as well.

Look freakshow, it's Kurt Bowels, and you're the idoit.

  • Hook 'Em 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, utee94 said:

Look freakshow, it's Kurt Bowels, and you're the idoit.

Look jackass, we all know and have agreed I'm prone to go full regard! I wasn't aware that self mockeration fell into the full regard world. I've noted it and will endeavor to never repeat that mistake again. 

Now, please go eabod.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TrashMaster G said:

I'm just saying to feel free to misspell Kunt Bowels' name any time and any way you want.

Well, next time just fucking say that instead of making me decode your message. See my post above regarding regards and my propensity to regard regardless. 

Asshole.

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Funk Doctor Spock said:

Miami, who plays literally no one, being ahead of us is absolutely hilarious. Clemson is going to go full on Sing Sing shower rape on them. 

If SMU, Miami, and Clemson go undefeated, who goes to the ACC championship?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dnaguy said:

If SMU, Miami, and Clemson go undefeated, who goes to the ACC championship?

I would think Clemson based on schedule. Miami has had nothing but cupcakes, same with SMU. Clemson played Georgia, and the other two played JUCO teams. 

Just now, Richter said:

This is the gayest thread on the internet

Really? Let me introduce you to TexAgs 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oof.  Google is your friend:

Quote

At the most basic level, the teams with the two best winning percentages in conference play will play on the first weekend of December in Charlotte, North Carolina at the Bank of America Stadium for the ACC title. 

In the case of a two-team tie for the second-best winning percentage, the first move is to turn to head-to-head competition, with the winner of that game holding the advantage. If there was no head-to-head competition, the next determinant is winning percentage against all common opponents. Then it moves to win percentage against common opponents with the added caveat of order of finish in the conference, beginning with the highest-seeded common opponents and moving downward in order of the standings. The fourth step is to factor in the combined winning percentage of a team's conference opponent, with the team who faced the better opponents gaining the advantage. 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

One problem is that there are simply too many Div 1 (or whatever the term is) college programs. 

plus

A playoff based on rankings is regarded. Guaranteed spots for certain conferences is bullshit. Big money wants it both ways. 

plus

NIL money and the transfer portal

 

equals: 

              Fans: Controversy!!! so and so is ranked one spot above so and so!!!! OUTRAGE!!!! 

              ESPN: Heh heh, dance morons. 

 

 

If we are going to have a playoff (sigh), then we need 8 conferences with 10 to 12 teams each. Each conference decides who their champion is and sends that team to the playoffs. Random seeded. Team with best record or best point differential is home team. 

Or seed based on records (or point differentials). Whatever. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/29/2024 at 7:29 PM, Funk Doctor Spock said:

I would think Clemson based on schedule. Miami has had nothing but cupcakes, same with SMU. Clemson played Georgia, and the other two played JUCO teams

SMU played two P4 teams in non-con one of whom is undefeated and ranked in the top 10. 

Not that non-con has anything to do with CCG tiebreaker. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, MirrOlure said:

So the All State playoff predictor has both us and Aggy in and Georgia in the top 4.

That seems like a very unlikely scenario.

I'm not sure what you're looking at, but what I see has A&M at #13 (which I think is unlikely unless they lose today and to us).

image.png.fe0e48014c240d90f19609b16efa0502.png

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, GreenspointTexas said:

Meh. Only one of those teams has a winning record

Yeah, but similar for Texas and Penn State.

Heard a talking head this morning trying to figure out ways to leave a 2 loss Texas and/or Penn State out of CFP... said they have no good wins.

 

Edited by LTtxfan
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...