Jump to content

2024 CFB polls/rankings - Texas #3/ #3 /#3 (CFP/AP/Coaches)


TKthunder2

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ztejas said:

I think teams with permanent big program OOC rivals should get a little credit, too. USC/ND, SCAR/Clemson, FSU/Florida off the top of my head. 

I’ll give you USC. Having LSU & ND ooc is legit. Even ND makes sure they have a few marquee games on top of the shit they pack in there. 

The other ones, they definitely get some credit for sure. But those games mean shit often enough that they go into that 3rd group with LSU. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ztejas said:

G5 Cincy MADE the CFP.

There were also a couple TCU, Utah seasons where they were legit top 5 teams playing in the G5.

You’re right, completely forgot about Cincinnati. I’m a dumbass. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, chainsaw said:

I think committees do a decent job, when it's the march madness bracket. I'm only upset if a team that clearly belongs in the conversation for #1 gets left out. I don't feel so bad about BYU, Boise, or any two-loss P4 being left out of the playoffs because they never would have had a chance in the BCS or 4-team CFP days.

What kind of logic is this? The system was horribly exclusive and unfair before, so if it's still unfair, just a little less so, then so what? Football is a game of direct competition, why are we having biased judges scoring for access? Let teams settle it on the field and come up with the most unbiased system possible for access. 

judging_scores.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Magus Ossis said:

Wasn't the old BCS "formula" really just a composite of the human polls with an average of the more popular computer algorithms as an add-on?

Not at first. But after Oklahoma lost in the Big12 championship to K state but still went to the National championship game they changed it to use the polls or something

Before that it was a computer formula or something.

Edited by Dnaguy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Crockett said:

What kind of logic is this? The system was horribly exclusive and unfair before, so if it's still unfair, just a little less so, then so what? Football is a game of direct competition, why are we having biased judges scoring for access? Let teams settle it on the field and come up with the most unbiased system possible for access. 

judging_scores.jpg

BYU and Boise aren't undefeated. G5s with 1+ loss and weak conference runner-ups (whether P4 or G5) have never had a legitimate claim to the chance at winning a national championship. Leaving them out of the playoff is kind of like failing to nominate a good (but not Oscar-worthy) acting performance in a year when there's two or three clearly better, clearly Oscar-caliber performances in that category.

This is not a 2004-2005 Auburn situation, nor is it like any of the other famous snubs that cast doubt on who the best team in college football was at the end of the season.

Edited by chainsaw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Js1 said:

yeah, I like our scheduling philosophy.  If we move to 9 game SEC schedule, we should continue to schedule: 

1 major P4 program
1 in-state G5 school (either within our system or Rice)
1 nearby G5 school

I’m totally on board with this, and I’d be in favor of playing one of the 2 OOC chump games in November like the rest of this conference does. Not only does it give you an almost bye week at a time when most of the team is at least a little banged up, but it reduces the number of September swelter games we have to endure. If one of those games get replaced by an SEC game early on, at least every other year it won’t be in Austin…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...