Jump to content

2024 CFB polls/rankings - Texas #6 /#6 (AP/Coaches)

TKthunder2

By TKthunder2
in Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

Funk Doctor Spock

Funk Doctor Spock 11603

Posted
Posted
On 10/13/2024 at 1:24 PM, 89Horn said:

Penn St. are four spots from not playing a ranked team.  Agree though that after Saturday it will be a bit different.  Our schedule will then be on par with OSU’s, at that point in time.  Oregon beat Boise State, so I guess that makes their schedule better.

Penn St always fucking loses to Ohio State and at least another 2-3 losses. They're a fraud 

On 10/13/2024 at 2:04 PM, ApocalypseTexas said:

I get the votes for Penn State ahead of Ohio State but no one putting Penn State ahead is going to bet on Penn State to beat Ohio State 

See above. 

Not even remotely concerned about Georgia. Just like Michigan. We're curb stomping them. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

The Dog
The Dog
Bill Lumbergh
Bill Lumbergh

I'd rather stay behind Georgia until they come to Austin.  Same way I felt about being behind SC in 05.  I'd rather have something to prove than something to defend.

closetojumping
closetojumping

You say a lot of stupid shit and you do it at a rapid, voluminous rate. You’re like a shit howitzer, just fucking blasting the board with constant bullshit. 

Posted Images

dcar00

dcar00 13854

Posted
Posted
22 hours ago, Wulaw Horn said:

We have a lot of people who are going to get really scared about this game. Gonna need a mud hole post (and yeah- I know Georgia is too good for a traditionally mud hole post but we got one for Bama last year). 

usually I am, "welp, this will probably be the week" but....we finally have a D we can trust, fully.  If you have played 6 D1 opponents and are holding teams under 7 points with probably an average of 3 points a game of those 7 in garbage time you are fucking good.  I don't care who the opponents are.  If they are D1 that is all I need to know.

Imma hang my hat on that, which IMO has always been the way to a championship.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Magus Ossis

Magus Ossis 2737

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Pimphand said:

2025 16 weeks (preseason, 12 games, 2 byes, CCG)
2024 4  11 weeks (+6 more games +CCG)
2008 3 weeks
2005 1 week
1984 2 weeks
1981 1 week
1977 6 weeks
1970 6 weeks
1969 4 weeks
1965 3 weeks
1964 3 weeks
1963 9 weeks
1962 2 weeks
1961 2 weeks
1946 1 week
1941 2 weeks
 

So let it be written, so let it be done

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pimphand

Pimphand 5502

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, TonyTexas said:

Kurt, same dumbass, different newspaper . 
 

IMG_1685.jpeg

I'm actually kinda shocked he has Texas #1 TBH.

Auburn @ Missouri (-4.5)
Oklahoma @ South Carolina (+3)
Alabama @ Tennessee (+2.5)
Texas A&M @ Mississippi State (+15)
LSU @ Arkansas (+3)
Georgia @ Texas (-3.5)
Kentucky @ Florida (+1)

Vegas thinks Bohls is a moron #shocker
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nnm

nnm 35453

Posted
Posted
On 10/13/2024 at 1:39 PM, mdmost said:

 

Unpossible. Military schools were not competitive in that era because they were busy fighting wars and were male-only. It is known. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 2
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pimphand

Pimphand 5502

Posted
Posted
59 minutes ago, n64ra said:

We're coming for you 1963 9 weeks!

I'm assuming even with the extended playoffs we still will only have 16 weeks of polls with the one coming out post CCG weekend and the final one coming out post CFP conclusion.

That means we could max out at 12 this year as long as we continue to win since we missed weeks (1-3, & 6) so far.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pimphand

Pimphand 5502

Posted
Posted

Isn't really poll related but I don't know a better thread to tuck it in.. holy fuq we tend to oscillate between great and busted dog shit
image.thumb.png.f6285b5d21dfd7caea3ec9eb58119043.png

1940-1947 dominance outside of 1946
1948-1958 rapid fire puke
1959-1983 the golden era minus DKRs mid 60s pre-wishbone melt & mid 70s malaise
1984-1997 two decent years in a morass of shit
1998-2009 the second golden age just way too short
2010-2022 two neutral years in a morass of shit
2023-beyond hopefully the 3rd golden age

Need to dig the winning % back up near the .7289 mark we peaked out at in 1983 vs this .704 dungheap we currently have.

Only need to win the next 128 games in a row ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cmontexas

cmontexas 3201

Posted
Posted

I love watching Army and Navy play and root for them. But do you guys think its an indicator that the overall quality of play in college football has diminished? Army and Navy are essentially always the same team year in year out. The teams they play seem to have gotten much much worse.

College football is still great regardless, and the drama and passion and atmospheres remain top notch

Link to comment
Share on other sites
closetojumping

closetojumping 61996

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, cmontexas said:

I love watching Army and Navy play and root for them. But do you guys think its an indicator that the overall quality of play in college football has diminished? Army and Navy are essentially always the same team year in year out. The teams they play seem to have gotten much much worse.

College football is still great regardless, and the drama and passion and atmospheres remain top notch

I think it is the opposite. We’re seeing better play across the board because of the portal and NIL. 

Now, neither of those things applies to Army or Navy. I think what you’re seeing with those two is that the QB play for both this year has been phenomenal and that is guiding their records as much as anything. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wulaw Horn

Wulaw Horn 18917

Posted
Posted
On 10/15/2024 at 12:17 PM, Pimphand said:

Isn't really poll related but I don't know a better thread to tuck it in.. holy fuq we tend to oscillate between great and busted dog shit
image.thumb.png.f6285b5d21dfd7caea3ec9eb58119043.png

1940-1947 dominance outside of 1946
1948-1958 rapid fire puke
1959-1983 the golden era minus DKRs mid 60s pre-wishbone melt & mid 70s malaise
1984-1997 two decent years in a morass of shit
1998-2009 the second golden age just way too short
2010-2022 two neutral years in a morass of shit
2023-beyond hopefully the 3rd golden age

Need to dig the winning % back up near the .7289 mark we peaked out at in 1983 vs this .704 dungheap we currently have.

Only need to win the next 128 games in a row 😉

That seems like a minor ask

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
thunderlounge

thunderlounge 7578

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, closetojumping said:

I think it is the opposite. We’re seeing better play across the board because of the portal and NIL. 

Now, neither of those things applies to Army or Navy. I think what you’re seeing with those two is that the QB play for both this year has been phenomenal and that is guiding their records as much as anything. 


I think you’re on the right track, but can’t help to wonder if maybe talent being paid for (through NIL) upstream isn’t having an effect on the lower end. Combined with the portal and players moving up. In turn, leaving less talented players towards the bottom.

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pimphand

Pimphand 5502

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Wulaw Horn said:

That seems like a minor ask

The highs get shorter and the lows get lower just look Mack Brown didn't return us to DKR+Akers levels and instead put us on a downward spiral that left us worse off than when he arrived.

  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JBJ

JBJ 3591

Posted
Posted

I think parity has remained roughly the same.  Lower FBS teams pulling up talent from FCS and D2 has even things out, and there are arguably more opportunities to improve at that level than there are portal CUSA players making a difference at Texas.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dcar00

dcar00 13854

Posted
Posted
On 10/16/2024 at 5:26 PM, Pimphand said:

The highs get shorter and the lows get lower just look Mack Brown didn't return us to DKR+Akers levels and instead put us on a downward spiral that left us worse off than when he arrived.

This is really revisionist IMO.  we were better off than when he arrived.  mackovic was a disaster at the end. 

the problem was we were only reasonably better off(because Mack had basically run out the string) and then we hired a coach who didn't know his own zip code or his QB's name.  had we hired even James Franklin he would have kept us treading water at late Mack levels and probably improved a bit.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ztejas

ztejas 42730

Posted
Posted
On 10/16/2024 at 1:07 PM, cmontexas said:

I love watching Army and Navy play and root for them. But do you guys think its an indicator that the overall quality of play in college football has diminished?

No. Navy was ranked 4 seasons in 5 from '15 to '19.

Army was ranked in '18 and '20.

It could have easily happened around that window, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ztejas

ztejas 42730

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Pimphand said:

Jesus Christ look at the graph 

Akers followed DKR. Mack had to follow 11 seasons of dogshit. Also the scale of that graph is miniscule. Under Akers we peaked at like .728 - Mack got it all the way back to .720 before his last few seasons.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dcar00

dcar00 13854

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, kevwun said:

Franklin would have recruited well.  He would have taken to being OU's bitch pretty easily though.

sure.  He would have had an actual offense and probably kept us at 8-5, 9-4 levels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BevoAbyss

BevoAbyss 1873

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 10/16/2024 at 6:26 PM, Pimphand said:

The highs get shorter and the lows get lower just look Mack Brown didn't return us to DKR+Akers levels and instead put us on a downward spiral that left us worse off than when he arrived.

If the height of the lines is the criteria for seasons of Longhorn greatness .... then DKR's three national championships did not rise to the visual greatness of the Akers regime, which had zero titles. Same with Mack's 2005 team, one of the greatest teams of all time as was DKR's 1969 team.

Suggests to me that chart is visual BS.... or at least deeply flawed.

Edited by BevoAbyss
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Funk Doctor Spock

Funk Doctor Spock 11603

Posted
Posted
On 10/16/2024 at 8:14 AM, Alien Octopus said:

Would love to see Army v Boise in playoffs. A ground game buffet.

Jeanty wouldn't even need a line and would massacre them like it was 1888.

4 hours ago, burntorangebongos said:

Titty Bingo 

Great band name. I'd love to see them team up with the Butthole Surfers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pimphand

Pimphand 5502

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, ztejas said:

Akers followed DKR. Mack had to follow 11 seasons of dogshit. Also the scale of that graph is miniscule. Under Akers we peaked at like .728 - Mack got it all the way back to .720 before his last few seasons.

I didn't talk about the situation they inherited. 1983 was the peak winning percentage for the program all time.

Mack started trending upwards and got close but that petulant bitchass left us in a death spiral where our winning percentage was worse than it was in 1997

DATA HOW DOES IT WORK??????

Stop being an emotional retard lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
satyanash

satyanash 14128

Posted
Posted (edited)

Down to #6 in the FWAA-NFF poll

https://footballfoundation.org/news/2024/10/20/football-2024-week-8-fwaa-nff-super-16-poll.aspx

1. Oregon 852 44 2
2. Georgia 773 10 5
3. Penn State 707   4
4. Ohio State 681   3
5. Miami (FL) 640   6
6. Texas 626   1
7. Tennessee 478   9
8. Clemson 411   8
9. LSU 395   10
10. Iowa State 345   11
11. BYU 301   13
12. Indiana 281   15
13. Notre Dame 277   12
14. Texas A&M 173   14
15. Alabama 154   7
16. Ole Miss 52   16
Edited by satyanash
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The_Great_Hornsby

The_Great_Hornsby 3306

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, satyanash said:

Down to #6 in the FWAA-NFF poll

https://footballfoundation.org/news/2024/10/20/football-2024-week-8-fwaa-nff-super-16-poll.aspx

1. Oregon 852 44 2
2. Georgia 773 10 5
3. Penn State 707   4
4. Ohio State 681   3
5. Miami (FL) 640   6
6. Texas 626   1
7. Tennessee 478   9
8. Clemson 411   8
9. LSU 395   10
10. Iowa State 345   11
11. BYU 301   13
12. Indiana 281   15
13. Notre Dame 277   12
14. Texas A&M 173   14
15. Alabama 154   7
16. Ole Miss 52   16

Miami and Penn st are frauds. Disgustingly weak schedules and shitty teams. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Doc Sam Beckett

Doc Sam Beckett 5695

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, The_Great_Hornsby said:

Miami and Penn st are frauds. Disgustingly weak schedules and shitty teams. 

Why stop at Miami and Pedo State? Oregon, Georgia, Texas and OSU are the only teams who can argue straight faced that they aren't frauds. Every one else in that top 16 have either looked like shit, played a shit schedule, or have a bad loss. Some hit the trifecta 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...