Jump to content

Carpetbagging weasel faced smarmy little bitch, Ted Cruz

Grade of D as in David

By Grade of D as in David
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Homercles
Homercles

Wow I didn’t know that, not to be rude but is there a source on that?  I cannot imagine living with a national public figure for a parent, who not only spreads that hate to a huge audience but is also

mchookem
mchookem

SIAP

atomheartbevo
atomheartbevo

https://www.yahoo.com/news/ruben-gallego-hurls-expletives-ted-002927543.html Rep. Ruben Gallego hurled profanity at Sen. Ted Cruz after the Texas Republican worried that Democrats and the media w

Posted Images

pyrohornIII

pyrohornIII 4844

Posted
Posted

I think he is trying to separate himself from Trump, but not the Trumpkins.  Skipping CPAC was part of that.   He's trying to establish a new standard of deplorable to follow.  Trump will not run again and he's going to be covered up in lawsuits and everything else coming at him.  Leaving a void, and Rafael figures to fill it.  

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JimmyJames

JimmyJames 12271

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, pyrohornIII said:

I think he is trying to separate himself from Trump, but not the Trumpkins.  Skipping CPAC was part of that.   He's trying to establish a new standard of deplorable to follow.  Trump will not run again and he's going to be covered up in lawsuits and everything else coming at him.  Leaving a void, and Rafael figures to fill it.  

Cruz, Desantis and the other various scum bags know Trump isn’t running again. That’s what this is about.

Edited by JimmyJames
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Born to Run

Born to Run 6598

Posted
Posted
Ted Cruz somehow thinks he can be president which is absolutely ridiculous. He’s battling Lindsey Graham for who is the biggest cuck cocksucker of Trump’s micro dick and at least ladybugs has the excuse that he’s gay.
Even hardcore trumplicans hate Ted Cruz but he’s apparently unaware of that fact. Or just doesn’t care because he’s a psychopath.
 
His own family hates him. He will die alone.
When?
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Born to Run

Born to Run 6598

Posted
Posted
There will never be another republican president of the United States. And rightly so. Because it would mean the end of the country. We already luckily somehow dodged that bullet. That won’t happen again.
Ha ha
Holy shit.
Pour me a glass of that Kool Aide

I put the odds of another one in 2024 at a smooth coin flip. A little global economic decline or a dip in the markets and the independents go R all hurr durr.
That group ways votes base on some blizzard of "feeling"

Feelings aren't predictable
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mrs Whiggins

Mrs Whiggins 13050

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, pyrohornIII said:

 Leaving a void, and Rafael figures to fill it.  

Sure seems like it. I'd give him credit for paying attention to the plight of Cuban citizens except anyone thinking he is being altruistic here ought to pay more attention to his actions during a crisis....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bullneck

Bullneck 19454

Posted
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, WhatTheBuck said:

He’s the act you’ve known for all these years. Private bone spur’s criminal family band.  

Is that in the song?  I'll have to re-listen.

Spoiler

 

 

Edited by Bullneck
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tom

Tom 2960

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, HenryJames said:

 

 

Wow.  Even though it had already started with his terrible beard, he looks so much worse now than he did even just a year go.  Insurrections must be a terrible stressor on your body and metabolism.  His outward ugliness is rapidly catching up to his soul and personality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WhatTheBuck

WhatTheBuck 28904

Posted
Posted
On 7/24/2021 at 11:32 PM, dingleberryswitzer said:

What else is he gonna do?  Spend time with his wife and kids who are desperate for his attention?  Lol

Sadly it seems there are a number on this board who agree with Ted. I can’t remember who said it or in what thread but one guy actually came out and said the Indians name isn’t racist. Never mind what the Native American community says. He knows better. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nivek

Nivek 17330

Posted
Posted
Sadly it seems there are a number on this board who agree with Ted. I can’t remember who said it or in what thread but one guy actually came out and said the Indians name isn’t racist. Never mind what the Native American community says. He knows better. 

It is complicated because there is no monolithic Native thinking on the subject.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dingleberryswitzer

dingleberryswitzer 2724

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, WhatTheBuck said:

Sadly it seems there are a number on this board who agree with Ted. I can’t remember who said it or in what thread but one guy actually came out and said the Indians name isn’t racist. Never mind what the Native American community says. He knows better. 

What bothers me the most is that people like Ted for example HAVE to have opinions about everything.  Like, does Ted Cruz (or the “number on this board”) actually give a shit about Cleveland’s baseball team?  
 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Macanudo

Macanudo 13254

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Blotto said:

As a Braves fan, I gotta believe Atlanta is on the clock to change names. I know ownership claims they won't change it, but they all will eventually. Hope we do better than Guardians.

Crackers is still up for grabs.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Blotto

Blotto 23974

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Macanudo said:

Crackers is still up for grabs.

If we're gonna go that direction, I'd prefer cracka-ass crackas. replace the tomahawk chop with a dance move pantomiming asking to speak with the manager.

ES_VICTORIA_SECRET_KAREN_COMPOSITE2.jpg?

Edited by Blotto
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nivek

Nivek 17330

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, WhatTheBuck said:

There’s no defense of Chief Wahoo. 

That is a perfect strawman attempt, disguised as a witty quip, mixed with a little self-righteousness.  

All I said was that the Indian term is complicated because some communities did not find it offensive.  That you pivoted to Chief Wahoo clearly demonstrates you are emotionally invested here and not your usual clear thinking self. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WhatTheBuck

WhatTheBuck 28904

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Nivek said:

That is a perfect strawman attempt, disguised as a witty quip, mixed with a little self-righteousness.  

All I said was that the Indian term is complicated because some communities did not find it offensive.  That you pivoted to Chief Wahoo clearly demonstrates you are emotionally invested here and not your usual clear thinking self. 

That’s a weak argument. Do you need unanimity from the Native American community in opposition to the Indians name before you accept that it’s a bad nickname? What gives you the right to judge? Are you a member of a Native American tribe? Because there are Native Americans who oppose it and yes, if you don’t find Chief Wahoo offensive, there is something wrong with you. That’s not a straw man. You’re just blind. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nivek

Nivek 17330

Posted
Posted
That’s a weak argument. Do you need unanimity from the Native American community in opposition to the Indians name before you accept that it’s a bad nickname? What gives you the right to judge? Are you a member of a Native American tribe? Because there are Native Americans who oppose it and yes, if you don’t find Chief Wahoo offensive, there is something wrong with you. That’s not a straw man. You’re just blind. 

That is not accurate at all. A strawman is when you frame and argument that someone didn’t say. So in your example, I made a comment about the term Indian is not settled because it is not a monolithic group.

You went on about Chief Wahoo and how that is wrong, offensive, when the conversation was about the term Indians. That is the definition of a strawman. If my reply was, “Well, I think it is wrong to put puppies in ovens” I would be making just as an absurd statement, also a strawman. Because we are not talking about puppies and ovens, and you did not say anything about puppies in ovens.

So let me make it more complicated. I knew a woman who grew up on an Indian Reservation. Should I have corrected her when she told me that?

I usually just go with the flow because I have been around, travelled a little, and met people that seem to prefer different titles.

*The Seminoles refer to themselves as both Seminole Tribe and Seminole Indians on their own website. Feel free to tell them they are wrong.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WhatTheBuck

WhatTheBuck 28904

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Nivek said:


That is not accurate at all. A strawman is when you frame and argument that someone didn’t say. So in your example, I made a comment about the term Indian is not settled because it is not a monolithic group.

You went on about Chief Wahoo and how that is wrong, offensive, when the conversation was about the term Indians. That is the definition of a strawman. If my reply was, “Well, I think it is wrong to put puppies in ovens” I would be making just as an absurd statement, also a strawman. Because we are not talking about puppies and ovens, and you did not say anything about puppies in ovens.

So let me make it more complicated. I knew a woman who grew up on an Indian Reservation. Should I have corrected her when she told me that?

I usually just go with the flow because I have been around, travelled a little, and met people that seem to prefer different titles.

*The Seminoles refer to themselves as both Seminole Tribe and Seminole Indians on their own website. Feel free to tell them they are wrong.

It’s not a straw man to say that Native American groups have made complaints about the Indians name. That’s a fact. Have all of them done so? I don’t know. I don’t think it matters. How many should it take before you’d agree they should change the name?

I don’t think there’s any rational defense of Chief Wahoo. Against anyone who wants to defend the Indians name or the Chief Wahoo logo, I’m certain I’m standing on higher ground.

Find a Native American group defending the Indians name and we can discuss it further.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JohnnyRage

JohnnyRage 1617

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Nivek said:

That is a perfect strawman attempt, disguised as a witty quip, mixed with a little self-righteousness.  

All I said was that the Indian term is complicated because some communities did not find it offensive.  That you pivoted to Chief Wahoo clearly demonstrates you are emotionally invested here and not your usual clear thinking self. 

I'm pretty sure that being erroneously accused for centuries of smelling like curry while simultaneously also being unable to grow a sweet 'stache that it is at least on the table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...