Jump to content

Coach Sark Press Conference 9.9 - Sometime in the Morning - LHN App

BigOrange1

By BigOrange1
in Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
Red Five

Red Five 40574

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
3 minutes ago, Hiphopopotamos said:

There it is - 'UTSA is a wounded animal and that's the most dangerous type'.

".... granted, they're a wounded mouse and we're a fucking grizzly bear, but still." 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Haha 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hiphopopotamos

Hiphopopotamos 20862

Posted
Posted

Anwar with a surprisingly good question about the philosophical shift from 'big bodied' WR's to smaller faster guys.  Sark talks about the shift away from pro-style to a more wide open style - specifically the desire to throw the ball to guys who are moving vs. standing still targets.  Speed more important than a WR that can win a physical 1 on 1 rep.  Sark said the one year with John Ross at Washington opened his eyes to what pure speed could do.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Doc Daneeka

Doc Daneeka 6769

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, South Austin said:

I don't recall any particular plays from him against Michigan, but I do remember seeing him on the field quite a bit.

Didn’t he rag doll their RT at least once?

Sarkisian mentioned that he’d been holding the edge against the run and that teams are going to have to try something different. I inferred that he felt like that would provide even more opportunities. 

Edited by Doc Daneeka
  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
Red Five

Red Five 40574

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
1 minute ago, Rockethorn1978 said:

Love the big win, didn’t love the weak play calling the second half and scoring only 7. I would say it’s been sark biggest weakness as a coach and I would love if someone would ask why the overly conservative approach to play calling in the second half. 

You mean ask why we took the air out of the ball up 25 in the second half, on the road at Michigan? Does that really need an answer?

  • Hook 'Em 25
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
texifornia

texifornia 56309

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
2 minutes ago, Rockethorn1978 said:

Love the big win, didn’t love the weak play calling the second half and scoring only 7. I would say it’s been sark biggest weakness as a coach and I would love if someone would ask why the overly conservative approach to play calling in the second half. 

Playing clock-sucking low-risk football against an opponent that can't move the football and kept shooting themselves in the foot seemed to work exactly the way it was supposed to.

  • Hook 'Em 11
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rockethorn1978

Rockethorn1978 6061

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Red Five said:

You mean ask why we took the air out of the ball up 25 in the second half, on the road at Michigan? Does that really need an answer?

Sark has routinely struggles in the second half this is known. I knew even asking a tough question would get backlash, it’s surly. Read the game thread, literally everyone was like wtf is this playcalling in the second half.  But we will see by the ou game. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
TotallyLegit

TotallyLegit 3050

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
Just now, Rockethorn1978 said:

Sark has routinely struggles in the second half this is known. I knew even asking a tough question would get backlash, it’s surly. Read the game thread, literally everyone was like wtf is this playcalling in the second half.  But we will see by the ou game. 
 

 

Yes, and the game thread is consistently full of idiots.

  • Hook 'Em 15
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Firemans4Horn

Firemans4Horn 17776

Posted
Posted
Just now, Rockethorn1978 said:

Sark has routinely struggles in the second half this is known. I knew even asking a tough question would get backlash, it’s surly. Read the game thread, literally everyone was like wtf is this playcalling in the second half.  But we will see by the ou game. 
 

 


Ah yes, the game thread. 500 backseat drunk drivers. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Doc Daneeka

Doc Daneeka 6769

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Rockethorn1978 said:

Sark has routinely struggles in the second half this is known. I knew even asking a tough question would get backlash, it’s surly. Read the game thread, literally everyone was like wtf is this playcalling in the second half.  But we will see by the ou game. 
 

 

Don’t confuse “tough question” with “stupid question.”

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
texifornia

texifornia 56309

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Rockethorn1978 said:

Sark has routinely struggles in the second half this is known. I knew even asking a tough question would get backlash, it’s surly. Read the game thread, literally everyone was like wtf is this playcalling in the second half.  But we will see by the ou game. 
 

 

Surly game threads are 75% "but why didn't we run the touchdown playyyyyyy"

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TrashMaster G

TrashMaster G 17343

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Rockethorn1978 said:

Sark has routinely struggles in the second half this is known. I knew even asking a tough question would get backlash, it’s surly. Read the game thread, literally everyone was like wtf is this playcalling in the second half.  But we will see by the ou game. 
 

 

Dude, if you are citing a game thread as support for your analysis of the situation, you have already lost the argument.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Doc Daneeka

Doc Daneeka 6769

Posted
Posted
Just now, Rockethorn1978 said:

Ok so you’re saying the play calling the second half wasn’t conservative? Lmao. Ok. Michigan wasn’t even that good. I didn’t like the play calling and felt we took the foot off the gas.

It was. He did. That’s not the same as “struggling.” It shouldn’t be this hard. 

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mdmost

mdmost 42699

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Rockethorn1978 said:

Sark has routinely struggles in the second half this is known. I knew even asking a tough question would get backlash, it’s surly. Read the game thread, literally everyone was like wtf is this playcalling in the second half.  But we will see by the ou game. 
 

 

Brother, that Michigan offense was not coming back and Sark knew it. They actually held onto the ball for a majority of the 3rd quarter, only to come away with just 3 points, getting picked and a turnover on downs. Sark didn't need to risk anything further. Not up 25. He trusted his defense to close it out. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TotallyLegit

TotallyLegit 3050

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Rockethorn1978 said:

Ok so you’re saying the play calling the second half wasn’t conservative? Lmao. Ok. Michigan wasn’t even that good. I didn’t like the play calling and felt we took the foot off the gas.

1. It was conservative; we did take the foot off the gas

2. Nobody gives a shit what you like

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hookemATL

hookemATL 11585

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Rockethorn1978 said:

Ok so you’re saying the play calling the second half wasn’t conservative? Lmao. Ok. Michigan wasn’t even that good. I didn’t like the play calling and felt we took the foot off the gas.

It was deliberate. There’s your answer. We did it on purpose and it worked. Anyone with half a tit knows we could have inserted ourselves up their asses several more times.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Doc Daneeka

Doc Daneeka 6769

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Bevo said:

 

 

In all fairness, this could be said about every thread.

True, but it’s rarely so stark as when the guy who predicted a 50-7 win says, “oh, fuck, Sark, this isn’t looking good at all” with a third and eight on the opening possession. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheAuditor

TheAuditor 1024

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, hookemATL said:

It was deliberate. There’s your answer. We did it on purpose and it worked. Anyone with half a tit knows we could have inserted ourselves up their asses several more times.  

This.  I'd  love to hear the laminations of their women as much as the next,  but the only way Mich was going to win that game in the second half was if we allowed them back in with short fields.   

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wilcox Cummingtonite

Wilcox Cummingtonite 2836

Posted
Posted (edited)

If Sark would have run it up in the 2nd half and won like 45-12, we'd have posters complaining about risking injuries, it's a long season, "not classy," etc.

I think he did the right thing. It's a looooong season. Shut it down and move on.

How nice to have confidence in your defense that we can just shut down the O and win easily no matter what. Says a lot.

Edited by Wilcox Cummingtonite
  • Hook 'Em 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Doc Daneeka

Doc Daneeka 6769

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Wilcox Cummingtonite said:

If Sark would have run it up in the 2nd half and won like 45-12, we'd have posters complaining about risking injuries, it's a long season, "not classy," etc.

I think he did the right thing. It's a looooong season. Shut it down and move on.

How nice to have confidence in your defense that we can just shut down the O and win easily no matter what. Says a lot.

I understand why Sarkisian did what he did. 

I’d also have understood letting Manning run the game plan at full speed against a legit defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GTJ1982

GTJ1982 378

Posted
Posted

It's amazing we've gone from "fire Sark" to "don't question Sark".  

 

Why are we pretending the execution in the second half wasn't great at times.  All the starters were in and passes were still being thrown so it's not as if we had shut it down and just running up the gut every play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Doc Daneeka

Doc Daneeka 6769

Posted
Posted
Just now, GTJ1982 said:

It's amazing we've gone from "fire Sark" to "don't question Sark".  

 

Why are we pretending the execution in the second half wasn't great at times.  All the starters were in and passes were still being thrown so it's not as if we had shut it down and just running up the gut every play. 

Three passes after the 31st point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BillyGoatHill

BillyGoatHill 4276

Posted
Posted (edited)
37 minutes ago, TotallyLegit said:

Yes, and the game thread is consistently full of idiots.

 

37 minutes ago, Firemans4Horn said:


Ah yes, the game thread. 500 backseat drunk drivers. 

 

25 minutes ago, Bevo said:

 

 

In all fairness, this could be said about every thread.

1.

2.

3.

Laugh Lol GIF

Edited by BillyGoatHill
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bevo

Bevo 13468

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Doc Daneeka said:

True, but it’s rarely so stark as when the guy who predicted a 50-7 win says, “oh, fuck, Sark, this isn’t looking good at all” with a third and eight on the opening possession. 

 

I don't know. You told the story so well, I laughed out loud. Hopefully, you aren't "the guy" but now sober.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...