Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 9/11/2024 at 11:21 AM, Hawndoh said:

The "aliens eating our pets" thing had to have started out as an Alf reference that was misunderstood by idiots on twitter, yes?

Expand  

see. see. this is what i'm talking about. this shit is not real. even them saying it is a joke. trump is a troll. has to be.

  • Haha 1
Posted
  On 9/11/2024 at 5:52 PM, Born to Run said:

You'd think the very clear fact that Trump so easily manipulated and controlled would be disqualifying to the fine folks at Tex Ags.  "He kept taking the bait, arrggh. But let's give him the nuke codes again."

Expand  

They like that shit, they were posting about bringing back Jimbo last saturday. They have a humiliation fetish.

Posted

JFC, I keep reading how Harris wasn't specific enough in her policy points.  Can someone point me to where dotard was?  Hell, he never even addressed a direct question.  This double standard pisses me the fuck off. 

If there's another debate, she needs to direct folks to a policy website and kill them with specifics. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
Posted
  On 9/11/2024 at 5:37 PM, Mother mopar said:

JD Vance says he's getting calls from voters in Springfield, OH that thier pets are disappearing from Hatian immigrants. #eatingdogs Trump brought that up as it was due to Biden immigration policy.

 

ABC says they reach out the Springfield, OH city manager and he said no increase in missing dogs/cats from people eating them. It was a shit show

Expand  

Is there a surlybuckeyes board with their own lobo that’s fucking with vance’s office? 

  • Haha 2
Posted
  On 9/11/2024 at 11:21 AM, Hawndoh said:

The "aliens eating our pets" thing had to have started out as an Alf reference that was misunderstood by idiots on twitter, yes?

Expand  

No, the original twitter post has been unearthed, before the debate. It was a russian bot trying to stir the pot on twitter, which said everything without irony:

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
  On 9/11/2024 at 5:59 PM, DigglerontheHoof said:

JFC, I keep reading how Harris wasn't specific enough in her policy points.  Can someone point me to where dotard was?  Hell, he never even addressed a direct question.  This double standard pisses me the fuck off. 

If there's another debate, she needs to direct folks to a policy website and kill them with specifics. 

Expand  

I thought she was very specific about certain plans, with figures. One thing she said in the debate that I hadn't heard before that stuck was $50,000 tax credits to new home buyers. That point was loud and clear and said in simple, easy to understand english.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted

She does need to have more detailed discussion of her plans but it can't be in the stupid gotcha terms CNN, ABC, and the NY Times wants. This isn't a policy discussion. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
Posted
  On 9/11/2024 at 5:52 PM, troph said:

 I saw enough to see the domination. I saw the Hatians eat cats and dogs part that was awesome. she totally set him up at the beginning telling everyone tonight will be full of lies. it was brillant. at some point after the dogs and cats stuff I had to walk away.

Expand  

I'd still recommend a full watch so you get to see the context plus ebb and flow as the debate went on, things the highlights can't really show. She dominated, yes, but it's equally as impressive to watch how she deftly kept control of the debate. Anytime something would come up that seemed designed to knock her off, she'd turn it around on trump and make weakness into strength. It's how she used the domination in perfectly placed spots that makes it even more lopsided than the clips would appear. It was, bar none, the most thorough owning I've ever seen in a debate, on any subject. Not just great answers, but purposefully great answers at the right moments.

  • Hook 'Em 7
Posted
  On 9/11/2024 at 6:10 PM, 4th&Five said:

image.thumb.png.8e93d41bb352e8b0160d4467c34487a4.png

Expand  

him proclaiming victory to everyone who watched the debate is too funny. “who are you gonna believe, me or your lying eyes?” 

speaking of lies, watching republicans cry all over twitter about anc not fact checking kamala and all of her “lies”, since fucking when do any of these jokers give even the smallest shit about a presidential candidate lying? these are totally unserious people.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Posted

In an actual boxing fight, Trump's corner would have thrown the towel at the end of the 6th or 7th after several 10-8 rounds in a row, assuming that the ref didn't stop it first.

Posted
  On 9/11/2024 at 5:55 PM, DaysOff said:


I'd like these nitwits to:

Define Woke
Define DEI
Define Marxism
Define Socialism

Does it mean the government is going to take over my airline and my stolen pension gets reinstalled because I'm a federal employee now? Sign me the fuck up.

Expand  

"Socialism is when bottom feeding freeloaders get just as much equal pay as those who put in all the work."
"In other news, GOD BLESS THE SEC and it's totally fair payment model unlike that damned LHN!"

Posted (edited)
  On 9/11/2024 at 3:58 PM, Derka said:

we need more people and posts like this from republicans. we need the sane ones who remember the actual republican party before it became the cult of a deranged demagogue to shout this shit from the mountaintops:

 

Expand  

Yep. These things matter a great deal to most Americans, Republican or Democrat, Conservative, Moderate, or Liberal. I predicted that we'd see more and more conservatives coming forward to express their disgust, but I feared at least  a little bit that it might not happen. I'm extremely gratified to see it happening, and I hope this is just the beginning.

Edited by wood
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
  On 9/11/2024 at 5:53 PM, The Dog said:

believe it or not, there are some on this thread. go look at their reactions to last night. 

Expand  

I had moments of trepidation last night. But my position was more frustrated that she didn't take as many headshots as were available, and that the genereal public might not see it as the ass-kicking we were seeing for various reasons. Which I mostly stand by, although I get "let the dumb fuck talk" is a strategy that clearly worked. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
Posted
  On 9/11/2024 at 6:06 PM, mdmost said:

She does need to have more detailed discussion of her plans but it can't be in the stupid gotcha terms CNN, ABC, and the NY Times wants. This isn't a policy discussion. 

Expand  

If she gets down in the weeds on details, they’ll criticize her for being boring. 

  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted
  On 9/11/2024 at 6:44 PM, SydneyCarton said:

I had moments of trepidation last night. But my position was more frustrated that she didn't take as many headshots as were available, and that the genereal public might not see it as the ass-kicking we were seeing for various reasons. Which I mostly stand by, although I get "let the dumb fuck talk" is a strategy that clearly worked. 

Expand  

i’m with you. felt like she left a lot of low hanging fruit just sitting there. thankfully, when all was said and done, all but the most hardcore, irredeemable trump sycophants saw the debate for the ass kicking that it was. kind of reminds me of the Texas vs Michigan game- probably could have been a whole lot more of an ass kicking, but everyone with a brain saw how one sided it was.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
  On 9/11/2024 at 6:44 PM, SydneyCarton said:

I had moments of trepidation last night. But my position was more frustrated that she didn't take as many headshots as were available, and that the genereal public might not see it as the ass-kicking we were seeing for various reasons. Which I mostly stand by, although I get "let the dumb fuck talk" is a strategy that clearly worked. 

Expand  

This is where I was as it was going on: "KNOCK THAT MOTHERFUCKER OUT!"

It was my wife who reminded me that you never interrupt your enemy while they are in the process of destroying themselves. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
  On 9/11/2024 at 6:44 PM, SydneyCarton said:

I had moments of trepidation last night. But my position was more frustrated that she didn't take as many headshots as were available, and that the genereal public might not see it as the ass-kicking we were seeing for various reasons. Which I mostly stand by, although I get "let the dumb fuck talk" is a strategy that clearly worked. 

Expand  

I found myself there as well. But she would have needed the full 90 minutes by herself to get to all the potential head shots. 

There are some things that I don't think the average person really knows about that I wish she could have introduced. Like owing half a billion dollars to the state of New York. Something like "the guy trades in favors and flattery, and you want to put him in the office of the president owing that kind of money?". Or "The guy is a felon who can't even vote himself and is legally prohibited from running a charity again because he stole from the last one, and he wants to be president?". Just stuff like that. But there is too much.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
  On 9/11/2024 at 6:44 PM, SydneyCarton said:

I had moments of trepidation last night. But my position was more frustrated that she didn't take as many headshots as were available, and that the genereal public might not see it as the ass-kicking we were seeing for various reasons. Which I mostly stand by, although I get "let the dumb fuck talk" is a strategy that clearly worked. 

Expand  

Yeah, there were times that her answer may have been too complicated for the average idiot. But there’s no way this won’t have a positive impact on the polls



×
×
  • Create New...