SEC Refs Suck

[blacklab 11843]

30 minutes ago, Rholl said:

Todays game….low block on defensive player??    can someone explain what happened…… to me a Texas lb’er went low on Fl pulling guard….. can you not “wreck the puller” anymore?     Oline can cut but defensive players cant?

no, you can't dive low at a pulling lineman. It was the correct call.

[AUS-97HORN 11669]

how in the holy fuck did the refs in the okie mizz game just call a fucking forward pass thrown into the dirt a fucking FUMBLE?

 

[UncleSonny 6524]

9 minutes ago, blacklab said:

no, you can't dive low at a pulling lineman. It was the correct call.

Yeah, that was the correct call. Sorrell’s roughing the passer was too (shades of Killebrew). They picked up what would have been a bullshit hold on Blue’s long catch. 

The only really bad call was the no call PI on the one deep ball Arch threw (I think to Wingo?) in his first series.

[AUS-97HORN 11669]

Just now, UncleSonny said:

The only really bad call was the no call PI on the one deep ball Arch threw (I think to Wingo?) in his first series.

i kinda disagree.  the play where we had the roughing the passer called on us also had the FL WR holding the ever living fuck out of our DB on the edge, so much so that when our guy turned around to try and tackle the RB, our DB couldnt turn his body around because both his arms were being held by the fucking receiver.... and it was directly on the edge and exactly where the RB ran through to get another 5 yards before we tackled him and then got the tacked on 15. 

 

that should have been offsetting. it was literally a 40 yard field position miss by the refs. 

[satyanash 14280]

Fuck blOU but absolutely insane this wasn't reviewed for targeting

 

[Jkwellborn 6651]

What the hell were they discussing on the fair catch interference? I feel like that was targeting.

[WBT 20411]

3 minutes ago, satyanash said:

Fuck blOU but absolutely insane this wasn't reviewed for targeting

 

Not defenseless and didn't hit him with the crown

[hornian 5203]

12 minutes ago, WBT said:

Not defenseless and didn't hit him with the crown

I think shoulder to the head/neck area is targeting too. Doesn’t have to be crown of the helmet to be targeting. 

[AUS-97HORN 11669]

16 minutes ago, Jkwellborn said:

What the hell were they discussing on the fair catch interference? I feel like that was targeting.

the refs made an attempt to try and kick that player out without actually kicking him out... no idea why they just didnt fucking rule him ejected for unsportsmanlike 

instead they decided to call it targeting.... which it clearly WAS NOT targeting, hell the defender led with his shoulder into Bolden's gut. 

[Paco 1926]

It was absolutely targeting. Leading with his head against a defenseless player. Doesn't have to hit in the head or neck area if it satisfies those conditions.

[Chooky 13296]

1 hour ago, WBT said:

Not defenseless and didn't hit him with the crown

Doesn't have to be just the crown.  

[landman 559]

28 minutes ago, Paco said:

It was absolutely targeting. Leading with his head against a defenseless player. Doesn't have to hit in the head or neck area if it satisfies those conditions.

Disregard.

Edited Sunday at 05:41 AM by landman

[Paul Wesley 3277]

1 hour ago, AUS-97HORN said:

no idea why they just didnt fucking rule him ejected for unsportsmanlike 

Yeah, if they're really interested in player safety, then taking a free full-speed shot at a punt returner who is standing still and looking up into the sky - that ought to get you ejected along with 15 yards and a 1-game (or more) suspension.  

Sometimes I feel kind of bad for a defender who gets ejected for "targeting" when they're running up to make a play on a QB who's either already getting tackled or is about to slide.  A lot of it comes down to guessing if the runner is going to slide head-first, feet-first, or not at all... and if the defender guesses wrong, they get ejected plus they have to sit out another half.  I've seen several "targeting" collisions that seem like bad luck as much as malicious intent.  

Contrast that to sprinting 45 yards toward a defenseless guy standing straight up.   

Edited Sunday at 05:54 AM by Paul Wesley

[HenryJames 65884]

Anyone see the block in the back on our fumble return?

[Nivek 16843]

Unspeakably horrendous officiating in the CU-Texas Tech game. McGuire called out the biased refs by name postgame and will likely be fined by the Big 12.

[HenryJames 65884]

It's roughing if it's the knee area or below, and that was definitely above the knees.

[Billy Pilgrim 1912]

Thank god they picked up the holding on Bond flag but fuck that ref for “guessing” that Bond must have held on that play. If you’re not 100% sure don’t throw the flag. That was a textbook block by a receiver.