Jump to content

SEC Refs Suck


Nueces River Rat

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, Rholl said:

Todays game….low block on defensive player??    can someone explain what happened…… to me a Texas lb’er went low on Fl pulling guard….. can you not “wreck the puller” anymore?     Oline can cut but defensive players cant?

no, you can't dive low at a pulling lineman. It was the correct call.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, blacklab said:

no, you can't dive low at a pulling lineman. It was the correct call.

Yeah, that was the correct call. Sorrell’s roughing the passer was too (shades of Killebrew). They picked up what would have been a bullshit hold on Blue’s long catch. 

The only really bad call was the no call PI on the one deep ball Arch threw (I think to Wingo?) in his first series.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, UncleSonny said:

The only really bad call was the no call PI on the one deep ball Arch threw (I think to Wingo?) in his first series.

i kinda disagree.  the play where we had the roughing the passer called on us also had the FL WR holding the ever living fuck out of our DB on the edge, so much so that when our guy turned around to try and tackle the RB, our DB couldnt turn his body around because both his arms were being held by the fucking receiver.... and it was directly on the edge and exactly where the RB ran through to get another 5 yards before we tackled him and then got the tacked on 15. 

 

that should have been offsetting. it was literally a 40 yard field position miss by the refs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Jkwellborn said:

What the hell were they discussing on the fair catch interference? I feel like that was targeting.

the refs made an attempt to try and kick that player out without actually kicking him out... no idea why they just didnt fucking rule him ejected for unsportsmanlike 

instead they decided to call it targeting.... which it clearly WAS NOT targeting, hell the defender led with his shoulder into Bolden's gut. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Paco said:

It was absolutely targeting. Leading with his head against a defenseless player. Doesn't have to hit in the head or neck area if it satisfies those conditions.

Disregard.

Edited by landman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AUS-97HORN said:

no idea why they just didnt fucking rule him ejected for unsportsmanlike 

Yeah, if they're really interested in player safety, then taking a free full-speed shot at a punt returner who is standing still and looking up into the sky - that ought to get you ejected along with 15 yards and a 1-game (or more) suspension.  

Sometimes I feel kind of bad for a defender who gets ejected for "targeting" when they're running up to make a play on a QB who's either already getting tackled or is about to slide.  A lot of it comes down to guessing if the runner is going to slide head-first, feet-first, or not at all... and if the defender guesses wrong, they get ejected plus they have to sit out another half.  I've seen several "targeting" collisions that seem like bad luck as much as malicious intent.  

Contrast that to sprinting 45 yards toward a defenseless guy standing straight up.   

Edited by Paul Wesley
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...