Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

on the one hand, russ getting a coach fired for one reason or another tracks. on the other hand, who exactly are these nuggets scrubs that are losing faith in their nba champion coach because he treats his best players differently? and who is the gm/front office person who decided that that was a good enough reason to fire malone?

Posted (edited)

oh yeah, that’s right, its josh kroenke. i generally trust his judgment, and his track record speaks for itself, but damn. and they didn’t even confer with jokic at all, they just told him about the decision before everyone else. damn. really hoping jokic can get out of denver now.

Edited by Derka
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Derka said:

oh yeah, that’s right, its josh kroenke. i generally trust his judgment, and his track record speaks for itself, but damn. and they didn’t even confer with jokic at all, they just told him about the decision before everyone else. damn. really hoping jokic can get out of denver now.

Jokic isn't going anywhere.  He's like Luka was.  Zero desire to leave.

From what I've heard, he was fine with the firing.  The Malone/Booth beef had infected the entire organization.  The only way forward was getting rid of both of them and start fresh.

Take last night, for example, Russ didn't get near the minutes he's been getting and Jalen Pickett got them instead.  Which is a good thing for the Nuggets.  Russ works in 15-20 minutes a night.  He doesn't work at 30+ a night (like he has been getting since Murray got injured).  Nor do you want him out there to close out games (see TWolves).

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

Also Pickett actually looked pretty damn awesome. He doesn’t turn the ball over (leads the team in A/TO), he shot well, he played alongside Jokic and CB well. I mean we definitely want Murray back for the playoffs, but maybe Pickett helps stagger Murray when Jokic is out and we’re not as terrible then.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Chewbacca said:

Jokic isn't going anywhere.  He's like Luka was.  Zero desire to leave.

yeah i mean i’ve never even imagined him angling for a move, he’s 0% preoccupied with stuff like that. i just think he deserves better than being left in the dark on stuff like that, and i don’t see the FO doing anything to make denver competitive. he’s going to play 20 years and finish with one title, which again, he couldn’t care less about, but i do. id like to see him win again, and i don’t see denver even trying.

Posted

They could win again with him but Murray and MPJ are taking up way too much cap space. They need to either cycle out of those contracts or dump one or both of them - granted no one is going to want to pay Murray $57M in 2029.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Derka said:

yeah i mean i’ve never even imagined him angling for a move, he’s 0% preoccupied with stuff like that. i just think he deserves better than being left in the dark on stuff like that, and i don’t see the FO doing anything to make denver competitive. he’s going to play 20 years and finish with one title, which again, he couldn’t care less about, but i do. id like to see him win again, and i don’t see denver even trying.

Jokic was Josh Kroenke's first call after he fired Malone.  While they didn't consult him on it, he was the first to know when it happened.

You're going to see some moves from the Nuggets this offseason.  They can't just keep rolling the same squad (great starting 5, awful bench) out there and expect different outcomes.

Posted
7 minutes ago, ztejas said:

They could win again with him but Murray and MPJ are taking up way too much cap space. They need to either cycle out of those contracts or dump one or both of them - granted no one is going to want to pay Murray $57M in 2029.

At least one of them, if not both, are gone this offseason. 

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, ztejas said:

They could win again with him but Murray and MPJ are taking up way too much cap space. They need to either cycle out of those contracts or dump one or both of them - granted no one is going to want to pay Murray $57M in 2029.

This is exactly it. I avoided the thread because I was in a dark place Tuesday with my buddy who I go to a lot of games with. Firing Malone is admitting that our current set of stars and bench won’t work, at least to me. I really can’t believe we gave Murray the contract we did with how bad he played at the Olympics. I don’t think we get anywhere close to value on getting rid of him.

To Derka’s point about not caring about winning enough with ownership I completely agree. So pissed that last year we weren’t willing to go over the second apron. 

Edited by I Plead Da Fif
Derp
  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
2 minutes ago, I Plead Da Fif said:

This is exactly it. I avoided the thread because I was in a dark place Tuesday with my buddy who I go to a lot of games with. Firing Malone is admitting that our current set of stars and bench won’t work, at least to me. I really can’t believe we gave Murray the contract we did with how bad he played at the Olympics. I don’t think we get anywhere close to value on getting rid of him.

To Derka’s point about not caring about winning enough with ownership I completely agree. So pissed that last year we weren’t willing to go over the second apron. 

I'd be optimistic. Your ownership seems to give a shit and is making tough decisions to try and go in a new direction. A lot of teams aren't managed like that.

Spoiler

College Football Deal With It GIF by Arkansas Razorbacks

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Chewbacca said:

Jokic was Josh Kroenke's first call after he fired Malone.  While they didn't consult him on it, he was the first to know when it happened.

You're going to see some moves from the Nuggets this offseason.  They can't just keep rolling the same squad (great starting 5, awful bench) out there and expect different outcomes.

Star player is the first to know.  Aaron Rodgers didn't fire Saleh but maybe he could've stopped it.  Same here?

 

As for big moves, like Dallas, who was the last big FA that signed there?  I used to live in Denver, loved it.  But NBA free agents don't, though money talks 

9 minutes ago, Chewbacca said:

At least one of them, if not both, are gone this offseason. 

No troll, curious how either would fit with the Lakers?

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, ztejas said:

Wolves/Grizz 8:30 TNT 👀

Do or play in tonight. actually just thinking about the game and if we lose, im on board to just shut it down for the next 3 days and get our rest now since we're 98% going to the play ins in the 7/8. let the 7/8 opponent play out these last 2 games and not get the rest 

Edited by MNLonghornFUKM
Posted
8 minutes ago, I Plead Da Fif said:

This is exactly it. I avoided the thread because I was in a dark place Tuesday with my buddy who I go to a lot of games with. Firing Malone is admitting that our current set of stars and bench won’t work, at least to me. I really can’t believe we gave Murray the contract we did with how bad he played at the Olympics. I don’t think we get anywhere close to value on getting rid of him.

To Derka’s point about not caring about winning enough with ownership I completely agree. So pissed that last year we weren’t willing to go over the second apron. 

The Kroenkes are good owners.  They've won championships in football, hockey and basketball all within the past ~5 years (don't remember what year the Rams won). They are not afraid to make big changes when things aren't working (see the Avs this year). The only knock I've heard on them is they aren't willing to pay for top GMs in the NBA.  We'll see if that changes this offseason.

2 minutes ago, Im_smarter_then_you said:

No troll, curious how either would fit with the Lakers?

Lakers aren't getting either one of them without giving up Reaves, at minimum.  They aren't going to give them away.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, Chewbacca said:

At least one of them, if not both, are gone this offseason. 

I’ve been thinking 1 or 2 of MPJ, Murray and AG are gone. I love AG, he’s Mr Nugget, but to me he has the highest trade value of the 3 and he’s maybe actually not the best natural fit alongside Jokic, as much as it pains me to say. I wear the guys jersey to some games.

I’ll just say 2 years ago I wanted bad for Denver to trade for Obi Anonoby when he was on the Raptors and ship MPJ there and I still stand by it.

Edited by I Plead Da Fif
Posted
1 minute ago, Chewbacca said:

Lakers aren't getting either one of them without giving up Reaves, at minimum.

Reaves is the best player among those 3 and is on the best deal. They'd trade LeBron before they'd trade Reaves. If I'm Denver I'm looking to dump one of MPJ or Murray or both and not entirely worried about what I get in return as long as it gives some flexibility or draft capital. 

I mean how much high-level basketball does Murray realistically have in the tank? His body seems like it's fucked. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, I Plead Da Fif said:

I’ve been thinking 1 or 2 of MPJ, Murray and AG are gone. I love AG, he’s Mr Nugget, but to me he has the highest trade value of the 3 and he’s maybe actually not the best natural fit alongside Jokic, as much as it pains me to say. I wear the guys jersey to some games.

I’ll just say 2 years ago I wanted bad for Denver to trade for Obi Anonoby when he was on the Raptors and ship MPJ there and I still stand by it.

AG needs to stay on this team.  Not only is he a perfect fit for Jokic, he's an athletic big who can play top level defense.  Agreed that he has the highest trade value of the 3, although I think MPJ is a lot more valuable than people think.  He shoots 40% from 3 on high volume and grabs 7 boards a game.  Problem for the Nuggets in the playoffs is that he disappears for games at a time and is not good on D.

Posted
4 minutes ago, ztejas said:

Reaves is the best player among those 3 and is on the best deal. They'd trade LeBron before they'd trade Reaves. If I'm Denver I'm looking to dump one of MPJ or Murray or both and not entirely worried about what I get in return as long as it gives some flexibility or draft capital. 

I mean how much high-level basketball does Murray realistically have in the tank? His body seems like it's fucked. 

Nuggets are not giving up either one to the Lakers for less than Reaves. Lakers honestly don't have much to offer for them and, unlike the Mavs, aren't looking to just help them out.

Posted
39 minutes ago, Chewbacca said:

The Kroenkes are good owners.  They've won championships in football, hockey and basketball all within the past ~5 years

they’ve won a bunch of trophies and are doing a fantastic job with Arsenal as well.

Posted
1 hour ago, I Plead Da Fif said:

This is exactly it. I avoided the thread because I was in a dark place Tuesday with my buddy who I go to a lot of games with. Firing Malone is admitting that our current set of stars and bench won’t work, at least to me. I really can’t believe we gave Murray the contract we did with how bad he played at the Olympics. I don’t think we get anywhere close to value on getting rid of him.

To Derka’s point about not caring about winning enough with ownership I completely agree. So pissed that last year we weren’t willing to go over the second apron. 

Only chance is to trade the Joker to Houston and rebuild with their 10 picks. 

Posted

Okay. Fuck it. I like Ja.

The grenade celebration after getting fined for the gun celebration is fucking hysterical and he's backing it up by balling his ass off. 

Sue me.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Every time I see Rudy Gobert, he isn't doing shit except being tall and French. 

 

Edited by Slacks
Auto correct doesn't like Gobert either
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, MNLonghornFUKM said:

most of any quarter from any team this year

 

but ive seen this movie before 

Bro stop you aren't losing this. That MIL game was a freak incident. 

Posted
4 hours ago, Derka said:

yeah i mean i’ve never even imagined him angling for a move, he’s 0% preoccupied with stuff like that. i just think he deserves better than being left in the dark on stuff like that, and i don’t see the FO doing anything to make denver competitive. he’s going to play 20 years and finish with one title, which again, he couldn’t care less about, but i do. id like to see him win again, and i don’t see denver even trying.

If you think this move was made without Jokic’s approval in some form…

Jokic got super cryptic when asked about the conversation with ownership. Malone is a good coach and a great fit for up and comer like the Nuggets a few years ago. But a seasoned team with success under its belt is probably gonna get sick of his shit

Posted
3 hours ago, Chewbacca said:

At least one of them, if not both, are gone this offseason. 

You think that Murray contract is tradeable?  Sheesh. They’re not dumping their core four guys 

Posted
3 hours ago, Chewbacca said:

The Kroenkes are good owners.  They've won championships in football, hockey and basketball all within the past ~5 years (don't remember what year the Rams won). They are not afraid to make big changes when things aren't working (see the Avs this year). The only knock I've heard on them is they aren't willing to pay for top GMs in the NBA.  We'll see if that changes this offseason.

Lakers aren't getting either one of them without giving up Reaves, at minimum.  They aren't going to give them away.

Bring Tim Connelly back. Pay the man his money

Posted
3 hours ago, ztejas said:

Reaves is the best player among those 3 and is on the best deal. They'd trade LeBron before they'd trade Reaves. If I'm Denver I'm looking to dump one of MPJ or Murray or both and not entirely worried about what I get in return as long as it gives some flexibility or draft capital. 

I mean how much high-level basketball does Murray realistically have in the tank? His body seems like it's fucked. 

Reaves is better than Murray?  Health issues get it in the ballpark I guess but no way am I taking Reaves. 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, MrX said:

Reaves is better than Murray?  Health issues get it in the ballpark I guess but no way am I taking Reaves. 

Maybe look up what Reaves is posting this season. 

1 minute ago, MrX said:

I guess OKC vs the field in the West I’m leaning OKC, but there are some scary teams that could pop up and steal it 

I'd take the field but it's close. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...