Jump to content

24/25 Astros Offseason thread


Wulaw Horn

Recommended Posts

Why did we trade for Kikuchi at the trade deadline last year if we are trading Tucker and not signing Bregman? Why would you give up prospects if you plan to tear it down? Those guys we gave up would be nice to have now. Brown has no process or long term plan or process in place clearly. He is so clearly outclassed and outwitted by the other GMs in the league. Second rate owner and GM.

Edited by Macklemore
  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why did we trade for Kikuchi at the trade deadline last year if we are trading Tucker and not signing Bregman? Why would you give up prospects if you plan to tear it down? Those guys we gave up would be nice to have now. Brown has no process or long term plan or process in place clearly. He is so clearly outclassed and outwitted by the other GMs in the league. Second rate owner and GM.

If they knew this was the last season with Tuck/Breg, then going all-in with the Kikuchi trade actually makes more sense… and this is coming from someone who absolutely hated that deal when it happened.
  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Macklemore said:

Why did we trade for Kikuchi at the trade deadline last year if we are trading Tucker and not signing Bregman? Why would you give up prospects if you plan to tear it down? Those guys we gave up would be nice to have now. Brown has no process or long term plan or process in place clearly. He is so clearly outclassed and outwitted by the other GMs in the league. Second rate owner and GM.

Find another team to root for.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 2
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Macklemore said:

Enjoy the shitty team we will be putting out and end of playoff runs. You need to expect more out of your teams 

Lighten up, Francis. This move doesn't mean they are tearing it down. It means they are trying to keep the window open and also have good players in the future.  We need one more good bat and we'll be fine.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ojo Rojo said:

Lighten up, Francis. This move doesn't mean they are tearing it down. It means they are trying to keep the window open and also have good players in the future.  We need one more good bat and we'll be fine.

This is why I am against Bregman, you can get two good bats for his projected price point.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sad to see Tuck go, but I understand. Build for the future and hope your talent pipeline continues to pull diamonds out of the rough. The Astros farm system has gotten little respect from the people who evaluate Mlb prospects, despite producing a lot of good pitchers. 

The NL next year is going to be an interesting MVP race with Ohtani, Soto and Tucker over there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a Cubs fan, I've got mixed feelings about this trade.  On one hand, it's great to get a player who immediately becomes the best player on the team (assuming the Cubs move Bellinger as rumored).  And Chicago needed lefty power if they do, in fact, trade Bellinger.

OTOH, unless they can extend Tucker, it's probably a one-year rental.  I also think Cam Smith is going to be a good player at some point.  But to get someone like Tucker, it was going to take a prospect like Smith. 

Don't be shocked if Paredes, a dead pull hitter, goes for 30+ dingers with that short leftfield distance in Minute Maid.

I'd say this one is TBD  

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ojo Rojo said:

Lighten up, Francis. This move doesn't mean they are tearing it down. It means they are trying to keep the window open and also have good players in the future.  We need one more good bat and we'll be fine.

Do you mean before or after the good bat we just traded for a bag of marbles? Because we needed more than one before this bullshit 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Dennis Taylor said:

Do you mean before or after the good bat we just traded for a bag of marbles? Because we needed more than one before this bullshit 

A bag of marbles might have been more productive than Kyle Tucker was during the last two postseasons.

Edited by David Dennison
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To think we had Tucker's replacement lined up only for our shitty manager at the time to talk the owner out of the solid acquisition of Contreras for Urquidy. Then we scrambled and gave up W. Abreu for a player that Dusty refused to play. This is why you don't let fucking managers and owners dictate personnel moves.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Storm the Field said:

Lifelong Astros diehard here, but I might have to find a new team with a less annoying fanbase. 

I'd have been much more pissed at keeping Tucker and letting him walk for nothing this offseason than actually getting value for him now.

People really don't understand that we were never going to sign Kyle Tucker.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...