Jump to content

LOL, tolerant Democrats on the Green Party.

EMAWesome

By EMAWesome
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

shnsajax

shnsajax 3,605

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, Mojo Hand said:

I did.  Didn't work.  Got:

Access to i.imgur.com was denied

You don't have authorization to view this page.

HTTP ERROR 403
RELOAD

Initially I didn't bother clicking on the links, but now I had to try. 

Image result for dumb and dumber totally redeem yourself gif

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brisketexan

Brisketexan 106,621

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Huckleberry said:

FFS, dude. imgur. does. not. work. on. surly.

Stop fucking trying. If this is the greatest political commentary of all time, and it better be based on how long you've dragged this out, then save the images and upload them to another free image host.

STFU.

When you're watching someone repeatedly smash himself in the dick, do what any decent man would do -- point and laugh until you can't breathe.

  • Like 2
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hiphopopotamos

Hiphopopotamos 21,158

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Huckleberry said:

FFS, dude. imgur. does. not. work. on. surly.

Stop fucking trying. If this is the greatest political commentary of all time, and it better be based on how long you've dragged this out, then save the images and upload them to another free image host.

He's going to try imgur just once more - he's got a really good feeling this time it will work.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
EMAWesome

EMAWesome 101

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Okay, last post in this thread for a while.   Before this thread turned into a demonstration of how little I know about how imgur fucks up posts here the original intent of this thread was to show how progressives react when anyone votes for any candidate other than the one progressives support.  How dare people vote their conscious and not yours. 

It is the political party's duty to put forth the superior candidate.  It is not the voters' duty to vote for a candidate they consider to be inferior to another candidate whether that candidate has a "chance" to win or not.  You can't bitch and moan about how limiting the two party system is and then bitch and moan about people voting for third party candidates.  The idea is to vote for who you consider to be the best candidate for the job, not to vote to keep who you consider to be the worst candidate for the job from winning.  If Green Party voters would rather vote for a member of the Green Party than for a Democrat then it is on the Democrats to come up with a candidate that will sway more Green Party voters (while preferably also swaying as many Democrat, Republican, Independent, Libertarian and any other party of voters as possible too).  It is not on the voters to compromise their beliefs or positions just because not doing so is going to upset other voters.

  • Like 1
  • Fuck You 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mojo Hand

Mojo Hand 4,580

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, EMAWesome said:

Okay, last post in this thread for a while.   Before this thread turned into a demonstration of how little I know about how imgur fucks up posts here the original intent of this thread was to show how progressives react when anyone votes for any candidate other than the one progressives support.  How dare people vote their conscious and not yours. 

It is the political party's duty to put forth the superior candidate.  It is not the voters' duty to vote for a candidate they consider to be inferior to another candidate whether that candidate has a "chance" to win or not.  You can't bitch and moan about how limiting the two party system is and then bitch and moan about people voting for third party candidates.  The idea is to vote for who you consider to be the best candidate for the job, not to vote to keep who you consider to be the worst candidate for the job from winning.  If Green Party voters would rather vote for a member of the Green Party than for a Democrat then it is on the Democrats to come up with a candidate that will sway more Green Party voters (while preferably also swaying as many Democrat, Republican, Independent, Libertarian and any other party of voters as possible too).  It is not on the voters to compromise their beliefs or positions just because not doing so is going to upset other voters.

Tldr.   Try a snappy meme, perhaps. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ndawg

ndawg 1,242

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, EMAWesome said:

Okay, last post in this thread for a while.   Before this thread turned into a demonstration of how little I know about how imgur fucks up posts here the original intent of this thread was to show how progressives react when anyone votes for any candidate other than the one progressives support.  How dare people vote their conscious and not yours. 

It is the political party's duty to put forth the superior candidate.  It is not the voters' duty to vote for a candidate they consider to be inferior to another candidate whether that candidate has a "chance" to win or not.  You can't bitch and moan about how limiting the two party system is and then bitch and moan about people voting for third party candidates.  The idea is to vote for who you consider to be the best candidate for the job, not to vote to keep who you consider to be the worst candidate for the job from winning.  If Green Party voters would rather vote for a member of the Green Party than for a Democrat then it is on the Democrats to come up with a candidate that will sway more Green Party voters (while preferably also swaying as many Democrat, Republican, Independent, Libertarian and any other party of voters as possible too).  It is not on the voters to compromise their beliefs or positions just because not doing so is going to upset other voters.

TL;DR reductive rambling that doesn't recognize that voters do have to choose between preventing an undesirable outcome and causing a desirable outcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chuckie Finster

Chuckie Finster 22,978

Posted
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, EMAWesome said:

Okay, last post in this thread for a while.   Before this thread turned into a demonstration of how little I know about how imgur fucks up posts here the original intent of this thread was to show how progressives react when anyone votes for any candidate other than the one progressives support.  How dare people vote their conscious and not yours. 

It is the political party's duty to put forth the superior candidate.  It is not the voters' duty to vote for a candidate they consider to be inferior to another candidate whether that candidate has a "chance" to win or not.  You can't bitch and moan about how limiting the two party system is and then bitch and moan about people voting for third party candidates.  The idea is to vote for who you consider to be the best candidate for the job, not to vote to keep who you consider to be the worst candidate for the job from winning.  If Green Party voters would rather vote for a member of the Green Party than for a Democrat then it is on the Democrats to come up with a candidate that will sway more Green Party voters (while preferably also swaying as many Democrat, Republican, Independent, Libertarian and any other party of voters as possible too).  It is not on the voters to compromise their beliefs or positions just because not doing so is going to upset other voters.

Hey look at all these words from the guy who couldn't figure out how to post a picture when given 10 tries.  I'm sure they are full of keen insight and expert analysis.

Edited by Chuckie Finster
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
J.R.

J.R. 150

Posted
Posted
45 minutes ago, EMAWesome said:

Okay, last post in this thread for a while.   Before this thread turned into a demonstration of how little I know about how imgur fucks up posts here the original intent of this thread was to show how progressives react when anyone votes for any candidate other than the one progressives support.  How dare people vote their conscious and not yours. 

It is the political party's duty to put forth the superior candidate.  It is not the voters' duty to vote for a candidate they consider to be inferior to another candidate whether that candidate has a "chance" to win or not.  You can't bitch and moan about how limiting the two party system is and then bitch and moan about people voting for third party candidates.  The idea is to vote for who you consider to be the best candidate for the job, not to vote to keep who you consider to be the worst candidate for the job from winning.  If Green Party voters would rather vote for a member of the Green Party than for a Democrat then it is on the Democrats to come up with a candidate that will sway more Green Party voters (while preferably also swaying as many Democrat, Republican, Independent, Libertarian and any other party of voters as possible too).  It is not on the voters to compromise their beliefs or positions just because not doing so is going to upset other voters.

Stick to imgur.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tuco

Tuco 5,093

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Chuckie Finster said:

Hey look at all these words from the guy who couldn't figure out how to post a picture when given 10 tries.  I'm sure they are full of keen insight and expert analysis.

The first sentence was pretty solid.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hank Scorpio

Hank Scorpio 17,924

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, EMAWesome said:

Okay, last post in this thread for a while.   Before this thread turned into a demonstration of how little I know about how imgur fucks up posts here the original intent of this thread was to show how progressives react when anyone votes for any candidate other than the one progressives support.  How dare people vote their conscious and not yours. 

It is the political party's duty to put forth the superior candidate.  It is not the voters' duty to vote for a candidate they consider to be inferior to another candidate whether that candidate has a "chance" to win or not.  You can't bitch and moan about how limiting the two party system is and then bitch and moan about people voting for third party candidates.  The idea is to vote for who you consider to be the best candidate for the job, not to vote to keep who you consider to be the worst candidate for the job from winning.  If Green Party voters would rather vote for a member of the Green Party than for a Democrat then it is on the Democrats to come up with a candidate that will sway more Green Party voters (while preferably also swaying as many Democrat, Republican, Independent, Libertarian and any other party of voters as possible too).  It is not on the voters to compromise their beliefs or positions just because not doing so is going to upset other voters.

Shut the fuck up dummy

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...