Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, The_Great_Hornsby said:

No, you were acting like Arch didnt earn an opportunity to keep playing because he was strip sacked. Which is fucking retarded. The reason he didnt keep playing is because if he did then Eweres wouldve been fucked the rest of the year and killed his already plummeting draft stock. It was politics that got Ewers back in. That is Sark's fault and a demerit for him. 

Take your politics talk to CR

  • Haha 6
Posted
1 minute ago, The_Great_Hornsby said:

No, you were acting like Arch didnt earn an opportunity to keep playing because he was strip sacked. Which is fucking retarded. The reason he didnt keep playing is because if he did then Eweres wouldve been fucked the rest of the year and killed his already plummeting draft stock. It was politics that got Ewers back in. That is Sark's fault and a demerit for him. 

He looked like shit also. If his first 2 drives look like Reeds he starts the second half. Simple as that.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

That's true. But I haven't seen anything out of them that makes me think we can't beat them.

I’m not saying Texas can’t. But I’m not confident Texas will. 
 

Lol, neg away. The same reckless overconfidence some of y’all had before the UGA game. The concerns are real. We almost blew it against Vandy today. 

Edited by MuellerHorn
  • Fuck You 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, UTEE97 said:

The Elk is not afraid of benching his 5* QB to win a game and it has paid off. Sark on the other hand insists on keeping the incumbent no matter what. 

Quinn was 27-37 with 300 yds and 3 tuddies

Both INTs were tipped

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
3 minutes ago, Hondo said:

That's what the SEC Standings calculator shows.  That's all I know.  Guess it has to do with SOS or something.  It shows that if LSU wins tonight, they can lose to Alabama and still finish 2nd to UGA (assuming UGA wins out), even if we win out as well.

 

Where is this “SEC standings calculator” you speak of

Posted
That's true. But I haven't seen anything out of them that makes me think we can't beat them.
I've seen plenty out of us to show we are capable of losing that game. We absolutely can beat them, no question.
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
Just now, Hank_Hill said:

He looked like shit also. If his first 2 drives look like Reeds he starts the second half. Simple as that.

We moved the ball with him and he used his feet to gain some yards. Looked better than Ewers did. And you know it. 

  • Haha 2
Posted
Just now, A’Dam Psycho said:

Quinn was 27-37 with 300 yds and 3 tuddies

Both INTs were tipped

Are you serious Clark? Are you arguing that Quinn had a good game?

Posted
2 minutes ago, A’Dam Psycho said:

I said this on Reddit and got bitched at. I’d rather host a playoff game than risk losing a CCG. You’ll end up right back where you’re at without the rest and with possible injuries 

With a 12 team playoff, conference championships pretty much don’t mean shit in the trophy case.  It just adds un-necessary risk.

Posted

You guys freaking out about aggy because LSU has missed 3 FGs and turned it over twice deep in their end to hand them the game is funny.  

Also SCAR gonna buttfuck this run only shit.  LSU is catching it midstream.  

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
1 minute ago, The_Great_Hornsby said:

We moved the ball with him and he used his feet to gain some yards. Looked better than Ewers did. And you know it. 

Woah! Some yards! 

  • Haha 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Hondo said:

That's what the SEC Standings calculator shows.  That's all I know.  Guess it has to do with SOS or something.  It shows that if LSU wins tonight, they can lose to Alabama and still finish 2nd to UGA (assuming UGA wins out), even if we win out as well.

First tiebreaker is "head to head competition amongst the tied teams." It would be weird as fuck if there is a three way tie, two of the teams played each other and the third one didn't, and they bounce the one that lost that matchup. But hey, this is the SEC, so perhaps I am wrong to assume it makes sense. Second tiebreaker is record vs all common conference opponents, and in that case we would go ahead of LSU assuming they lose to A&M and we win.

Posted
7 minutes ago, hornbri said:

Not even for the chance of the playoff bye?

I know it is an extra game either way. But it feels like if the ultimate goal is a NC. That bye is pretty valuable. 

Ehh the 5 seed might get a de facto bye with the 12 seed. And then the 4seed is super week too most likely. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

back in the day, that's a classic crackback block. you'd give that player a star for his helmet 

Yeah I hate that rule.  If you're on the field you better keep your head on a swivel.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, satyanash said:

A&M's D-line is going to give our O-line fits. Their defense is shutting down the SEC's best passing attack and with Marcel Reed at QB they are unstoppable on the ground.

Whether or not this board wants to admit it, they should and will be favorites against us.

are you ever not a bitch jesus 

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Gen. Applewhite said:

First tiebreaker is "head to head competition amongst the tied teams." It would be weird as fuck if there is a three way tie, two of the teams played each other and the third one didn't, and they bounce the one that lost that matchup. But hey, this is the SEC, so perhaps I am wrong to assume it makes sense. Second tiebreaker is record vs all common conference opponents, and in that case we would go ahead of LSU assuming they lose to A&M and we win.

I posted a screenshot of the result with an LSU win tonight, loss against Alabama, and UGA winning out.  The calculator might be wrong, but that's what it shows.  Don't know what else to tell you.

 

Aggy win tonight and LSU beating Alabama, both finish with 1-loss, UGA winning out, and Texas winning out...

 

Aggy 1

LSU 2

UGA 3

Texas 4

Edited by Hondo
Posted
Just now, WBT said:

Yeah I hate that rule.  If you're on the field you better keep your head on a swivel.


lol. He smashed into the guy’s helmet and then taunted over his lifeless body. This isn’t 1950’s football. 

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, F250 said:

Fuck off, troll.

Not a troll. Just not a clueless Texas homer. Nothing about Ewers or our OL says they’ll handle the noise, stage, or defensive pressure well. Just like UGA. 

Edited by MuellerHorn
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Horn Dogg said:

Yeah, everyone is freaking out.  We’re going to curbstomp aggy in November.  They don’t call us big brother for nothing.

Cut the shit. What was your prediction for the Vandy game today? Because there were a whole lot of dumbfucks around here predicting a blowout.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
Texas gets to prep for Reed with plenty of time. Weggy is done and will be portal bound.

I do feel more confident playing against reed. We are fast on the edges and Lb.
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Kel Varnsen said:

It ain't what they bring that worries me about beating them. It's our own inadequacies. 

Our defense is significantly better than LSU. Reed won’t have the element of surprise against us. If we get decent Quinn we’ll win pretty easily 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted (edited)

This all started on a 3rd and 2 when LSU up 10 facing a moribund aggy offense and pretty deep in their end decided they had no interest in trying to run for it and if they didn't get it just punt and make aggy drive the field.  

Edited by Surly Bevo
  • Haha 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...