Jump to content

🇺🇸 2024 Election Day 🇺🇸

Pancho

By Pancho
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Js1
Js1

For the love of fucking god, stop posting screenshots from TexAgs

coachherman'sgrill
coachherman'sgrill

Does anyone else wish YGIFS was here? I think he’d be loving this shit

Bateshorn
Bateshorn

Ib4c

Posted Images

PRONG HORN

PRONG HORN 3133

Posted
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Macklemore said:

Any explanation from our Democrat friends on why 2020 why was such an outlier?

 

 

Immamac says Tuesday was because a bunch of lefties stayed home, and rather than choosing to vote, decided to masturbate, or bake cookies, or something.  

 

 

Edited by PRONG HORN
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
B00M

B00M 6413

Posted
Posted (edited)
44 minutes ago, Macklemore said:


Any explanation from our Democrat friends on why 2020 why was such an outlier?

The popular vote totals are still incomplete. Not sure when all the numbers will be in. Both candidates will end up with more. I think the chart would be better if it showed 3rd party results, but also it seems clear that more former Biden voters switched to Trump than former Trump voters switched to Harris. That makes intuitive sense to me since Trump has clearly been who he is for at least 8 years now, Harris became the candidate late and she got saddled with the price inflation that hurt so many more Americans than the asset inflation benefited 

Edited by B00M
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Aqua Buddha

Aqua Buddha 14581

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Macklemore said:


Any explanation from our Democrat friends on why 2020 why was such an outlier?

Well, half of California is still out as of the time stamp on that tweet.  Also a combo of lower turnout of some Dem groups an some voters voting Trump.

Do you realize that Trump had a bigger increase from 2016 to 2020 than Biden had over Hillary's total?

Edited by Aqua Buddha
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brandywine

Brandywine 1316

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Macklemore said:


Any explanation from our Democrat friends on why 2020 why was such an outlier?

 Voters have very short memories. My concern is Trump will try and get the 2 term limit as President overturned with a Republican Congress and SC. On Day One!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
David Dennison

David Dennison 18845

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, Brandywine said:

 Voters have very short memories. My concern is Trump will try and get the 2 term limit as President overturned with a Republican Congress and SC. On Day One!

Seeing as how that requires amending the Constitution, it's not happening.

He's done running for president.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DigglerontheHoof

DigglerontheHoof 21175

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

Seeing as how that requires amending the Constitution, it's not happening.

He's done running for president.

What/who is going to make him adhere to the rules of the Constitution?  SCOTUS?

There are no more rules for the dumbest, most flawed human to ever sniff POTUS.  All bets are off. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WBT

WBT 20561

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, PRONG HORN said:

 

 

Idk what happened in 2020, but it's an interesting topic for sure.

 

 

 

Do those people know what the phrase record turnout means?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
B00M

B00M 6413

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, chainsaw said:

But how could that be? I was told all these Liz Cheney events were a great idea

I mean, they were. It needed to be presented and investigated. But the only people that watched them would’ve voted against Trump even if the D candidate was a literal donkey. Independents of today are only independent because they’re disengaged. 

I also suspect abortion helped trump more than it helped Harris. Lots of people that are completely unaffected by abortion laws because they’re old, or men without young daughters, or just very religious, care deeply enough about it to hold their nose and vote for a giant piece of shit.

Edited by B00M
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WBT

WBT 20561

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, chainsaw said:

But how could that be? I was told all these Liz Cheney events were a great idea

You think she should have not tried to get never Trump Republicans to vote for her?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lucid

Lucid 3

Posted
Posted

Maybe this was already posted but all well. I normally don’t give a fig for bernie but I give the guy credit for saying out loud what cant be said in polite political society:

 

Kamala lost because she sucks. Donald lost in 2020 because he sucks. Hilary lost in 2016 because she sucks. Everything else is cope. James Comey and the emails, russia, the steal, all cope. We live in an age of cope. What will be the cope this time? Neither party does dick for the common man but we go on swinging the pendulum back and forth in the vain hope that maybe it’ll be different this time. We’ll riot at the capitol over a fake cope but wont lift a finger to challenge the real fraud that gives us these two bunk choices in the first place and even has the audacity to present itself as the bestest noblest system on earth.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Frank Drebin

Frank Drebin 5654

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, WBT said:

You think she should have not tried to get never Trump Republicans to vote for her?

At least the Lincoln Project grifters took a bunch of money from progressives.  It's a sin to let suckers keep their money.  That and all the money they wasted in Texas on Wendy Davis Beto O'Rourke Collin Allred warms my soul.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
B00M

B00M 6413

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Frank Drebin said:

At least the Lincoln Project grifters took a bunch of money from progressives.  It's a sin to let suckers keep their money.  That and all the money they wasted in Texas on Wendy Davis Beto O'Rourke Collin Allred warms my soul.

How does it compare to the $100M Trump has spent on legal fees, paid for by his supporters, the last few years? 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
chainsaw

chainsaw 9857

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, WBT said:

You think she should have not tried to get never Trump Republicans to vote for her?

That is a basically non-existent demographic. Yes, they exist but they didn't need to be courted because they were already vocal about their support for Harris.

I have a strong feeling that these types of high-effort, low-results appeals to the right wing also played a role in depressing turnout for Dems from Biden's 81M to Kamala's probably sub-70M turnout.

Results like these are Not Our Standard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hookah Horns

Hookah Horns 3083

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Macklemore said:


Any explanation from our Democrat friends on why 2020 why was such an outlier?

Trump fucked up covid response to the absolute max, helped make masks a political issue for no reason, and told people to inject bleach. And gas was expensive; even you retarded MAGAts know voters don't like that. 

And did your dumb ass notice that the red bar was highest in 2016 as well? Maybe it's because a lot more people voted. 

I'm surprised you morons remember how to get dressed everyday

Edited by Hookah Horns
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JBJ

JBJ 3654

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, WBT said:

Just read Harris is only winning Clark County 50-49.  That's amazing.

I can't find exit polling data, but there's a lot of young Hispanics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nice Guy Eddie

Nice Guy Eddie 13508

Posted
Posted (edited)

SIAP. Arizona craziness:

  • Trump 1.30m, Harris 1.17m
  • Gallego 1.25m, Lake 1.182m

Basically 120K voters voted for Trump but didn't vote for Lake. She's identical to him in many ways. And roughly 60K of them voted for Gallego. WTF. 

In hindsight Trump not more vocally supporting Lake in the last few months is going to be a mistake by the GOP. It's an understandable mistake since she seemed so toxic but he may have been able to pull her over the finish line with different tactics. EDIT: vote counting is not over so who knows how it will shake out including Lake winning. 

Lake has more votes than Harris! Wow.

Edited by Nice Guy Eddie
Link to comment
Share on other sites
linux

linux 1660

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

Dems might not win another POTUS election unless they drop identity politics.  Americans are mostly shitty people who like to see the fringes suffer. 

I have hated identity politics since the 2010s it is such a god damn losing strategy, its like they are stupid enough to never understand that there are 100 to 1 ratio on trans voters vs everyone else, yes it is shitty that they are being abandoned but the answer was pity parties, tear jerkers, not going to ham on god damn pronoun enforcement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nice Guy Eddie

Nice Guy Eddie 13508

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

Dems might not win another POTUS election unless they drop identity politics.  Americans are mostly shitty people who like to see the fringes suffer. 

 

3 minutes ago, linux said:

I have hated identity politics since the 2010s it is such a god damn losing strategy, its like they are stupid enough to never understand that there are 100 to 1 ratio on trans voters vs everyone else, yes it is shitty that they are being abandoned but the answer was pity parties, tear jerkers, not going to ham on god damn pronoun enforcement.

I'm not entirely agreeing with this because I don't see Harris going heavy with identity politics. Harris seemed to intentionally shy away from her background other than she grew up in a middle class household. Were you aware of that? :)

I do agree that Dems do a poor job communicating their stance towards trans issues. As a group they support trans rights but I don't see them running on that. The right has pounced on the unpopularity of trans rights. Should the Dems join the bandwagon and try to out-cruel the right? It goes against the values of the Dems to add to the marginalization of a minority group.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
wildcat09

wildcat09 29340

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

Dems might not win another POTUS election unless they drop identity politics.  Americans are mostly shitty people who like to see the fringes suffer. 

What the fuck are you talking about? What Democratic candidates ran on "identity politics"?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Frank Drebin

Frank Drebin 5654

Posted
Posted (edited)

The Democrat party is one huge narcissistic circle jerk.  The first rule about that is that it is you and not them. So the autopsy of this election cycle will be someone else's fault. I am okay with them keeping that line of thinking.

The Democrat party is wildly attractive to people with mental illnesses, especially narcissists. All you have to look at is the core traits that make someone a narcissist.

1. No ability for self reflection. If they get a negative response, it's on the other person. Not them. They are perfect.

2. No ability for accountability. Ties in to #1.

3. Narcissists LOVE echo chambers. They have no ability to receive and process thoughts other than their own. This is why college campuses have become giant narcissistic echo chambers. Anyone who does not think like them infuriates them and causes them to lash out.

All that said to point out that there's a fractional chance they'll look in the mirror and be honest with themselves, but they don't have the ability. This is good news for the GOP.

Edited by Frank Drebin
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Message Board User

Message Board User 12395

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

Should the Dems join the bandwagon and try to out-cruel the right? It goes against the values of the Dems to add to the marginalization of a minority group.

The country isn't ready for it.  Like it or not, men in women's sports is an 80/20 or 70/30 issue (against).  The Harris campaign had to moderate on that issue and they never did.

Don't forget - as I recall in 2008, Obama was anti gay marriage...because he and his people recognized the country wasn't ready yet.  Since the final vote was a landslide, he may have still won if he had come out in favor of gay marriage but the margin would have been a lot slimmer.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
aggie08

aggie08 21482

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, Message Board User said:

Call it mean, call it divisive, call it "transphobic," call it whatever, but the "Kamala is for they/them; Trump is for you" ad was unquestionably the most effective ad in this cycle.  Even the Clinton folks said that the Kamala people needed to push back and they wouldn't.

 

Yep. I was definitely worried about that one the second I saw it during a football game. My initial reaction was, "Shit, that's a really good commercial." And obviously a good tagline. Begrudgingly, his team knocked it out of the park with their ads down the stretch. Way less hateful and divisive than earlier efforts while still painting her in a "radical" corner, and, importantly, they didn't let him talk.

I've been saying for awhile that trans issues are going to be a much bigger deal in this election than any of us wanted to let on. It sucks that years of culture wars have made 2% of the population a tentpole issue (and drawn targets on their backs), but that's where we are in America. 

Kamala's ads were extremely blah down the stretch. She needed to say something to the effect of: "We strongly believe that no one should make life altering decisions before they reach adulthood, but ultimately their decision lies between the individual, their parents, and their doctor, and them alone."

Not sure it would have had an effect, but can't let their propaganda run unopposed.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
wildcat09

wildcat09 29340

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

I don't think Harris necessarily ran on it but she certainly got shackled with it.   ToMAYto ToMAHto.  It worked just the same. 

Yeah, because people hear others talk about how they ran on identity politics even though they fucking didn't. Don't contribute to that bullshit. Be part of the solution. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hookah Horns

Hookah Horns 3083

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, Frank Drebin said:

The Democrat party is one huge narcissistic circle jerk.  The first rule about that is that it is you and not them. So the autopsy of this election cycle will be someone else's fault. I am okay with them keeping that line of thinking.

The Democrat party is wildly attractive to people with mental illnesses, especially narcissists. All you have to look at is the core traits that make someone a narcissist.

1. No ability for self reflection. If they get a negative response, it's on the other person. Not them. They are perfect.

2. No ability for accountability. Ties in to #1.

3. Narcissists LOVE echo chambers. They have no ability to receive and process thoughts other than their own. This is why college campuses have become giant narcissistic echo chambers. Anyone who does not think like them infuriates them and causes them to lash out.

All that said to point out that there's a fractional chance they'll look in the mirror and be honest with themselves, but they don't have the ability. This is good news for the GOP.

The party that is obviously more empathetic and the only one that cares about anyone other than rich people and corporations is clearly full of narcissists. Not the party of white men who look down on and try to kick dirt in the face of the poor, immigrants, non-white people generally, gays, trans, the disabled etc.

Hilarious 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites
aggie08

aggie08 21482

Posted
Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, Frank Drebin said:

1. No ability for self reflection. If they get a negative response, it's on the other person. Not them. They are perfect.

 

2. No ability for accountability. Ties in to #1.

 

3. Narcissists LOVE echo chambers. They have no ability to receive and process thoughts other than their own.

The unintended humor of typing this after gleefully putting Trump back into the White House. Chef's kiss.

Edited by aggie08
  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hookah Horns

Hookah Horns 3083

Posted
Posted
40 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

SIAP. Arizona craziness:

  • Trump 1.30m, Harris 1.17m
  • Gallego 1.25m, Lake 1.182m

Basically 120K voters voted for Trump but didn't vote for Lake. She's identical to him in many ways. And roughly 60K of them voted for Gallego. WTF. 

In hindsight Trump not more vocally supporting Lake in the last few months is going to be a mistake by the GOP. It's an understandable mistake since she seemed so toxic but he may have been able to pull her over the finish line with different tactics. EDIT: vote counting is not over so who knows how it will shake out including Lake winning. 

Lake has more votes than Harris! Wow.

Pretty good indicator that being female was a liability for a lot of people. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Planet Houston

Planet Houston 4930

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, Frank Drebin said:

The Democrat party is one huge narcissistic circle jerk.  The first rule about that is that it is you and not them. So the autopsy of this election cycle will be someone else's fault. I am okay with them keeping that line of thinking.

The Democrat party is wildly attractive to people with mental illnesses, especially narcissists. All you have to look at is the core traits that make someone a narcissist.

1. No ability for self reflection. If they get a negative response, it's on the other person. Not them. They are perfect.

2. No ability for accountability. Ties in to #1.

3. Narcissists LOVE echo chambers. They have no ability to receive and process thoughts other than their own. This is why college campuses have become giant narcissistic echo chambers. Anyone who does not think like them infuriates them and causes them to lash out.

All that said to point out that there's a fractional chance they'll look in the mirror and be honest with themselves, but they don't have the ability. This is good news for the GOP.

This post is amazing in so many ways. Bravo. But MAGA has no ability to see irony, nor the ability self reflect, so I don’t expect you to understand why it’s so amazing. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brandywine

Brandywine 1316

Posted
Posted (edited)
30 minutes ago, Frank Drebin said:

The Democrat party is one huge narcissistic circle jerk.  The first rule about that is that it is you and not them. So the autopsy of this election cycle will be someone else's fault. I am okay with them keeping that line of thinking.

The Democrat party is wildly attractive to people with mental illnesses, especially narcissists. All you have to look at is the core traits that make someone a narcissist.

1. No ability for self reflection. If they get a negative response, it's on the other person. Not them. They are perfect.

2. No ability for accountability. Ties in to #1.

3. Narcissists LOVE echo chambers. They have no ability to receive and process thoughts other than their own. This is why college campuses have become giant narcissistic echo chambers. Anyone who does not think like them infuriates them and causes them to lash out.

All that said to point out that there's a fractional chance they'll look in the mirror and be honest with themselves, but they don't have the ability. This is good news for the GOP.

Take what you just wrote, replace where you said the “Democrat” with the “Republican” and that’s exactly how I feel about them. 

Edited by Brandywine
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Frank Drebin

Frank Drebin 5654

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Hookah Horns said:

The party that is obviously more empathetic and the only one that cares about anyone other than rich people and corporations is clearly full of narcissists. Not the party of white men who look down on and try to kick dirt in the face of the poor, immigrants, non-white people generally, gays, trans, the disabled etc.

Hilarious 😂

I wish you guys would do more with your actual time and treasure.  Why is it that compassionate democrats are so fucking stingy giving voluntarily to the poor and downtrodden compared to heartless and selfish republicans?  It's all talk. What people spend their time and money on is what they really care about

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Fuck You 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...