Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, 956 Worldwide said:

Read.  Read Bulgakov, and Havel, and Orwell, and Huxley and Akhmatova and do not take them as warnings.  Read them to understand where you live now. Cowardice is the gravest of vices.  Put cowards and collaborators on ignore, here and in your life. 

 

Huxley? so can i get some soma up in this bitch? cuz Plan A is looking better as each week passes...

200w(22).gif.ca3be21f60baa3b163bf22cc5b2d26b5.gif

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
  • Drool 1
Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, mchookem said:

Huxley? so can i get some soma up in this bitch? cuz Plan A is looking better as each week passes...

200w(22).gif.ca3be21f60baa3b163bf22cc5b2d26b5.gif

 

Look, I’m ready to accept getting doped up and having orgy-porgy at the feelies every Friday.  Sign me up and I’ll quit the resistance. 

Edited by 956 Worldwide
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

^^^^ Yeah, you sure don't want Big Peanut influencing Department of Agriculture policy.  Had he not done the trust some of us might have ended up wtih 51 or 52% peanuts.  It's a slippery slope.

image.png.9f3e37e44fc8c5101a46c41eeb6a1241.png

  • Like 2
Posted
11 hours ago, hookem2010 said:

Have we discussed the SAVE Act yet? Not the one Trump nixed to make student loans unaffordable again. The new Chip Roy one that will, among other things, possibly make it difficult for married women who changed their last name to vote.

https://www.newsweek.com/married-women-stopped-voting-save-act-2029325

Maybe it’s not so bad

Quote

A Republican representative introduced the act. However, if passed, the measure may actually reduce voting opportunities for Republicans, as a Pew study found that more Republican than Democratic women choose to change their name after getting married.

The SAVE Act also accepts valid passports as proof of ID. The states with the fewest number of people with passports are West Virginia, Mississippi, Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, and Oklahoma. All of these states voted for President Donald Trump in 2024.

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
3 hours ago, C-Man said:

US captain Auston Matthews booed mercilessly in Montreal tonight before the Canada/Sweden game in the 4 Nations Cup.

He should be booed for that abortion of a first name 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, InkaUtexas said:

he never would be issued a clearance. But then, Elon's should have been revoked.

Once Elon gets all of his contracts signed, he will slowly remove himself from Trump…..tbd.

Posted

 

10 hours ago, InkaUtexas said:

Ok, so what do you want to replace it with? Also, interesting use of words. Clown bozo? It would usually be Bozo the Clown.

 

9 hours ago, InkaUtexas said:

I asked him what he would want to replace it with. Of course, no response. He is a shallow bot.

 

What would I prefer over the American two party system? Well, a multi party system.

And yes, a comma would have been useful there. 

  • Fuck You 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

 

 

 

What would I prefer over the American two party system? Well, a multi party system.

And yes, a comma would have been useful there. 

except Bozo is a clown. So by calling someone a clown, or calling them Bozo, is the same.

And why would this multi-party system work better? How would it halt all the shit you hate? How would it not allow for misuse of citizens money? How would it protect the oppressed overseas you so care about?

And on that. When was the last time you went and did something about that? Go on a mission? Volunteer with MSF? Take a job in development with a rich NGO even. Something.

Posted
8 minutes ago, InkaUtexas said:

except Bozo is a clown.

We agree. 

9 minutes ago, InkaUtexas said:

And why would this multi-party system work better?

Maybe an interesting paper on this for consideration. I think that the "dysfunction" section lays out pretty nicely the current situation: https://protectdemocracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/The-Case-for-Multiparty-Presidentialism.pdf

It would not address nor solve all of our problems. But it is clear, at least from my perspective, that given the increasingly polarized and dysfunctional US political system since the 1970s that something needs to change. 

  • Fuck You 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Judge Roybeanbag said:

I’ve refrained a lot lately from commenting on shit like this.  But you are misrepresenting.  Brisket and lots of us said for years that the hate and demonization of dirty libs, browns, others, whatever that the Republican party feasted on would lead to bloodshed.  It did. El Paso here was the specific reference.  I don’t think it’s unreasonable for those who have witnessed the bloody fruit of the southern strategy steroided by religion and Oakley glasses to wish karma on the perpetrators.

At risk of doing a "well Ackshully", I don't believe that to be correct. It was from the old board IIRC. So pre-El Paso 2019. But you may be confusing that reference with the numerous other times that brisket has wished violence upon his political adversaries, not just in like conceptual terms, but directly towards other posters. 

Posted

Look, healthy multiparty proportional representation is my goal but if I can’t have that then I’ll just have to support the next best thing— the authoritarian party that is destroying constitutional checks and balances and handing state capacity to tech oligarchs.
 

Stop debating the cowards and enemies. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
7 hours ago, Sawbonz said:

Maybe it’s not so bad

 

Hahaha, I was wondering about this. My liberal wife and many of our friends didn't change their last name. My conservative mother and her entire group? Say goodbye to your vote!

  • Hook 'Em 1


×
×
  • Create New...