Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Wally Fairway said:

Heard a snip from President Huff & Puff q&a today - egg prices are down 93 or 94%. So if eggs were $5.00/dz, they would now be $0.35 or $0.70 for $10/dz. Anyone here seeing eggs for less than $1 dozen.

Okay move along, nothing new just 1 more thing that is said by our fearless leader that has no truth to it or facts that it is based upon.

Comments like these are great. Even the morons know it’s not true. Every little irrefutable lie helps chip away at their blind obedience. It also allows us easy opportunities to make fun of him when we’re around the morons, and they’re forced to take it without response

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
53 minutes ago, Macanudo said:

Does it though?

nope, not in the least - it doesn't even register to those in the cult, and if confronted they will either ignore the question or say it was a rhetorical or indicative directionally but not to be taken literally. They wouldn't believe he is a follower of Satan, even if Lucifer himself was to introduce Trump one of his ongoing cult rally's. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
On 4/18/2025 at 3:07 PM, Francisco 2.0 said:

 

I did this just this morning for my wife.

She's going out of the country in early May on a girls trip.   I took an old iPhone to ATT, got a new number and the international plan for a month, created her a new Apple ID just for this single phone, installed no social media apps, only put on the esssential contacts and only the apps necessary for the trip.   She's paranoid about having to hand over her phone when she re-enters the country, so I set up a phone she can just hand over and never look back.

 

 

She'll have a dozen apps loaded before she gets back. 

On 4/18/2025 at 3:17 PM, Brisketexan said:

I've always been prepared to do that.  I do not enable any biometrics.  I will not give my passcode, as doing so would allow access to my email and other portals through which I have client communications and materials.  If they say "if you don't allow us access, we'll just seize your phone," I'll say "cool, have it."  Because 1) I can go buy a new one for $1k, 2) unless they have REALLY good reason to access my phone (and they really won't), it's not worth the cost and time to try to break into it, and 3) I'll send a nice piece of correspondence to CBP and the DOJ before the day is out informing them that they seized a device that has attorney-client privileged material on it, and as the know, that requires them to take certain steps to insure that any access they obtain does not intrude on the privilege.

And then I'll go buy a new phone.

On 4/19/2025 at 6:56 PM, Firemans4Horn said:

 

wish it was Van Halen

 

@Brisketexan I fucked up and can't directly reply to your post.  If I send a single email to a lawyer I know, can I make the same "attorney-client" claim? 

Edited by Gil Bang
  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Gil Bang said:

She'll have a dozen apps loaded before she gets back. 

wish it was Van Halen

 

@Brisketexan I fucked up and can't directly reply to your post.  If I send a single email to a lawyer I know, can I make the same "attorney-client" claim? 

Considering that you can have him on retainer for a 6 pack of Lone Star and some beef jerky, of course.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
wish it was Van Halen
 
[mention=593]Brisketexan[/mention] I fucked up and can't directly reply to your post.  If I send a single email to a lawyer I know, can I make the same "attorney-client" claim? 

If it’s an actual A/C communication, then you can claim that the device has privileged communications with your attorney.
Posted
2 hours ago, SquishMitten said:

Comments like these are great. Even the morons know it’s not true. Every little irrefutable lie helps chip away at their blind obedience. It also allows us easy opportunities to make fun of him when we’re around the morons, and they’re forced to take it without response

No, the canned response is "that's just trump being trump, it drives the libs crazy hurhurhur" 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:


If it’s an actual A/C communication, then you can claim that the device has privileged communications with your attorney.

For search warrants directed to attorneys or their offices, USDOJ had (past tense may be key here) a policy that required review and approval of the warrant at Main Justice including a plan for segregating without unnecessary review of privileged matter from an attorney's files, property and devices.  And those reviewing for privilege had to be "chinese walled" from the prosecution or investigation team, so that even snippets of privileged information couldn't be used by the prosecution team ("I saw an email to Gotti  . . . .").

You may recall this was a big to-do when Giuliani's and Cohen's cell phones were seized.

But by letting them know you're a lawyer, or if not a lawyer, that your devices contain attorney-client communications, you should be able to make life harder on them.  Should doing a lot of heavy lifting here.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

No idea what this is.  Looks like a 12 year old girl getting cuffed and arrested.

Maybe she didn't pay the troll toll:

 

Edited by Bullneck
  • Rage+1 3
Posted
3 hours ago, SquishMitten said:

Comments like these are great. Even the morons know it’s not true. Every little irrefutable lie helps chip away at their blind obedience.

That’s not how cults work. It’s not chipping away at anything other than their grip on reality. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Wally Fairway said:

nope, not in the least - it doesn't even register to those in the cult, and if confronted they will either ignore the question or say it was a rhetorical or indicative directionally but not to be taken literally. They wouldn't believe he is a follower of Satan, even if Lucifer himself was to introduce Trump one of his ongoing cult rally's. 

And without blinking they would ascribe the same behavior to democratic voters regarding Obama, Biden, et al. It’s truly just team sports to them. 



×
×
  • Create New...