Johntay Cook dismissed from the football team.

[Tex Long 4,347]

10 minutes ago, Royale with cheese said:

Goin' up the country, mama. Don't you want to go

Gon' take a high brown woman, might take one or two mo'

[SamMan 1,347]

I’d actually not be surprised at all to learn that Kenny D passed on Johntay. Anybody who knows about him and what he has brought to the Valley would have guessed that would be his position on a kid like that.

Man, there’s not a great track record of success for the top rated WR in the state here recently. Demas, Earle, Stewart, Cook, and Hudson. Earle might be questionable but I think the next guy was a kid who now plays at SFA. I’ll never understand why anyone would think becoming a malcontent in the middle of the season is a wise choice even if you do have eyes on the portal. It looks even worse when the other two WRs in your class got zero burn last year, had much more reason to explore other options in the spring and summer, decided to stay, one literally added extra responsibilities at a brand new position to help the team with depth, and the other dude committed to filling the big shoes JWhitt left behind as a leader/glue guy.

I mean, I suppose somebody could’ve been in his ear saying his position coach is giving preferential treatment to a kid from his HS alma mater, but all you would need to refute that is film and first hand accounts of Moore’s habits and demeanor. If he’s thinking his talent exempts him from following that example, he better hope to God that other programs only look at his HS highlight reel and don’t bother to find out what he has done since then. He should also hope they don’t take a look at how Sark treated Maalik and other players who had to decide to enter the portal at the end of last year ahead of the CFP, and how he handled Juan Davis when he asked to return to the team. Seems to me like he is fair and makes his decisions based on merit.

If I was a coach, my response would be: “so, you played as a true freshman on CFP semifinalist, you were on the field in Tuscaloosa at critical moments in your second collegiate game, spent spring and fall camp at the top of the depth chart, got plenty of snaps to start the season, eventually got passed by two dudes who got far less handed to them, and you decided to just check the fuck out because you felt you were being treated unfairly? You didn’t appreciate the team taking three older players out of the portal, but you are asking us to bring you in ahead of the young guys we already have…and pay you handsomely to do so? The second to last relevant snap you have on film is you dropping a wide open TD in a one score game and laughing about it? You left a place with the most talented QB room in the country, where they just put three dudes at your position in the league, and you want us to believe your lack of success isn’t your own fault? Who is your advisor, again? Actually, it doesn’t matter. Thanks for your time.”

[Rimbo 25,777]

3 hours ago, BurntEyes said:

Just christ, I was agreeing with your first point. I don't know wtf we're arguing about. 

#Surlyfindsarguementinagreement 

Well fuck you! I was agreeing with you too! You asshole!

(I'm not even sure what's going on any more, just rolling with it)

[Rimbo 25,777]

2 hours ago, Davis Lane said:

Go on.

no no no this is no good, if they're all lesbians then I don't have a chance!

[Da Fino 2,738]

5 hours ago, SamMan said:

I’d actually not be surprised at all to learn that Kenny D passed on Johntay. Anybody who knows about him and what he has brought to the Valley would have guessed that would be his position on a kid like that.

Man, there’s not a great track record of success for the top rated WR in the state here recently. Demas, Earle, Stewart, Cook, and Hudson. Earle might be questionable but I think the next guy was a kid who now plays at SFA. I’ll never understand why anyone would think becoming a malcontent in the middle of the season is a wise choice even if you do have eyes on the portal. It looks even worse when the other two WRs in your class got zero burn last year, had much more reason to explore other options in the spring and summer, decided to stay, one literally added extra responsibilities at a brand new position to help the team with depth, and the other dude committed to filling the big shoes JWhitt left behind as a leader/glue guy.

I mean, I suppose somebody could’ve been in his ear saying his position coach is giving preferential treatment to a kid from his HS alma mater, but all you would need to refute that is film and first hand accounts of Moore’s habits and demeanor. If he’s thinking his talent exempts him from following that example, he better hope to God that other programs only look at his HS highlight reel and don’t bother to find out what he has done since then. He should also hope they don’t take a look at how Sark treated Maalik and other players who had to decide to enter the portal at the end of last year ahead of the CFP, and how he handled Juan Davis when he asked to return to the team. Seems to me like he is fair and makes his decisions based on merit.

If I was a coach, my response would be: “so, you played as a true freshman on CFP semifinalist, you were on the field in Tuscaloosa at critical moments in your second collegiate game, spent spring and fall camp at the top of the depth chart, got plenty of snaps to start the season, eventually got passed by two dudes who got far less handed to them, and you decided to just check the fuck out because you felt you were being treated unfairly? You didn’t appreciate the team taking three older players out of the portal, but you are asking us to bring you in ahead of the young guys we already have…and pay you handsomely to do so? The second to last relevant snap you have on film is you dropping a wide open TD in a one score game and laughing about it? You left a place with the most talented QB room in the country, where they just put three dudes at your position in the league, and you want us to believe your lack of success isn’t your own fault? Who is your advisor, again? Actually, it doesn’t matter. Thanks for your time.”

That’s a ton of words. They like what Moore and Niblett do more. Done. 

[Hank Scorpio 17,723]

Sark out here cutting five stars, no one is safe. Banks needs to shore up his pass pro or Sark will drop his ass too. 

[LTtxfan 48,964]

5 hours ago, Hank Scorpio said:

Sark out here cutting five stars, no one is safe. Banks needs to shore up his pass pro or Sark will drop his ass too. 

 

[BurntEyes 5,831]

11 hours ago, Rimbo said:

no no no this is no good, if they're all lesbians then I don't have a chance!

Well, I'm gonna have to disagree with you once again. Looking at the pic, doing and doing some quick math using the metrics below, the following has to be true. (I'm rounding up cause math is hard)

3 of those women identify as LGBTQ+, but 2 of 9 or close to 20% identify as bisexual. Odds are with only 5% identifying as gay, there is a better chance #3 LGBTQ+ is bisexual or bicurios than lesbian. The rest are most likely straight.

So, I regretfully have to inform you, you do have a chance with all but possibly 1 of them by the metrics. 

I good news, that means I do too. I'm a team player and I'm willing to take the 2 bisexual women out of the lineup to be on team BurntEyes. That means your only facing 6 women that you have a chance with thereby slightly reducing your chances of cheating on your partner.

#scienceyourewelcomerimbo

“Almost 30% of Gen Z women identify as LGBTQ+, most as bisexual,” Jeffrey Jones, a senior editor at Gallup, told NBC News. “That’s where a lot of the growth seems to be happening.”

The group most likely to identify as LGBTQ, by far, was Generation Z women (ages 18 to 26), 28.5% of whom identified as LGBTQ in the survey. The lion’s share of them, of all Gen Z women surveyed, 20.7%, identified as bisexual, followed by 5.4% who identified as lesbians. 

NBC Article on Sexual Identity

[hookemATL 11,609]

[WBT 20,418]

19 hours ago, Rimbo said:

I used to think that Helo wasn't a bit; that he was just stupid.

Now I'm convinced that this is a bit.

I refuse to believe that anyone can be this stupid.

[Rimbo 25,777]

17 hours ago, Dennis Taylor said:

 

 

This doesn't make me laugh any more. Now it's just depressing.

[lilMAC25 3,778]

22 hours ago, Rimbo said:

I used to think that Helo wasn't a bit; that he was just stupid.

Now I'm convinced that this is a bit.

I refuse to believe that anyone can be this stupid.

When’s the last time you went to Walmart?

[Rimbo 25,777]

3 hours ago, lilMAC25 said:

When’s the last time you went to Walmart?

I'M NOT SAYING THERE'S A LACK OF EVIDENCE

7 hours ago, BurntEyes said:

Well, I'm gonna have to disagree with you once again. Looking at the pic, doing and doing some quick math using the metrics below, the following has to be true. (I'm rounding up cause math is hard)

3 of those women identify as LGBTQ+, but 2 of 9 or close to 20% identify as bisexual. Odds are with only 5% identifying as gay, there is a better chance #3 LGBTQ+ is bisexual or bicurios than lesbian. The rest are most likely straight.

So, I regretfully have to inform you, you do have a chance with all but possibly 1 of them by the metrics. 

I good news, that means I do too. I'm a team player and I'm willing to take the 2 bisexual women out of the lineup to be on team BurntEyes. That means your only facing 6 women that you have a chance with thereby slightly reducing your chances of cheating on your partner.

#scienceyourewelcomerimbo

“Almost 30% of Gen Z women identify as LGBTQ+, most as bisexual,” Jeffrey Jones, a senior editor at Gallup, told NBC News. “That’s where a lot of the growth seems to be happening.”

The group most likely to identify as LGBTQ, by far, was Generation Z women (ages 18 to 26), 28.5% of whom identified as LGBTQ in the survey. The lion’s share of them, of all Gen Z women surveyed, 20.7%, identified as bisexual, followed by 5.4% who identified as lesbians. 

NBC Article on Sexual Identity