Jump to content

The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread


Horn Dog

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, GenXer said:

Just grab the image and print them on your printer. You aren’t being graded on the quality of the medium you’re using to troll people.

Um sir, if we are going to risk a tenner at the Trump Gulag and Resort I want them to be picture perfect.

And  we need one of Musk doing the salute thingy also saying I Did This.

Edited by InkaUtexas
  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, tx 3 putt said:

 

He said he was going to pardon those fucks when he got in the race.

"Oh, that's what we like about Trump.  He does what he says he's gonna do."

Boo fucking hoo, dumbasses.

  • Fuck Around and Find Out 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Dog said:

There's more GOP support for Ukraine than people realize - including Mike Johnson. 

Also, if Russia leaves Ukraine on his watch then Trump can take credit for it.

That'll be a good angle to take with him.  

They should also tell him he's more powerful than Putin now, so he doesn't need to act like such a weasely little bitch around him.  Not in those words, of course.

Edited by Chad Fuck
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, bolverk said:

This will be my first and last post on the topic.

Last night, you posted a bulleted list of some of your principles. One of them was having the right to do whatever you'd like in your personal space so long as it doesn't negatively impact others. An example was the discussion of German polka oompah music being played loudly at night, bothering neighbors.

PAUSE: Now, please reflect on that for a moment.

You state that when you call Caitlyn "Bruce," you're intention is only to insult her. And yet, you continue to insist on stating it publicly (i.e., loudly) in this forum in the presence of someone who has repeatedly stated that you're offending her (as have others who have been trying to help you grasp what you're doing). In other words, you're continuing to blast your German polka oompah music even though you only "intended" to disturb one of your neighbors (but not the whole neighborhood).

You defend yourself by saying, "Well, she's not the intended target of my insult," as if it absolves you from using a known and widely recognized slur against an entire group of people. It is EXACTLY the same concept (as others have pointed out) as calling one Black person with whom you're pissed an N-word in front of an audience that includes other Black people.

How would you react when being called out on that behavior?

Would you quickly apologize and say something like, "Shit, I'm sorry I blurted out the N-word. It just slipped out." Or would you continue and dig in by saying, "I'm not racist! I just really wanted to hurt his feelings because that's the quickest and cheapest shortcut that I know of to emotionally damage a person that looks like him. Sure, I'm pissing off other Black people during the process, but fuck them for being so woke and sensitive and shit."

If you're still cool with that argument and CONTINUE TO DIG IN, then you are truly and remarkably a tremendous asshole.

 

Look, my advice is to insult someone over their behavior and not their appearance, like how they're a fucking hypocrite and traitor to others like them. Do it with precision and not a fucking shotgun blast where a bunch of others catch strays.

They Pull Me Back In Al Pacino GIF by The Godfather

Sounds like you inferred something that wasn't there.  I said doesn't infringe on someone's rights, not "doesn't negatively impact" others.  Big difference.  

Also, I have not said the work Bruce since my first post, and it was in response to ...checks notes... Troph's wife posting a Tweet/X post saying Jenner voted to be called Bruce.

Since then, I have used the terms Jenner and They, so no, I haven't been blasting "polka music" ...which is Czech, by the way (meaning little Polish girl) not German.  The German equivalent is Oom-pah which you noted.  But I digress...

I've spent the rest of my posts differentiating between generalized slurs, IE N-word, T-word, R-word, etc, versus individualized slurs.  Which somehow you put in quotes as, "Well, she's not the intended target of my insult".  While it's true I am NOT, nor would I refer to Troph by her dead name (unless she too voted for Trump), I simply don't see the correlation between disrespecting an individual (Jenner) and disrespecting a group (Trans people).  

I have a "dead" last name, so I might have a little more perspective than you.  I was adopted by my stepdad when I was 7, but I never felt comfortable with his last name, in fact, I hated it.  When I was 19, I changed it, but some people still referred to me by my previous name.  Sometimes as a habit, but other times as an insult complete with the not so nice, play on words that my former last name afforded.  But I never thought they were insulting all adopted kids who didn't like their adopted last names.  Frankly, it didn't even bother me.  It was a "them" problem, not a me problem.  Just as you can, and probably do, view my opinion as a me problem.   Which is fine, and your right.  I simply don't care.

My responsibility in life isn't to tip toe around other people's feelings.  I try to be nice to people who are nice to me, but I'm not going to bend over backwards to spare people's feelings.  If that's being an asshole, the I'm an asshole and I'm fine with that.  Not everyone is going to like me all the time.  I agree with many on here about a lot of things, this just isn't one of them.  I feel like we've become a culture of whiners who get offended too easily.

There is plenty of bad shit heading the trans community's way if certain people (people Jenner voted for) get their way.  Jenner being called by a dead name shouldn't be high on that list of concerns.  

There's a saying I learned in kindergarten that we might want to refer to from time to time ...sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wife and I are part of the queer community. I can call myself a tranny all day long, I can deadname myself all day long. By permission she can too though she doesn’t.

she posted a tweet where someone said congrats to government gonna call you by your deadname. Yeah it’s kinda funny. But it’s not carte blanche endorsement of every body doing it. Sticks and stones I don’t give fuck. You’re not listening. 

but fuck it I don’t care, my blood pressure is through the roof today trying to keep it under 160/xx as I try to make sense of the legal ramifications of bills filed in the Texas legislature and this damn executive order Trump signed that literally erase my existence.

its about to become a hellscape. Enjoy your right to be a dumbass, hope it’s not taken away from you.

 

Edited by troph
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, troph said:

My wife and I are part of the queer community. I can call myself a tranny all day long, I can deadname myself all day long. By permission she can too though she doesn’t.

she posted a tweet where someone said congrats to government gonna call you by your deadname. Yeah it’s kinda funny. But it’s not carte blanche endorsement of every body doing it. Sticks and stones I don’t give fuck. You’re not listening. 

but fuck it I don’t care, my blood pressure is through the roof today trying to keep it under 160/xx as I try to make sense of the legal ramifications of bills filed in the Texas legislature and this damn executive order Trump signed that literally erase my existence.

its about to become a hellscape. Enjoy your right to be a dumbass, hope it’s not taken away from you.

 

Keep being strong.

And concerning losing the right to be a dumbass. Trump won't go there as he would lose his voting and adoring masses.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, InkaUtexas said:

Keep being strong.

And concerning losing the right to be a dumbass. Trump won't go there as he would lose his voting and adoring masses.

Thanks I’m logging off for a few days I’ve worked my butt off to be healthy, my chest hurts. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, troph said:

My wife and I are part of the queer community. I can call myself a tranny all day long, I can deadname myself all day long. By permission she can too though she doesn’t.

she posted a tweet where someone said congrats to government gonna call you by your deadname. Yeah it’s kinda funny. But it’s not carte blanche endorsement of every body doing it. Sticks and stones I don’t give fuck. You’re not listening. 

but fuck it I don’t care, my blood pressure is through the roof today trying to keep it under 160/xx as I try to make sense of the legal ramifications of bills filed in the Texas legislature and this damn executive order Trump signed that literally erase my existence.

its about to become a hellscape. Enjoy your right to be a dumbass, hope it’s not taken away from you.

 

 

stay safe buddy !

and healthy 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

 

Jesus.  Fucking....the stupidity.

Hey, non-white people....HE FUCKING HATES YOU.  HE DOESN'T THINK THAT ANY OF YOU BELONG HERE OR THAT ANY OF YOU ARE "REAL AMERICANS."  He has consistently told you that.  He has acted 100% consistently with what he told you he was, and what he would do.  And you dumbasses STILL voted for him.

Your faces are DELICIOUS, says the leopard.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Brisketexan said:

Jesus.  Fucking....the stupidity.

Hey, non-white people....HE FUCKING HATES YOU.  HE DOESN'T THINK THAT ANY OF YOU BELONG HERE OR THAT ANY OF YOU ARE "REAL AMERICANS."  He has consistently told you that.  He has acted 100% consistently with what he told you he was, and what he would do.  And you dumbasses STILL voted for him.

Your faces are DELICIOUS, says the leopard.

 

trump to latin supporters : No Hables !

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump voters and "libertarians" concerned about privacy and intrusive government surveillance 'bout to find out.

Quote

 

Trump Seeks to Paralyze Independent Privacy and Civil Liberties Watchdog
The Trump White House has told three Democratic-selected members of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board to resign or be fired, which would stop the independent agency from functioning.

The Trump White House is moving to paralyze a bipartisan and independent watchdog agency that investigates national security activities that can intrude upon individual rights.

The move comes as the new administration is vowing to put its own stamp on federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies. It also comes ahead of a new conflict over whether or how Congress should renew a warrantless surveillance law that is set to expire in 2026.

Congress established the agency, called the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, as an independent unit in the executive branch after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. It has security clearances and subpoena power, and is set up to have five members, appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate, who serve six-year terms. Some members are picked by the president, and some are selected by congressional leaders of the other party.

It needs at least three members in order to take official actions like starting a new investigative project or issuing a board report with a policy recommendation. Its work has included scrutiny of surveillance and bulk data collection activities, terrorism watch lists and the use of facial recognition and other biometrics at airports.

On Tuesday evening, each of the three members who were picked by Democrats — Sharon Bradford Franklin, Edward W. Felten and Travis LeBlanc — received an email from the White House telling them to submit resignation letters by the close of business on Jan. 23, according to three people with knowledge of the situation.

The people spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisal. They said the email, sent by Trent Morse, the deputy director of presidential personnel, told the board members that that President Trump would terminate their positions if they did not resign by that deadline.

The fifth seat is currently vacant. The Trump White House did not tell the board’s sole current Republican-picked member, Beth Williams, to leave, two of the people familiar with the matter said.

The departure of the three Democratic-picked members would mean the agency would lack enough members to function as the Trump administration begins its efforts to reshape the nation’s law enforcement and intelligence agencies.

Senator Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat who is frequently critical of surveillance programs, denounced the move in a statement, saying it was related to accusations that Mr. Trump was trying to install his own loyalists and partisans at the F.B.I. and intelligence agencies to weaponize the government against his enemies.

“By purging the Democratic members of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, Trump is kneecapping one of the only independent watchdogs over government surveillance who could alert Congress and the public about surveillance abuses by his administration,” Mr. Wyden said.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The Privacy and Civil Liberties Board was initially set up as part of the White House operation, but Congress later decided to make it an independent agency within the executive branch so that its judgments would carry greater weight.

Ambiguously, however, while Congress declared that the agency was “independent,” the statute establishing the agency does not have a provision that bars presidents from removing its board members without a good cause like misconduct — the usual method by which independent agencies are protected from undue White House interference.

Advisers to Mr. Trump subscribe to a strong view of presidential power called the unitary executive theory, under which the Constitution should be interpreted as giving presidents exclusive control of the executive branch and independent agencies are considered illegitimate. During the campaign, Trump allies vowed to stomp out pockets of independence in the executive branch if he won the election.

Mr. Trump and his allies have been harshly critical of F.B.I. and spy agency power, and the Privacy and Civil Liberties Board has sometimes been aligned with that point of view. In 2023, its Democratic members annoyed the Biden White House by recommending that Congress require the F.B.I. to get court orders before looking for Americans’ private communications swept up by a warrantless surveillance program, which the Biden administration opposed.

Privacy advocates reacted with alarm. Among them, Jeramie Scott of the Electronic Privacy Information Center portrayed the Trump White House move as undercutting the purpose of the agency in being able to perform oversight free from interference.

“Calling for current Democratic members of the board to resign or be fired threatens independent oversight of surveillance programs by this administration and future administrations,” he said.

The board also plays a key role in an agreement between the United States and the European Union, which allows businesses to transfer Europeans’ personal data to the United States in part because the board exists as a check on surveillance practices and can oversee a process of addressing complaints from Europeans about any misuse of their data.

Among other things, the board must annually certify that a new Data Protection Review Court inside the Justice Department, which can investigate and render judgments on any European complaints, complies with the pact.

Still, Paul Rosenzweig, a former special advocate to represent Europeans before that court and who resigned this week in protest of Mr. Trump’s return to the presidency, disclosed in a blog post about his resignation that to date the court has yet to hear a case.

Board members either did not respond or declined to comment, and a spokesman for the agency did not have any immediate comment.

An ouster would mean little to Ms. Franklin, a former staff director for the agency who is now the board’s full-time chairwoman. Her term technically ended on Jan. 29, 2024. Under the agency’s statute, members can serve one additional year after their terms end, unless or until their successors are appointed, to keep their seats from becoming vacant. So Ms. Franklin was set to depart the board next week regardless.

But the term for Mr. Felten, a Princeton University computer science and public policy professor, is set to end on Jan. 29 of this year— meaning he has been set to stay in place for another year unless a replacement gets confirmed. And Mr. LeBlanc, a cybersecurity and data privacy lawyer, has been set to stay on the board until as late as January 2029.

While selected by congressional Democrats, both Mr. Felten and Mr. LeBlanc were appointed by Mr. Trump during his first term after also interviewing with the White House.

 

 

  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

Jesus.  Fucking....the stupidity.

Hey, non-white people....HE FUCKING HATES YOU.  HE DOESN'T THINK THAT ANY OF YOU BELONG HERE OR THAT ANY OF YOU ARE "REAL AMERICANS."  He has consistently told you that.  He has acted 100% consistently with what he told you he was, and what he would do.  And you dumbasses STILL voted for him.

Your faces are DELICIOUS, says the leopard.

Now bring me another mojito.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, troph said:

My wife and I are part of the queer community. I can call myself a tranny all day long, I can deadname myself all day long. By permission she can too though she doesn’t.

she posted a tweet where someone said congrats to government gonna call you by your deadname. Yeah it’s kinda funny. But it’s not carte blanche endorsement of every body doing it. Sticks and stones I don’t give fuck. You’re not listening. 

but fuck it I don’t care, my blood pressure is through the roof today trying to keep it under 160/xx as I try to make sense of the legal ramifications of bills filed in the Texas legislature and this damn executive order Trump signed that literally erase my existence.

its about to become a hellscape. Enjoy your right to be a dumbass, hope it’s not taken away from you.

 

Oh, I get it.  There are special rules.

That sounds like the same "rules for thee but not for me" BS the right uses.  If you can't see the hypocrisy, that's on you not me.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, DixonHur said:

They Pull Me Back In Al Pacino GIF by The Godfather

Sounds like you inferred something that wasn't there.  I said doesn't infringe on someone's rights, not "doesn't negatively impact" others.  Big difference.  

Also, I have not said the work Bruce since my first post, and it was in response to ...checks notes... Troph's wife posting a Tweet/X post saying Jenner voted to be called Bruce.

Since then, I have used the terms Jenner and They, so no, I haven't been blasting "polka music" ...which is Czech, by the way (meaning little Polish girl) not German.  The German equivalent is Oom-pah which you noted.  But I digress...

I've spent the rest of my posts differentiating between generalized slurs, IE N-word, T-word, R-word, etc, versus individualized slurs.  Which somehow you put in quotes as, "Well, she's not the intended target of my insult".  While it's true I am NOT, nor would I refer to Troph by her dead name (unless she too voted for Trump), I simply don't see the correlation between disrespecting an individual (Jenner) and disrespecting a group (Trans people).  

I have a "dead" last name, so I might have a little more perspective than you.  I was adopted by my stepdad when I was 7, but I never felt comfortable with his last name, in fact, I hated it.  When I was 19, I changed it, but some people still referred to me by my previous name.  Sometimes as a habit, but other times as an insult complete with the not so nice, play on words that my former last name afforded.  But I never thought they were insulting all adopted kids who didn't like their adopted last names.  Frankly, it didn't even bother me.  It was a "them" problem, not a me problem.  Just as you can, and probably do, view my opinion as a me problem.   Which is fine, and your right.  I simply don't care.

My responsibility in life isn't to tip toe around other people's feelings.  I try to be nice to people who are nice to me, but I'm not going to bend over backwards to spare people's feelings.  If that's being an asshole, the I'm an asshole and I'm fine with that.  Not everyone is going to like me all the time.  I agree with many on here about a lot of things, this just isn't one of them.  I feel like we've become a culture of whiners who get offended too easily.

There is plenty of bad shit heading the trans community's way if certain people (people Jenner voted for) get their way.  Jenner being called by a dead name shouldn't be high on that list of concerns.  

There's a saying I learned in kindergarten that we might want to refer to from time to time ...sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.  

tl;dr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DixonHur said:

Oh, I get it.  There are special rules.

That sounds like the same "rules for thee but not for me" BS the right uses.  If you can't see the hypocrisy, that's on you not me.

Qu'est-ce que c'est?

Spoiler

Cfdza6HXIAI2woD.jpg

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

Jesus.  Fucking....the stupidity.

Hey, non-white people....HE FUCKING HATES YOU.  HE DOESN'T THINK THAT ANY OF YOU BELONG HERE OR THAT ANY OF YOU ARE "REAL AMERICANS."  He has consistently told you that.  He has acted 100% consistently with what he told you he was, and what he would do.  And you dumbasses STILL voted for him.

Your faces are DELICIOUS, says the leopard.

 

leopards are going to get fat !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DixonHur said:

Oh, I get it.  There are special rules.

That sounds like the same "rules for thee but not for me" BS the right uses.  If you can't see the hypocrisy, that's on you not me.

God just shut up. Yes there are different rules for different groups of people. Crazy!!! You’ve been educated, now you can choose to use whatever language you want. No one is stopping you. You just look like a fucking asshole when doing so. Again, you can choose to care about that or not. Doesn’t change the fact that you are an asshole 

  • Hook 'Em 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, DixonHur said:

Oh, I get it.  There are special rules.

That sounds like the same "rules for thee but not for me" BS the right uses.  If you can't see the hypocrisy, that's on you not me.

Are you aggy? You have to tell us if you are.

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DixonHur said:

There's a saying I learned in kindergarten that we might want to refer to from time to time ...sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.  

IMG_2673.thumb.jpeg.2966cb2d0395036ec146d75f103d058b.jpeg

Listen, Mister, we don’t want any trouble in here - in any age group’s language…

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Horn Dogg said:

I’ll just call it the dumbass tax.

We've always had to pay the dumbass tax.  But, with Trump being voted back into office, I feel no need to compassionate any longer.  This election should have taught everyone to put yourself first.  Go out and get yours.  That dumbass tax we have all been paying?  I would imagine a lot of us will be shifting as much of the burden to the source as we can.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, and I'm aware that crippling the CDC exposes all of us to massive risk, spreading illness, stacks of bodies.

Fuck it.  The only language we the people will listen to is pain and death.  So....bring it.  We're all going to have to suffer...a lot....before it gets through our thick head that maybe guzzling cyanide to spite brown people isn't a great plan.

1 minute ago, Aqua Buddha said:

He might end up homeless, but at least a trans kid in rural Iowa won't be on the track team, right?

THANK GOD.  PRIORITIES, PEOPLE!

Death, pestilence, mass unemployment, thousands of lives turned upside down....but at least that one trans kid will really, really know we hate him.  And THAT'S what matters.

  • Rage+1 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

Oh, and I'm aware that crippling the CDC exposes all of us to massive risk, spreading illness, stacks of bodies.

Fuck it.  The only language we the people will listen to is pain and death.  So....bring it.  We're all going to have to suffer...a lot....before it gets through our thick head that maybe guzzling cyanide to spite brown people isn't a great plan.

 

when you don't like the message, you discontinue the messaging !!!

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i feel like pieces of something a lot more catastrophic than grocery prices or international shame and embarrassment are floating around...

but with the probability that vaccines will no longer be/can no longer be required, combined with kneecapping the communication arm of our institutions meant to educate and inform of disease/health risks...i mean... are we... like wtf is the actual end game here?? we all gonna die? where's the profit in that?

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mchookem said:

i feel like pieces of something a lot more catastrophic than grocery prices or international shame and embarrassment are floating around...

but with the probability that vaccines will no longer be/can no longer be required, combined with kneecapping the communication arm of our institutions meant to educate and inform of disease/health risks...i mean... are we... like wtf is the actual end game here?? we all gonna die? where's the profit in that?

Trump Vitamins.  Sure they are made with arsenic, but fuck you, it's not on the label. 

  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mchookem said:

i feel like pieces of something a lot more catastrophic than grocery prices or international shame and embarrassment are floating around...

but with the probability that vaccines will no longer be/can no longer be required, combined with kneecapping the communication arm of our institutions meant to educate and inform of disease/health risks...i mean... are we... like wtf is the actual end game here?? we all gonna die? where's the profit in that?

You are forgetting that the cruelty is the point.

Causing suffering -- especially needless, pointless suffering, in furtherance of no rational policy goal -- is the ULTIMATE display and demonstration of raw power.  There is no greater display of power than "fuck you, that's why."  And that's a theme that runs through the regime's agenda.  "Fuck you, that's why."  It's a display of power and dominance, and cruelty and suffering is the surest shortcut to that.  That's it.  That's all we're dealing with here.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, CooterBrown said:

Better to lose that VA job before you start and not when the VA is eliminated in the next six months. 

Didn't you read the tweet? THEY WERE MOVING FROM FT. WORTH TO WACO. 

How can anything make up for the pain of not living in Waco?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mchookem said:

i feel like pieces of something a lot more catastrophic than grocery prices or international shame and embarrassment are floating around...

but with the probability that vaccines will no longer be/can no longer be required, combined with kneecapping the communication arm of our institutions meant to educate and inform of disease/health risks...i mean... are we... like wtf is the actual end game here?? we all gonna die? where's the profit in that?

I initially thought that we could all just mask up for the next pandemic and be cool which Magatards died off but then I realized that banning the public sale of N95 masks is probably on the agenda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CooterBrown said:

I initially thought that we could all just mask up for the next pandemic and be cool which Magatards died off but then I realized that banning the public sale of N95 masks is probably on the agenda.

Not just the sale, but the wearing.  Wearing a mask will be a defiance of MAGA, and you will be placed in a deportation camp for processing.  I exaggerate only slightly.  Seriously, there WILL be rules/laws AGAINST wearing an N95 mask, I guarantee it.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, mchookem said:

i feel like pieces of something a lot more catastrophic than grocery prices or international shame and embarrassment are floating around...

but with the probability that vaccines will no longer be/can no longer be required, combined with kneecapping the communication arm of our institutions meant to educate and inform of disease/health risks...i mean... are we... like wtf is the actual end game here?? we all gonna die? where's the profit in that?

I wonder if all this (Trump 2.0 and everything that has transpired the last, let's say, 100 days) could have been avoided if we as a country took a less hardline approach to the vaccinations back in 2021. Hindsight being 20/20 and all, I do wonder if the outcomes would have been materially or statistically significantly different if the NEVER-VAXERS and Vax-Anxious didn't feel "forced" to take it. I think most people who had even small reservations were like me in that they still got or would get the jab.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...