Jump to content

The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread


Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Dutchrudder said:

Well at least he learned a valuable lesson. Next lesson is living with bad credit scores, repo men and maybe bankruptcy court. But I mean, how could this have been avoided? 

FB_IMG_1740005198615.jpg

If you're gonna be stupid you better be tough.  

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Dahobbs said:

Why are you posting an article from 2018? 

Screenshot on reddit didn’t have the date. My bad. Old leopards are still leopards.

  • Like 1
Posted

man...there is something deeply, deeply ironic in the Make America Great Again! and America First! crowd being completely down and supportive of traumatizing their fellow Americans and the indiscriminate trashing of their American government and way of life...and reaching the 'bridge too far' state only on the issues of turning Gaza into Trumplandia and bowing down to Russia.

🤣

anecdotal leopard stories aside, those are literally the only two issues i have seen some significant consistent 'heeeey....guys, this might not be a good idea!' responses.

  • Drool 1
Posted
23 hours ago, crash_davis said:

How it started.

fire-the-bureaucrats-man-realizes-that-i

How it's going.

fire-the-bureaucrats-man-realizes-that-i

I tend to assume anytime their name/username is redacted that a) the entire thing is fake, or b) the two posts came from different people. There’s zero reason to black that out other than to prevent anybody from being able to quickly fact check it.

Posted
1 minute ago, SquishMitten said:

I tend to assume anytime their name/username is redacted that a) the entire thing is fake, or b) the two posts came from different people. There’s zero reason to black that out other than to prevent anybody from being able to quickly fact check it.

I assume it's someone else posting the pic, and blacking out things because they don't want to be sued. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Reap the whirlwind motherfuckers.

You know whose fault this is? Fuck him for his hypocrisy over the years. Fucker deserves to be goatsed by a Dodge Ram. 

Freezing Mitch Mcconnell GIF by GIPHY News - Find & Share on ...

 

2 hours ago, The Dog said:

image.thumb.png.2cf86ba24558ea09fdb9fa2129777c63.png

Whoopsies GIFs - Find & Share on GIPHY

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

I assume it's someone else posting the pic, and blacking out things because they don't want to be sued. 

They could block out their own name if that was the case. But that’s obviously blacking out the name of the person in the picture (“Check out my new shirt” or whatever) and the name of the person who wrote about their wife.

Posted
2 minutes ago, SquishMitten said:

They could block out their own name if that was the case. But that’s obviously blacking out the name of the person in the picture (“Check out my new shirt” or whatever) and the name of the person who wrote about their wife.

I mean, I'd block it all out if I thought it could be traced back to me somehow. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Superhero said:

You know whose fault this is? Fuck him for his hypocrisy over the years. Fucker deserves to be goatsed by a Dodge Ram. 

Freezing Mitch Mcconnell GIF by GIPHY News - Find & Share on ...

 

PSA: The Traitor Turtle announced today he's stepping down after next year. So, his vote to confirm Kash Patel as head of the FBI wasn't because he was afraid of getting primaried. It was because he's in support of his party going full fascist.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 5
Posted
4 minutes ago, Dutchrudder said:

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1XPxFnRs9Q/

People regretting their votes already. Trump is going to have to kick Elon and DOGE to the curb to regain their trust and win these people back, so he can win a third term in 2028...

No worries.  They'll vote for him again (and yes, he is "running" in 2028, accept that), because this one time, a dirty tranny played women's badminton at Upper Western Minnesota State Tech and Teacher's College.

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 2
Posted
5 hours ago, TexasHooch said:

Well he can't pardon State and Local assault convictions, so we're good there.

Unless of course Washington DC gets taken over by the federal government, but why would that happen? ...

 

 

furk.

Any red state governor would pardon anyone he tells them to. I wouldn't put it past some weak yellowbelly democratic governor doing the same for some kind of quid pro quo. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Hookah Horns said:

I wouldn't put it past some weak yellowbelly democratic governor doing the same for some kind of quid pro quo. 

Or under threat of deployment of military force against the state.

Some of y'all seem to think that Trump won't use military force against states that do not bend to his will.  You have not been paying attention.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
Posted
24 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

No worries.  They'll vote for him again (and yes, he is "running" in 2028, accept that), because this one time, a dirty tranny played women's badminton at Upper Western Minnesota State Tech and Teacher's College.

This is so true.  After January 6, my dad hated Trump.  Just last week he was trying to convince me that Trump is a good man.

Fuck all that noise.

  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Jive Turkey said:

 

Infuriating. Here are some selected passages:

Quote

According to one source with direct knowledge of the events, North Carolina senator Thom Tillis told people that the FBI warned him about “credible death threats” when he was considering voting against Pete Hegseth’s nomination for defense secretary. Tillis ultimately provided the crucial 50th vote to confirm the former Fox & Friends host to lead the Pentagon. According to the source, Tillis has said that if people want to understand Trump, they should read the 2006 book Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work. (When asked for comment for this story, a spokesperson for Tillis said it was false that the senator had recommended the book in that capacity. The FBI said it had no comment.)

Quote

January 6 further catalyzed GOP fear of Trump-inspired violence. Romney told his biographer, McKay Coppins, that an undercurrent of anxiety thwarted Republican efforts to formally punish Trump for his role in inciting the riot. “One Republican congressman confided to Romney that he wanted to vote for Trump’s second impeachment, but chose not to out of fear for his family’s safety,” Coppins wrote in his book. “When one senator, a member of leadership, said he was leaning toward voting to convict, the others urged him to reconsider. You can’t do that, Romney recalled someone saying. Think of your personal safety, said another. Think of your children. The senator eventually decided they were right.”

Former Wyoming representative and prominent anti-Trump Republican Liz Cheney told CNN that House GOP members confided to her that they were “afraid for their own security—afraid, in some instances, for their lives.” Representative Jason Crow of Colorado told NBC News after January 6: “I had a lot of conversations with my Republican colleagues last night, and a couple of them broke down in tears—saying that they are afraid for their lives if they vote for this impeachment.”

Republican Peter Meijer, then a Michigan representative, told Atlantic writer Tim Alberta in 2021 that one colleague seemed to nearly have a nervous breakdown over fears of being harmed by MAGA supporters if he were to vote to certify the 2020 election results: “He asked his new colleague if he was okay,” Alberta reported. “The member responded that he was not; that no matter his belief in the legitimacy of the election, he could no longer vote to certify the results, because he feared for his family’s safety. ‘Remember, this wasn’t a hypothetical. You were casting that vote after seeing with your own two eyes what some of these people are capable of,’ Meijer says. ‘If they’re willing to come after you inside the US Capitol, what will they do when you’re at home with your kids?’”

 

  • Rage+1 4
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
3 hours ago, GenXer said:

Foxnews chat: Insane in the Ukraine 


IMG_2470.thumb.jpeg.5e8bf70a1d5f170219a7829e2b18a44c.jpeg

 

IMG_2471.thumb.jpeg.f536eb9a7bc0e95bd8b81aeed47dcd28.jpeg

 

 

IMG_2472.thumb.jpeg.00cc0b1905ff6c03837f90e8d7d06d72.jpeg
 

 

IMG_2474.thumb.jpeg.8caecd37743cda63016f6e518a392787.jpeg

 

IMG_2475.thumb.jpeg.c80b992309ec379efcdd29001604a884.jpeg

 

IMG_2476.thumb.jpeg.dbe1a78e96aff45cf341c2fe8c042c60.jpeg

 

 

You couldn't imagine that Biden cared more about Ukraine than Trump does?

No shit?

Trumps cares about exactly three people on the earth, including himself.  The others are Junior and the daughter he wants to fuck.  Everyone else is a piece on a board for him to manipulate into bringing him money and attention.  Yes, some of them are manipulating him in much bigger ways, but from his point of view, no one outside of his little circle matters at all.  I don't know what planet you were living on from about 2015 until now where you couldn't figure this out, because he doesn't try to hide it.

  • Like 2
Posted
Or under threat of deployment of military force against the state.
Some of y'all seem to think that Trump won't use military force against states that do not bend to his will.  You have not been paying attention.

This will be the breaking point - 1/2 the military won’t follow those orders and 1/2 will.
  • Like 2
Posted
27 minutes ago, C-Man said:

Infuriating. Here are some selected passages:

 

unbelievable we've come to this. with Elon's threat to spend $100M to primary anyone who stands in their way and the threat of physical violence, there's nothing left to do but roll the credits.

Posted
34 minutes ago, C-Man said:

Infuriating. Here are some selected passages:

 

What a bunch of fucking pussies. There needs to be a tv ad mocking these people, whether it's election season or not, urging people to stop putting weak people into power.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 2
Posted
58 minutes ago, Goofyboy said:


This will be the breaking point - 1/2 the military won’t follow those orders and 1/2 will.

I agree with the first part.  The second, I don't know. 

But this figures to be a huge turning point.  Military leaders have to respect the chain of command, but they also cannot obey an illegal order.  So, what's it gonna be when the illegal orders are coming from the top of the chain of command?

I really don't know how this one will break.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
22 hours ago, Dutchrudder said:

FB_IMG_1740005267612.jpg.9a656d171637610b40c418a8a0de3108.jpg

If only there was a cheap, safe, proven, effective option for these people...

The response should have been “Yes I can tell you a precaution. Give your child up for adoption to a family that believes in science.”

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, TexArcher said:

I agree with the first part.  The second, I don't know. 

But this figures to be a huge turning point.  Military leaders have to respect the chain of command, but they also cannot obey an illegal order.  So, what's it gonna be when the illegal orders are coming from the top of the chain of command?

I really don't know how this one will break.

When a military commander receives an illegal order from the CINC, he has a duty not to obey that order.

He also has a duty to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States from all enemies, foreign and domestic.  So if the CINC insists on issuing an order to use military force against one of the 50 states because its government didn't do what he wants, that commander further has a duty to take action against the CINC.

That is the crisis we are headed towards.  It's like it's out of a terrible fucking movie starring Steven Seagal or some shit.  But it's real.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Brisketexan said:

Or under threat of deployment of military force against the state.

Some of y'all seem to think that Trump won't use military force against states that do not bend to his will.  You have not been paying attention.

Do you believe our military doesn’t have contingency plans for when a president gets way out over their skis? Until I see it happen I will not think or believe that the United States military will choose to follow his orders over the Constitution. There are people there that take their oath seriously and care more about the country than following an orange man off a cliff.
 

To be a real big boy dictator like his friend in Russia you have to have a military backing you up. Right now he’s still just a paper tiger in comparison.

Posted
1 minute ago, Brisketexan said:

When a military commander receives an illegal order from the CINC, he has a duty not to obey that order.

He also has a duty to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States from all enemies, foreign and domestic.  So if the CINC insists on issuing an order to use military force against one of the 50 states because its government didn't do what he wants, that commander further has a duty to take action against the CINC.

That is the crisis we are headed towards.  It's like it's out of a terrible fucking movie starring Steven Seagal or some shit.  But it's real.

And, I think the War Colleges and other senior field officer training is very specific on these kinds of issues.  It's not going to stop some Flynn types, but I think the majority of senior officers will do the right thing.

Posted
3 minutes ago, UpperWestside said:

Do you believe our military doesn’t have contingency plans for when a president gets way out over their skis? Until I see it happen I will not think or believe that the United States military will choose to follow his orders over the Constitution. There are people there that take their oath seriously and care more about the country than following an orange man off a cliff.
 

To be a real big boy dictator like his friend in Russia you have to have a military backing you up. Right now he’s still just a paper tiger in comparison.

 

1 minute ago, TwiceHorn said:

And, I think the War Colleges and other senior field officer training is very specific on these kinds of issues.  It's not going to stop some Flynn types, but I think the majority of senior officers will do the right thing.

And I think it is rapidly approaching the "more likely than not" level that we're going to find out if y'all are right.

And the rest of us are going to have to pick a side.  Not just to root for.  When the elements of the military loyal to the Constitution call for aid, will we assist them?  We're going to reach that fork in the road - every one of us.

  • Like 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

When a military commander receives an illegal order from the CINC, he has a duty not to obey that order.

He also has a duty to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States from all enemies, foreign and domestic.  So if the CINC insists on issuing an order to use military force against one of the 50 states because its government didn't do what he wants, that commander further has a duty to take action against the CINC.

That is the crisis we are headed towards.  It's like it's out of a terrible fucking movie starring Steven Seagal or some shit.  But it's real.

Turns out, the real thing might also star Steven Seagal as Russia's special counsel to the President. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Hookah Horns said:

Any red state governor would pardon anyone he tells them to. I wouldn't put it past some weak yellowbelly democratic governor doing the same for some kind of quid pro quo. 

Yea we’ve literally in this pardoned a pedo murderer because he killed someone from the other team.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

I wss thinking that if one really wanted to try to get through to a MAGA, especially a fringe one, it's worth putting in that you were a trump supporter or you voted for him in the past.  They're never going to agree with a lib, but if they think you are/were one of them they might be more willing to listen to why he's a fucking moron. 

  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Colonel Sanders said:

I wss thinking that if one really wanted to try to get through to a MAGA, especially a fringe one, it's worth putting in that you were a trump supporter or you voted for him in the past.  They're never going to agree with a lib, but if they think you are/were one of them they might be more willing to listen to why he's a fucking moron. 

I would rather the world burn than state I ever supported or even agreed with Donald fucking Trump. You sir, can kiss my ass. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
46 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

 

And I think it is rapidly approaching the "more likely than not" level that we're going to find out if y'all are right.

And the rest of us are going to have to pick a side.  Not just to root for.  When the elements of the military loyal to the Constitution call for aid, will we assist them?  We're going to reach that fork in the road - every one of us.

I'm getting to this point.  Any pointers on freebasing crack cocaine? Surely it couldn't hurt. I’ve done a little toot; and reefers. I'll take a drink if offered.  It polite.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Dahobbs said:

I would rather the world burn than state I ever supported or even agreed with Donald fucking Trump. You sir, can kiss my ass. 

I think it work better anonymously.   And if we had some twitter bots, starting out a post like that would be better at changing opinions than just laughing in their face for their hardships.   We can do that in this thread.  Just a thought if we're really trying to change minds of those that voted for him and might go the other way in the mid terms.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
57 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

 

And I think it is rapidly approaching the "more likely than not" level that we're going to find out if y'all are right.

Since the inevitable comparisons to the Nazis are going to be made here is where there is a line. Germany in the early 1930’s had a whole bunch of veterans from The Great War that felt they did not lose the war. They felt unfairly blamed for the war and the Versailles Treaty was still fresh on their minds. The Wehrmacht at that point was a skeleton of its Great War size, BUT, and this is key, they had grievances a mile long against France and Britain. You had the necessary ingredients for Hitler to be able to have a military that pledged allegiance to him, especially so because he had served in that war. Revenge was still on the minds of those soldiers and the children who had to hear for their entire life to that point that Germany needed to gain revenge against those countries and a centuries old scapegoat of the Jews. 
 

Our military is not suffering from a crisis in the confidence of itself or the values it is sworn to uphold. The United States military owes nothing to the con man, its idiot and racist defense secretary or any of the rest of them. We have a military built upon 250 years of weathering two wars with England, a Civil War, two world wars and now 80 years past that still being the dominant force in the world. It is built to weather morons like Trump. People routinely make fun of the Marines and their supposed lack of intellect. I’ll take that marine and his commanding officers and their vow to protect us. Our politicians will fail us continually like they are now, but our military I have zero qualms about trusting them. Push comes to shove they still have the big guns, tanks and planes and the orange con man has only his own plane and his cadre of secret service guards to try and overtake that. To that I say good luck.

Edited by UpperWestside
  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 3
  • Drool 1


×
×
  • Create New...