Jump to content

The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread


Recommended Posts

Posted
39 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

IMG_4211.thumb.jpeg.4587b5d5e2c5dd96458c371eafb869d8.jpeg

 

Weird.  My dad lying to me about how the Ninth Armored and the Big Red One liberated camps in the Flossenburg system near the Czechoslovakia border with Germany.   He seemed so affected by seeing all of those dying women prisoners.   

And now Carly tells me it was all a lie and Nazis were the good guys.  

She needs to have cherished Nazi symbols tattooed over her body and be parachuted nude into the Russian lines.  The tattoos will start the conversation and she can educate them as well.

 

Screenshot_20250301-152149.png

Posted
Just now, Derka said:

i like how he says, “i stormed the capitol.” didn’t they all insist it was a peaceful protest? oh well, gene pool just got a little stronger:

january 6th rioter is the epitome of a loser. these are the very morons who see themselves as patriots, the same room temperature iq mongoloids who put trump, elon, and putin in power here in the USA. fuck em all. 

 

antifa !!!!

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 4
  • Drool 1
Posted
22 hours ago, dlatin said:

I’m in deep red East Texas. As expected, the Leopards are gonna feast out here. Recent post on FB:

4d77ca792e62d5795ff868500668c9c5.jpg

I wanted to have my face eaten. Don't ask about it. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Macanudo said:

Outsource the hotels?    He's going to sell the entire park system for commercialization.  Whose ready for the Buc-ees Yellowstone Conference Center and National Park?   The Vail Resorts Grand Teton National Park and Ski Area?  It's coming.

i cannot find a rage emoticon or gif sufficient for this

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, Derka said:

i like how he says, “i stormed the capitol.” didn’t they all insist it was a peaceful protest? oh well, gene pool just got a little stronger:

january 6th rioter is the epitome of a loser. these are the very morons who see themselves as patriots, the same room temperature iq mongoloids who put trump, elon, and putin in power here in the USA. fuck em all. 

I bet he thought the cop would be on his side with the "storming the capitol" line.  

  • Hook 'Em 8
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

This is really the epitome of MAGA thought.    I stormed the capital and have criminal problems.   But I wanna drive even though I’m not allowed to drive, so I’m gonna go to a different state to see if I can get a hardship license.  But even though I do not have a license, I’m gonna drive anyway. But you can’t give me a ticket or arrest me for driving without a license because you don’t understand it would be hard for me to have a negative consequence for yet another illegal thing I’ve done.

I’m looking on the bright side of this. He can visit with mom at the local cemetery all the time now without having to drive.

like, he’s ready to kill himself if he gets into trouble again, and yet he still makes all of the decisions you’ve laid out. these are the dumbest fucking people on the planet. just illiterate, xenophobic, garbage human beings who don’t give a fuck if their actions cause anyone else to suffer, but are too pussy to even hold themselves accountable at the lowest level possible. again, fuck em all.

Edited by Derka
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Rage+1 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
i like how he says, “i stormed the capitol.” didn’t they all insist it was a peaceful protest? oh well, gene pool just got a little stronger:
january 6th rioter is the epitome of a loser. these are the very morons who see themselves as patriots, the same room temperature iq mongoloids who put trump, elon, and putin in power here in the USA. fuck em all. 

Dumber than a sack of hammers.
Posted
26 minutes ago, Sawbonz said:

Assuming fact not in evidence 

He is the dumbass I tagged a few years ago in a post here and he replied as usual and then bitched to immac cause he had asked him to take him off this board. Just another loser that can’t control himself. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Ag with kids said:

Please explain how you would do it so that the largest amount of people get representation from representatives that share their policy beliefs that does not use any kind of political party as a proxy.

I’ll bite.  And this is absolutely crazy talk now, mind you….. but maybe through the electoral process the voters vote for candidates who most share their morals and interests and political philosophies on issues.  And then those elected officials selected through the electoral process want to get elected again, and lean toward voting in Congress in a way that the electorate likes. Wacky, I know. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
On 2/27/2025 at 7:34 AM, Bozo_Casanova said:

I already answered that- because “local interests often (or usually, really) transcend national party alignment.” People who live in the same community of interest generally agree on the major local economic and social issues, irrespective of their views on national political issues. 

For example, most voters in the Big Country, regardless of party, agree that orphaned oil wells are a problem. 

Different elections, different electorates. 

You do realize that the apportionment for federal offices, state offices, and local offices can be different, right?

 

Quote

This is precisely the question you leave begging. Why should it match when the issues faced by the nation or state as a whole do not encompass or reflect the interests of local communities in their interactions with the rest of the state and nation?

That’s the question you’ve been refusing to respond to for 20 years. “Why should they match?” In response,  you just continue chanting your mantra, “they should match.”

Then, please explain exactly how you would apportion representation at the federal, state, and local levels without any reference to political parties/policies/platforms as a proxy for the representation.

Posted
17 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

I’ll bite.  And this is absolutely crazy talk now, mind you….. but maybe through the electoral process the voters vote for candidates who most share their morals and interests and political philosophies on issues.  And then those elected officials selected through the electoral process want to get elected again, and lean toward voting in Congress in a way that the electorate likes. Wacky, I know. 

Yeah.

And amazingly, that methodology will closely align by party.

Since you can't do the apportionment based on individual candidates for every single election in every single district/precinct/etc.

  • Fuck You 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Gatorubet said:

You smooth brain Aggy.  Before one more word passes your stupid typing fingers to this board, explain how you are going to change the constitution to implement your stupid plan that understands nothing about the entire concept of democracy as enshrined in our constitution?

And you are apparently still don’t understand what gerrymandering is. Gerrymandering is NOT people who support one party more in a particular geographic area voting for that party.  

Nobody gives a shit what you want - when what you want is patently unconstitutional, and there is zero chance for this country voting for a constitutional amendment to enact the essence of stupid idea that you love so much.   

The reason you don’t get this is because you think everyone should vote for their team, not issues or policies. For instance, you could have a Republican congressman, supporting Ukraine and the dip shit orange traitor taking the anti-Ukraine position.   NOTHING about that factual scenario means that everyone in the state should vote for the same team just because the two candidates have a GOP next to their name.    

How did you pass high school civics?

Do you even understand federalism and how representatives work?

Because it appears you don't.  You're trying to get the representation to be as close as possible to the views of the constituents.  Parties as proxies tend to yield a good correlation.  Can you name a better proxy to get the representation of the area closer to the makeup of the electorate?

  • Fuck You 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Ag with kids said:

You do realize that the apportionment for federal offices, state offices, and local offices can be different, right?

You do realize that we are talking about redistricting in partisan legislative elections, right? 

 

1 hour ago, Ag with kids said:

Then, please explain exactly how you would apportion representation at the federal, state, and local levels without any reference to political parties/policies/platforms as a proxy for the representation.

Perhaps you don't realize that in many states partisan consideration is explicitly banned by law. In those states, they attempt to build compact districts of equal size around spacial, social, and economic communities of interest (AKA, "places").
 

 

56 minutes ago, Ag with kids said:

Do you even understand federalism and how representatives work?

Because it appears you don't.  You're trying to get the representation to be as close as possible to the views of the constituents.  Parties as proxies tend to yield a good correlation.  Can you name a better proxy to get the representation of the area closer to the makeup of the electorate?

Again, you're begging the question. It appears to yield a pretty horrible correlation, because the "areas" aren't actual places or communities but shapes drawn and curated to reenforce the  position of the dominant national political party in that state.

Edited by Bozo_Casanova
  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
7 hours ago, GenXer said:



IMG_2640.thumb.jpeg.9a783669dbf5c46ad3ec83e246cec9c8.jpeg

 

IMG_2641.thumb.jpeg.99ae18fc6317c826d084b0dfe3b6e434.jpeg

 

IMG_2642.thumb.jpeg.d0790a0109132012f9993719cf978639.jpeg

 

IMG_2643.thumb.jpeg.97fc229788fb35176df6fd31b86c09c9.jpeg

 

IMG_2644.thumb.jpeg.3bb7a3a3cba7b15048cd3f410784c7ae.jpeg

 

IMG_2645.thumb.jpeg.1bfe4756f7cfadc6805427a0f5ecbd3c.jpeg

 

IMG_2646.thumb.jpeg.808d5abbc6f5bc5a122c2b75404aab4e.jpeg

 

IMG_2647.thumb.jpeg.999d6ae195a562b5b11a50c3cd9545e7.jpeg

 

IMG_2648.thumb.jpeg.a2c2a4d4ca93e5c27a4a539c35589740.jpeg

 

IMG_2649.thumb.jpeg.4ac563f242e96df917a5780fe7cd102e.jpeg

 

Motherfuckers don’t remember Helsinki.

Dotard is putin’s bitch. This is old news.

 

IMG_2650.thumb.jpeg.eed0cd6701a23b86ab9ec342b9db4762.jpeg
 

 

IMG_2650.jpeg

Those seem fake... 

"I voted for you...." 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, StassneyHorn said:

Nobody has posted funny shaped California districts yet. Do that you gerrymandering sluts

Plus, I already posted how California draws their districts and not a single fucking one of you could tell me how that was so fucking unfair.  

Edited by Nivek
my mistake
  • Like 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, Slacks said:

Those seem fake... 

"I voted for you...." 

This is a basic requirement for any MAGA voter debasing themselves by criticizing the orange God-King.   Otherwise they will be jumped on by everybody on the forum as a commie Libtard.    

Posted
3 minutes ago, Nivek said:

How you thought this would be perceived is not how it is perceived.    Plus, I already posted how California draws their districts and not a single fucking one of you could tell me how that was so fucking unfair.   Typical magat, ignore evidence repeat the lie.   Your Nazi brethren would be proud of you.  

Jesus Christ you jump to conclusions. I dont think California is gerrymandered much and it’s because of the shapes and compactness. The post was an effort to have Ag w Kids show us something that looks sketch.

Great to know I’m both a magat and Nazi when I was the single biggest pumper for the Joe Biden economy and presidency. The only thing that stopped me from voting for Kamala was the US Postal service and an incompetent Travis Co Clerk office.

  • Like 2
Posted

@StassneyHorn  You are correct, I am wrong.  Pissy mood doesn't excuse my projection.   I am sorry.  

AwK has demonstrated he doesn't give a shit about facts/truth and he ran away when he was asked for clarity or challenged to talk about something.  While he has no obligation to respond, in a discussion forum, just posting lies and running away is not really cool.    

 

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, cactusflinthead said:

Noble Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman points out that nowhere are children more at risk from the proposed “savage” Medicaid cuts than in West Virginia, a state that voted overwhelmingly for President Trump — and where Medicaid provides health insurance for an astonishing 45% of children, the highest figure in the country. Doubling down on his idea that the cuts are savage, Krugman’s article addressing the Republican authorization is titled Cruel and Unusual.

Krugman writes of what he characterizes as a perception among conservatives — especially MAGA conservatives — that they can “safely target [Medicaid] for cuts, because it’s mainly a program for inner city people of color. But that was never as true as people imagined and is definitely not true now. Again, consider West Virginia. It’s one of America’s most rural states and overwhelmingly — 90 percent — white. Yet as we’ve seen, it’s deeply dependent on Medicaid.”

 

 

So, they voted to cut something they were taking based on the perception that other darker skinned individuals were also receiving.  This one's gonna sting, probably a lot harder than the darker skinned individuals that also have access to more jobs since they, checks notes, live in a city.  Should have checked their racism at the door, but that meant more than their children.  

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 3
Posted
3 hours ago, StassneyHorn said:

Nobody has posted funny shaped California districts yet. Do that you gerrymandering sluts

I've pointed out that CA votes much less Democratic than their districts are drawn.

 

Apparently, they have lots more "communities of interest" that the citizens of the state don't realize they need.

  • Fuck You 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Ag with kids said:

I've pointed out that CA votes much less Democratic than their districts are drawn.

So? Different elections, different electorate. How about you answer the question you've been ducking for 20 years?

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Nivek said:

Plus, I already posted how California draws their districts and not a single fucking one of you could tell me how that was so fucking unfair.  

I posted earlier that CA has gerrymandered their political districts to be 83% Democratic for Congress even though the state as a whole voted only 59% Democratic for POTUS.

Would you find it fair if Texas did the same for the GOP?  I lived in Parker County for 20 years.  It was about 85% Republican.  That was the county "community of interest".

So, why not make the entire state of Texas mirror that? 

Bozo would call that a great way to represent the "communities of interest".

  • Fuck You 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

So? Different elections, different electorate. How about you answer the question you've been ducking for 20 years?

 

I've answered your fucking question numerous times over the past 20 years.

I'm sorry you haven't likedmy answer.

Can't help you there.

 

When you're not doing DIRECT DEMOCRACY (which is a HORRIBAD idea), you have to try to find the highest correlation between citizen political views and representative political policies.  Sucks that parties tend to fill that criteria, but here we are.

  • Fuck You 1
Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

So? Different elections, different electorate. How about you answer the question you've been ducking for 20 years?

 

 multi-layer-venn-diagram.png

Here's a Venn diagram that is representative of the various "communities of interest" in generic state/county/city/rural area X.

 

Tell me your plan to apportion each state/county/city/rural area to ensure that the majority of each state/county/city/rural area of generic state X gets representation that most closely aligns with their views.

 

Edited by Ag with kids
  • Fuck You 2
Posted
11 hours ago, GenXer said:



IMG_2640.thumb.jpeg.9a783669dbf5c46ad3ec83e246cec9c8.jpeg

 

IMG_2641.thumb.jpeg.99ae18fc6317c826d084b0dfe3b6e434.jpeg

 

IMG_2642.thumb.jpeg.d0790a0109132012f9993719cf978639.jpeg

 

IMG_2643.thumb.jpeg.97fc229788fb35176df6fd31b86c09c9.jpeg

 

IMG_2644.thumb.jpeg.3bb7a3a3cba7b15048cd3f410784c7ae.jpeg

 

IMG_2645.thumb.jpeg.1bfe4756f7cfadc6805427a0f5ecbd3c.jpeg

 

IMG_2646.thumb.jpeg.808d5abbc6f5bc5a122c2b75404aab4e.jpeg

 

IMG_2647.thumb.jpeg.999d6ae195a562b5b11a50c3cd9545e7.jpeg

 

IMG_2648.thumb.jpeg.a2c2a4d4ca93e5c27a4a539c35589740.jpeg

 

IMG_2649.thumb.jpeg.4ac563f242e96df917a5780fe7cd102e.jpeg

 

Motherfuckers don’t remember Helsinki.

Dotard is putin’s bitch. This is old news.

 

IMG_2650.thumb.jpeg.eed0cd6701a23b86ab9ec342b9db4762.jpeg
 

 

IMG_2650.jpeg

Really, doesn't this look like the aftermath of the most brutal facefucking scene on pornhub?  Somehow they cleaned Trump up in a real hurry and didn't get any jizz on his suit.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Ag with kids said:

 multi-layer-venn-diagram.png

Here's a Venn diagram that is representative of the various "communities of interest" in generic state/county/city/rural area X.

 

Tell me your plan to apportion each state/county/city/rural area to ensure that the majority of each state/county/city/rural area of generic state X gets representation that most closely aligns with their views.

 

How about geometric shapes of a certain population size?

Has it ever occurred to you that statewide voting totals are a product of de facto voter suppression (my vote don't count who gives a shit) occurring in gerrymandered districts?

The solution you propose is a bit ass-backward.

  • Hook 'Em 6
Posted
4 hours ago, StassneyHorn said:

Nobody has posted funny shaped California districts yet. Do that you gerrymandering sluts

https://gerrymander.princeton.edu/?hl=en-US

 

There are multiple scoring methodologies for judging gerrymandered districts that are much better than biased "funny shaped" judgements. There are some minor issues in California but none touch the Southern states for blatant gerrymandering.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, Ag with kids said:

Because it appears you don't.  You're trying to get the representation to be as close as possible to the views of the constituents.  Parties as proxies tend to yield a good correlation.  Can you name a better proxy to get the representation of the area closer to the makeup of the electorate?

No. Nobody thinks that.  The bold is you thinking the goal of an election is to “get the representation to align with the views of constituents.”

That is not a goal.  That has never been a goal. That will never be a goal.

The goal is to allow fair elections, with the entire theory behind democracy being that the more input from all sides and the greater the cooperation from all sides, the better society will be.   You want a representative democracy where every election is preordained because the purpose of democracy is to get 100% of each team in each district - leaving each politician to ignore completely the minority views, because they will never be threatened with losing an election, allowing unreasonable ideology and team over benefit to public to shutdown government through a lack of compromise.

This is the model you want.  

 

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Ag with kids said:

I posted earlier that CA has gerrymandered their political districts to be 83% Democratic for Congress even though the state as a whole voted only 59% Democratic for POTUS.

dumb fuck. 

IMG_2840.gif.3f1597c3e703f1d11e333e555a6f8b34.gif

Posted
8 minutes ago, PenelopeWitherspoon said:

Please stop engaging with @Ag with kids. He is Helobious level stupid.

He has a degree in Animal Science! Are you not aware of the academic effort that is involved in that vocational degree?

Seriously, TAMU is a fucking vocational school that shouldn't be confused with actual universities.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, F250 said:

He has a degree in Animal Science! Are you not aware of the academic effort that is involved in that vocational degree?

Seriously, TAMU is a fucking vocational school that shouldn't be confused with actual universities.

Are Aggies against vaccinations of animals? I'm not an Animal Scientist, but I'm pretty sure that is year 1 shit...

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)

Sorry, I'm having quite the time here! She's from Dallas? (Southlake Carroll HS). (Edit: Uh, no. She's from Indiana).

image.thumb.jpeg.e46f4cccbd64265480e430b3901615f3.jpeg

image.thumb.jpeg.b2d6a88d96b21a46ce18f0774e5d35d5.jpeg

image.thumb.jpeg.6a672f3ab80b7df055e69312951f8c8c.jpeg

image.png.14002dea3961b4dc01865c4328542aac.png

image.png.4465e9bb78c07cbcdd43feb8eabe1573.png

Edited by Bullneck
  • Haha 3
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 2
Posted
15 hours ago, Gatorubet said:

You smooth brain Aggy.  Before one more word passes your stupid typing fingers to this board, explain how you are going to change the constitution to implement your stupid plan that understands nothing about the entire concept of democracy as enshrined in our constitution?

And you are apparently still don’t understand what gerrymandering is. Gerrymandering is NOT people who support one party more in a particular geographic area voting for that party.  

Nobody gives a shit what you want - when what you want is patently unconstitutional, and there is zero chance for this country voting for a constitutional amendment to enact the essence of stupid idea that you love so much.   

The reason you don’t get this is because you think everyone should vote for their team, not issues or policies. For instance, you could have a Republican congressman, supporting Ukraine and the dip shit orange traitor taking the anti-Ukraine position.   NOTHING about that factual scenario means that everyone in the state should vote for the same team just because the two candidates have a GOP next to their name.    

How did you pass high school civics?

He got an 84. You could have stopped at smooth brain aggy.

Also, can you fucks talk leopards on this thread?

Episode 9 GIF by The Simpsons

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Drool 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Bullneck said:

Sorry, I'm having quite the time here! She's from Dallas? (Southlake Carroll HS). (Edit: Uh, no. She's from Indiana).

image.thumb.jpeg.e46f4cccbd64265480e430b3901615f3.jpeg

image.thumb.jpeg.b2d6a88d96b21a46ce18f0774e5d35d5.jpeg

image.thumb.jpeg.6a672f3ab80b7df055e69312951f8c8c.jpeg

image.png.14002dea3961b4dc01865c4328542aac.png

image.png.4465e9bb78c07cbcdd43feb8eabe1573.png

She gonna show them A cups soon. Stay tuned. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1


×
×
  • Create New...