Jump to content

The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread


Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Chewbacca said:

I said this a lot during COVID and I'll say it now.  If you don't trust doctors, stay the fuck out of hospitals. Don't go clogging up the ER with your dumb, sick ass when shit gets real.  Just stay home and use your ivermectin and tinctures.  

pffft don't be a fool that stuff doesn't work.. Colloidal Silver or gfto  

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
14 hours ago, Hagbard Celine said:

95% of farmers are white

96% of farms are led by a "family unit"

64% of farmers are men (surprised it's not 85%+)

the electoral college maps since '48 tell a story but we need to get back to leopard face eating

Have Willie spearhead this  Or Mellencamp if he's not to busy sucking on a chili dog.

Posted
1 hour ago, 27-25 said:

I feel a little bad about myself right now, because one thought that popped into my head is that the wrong kid died of the measles.

Wrong kid died!

But, Maybe he will get halved soon.

Posted
On 3/2/2025 at 12:23 PM, Gatorubet said:

We need life-size figures in bronze to memorialize this event and place it somewhere in Kentucky

IMG_4218.thumb.jpeg.f0c849f56f3326ef9405d33170ff1ead.jpeg

That capture is fucking perfect - especially Thune's face in the background.  No notes.

Posted
59 minutes ago, G650 said:

ielx867z4ime1.jpeg

 

54 minutes ago, Ted Lange said:

 

Oh, you didnt think Trump would eat YOUR face?

 

9m4i5s.jpg

I mean, we wouldn't put it past this guy to vote for an actual leopard, would we?  The man has a brand to maintain.

  • Haha 3
Posted
16 hours ago, Hagbard Celine said:

95% of farmers are white

96% of farms are led by a "family unit"

64% of farmers are men (surprised it's not 85%+)

the electoral college maps since '48 tell a story but we need to get back to leopard face eating

image.gif.be4fc91b7147351b289d6ecbc7574454.gif

Posted
3 hours ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

Sure, but we’ve all had the seatbelt conversation with an idiot who says their friend at the carpet warehouse has a cousin who works at the feedmill and his boss was thrown free from a truck that caught on fire when he rolled it. So not wearing a seatbelt saved his life and the beers made him loose and limber so he didn’t break nothin either. 

talking-who-saw-ferris-pass-out-at31flav

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

Sure, but we’ve all had the seatbelt conversation with an idiot who says their friend at the carpet warehouse has a cousin who works at the feedmill and his boss was thrown free from a truck that caught on fire when he rolled it. So not wearing a seatbelt saved his life and the beers made him loose and limber so he didn’t break nothin either. 

Wrong.  The cousin worked at a feed LOT.  In Amarillo.  I sweatergawd, pretty much that exact story, from a dude I knew from Amarillo.  Like, 35 years ago.  We only get stupider.

  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
On 3/2/2025 at 9:41 AM, Horn Dog said:

IMG_9542.thumb.jpeg.9cd39b43d2e6641846e7cff99d9c9a21.jpeg

 

“As he nears the conclusion of his 18-year leadership tenure in the Senate, McConnell expressed concern about the direction in which Trump’s influence is steering the party. He argued that Trump appeals to those who feel left behind in a system that rewards success, suggesting that the former president provides a narrative that excuses individuals for their lack of achievement. “He’s tapping into the sentiment of people who haven’t reached the same level of success as others, offering them a way to rationalize their struggles by casting blame on those who are thriving,” McConnell explained.

The senator also lamented the fact that roughly half of Republican voters now align with Trump’s views, moving away from the party’s long-held priorities such as free trade and comprehensive immigration reform. “Unfortunately, about half of the Republicans in the country believe whatever he says,” he added.

 

Sorry Mitch, this is your legacy.  No running away from it.

 

He's worried about the R party. He should be worried about democracy. 

Motherfuck still putting party over country. 

 

 

\

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, High Plains Drifter said:

He's worried about the R party. He should be worried about democracy. 

Motherfuck still putting party over country. 

9m5l1c.jpg

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Captainant said:

if one of their friends posts it then they just turn off their critical thinking and okeydoke whatever the fuck is being repeated over and over.

the rooskies figured this out in 2015

Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

Remember, they are also very, very, very stupid and bad at math.

Accept the fact that any vaccine, like MMR, has a certain percentage chance of bad outcomes.  Seriously, everything good for you has some sort of risk - broccoli is a superfood, but I guarantee you that there are a handful of people out there who are deathly allergic to it.

Then accept the additional mathematical fact that a disease like measles has a certain fatality/serious/long-term complications rate.

Which one of those numbers is HIGHER?  That should drive your decision.   I've used the analogy repeatedly here, but it holds true: these fucking idiots are the kind of people who refuse to wear a seatbelt because "seatbelts trap you in the car, and when it goes over a bridge into water or bursts into flame, being trapped kills you"....which is indeed true in some situations.  There are cases where wearing a seatbelt actually CAUSES a death.  The problem is....those handful of cases are vastly outweighed by all the times that wearing a seatbelt SAVES someone from death or serious injury.  In 1 in 10,000 wrecks, a seatbelt causes a bad outcome.  But in 1 in 10 wrecks, seatbelts save lives/prevent serious injury.  Vaccine refusal is for people who are stupid bad at math.

Nailed it.

Simple math, you want about a .01 (unvaccinated measles) chance of a severe reaction that may or may not lead to death or about a 0.000001 (vaccination reaction) chance of a severe reaction that may or may not lead to death? Even that .000001 is really not an uncommon metric for the occurrence of everyday life and allergic reactions. Many people find out they are allergic to something only after taking it....

Edited by pacman
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, pacman said:

Nailed it.

Simple math, you want about a .01 (unvaccinated measles) chance of a severe reaction that may or may not lead to death or about a 0.000001 (vaccination reaction) chance of a severe reaction that may or may not lead to death?

Well, in fairness and in the interest of accuracy, there's also a number in their for likelihood of contracting measles.

If you get a vaccination, there's a 100% chance you are exposed to the risks of the vaccine.

Your chances of being exposed to the measles (not contracting it, but being exposed to it) are much lower (note that we don't know how many people are actually EXPOSED to an infectious dose, because almost all vaccinated people will not....catch the measles, so we won't be able to account for them).  So, there's some numerical chance of exposure.  Ironically, the more successful the antivax crowd is in their evangelism....the more prevalent the disease will become, boosting this number significantly.

Then, once exposed, what are the chances of an unvaxxed person having serious complications/death?

 

But in the end, the math is still outsized.  The ONLY way the numbers work in the anti-vaxxer's favor....is if they can successfully tag along on the herd's immunity.  But their efforts to get people not to vaccinate, ironically, lead to destroying the very thing that protects them: the immunity of all the smart people who DID get vaccinated.  So, the more successful antivaxxers are, the more likely their kids are to die.  Like I said....bad at math, bad at thinking.



×
×
  • Create New...