Jump to content

The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, NorthLoop said:

I just assumed everyone who voted for Trump has brain cancer. 

I'm hoping its terminal for all of them. 

Edited by Dahobbs
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Drool 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, The Royal We said:

She didn't give a wet fart fuck about any of Trump's fuckery until it punched HER in the mouth.

"Some government spending is needed and appropriate!?" WON'T SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE BILLIONAIRES!?

Let's not forget all the abhorrent things Trump said about her father

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 2
Posted
2 hours ago, texas08 said:

We are trending to becoming Somalia.

Somalis were called "skinnies" in Black Hawk Down.

Americans in general are overweight. By becoming Somalia, our population can slim down and we can say goodbye to Ozempic. 

 

/silverlining

  • Like 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
On 3/30/2025 at 2:30 AM, tx 3 putt said:

Trump won West Virginia by 70% of the votes.

West Virginia receives 50% of its annual budget from federal funds.

Trump froze federal funds to West Virginia and farmers are losing their farms.

#FAFO

 

The thing is, even if the common clay of West Virginia do end up blaming DoTarD for this shit (narrator: they won't), it doesn't matter, because doTArd won't be on another ballot. 

The congressmen who are allowing this will be on the ballot again, and they aren't taking the heat if dOTarD (or nazi bitch) is. 

 

IOW, blaming DoTARd doesn't really matter. 

 

Posted
17 hours ago, texas08 said:

The actual poisoning of the country being done right in front of us (let viruses and disease run rampant, yayyyy!!!)

We are trending to becoming Somalia.

But I don't wanna be a pirate!

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
Posted
40 minutes ago, Chuckie Finster said:

You Sure GIFs | Tenor

 

I get what you are saying, but I'm not so far out on the ledge that I think that states will be putting him on their ballots, with a few exceptions (Florida, OK). However, I am far out enough on the ledge that I think its possible he refuses to leave at the end of his current term, declares martial law, stays (or tries to stay) in power, and we have civil war II. 

Regardless, either way, he won't be on a ballot. So voters' anger over doge won't directly affect him, which was my point. And unfortunately we are too stupid to direct that anger at the people who are allowing this shit, which is Congress. 

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, High Plains Drifter said:

 

The thing is, even if the common clay of West Virginia do end up blaming DoTarD for this shit (narrator: they won't), it doesn't matter, because doTArd won't be on another ballot. 

The congressmen who are allowing this will be on the ballot again, and they aren't taking the heat if dOTarD (or nazi bitch) is. 

 

IOW, blaming DoTARd doesn't really matter. 

 

 

maga voters will fall out and stop showing up to the polls 

Posted
44 minutes ago, High Plains Drifter said:

 

I get what you are saying, but I'm not so far out on the ledge that I think that states will be putting him on their ballots, with a few exceptions (Florida, OK). However, I am far out enough on the ledge that I think its possible he refuses to leave at the end of his current term, declares martial law, stays (or tries to stay) in power, and we have civil war II. 

Regardless, either way, he won't be on a ballot. So voters' anger over doge won't directly affect him, which was my point. And unfortunately we are too stupid to direct that anger at the people who are allowing this shit, which is Congress. 

 

 

My legal education is limited to univ of texas sports message boards. So, I don’t know shit about fuck.

That being said, the 22nd amendment is worded so that trump could serve as president in a third term. At least it could be argued that way. As we know, the legal system intentionality works at a snail’s pace so we could be well into a third trump term before it hits the courts. But oh yeah, nothing the president does is illegal so we can’t really do anything about it anyway.

Here’s the play- trump doesn’t run for president in 2028; he runs for vice president and vance runs for president with the obvious implication that vance will resign on jan 21. Trump then makes vance his vice president.

The key is that trump is not elected to the office of the president. There isn’t verbiage that prohibits serving as president.

IMG_2924.thumb.jpeg.d160a3935b6d9848855cc64aec77e8ab.jpeg
 

Again, I don’t know shit about fuck but we all know trump challenges all the norms. I fully expect something like this to happen; he’s already saying as such.

Posted
15 minutes ago, GenXer said:

My legal education is limited to univ of texas sports message boards. So, I don’t know shit about fuck.

That being said, the 22nd amendment is worded so that trump could serve as president in a third term. At least it could be argued that way. As we know, the legal system intentionality works at a snail’s pace so we could be well into a third trump term before it hits the courts. But oh yeah, nothing the president does is illegal so we can’t really do anything about it anyway.

Here’s the play- trump doesn’t run for president in 2028; he runs for vice president and vance runs for president with the obvious implication that vance will resign on jan 21. Trump then makes vance his vice president.

The key is that trump is not elected to the office of the president. There isn’t verbiage that prohibits serving as president.

IMG_2924.thumb.jpeg.d160a3935b6d9848855cc64aec77e8ab.jpeg
 

Again, I don’t know shit about fuck but we all know trump challenges all the norms. I fully expect something like this to happen; he’s already saying as such.

My understanding is that there is also verbiage in the Constitution that says a candidate can't "run" for VP if they would not otherwise be eligible to be president. Trump would therefore not be eligible having already served two terms as POTUS.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
17 minutes ago, GenXer said:

My legal education is limited to univ of texas sports message boards. So, I don’t know shit about fuck.

That being said, the 22nd amendment is worded so that trump could serve as president in a third term. At least it could be argued that way. As we know, the legal system intentionality works at a snail’s pace so we could be well into a third trump term before it hits the courts. But oh yeah, nothing the president does is illegal so we can’t really do anything about it anyway.

Here’s the play- trump doesn’t run for president in 2028; he runs for vice president and vance runs for president with the obvious implication that vance will resign on jan 21. Trump then makes vance his vice president.

The key is that trump is not elected to the office of the president. There isn’t verbiage that prohibits serving as president.

IMG_2924.thumb.jpeg.d160a3935b6d9848855cc64aec77e8ab.jpeg
 

Again, I don’t know shit about fuck but we all know trump challenges all the norms. I fully expect something like this to happen; he’s already saying as such.

The twelfth amendment handles that. It states no one ineligible to be president shall become vice president. Or something like that.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
19 hours ago, NorthLoop said:

I just assumed everyone who voted for Trump has brain cancer. 

 

16 hours ago, Superhero said:

Somalis were called "skinnies" in Black Hawk Down.

Americans in general are overweight. By becoming Somalia, our population can slim down and we can say goodbye to Ozempic. 

 

/silverlining

Remember chemo is also quite slimming.  Let’s do this.  

Posted
8 minutes ago, Chad Fuck said:

All this is true.  I heard a law professor on NPR yesterday and she was quoting everything quoted above re the 12th and 22nd Amendments.  She finished with the following point, and I paraphrase:

So?  Who is going to stop this person who has so far not been bound by Constitutional laws and norms?  Is the most ineffectual and compliant Republican Congress ever going to stop him?  Is there an expectation that he will suddenly say to himself, "Well, now I've just gone too far."? There is nothing in what we know of him so far that would lead anyone to believe this to be the case.  So we should expect the unthinkable, as that's what we've witnessed from him so far.

 

 

100%. They could simply re-write the shit they don't like. They have the majority on SCOTUS. But, by the letter of the law (lol, I know) he cannot serve a third term as things stand today without some serious fucky fucky. (I expect fucky fucky.)

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, High Plains Drifter said:

 

Again, this doesn't matter if he's not on a ballot. Which I don't think he will be, either way. 

 

There are 23 states that currently hold a republican trifecta in state government. I'd bet he's on the ballot in every one of them, and they total 216 electoral votes. 

https://ballotpedia.org/Partisan_composition_of_state_legislatures

Posted
5 minutes ago, The Original Greaser Bob said:

Trump's going to cut a deal where he and his family and every family friend gets a lifetime pardon and a payment of a billion trillion dollars a year for his lifetime plus 25 years in exchange for him not running for and winning a third term.

 

There won't be any deal.  He'll just pardon everyone for everything by Presidential fiat.  

Posted
16 minutes ago, G650 said:

That's actually what my wife brought up last night

 

 

But more on thread

https://www.newsweek.com/republican-calls-ice-gop-rival-idaho-farm-2053021

 

Ken Watanabe Godzilla GIF by Legendary Entertainment

She should report him for pedophilia.  He is a self-proclaimed "conservative Christian," and we know the overlap of that performative label and criminal sexual activity is approaching 100%, so it's a good faith call.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
1 hour ago, RomaVicta said:

Who is this guy? Isn't he the same guy in the hotdog suit? 

I'm sure I'm the only one in the dark, but that's where I am.

Tim Robinson.  Yes.  "I Think You Should Leave with Tim Robinson."

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
Just now, GenXer said:

Today?

IMG_2925.jpeg.94ebe8b7682006da75ef311b042569cb.jpeg
 

willful ignorance and stupidity are not the same thing.

2 minutes ago, strangulation! said:

you know must judges were previously lawyers, right?

yes, and my naive assumption that in order to get to that role, you need to be the best of the best. worldview shattered. lol

Posted
2 hours ago, Walser said:

The twelfth amendment handles that. It states no one ineligible to be president shall become vice president. Or something like that.

Exact language:

But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Horndog said:

Exact language:

But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.

https://www.npr.org/2025/03/31/nx-s1-5191889/is-trump-running-for-a-third-term

Other legal experts, however, point to the last sentence of the 12th Amendment, which covers the Electoral College, as a roadblock for any twice-elected president attempting to return to the White House through the vice presidency. It says that "no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States."

Still, in court, a lawyer could try to argue that being a "natural born" citizen, at least 35 years old and a resident within the U.S. for at least 14 years are the only presidential eligibility requirements specified in the Constitution, says Stephen Gillers, a professor emeritus at New York University School of Law, who proposed in 2004 that Clinton run for vice president.

"I want to make it very clear that I'm identifying an argument that Trump could make in order to get back into the White House. I'm not endorsing it," Gillers says. "But we know from experience that even if it's far-fetched and it offers the possibility of a third presidential term, Trump will make it. If his health holds up, he will make the argument he likes the job. Whether or not it succeeds in court is another matter."

Gillers posits that Trump "could make a deal" with Vance that, ahead of the 2028 election, they switch places on the Republican ticket, and if they win the White House again, Vance resigns and Trump becomes president.

To avoid any debate about whether the 12th Amendment forbids presidential electors from choosing a twice-elected president as vice president, Gillers says there could be a similar arrangement in which Trump does not run on the winning Republican ticket but, after the newly elected vice president resigns, becomes vice president with congressional approval.

"It is not implausible. And just the existence of the possibility of it in the next four years gives Trump power that enhances his position," Gillers says. "The members of Congress in 2027 will know that they're not dealing with a lame duck necessarily because Trump could still hold out, through 2027 and 2028, the possibility of his return to power and the power that that possibility gives him — to get Congress to bend to his will."

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Nivek said:

If a pirate I must be.....

I've done a bit of smugglin', and I've run my share of grass
I made enough money to buy Miami, but I pissed it away so fast
Never meant to last, never meant to last

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Horndog said:

Exact language:

But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.

Again I don’t know shit but… the 22nd says eligible to be elected. Elected is the operative word. 

I think there’s an argument that the verbiage in the 12th doesn’t apply if trump isn’t elected to the office.

Every year the supreme court attends a mock trial at harvard law with the law students presenting the case. This would be an interesting case for them to present.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Chuckie Finster said:

https://www.npr.org/2025/03/31/nx-s1-5191889/is-trump-running-for-a-third-term

Other legal experts, however, point to the last sentence of the 12th Amendment, which covers the Electoral College, as a roadblock for any twice-elected president attempting to return to the White House through the vice presidency. It says that "no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States."

Still, in court, a lawyer could try to argue that being a "natural born" citizen, at least 35 years old and a resident within the U.S. for at least 14 years are the only presidential eligibility requirements specified in the Constitution, says Stephen Gillers, a professor emeritus at New York University School of Law, who proposed in 2004 that Clinton run for vice president.

"I want to make it very clear that I'm identifying an argument that Trump could make in order to get back into the White House. I'm not endorsing it," Gillers says. "But we know from experience that even if it's far-fetched and it offers the possibility of a third presidential term, Trump will make it. If his health holds up, he will make the argument he likes the job. Whether or not it succeeds in court is another matter."

Gillers posits that Trump "could make a deal" with Vance that, ahead of the 2028 election, they switch places on the Republican ticket, and if they win the White House again, Vance resigns and Trump becomes president.

To avoid any debate about whether the 12th Amendment forbids presidential electors from choosing a twice-elected president as vice president, Gillers says there could be a similar arrangement in which Trump does not run on the winning Republican ticket but, after the newly elected vice president resigns, becomes vice president with congressional approval.

"It is not implausible. And just the existence of the possibility of it in the next four years gives Trump power that enhances his position," Gillers says. "The members of Congress in 2027 will know that they're not dealing with a lame duck necessarily because Trump could still hold out, through 2027 and 2028, the possibility of his return to power and the power that that possibility gives him — to get Congress to bend to his will."

If the Dems were smart, they'd be pushing the Supreme Court to consider this in the run-up for the 2028 election.  I know that the SC would say that the issue isn't ripe, but there needs to be existing political pressure in place to prevent Roberts and Co. from pulling the same old "Aw shucks, we just can't rule on this so close to the election, so maybe next time ..." bullshit.   

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, GenXer said:

Again I don’t know shit but… the 22nd says eligible to be elected. Elected is the operative word. 

I think there’s an argument that the verbiage in the 12th doesn’t apply if trump isn’t elected to the office.

Every year the supreme court attends a mock trial at harvard law with the law students presenting the case. This would be an interesting case for them to present.

For the intellectual exercise only (because Trump and his bootlickers aren't bound by rules), what legal mechanism do you think exists for someone to become President if they aren't elected President and can never be Vice President? The only other option is being in the line of succession and everyone above them dying simultaneously. 

Posted

That’s one. Get chosen by rep majority as speaker, then have potus and vp resign or die. 
 

also, have vp resign and have Trump chosen as vp, approved by Congress, then potus resigns. 
 

it’s a card game with the rules of succession. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Pato del Muerto said:

That’s one. Get chosen by rep majority as speaker, then have potus and vp resign or die. 
 

also, have vp resign and have Trump chosen as vp, approved by Congress, then potus resigns. 
 

it’s a card game with the rules of succession. 

Your second option is not possible within existing law. He can't be chosen as VP via any method per the 12th.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Huckleberry said:

Your second option is not possible within existing law. He can't be chosen as VP via any method per the 12th.

Fair. I guess the argument (beyond claiming an amendment isn’t legal or just ignoring it) would be that since the 22nd says elected that means the 12th also means elected. Is it a winning argument?  Who knows anymore. 



×
×
  • Create New...