Jump to content

Tracking Trump Administration and Cabinet picks


Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

lol, it’s all just people he sees on TV.  Very excited to get Dog the Bounty Hunter for US Marshal Service, Al Roker for NOAA, and Scrooge McDuck to lead the mints. 

Nono, the noaa is just going away. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dr. Phil definitely getting something. 

Dr fucking Oz for Medicaid/Medicare director.
I thought aggy was the champ in neverending stupidity, but this shit I'm just telling myself that I'm insane and none of this is real.


Think Oprah would like a do-over on those two bozos?
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, TXSG8R said:

Herschel is gonna get a cabinet position…

EPA. Guy knows his stuff. 

According to Walker, America has some of the cleanest air in the world (that’s not actually true),“but since we don’t control the air, our good air decided to float over to China's bad air so when China gets our good air, their bad air got
[sic] to move. So it moves over to our good air space.” Walker’s solution? “We got to clean that back up.”

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Drool 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ojo Rojo said:

There is no longer any doubt - this is a bit.  These picks are for entertainment value only.  It turns out Trump actually does have a sense of humor.

He’s making a mockery of the entire country and our entire history. And we are letting it happen. 

  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ojo Rojo said:

There is no longer any doubt - this is a bit.  These picks are for entertainment value only.  It turns out Trump actually does have a sense of humor.

I've had a couple of Trump voters tell me they want him to be president because of the yucks.

Assholes are measuring drapes for the White House and lapping up my progressive tears.

  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, quigley said:

I've had a couple of Trump voters tell me they want him to be president because of the yucks.

Assholes are measuring drapes for the White House and lapping up my progressive tears.

This. 
People elected a reality show personality and want their reality show presidency.

Hes giving the people what they want.

The nerds have been running the show too long. Now it’s time for a president that promises to eliminate homework and make Friday a half day.

 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dnaguy said:

This. 
People elected a reality show personality and want their reality show presidency.

Hes giving the people what they want.

The nerds have been running the show too long. Now it’s time for a president that promises to eliminate homework and make Friday a half day.

 

Yeah, listening to "Rest is History" podcast about the 1968 election, Nixon just about lost it to Humphreys because the Dem shitshow was apparently captivating that year.

Kamala should have lit a blunt on the All the Smoke pod. (I was half expecting her to take a puff)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Anastasis said:

Oz ain’t gonna burn Medicare down. He was an ACA supporter and a Medicare advantage advocate. If anything he is probably inclined to expand Medicare access by removing or reducing the age in. 

Trump Admin expanding ObamaCare!!!

Hartford will burn the WH down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Oz ain’t gonna burn Medicare down. He was an ACA supporter and a Medicare advantage advocate. If anything he is probably inclined to expand Medicare access by removing or reducing the age in. 

Medicare Advantage plans suck. Him being an advocate for those plans is not a flex

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the effort to remove “birthright citizenship” will flow from Amy Comey Barrett’s belief that the 14th Amendment is “illegitimate.” She argues the Court would not raise the issue, but Congress has the right to declare the 14th Amendment illegitimate. The decision would come down to Kavanagh deciding whether the 14th was properly ratified. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SubliminalHorn said:

Medicare Advantage plans suck. Him being an advocate for those plans is not a flex

That’s a debatable matter of policy. Over 50% of Medicare beneficiaries enroll in ma. If you want Medicare for all, ma is one pathway to that. 

  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

ACA is not Medicare. But other than that, good post. 

My mistake on the ACA.

You're right. Trump is going to expand Medicare... ADVANTAGE, which is just what Hartford wants.

  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, washparkhorn said:

And the effort to remove “birthright citizenship” will flow from Amy Comey Barrett’s belief that the 14th Amendment is “illegitimate.” She argues the Court would not raise the issue, but Congress has the right to declare the 14th Amendment illegitimate. The decision would come down to Kavanagh deciding whether the 14th was properly ratified. 

 

All the reconstruction era amendments are illegitimate when you think about it….

/Trump judges

  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Anastasis said:

That’s a debatable matter of policy. Over 50% of Medicare beneficiaries enroll in ma. If you want Medicare for all, ma is one pathway to that. 

Bullshit. It's more expensive and provides worse coverage. Fuck off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

That’s a debatable matter of policy. Over 50% of Medicare beneficiaries enroll in ma. If you want Medicare for all, ma is one pathway to that. 

Yeah and they enroll in plans that have shitty reimbursements and since they are run by private insurance companies, will often deny coverage

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Objectively false. But again these are policy debates to be had. 

Let me google this for you:

https://www.kff.org/medicare/issue-brief/higher-and-faster-growing-spending-per-medicare-advantage-enrollee-adds-to-medicares-solvency-and-affordability-challenges/#:~:text=Medicare spent $321 more per person for,in 2019 for beneficiaries in traditional Medicare.

I work in this space you. Let me tell you how much people like having to change doctors because their advantage plan dictates it or if they like having meds rejected because prior authorizations. They don't.

Hartford benefits from this people don't.

5 minutes ago, SubliminalHorn said:

Yeah and they enroll in plans that have shitty reimbursements and since they are run by private insurance companies, will often deny coverage

It's marketing.

You're right. He's wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FFS people why are you arguing Doctor Oz’ policy ideas and playing into that deflection? He’s a celebrity TV doc and it doesn’t make a shit what his policy ideas are, he has no business running the nation’s largest social benefit program.  “Well Bob Vila knows his way around a job site, let’s hear his ideas for HUD.”  
 

It goes all the way to the top, even if DJT had good ideas, he’s a fake boss from TV.  He has no business being CINC of the global hegemon and all the people who put him there are really damn stupid. And yes, I stand by that, 48.9 percent of the adult electorate is stupid. 

  • Hook 'Em 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

FFS people why are you arguing Doctor Oz’ policy ideas and playing into that deflection? He’s a celebrity TV doc and it doesn’t make a shit what his policy ideas are, he has no business running the nation’s largest social benefit program.  “Well Bob Vila knows his way around a job site, let’s hear his ideas for HUD.”  
 

It goes all the way to the top, even if DJT had good ideas, he’s a fake boss from TV.  He has no business being CINC of the global hegemon and all the people who put him there are really damn stupid. And yes, I stand by that, 48.9 percent of the adult electorate is stupid. 

I admire your grip on sanity.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, quigley said:

Bullshit. It's more expensive and provides worse coverage. Fuck off.

 

56 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Objectively false. But again these are policy debates to be had. 

 

44 minutes ago, quigley said:

Let me google this for you:

https://www.kff.org/medicare/issue-brief/higher-and-faster-growing-spending-per-medicare-advantage-enrollee-adds-to-medicares-solvency-and-affordability-challenges/#:~:text=Medicare spent $321 more per person for,in 2019 for beneficiaries in traditional Medicare.

I work in this space you. Let me tell you how much people like having to change doctors because their advantage plan dictates it or if they like having meds rejected because prior authorizations. They don't.

Hartford benefits from this people don't.

It's marketing.

You're right. He's wrong.

MA plans are bound by the same NCDs and LCDs as traditional fee for service Medicare. Drug coverage is not provided by traditional Medicare, so that is just a diversion and irrelevant to this exchange. Yes, MA plans will leverage their networks. And more crucially imo, leverage outcomes based reimbursement schemes. Lots of room for improvement all around, no doubt, but the move from traditional fee for service to paying for outcomes is a move in the right direction imo. And traditional Medicare is not the driving force behind that movement. Providers that know or learn how to optimize their outcomes measures will benefit from that system, providers that just run a ffs shop will have challenges. Again, these are all good areas for policy debate. Oz, as least to the extent that you can rely on anything he has said previously, isn't going to burn Medicare down to the ground. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, washparkhorn said:

Nothing to fear — Senator Judas Fetterman will save Medicare. 

IMG_1522.thumb.jpeg.93ec93c95543bba43c4273c8bebb26f3.jpeg

. . . or maybe not

IMG_1523.thumb.jpeg.d07388affab33d5ee33ccd10c3996d18.jpeg

IMG_1505.thumb.jpeg.5b4d5500b6f74fb9c1d6b40070fb332b.jpeg

 

 

oz is there to push the project 2025 agenda. he’ll have zero input and play along or he’ll be replaced asap 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, MissingInAction said:

I admire your grip on sanity.

Evergreen:

https://theonion.com/you-know-now-that-i-think-about-it-settling-diplomati-1820799747/
 

Quote

When Donald Trump asked me to be his secretary of state, I was honored to be given such an extraordinary opportunity to serve my country. I was confident I could transition from my job as the CEO of ExxonMobil to become America’s chief diplomat. But after 10 months in my new role, I’m beginning to think that maybe settling complicated disputes between historically hostile groups of people is quite a bit different than drilling for oil.

As it turns out, the two occupations really don’t have much in common at all.

Discovering new oil reserves and finding ways to extract them is one thing, but serving as a mediator in foreign conflicts between dozens of warring factions whose discord goes back years, if not centuries, is actually another thing entirely. I figured the four decades I spent locating places to drill for oil would translate extremely well to navigating the complex histories of other cultures in order to negotiate delicate compromises that prevent the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people. I thought there would be some similarities there, but apparently that’s just not the case. Seriously, I was way off on that one.

Truth be told, when I walked into the State Department on Day 1, I was convinced I’d be well-equipped to deal with ISIS and Bashar al-Assad in Syria, having previously worked with submersible pumps to draw hydrocarbons buried deep within the earth up to the surface for eventual refinement and sale. But come to find out, bringing peace to Syria has a lot to do with understanding the dozens of shifting alliances between various government forces, armed rebel groups, and supranational jihadist militants, and very little to do with, say, selecting the proper drilling fluid. I know that now.

I’m really very sorry.

In retrospect, this should have become clear to me much sooner. When I met Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi back in March, he kept talking to me about strategies to rein in Kim Jong-un’s nuclear program, and I kept waiting for the discussion to turn to techniques for boring through bedrock to find hidden caches of petroleum. Well, it never did. To be honest, I’m not really sure why I thought it would. 

To be sure, there are times during diplomatic negotiations when oil does come up. Just last month, when I visited Saudi Arabia and Qatar, oil was alluded to on multiple occasions. But it was really only mentioned in passing. Any time I tried to dive into specifics like surveying an area for potential sources of oil, conducting seismic tests to find underground reservoirs, setting up rigs, drilling multilateral wells, or injecting steam into fields to extract heavier crude, none of the other diplomats at the table showed much interest.

In fact, pretty much every time I bring up the subject of oil these days, people seem to want to talk about something else.

Look, I never thought absolutely crucial tasks like going to the U.N. to address the representatives of the nations that are party to the Iran nuclear deal would be easy. I just thought it would be a lot like drilling for oil or, at the very least, distributing petroleum products to the 11,000 ExxonMobil-branded service stations across the United States. But it isn’t, so I’m kind of at a loss here.

The more I think about it, though, there is one similarity: If I really screw up a diplomatic dispute, we’re ultimately going to just walk away from it, same as we do with an oil spill.

 

  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

FFS people why are you arguing Doctor Oz’ policy ideas and playing into that deflection? He’s a celebrity TV doc and it doesn’t make a shit what his policy ideas are, he has no business running the nation’s largest social benefit program.  “Well Bob Vila knows his way around a job site, let’s hear his ideas for HUD.”  
 

 

Please don't give them any ideas. With our luck won't even be bob villa but tim the toolman taylor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, C-Man said:

 

 


Think Oprah would like a do-over on those two bozos?

 

 

Oprah is part of our problem, remember “The Secret” phase.  The most influential and successful woman in America told her audience “hey you should just disconnect from material reality and instead believe absolute horseshit, you’ll be happier and better off.”  And we all kind of went along with it because Oprah seems pretty nice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...