Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
42 minutes ago, Jameslaw121 said:

This is where I think Doctors and Medical facilities should be able to refuse service to this dipshits. "Sorry, you didn't trust us, go home and die."

I disagree. You should always try to help people. Be kind.

Instead of saying "Fuck Off," ask "how can I help you Fuck Off?"

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 6
Posted
Just now, Anastasis said:

BUILD THE WALL!!!

Old Mexico, New Mexico, Certified New Mexico with remaining warranty….

IMG_4245.jpeg.4e6da2b8c125083ac032e4568645d836.jpeg

it rubs the whiteness on its skin….or it gets the wall again. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

This country's concept of "freedom" is the most broken-brained bullshit imaginable.

Based on an unscientific poll of my Facebook aunts and uncles, “freedom” includes:

1. The right to own a shitload of guns.

2. The right to serve as a vector for preventable and potentially fatal diseases.

3. The right to not have homosexuals, trans people, or foreigners exist.

4. The right to prevent access to materials that express a positive view of homosexuals, trans people, foreigners, minorities, or girls with freckles, or that express a negative view of Christians or the institution of slavery.

5. The right for the government to arrest or beat people for expressing disfavored opinions.

6. The right to state all of these things publicly and not be called a “hopeless dumbass” or “stupid Nazi fuckstick” by their nephew.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 2
  • Rage+1 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, BrickHorn said:

Based on an unscientific poll of my Facebook aunts and uncles, “freedom” includes:

1. The right to own a shitload of guns.

2. The right to serve as a vector for preventable and potentially fatal diseases.

3. The right to not have homosexuals, trans people, or foreigners exist.

4. The right to prevent access to materials that express a positive view of homosexuals, trans people, foreigners, minorities, or girls with freckles, or that express a negative view of Christians or the institution of slavery.

5. The right for the government to arrest or beat people for expressing disfavored opinions.

6. The right to state all of these things publicly and not be called a “hopeless dumbass” or “stupid Nazi fuckstick” by their nephew.

I suspect you're violating the shit outta their right #6, you asshole.

d250bbdf-ce89-4958-87b7-9590f696e3d1_tex

Posted
29 minutes ago, BrickHorn said:

6. The right to state all of these things publicly and not be called a “hopeless dumbass” or “stupid Nazi fuckstick” by their nephew.

Maybe "hopeless fuckstick" or "stupid Nazi dumbass" might be acceptable?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
18 hours ago, BrickHorn said:

Based on an unscientific poll of my Facebook aunts and uncles, “freedom” includes:

1. The right to own a shitload of guns.

2. The right to serve as a vector for preventable and potentially fatal diseases.

3. The right to not have homosexuals, trans people, or foreigners exist.

4. The right to prevent access to materials that express a positive view of homosexuals, trans people, foreigners, minorities, or girls with freckles, or that express a negative view of Christians or the institution of slavery.

5. The right for the government to arrest or beat people for expressing disfavored opinions.

6. The right to state all of these things publicly and not be called a “hopeless dumbass” or “stupid Nazi fuckstick” by their nephew.

Your uncle sound like a swell guy. 

2 hours ago, HenryJames said:

i.imgur.com

Oof 

 

Posted

I appreciated the dark humor, my ex works for a firm that has vax makers as a client group, goal is to increase adoption. She didn’t appreciate the joke as much as I did. I prefaced saying it was dark humor. I thought it was quite funny. 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, troph said:

I appreciated the dark humor, my ex works for a firm that has vax makers as a client group, goal is to increase adoption. She didn’t appreciate the joke as much as I did. I prefaced saying it was dark humor. I thought it was quite funny. 

I laughed, showed to my wife and said I had a sick sense of humor. A fight... Yay, make up sex.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, InkaUtexas said:

I laughed, showed to my wife and said I had a sick sense of humor. A fight... Yay, make up sex.

ron burgundy GIF

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
2 hours ago, troph said:

I appreciated the dark humor, my ex works for a firm that has vax makers as a client group, goal is to increase adoption. She didn’t appreciate the joke as much as I did. I prefaced saying it was dark humor. I thought it was quite funny. 

I don't know why your background confuses me, but it always does. You were married and have kids and it must have been with her where your wife said something like she always knew she was a lesbian. But then you got divorced and remarried? You can PM me, and it isn't so important, but I have a heard time keeping things straight. It seems like it all happened around Covid.

And just to keep things on topic, I know some very smart doctors who were anti-vax for Covid. I couldn't understand it because scientifically, mRNA vaccines should be safer than the standard vaccines. mRNA doesn't enter the nucleus and can't intercalate into DNA. Now, granted there is a lot unknown, but that is the way things stand as of today. And it codes for a single protein, the spike protein. Meanwhile, a standard vaccine is an extremely large amalgamation of proteins that create thousands of antibodies that could attack intracellular proteins as well as microbial proteins. That seems much more dangerous to me.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Bevo said:

mRNA vaccines should be safer than the standard vaccines. mRNA doesn't enter the nucleus and can't intercalate into DNA. Now, granted there is a lot unknown, but that is the way things stand as of today.

The post marketing safety studies report out in 2029 timeframe unless timelines continue to get pushed. Same as with any novel therapeutics. You are actually the guinea pig. 

Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, Bevo said:

I don't know why your background confuses me, but it always does. You were married and have kids and it must have been with her where your wife said something like she always knew she was a lesbian. But then you got divorced and remarried? You can PM me, and it isn't so important, but I have a heard time keeping things straight. It seems like it all happened around Covid.

 

Married in 1997 to a straight woman. Came out to her in 2002 and we both thought it would still work (she never said she was a lesbian), had kids starting in 2005, started therapy and transition in 2013, separated in 2015 when she said she just couldn’t do it, divorced in 2017. Started seeing my current wife in 2016, engaged during vaccine required travel, married in 2023. 

Edited by troph
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Bevo said:

 

And just to keep things on topic, I know some very smart doctors who were anti-vax for Covid. I couldn't understand it because scientifically, mRNA vaccines should be safer than the standard vaccines. mRNA doesn't enter the nucleus and can't intercalate into DNA. Now, granted there is a lot unknown, but that is the way things stand as of today. And it codes for a single protein, the spike protein. Meanwhile, a standard vaccine is an extremely large amalgamation of proteins that create thousands of antibodies that could attack intracellular proteins as well as microbial proteins. That seems much more dangerous to me.

Covid clinics treat Covid vaccine injury the same as they do long covid. The spike protein in some causes micro clots, one prominent theory for vax injury is the emulated spike protein in the mRNA vaccine causes micro clots. I don’t speak to the efficacy of mRNA technology but in this theory it’s not the technology, it’s the spike protein and it’s facsimile in the vaccine that causes problems for a small subset of individuals. 

Edited by troph
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

My taste has been kinda jacked for months now.  In particular, I don't sense saltiness the way I used to.  My last known (positive) covid infection was in the summer of 2023, but I've had mild "colds" etc. since then that I suppose could have been covid.  (I stay pretty up to date on vaccine boosters, etc.).  Is there a way to determine if my impaired taste sensation is actually long covid?

Posted
1 hour ago, jimmyjazz said:

My taste has been kinda jacked for months now.  In particular, I don't sense saltiness the way I used to.  My last known (positive) covid infection was in the summer of 2023, but I've had mild "colds" etc. since then that I suppose could have been covid.  (I stay pretty up to date on vaccine boosters, etc.).  Is there a way to determine if my impaired taste sensation is actually long covid?

Not really, LC is diagnosed by elimination. But you can try and treat it as LC - I didn’t suffer that condition. So I don’t know a lot but the stellate ganglion block is used and there is limited evidence to show it can work on some. I’d start there. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

Researchers targeted a less mutable part of the Covid virus, and now have a vaccine that can outpace its mutations.

Quote

Bispecific antibodies targeting the N-terminal and receptor binding domains potently neutralize SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.

Although monoclonal antibody therapies were crucial in treating patients during the first few years of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, their utility waned as variants of concern arose. These variants evaded antibody binding primarily through mutations in the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Here, Rubio et al. developed bispecific antibodies that are not solely reliant on the variable RBD. These antibodies incorporated both an RBD-specific region and a conserved region specific to the amino-terminal domain of the spike protein. By combining these two specificities into one antibody, the authors generated a candidate therapeutic that could neutralize diverse SARS-CoV-2 variants in vitro. Moreover, the antibody was protective against SARS-CoV-2 when administered prophylactically to susceptible mice, further highlighting the translational potential of NBD- and RBD-bispecific antibodies. —Courtney Malo


https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scitranslmed.adq5720

Posted
4 minutes ago, Paper_jam said:

Thankfully our Texas Legislature is tuned in to the latest science and is protecting all of us by banning mRNA vaccines (and in fact all medical treatments involving mRNA):

https://kerrcountylead.com/virdell-to-lead-the-effort-to-ban-mrna-vaccines-in-texas/

Oh Brother Facepalm GIF by reactionseditor
 

Good to know my batshit sister-in-law is in the legislature,  I’m guessing that next we will mandate that schools tell kids that the earth could be flat, that we didn’t land on the moon,  and the legislature will demand Paxton arrest Oprah Winfrey if she steps foot in Texas because she was apparently trafficking little kids to drink their adrenochrome to stay young.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...