Jump to content

Texas vs Kentucky - 2:30pm on ABC


Pancho

Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, The Earl of Texas said:

UK came in prepped to stop the run and Quinn cut them up very well in the first half and gave us a lead UK could not recover from by half. Play calling was good, run game took off as Quinn did his thing - it was a great game plan and play calling and execution were very good.

No, it was not perfect, but this is football, shit is not going to go perfectly. UK's D is no joke, and we made them look bad, but that doesn't mean they aren't capable of making big plays.

Overall, we kicked their asses. Enjoy it.

image.gif.296f9e07e4a0867340fcde35e9199b4c.gif

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, dec3169 said:

My take is I remember a certain coach back in 2009 that decided to not really give the backup QB a lot of real game time - he completed 30 of 66 attempts on the year.  Then one of our greatest QBs went down in the title game.  The Backup tried, and even brought us to within 3 points - but 4 ints and a lost fumble later we lost.  Maybe that wasn't the best time to have to rely on a freshman with mostly mop-up duty when he could've had much more playing time in any of the games we ran away with.  https://fbschedules.com/2009-texas-football-schedule/

I don't get it.

 

It's a good thing our backup this year started two games, has almost 1K yards passing with 9 TDs and 2 picks to go with 53 rushing yards and a TD.  I would have put Arch in yesterday but not for the Garrett Gilbert experience reason.

You may not like it, I may not like it but at some point gonna just have to trust Bill Parcels when it comes to Sark and his 88% winning percentage over the last 2 seasons.  

Edited by Surly Bevo
  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coverages have been pretty good consistently.  Our returners seem to make questionable decisions much of the time, especially Bolden.  
Do you really lay Auburn's regression and punter injuries at the feet of the ST coach?  I guess you have to, but sometimes shit happens.

Banks needs to quit monkeying around
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remain pretty concerned about special teams, but not due to coaching in a direct sense. I suppose Auburn and Kern are what they are, but I'm hopeful both start much hotter streaks in B/CS. Bolden I love as a competitor and receiver, but he really needs to quit thinking he has to turn every punt in the shadow of our goalpost into a return score. One or more of those issues could easily be the death blow to our season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Gut Wagon said:

I remain pretty concerned about special teams, but not due to coaching in a direct sense. I suppose Auburn and Kern are what they are, but I'm hopeful both start much hotter streaks in B/CS. Bolden I love as a competitor and receiver, but he really needs to quit thinking he has to turn every punt in the shadow of our goalpost into a return score. One or more of those issues could easily be the death blow to our season. 

Our kicking game is a joke.  Obviously not a coaching issue.  It's a talent issue.  We have a top 3 D and top 10 O and a bottom tier ST's.  We did a hell of a job overall with roster construction this year but dropped the ball here obviously.  Need to get better next year.   Those 10+ yards we are losing on average on each punt really adds up and has helped keep teams in games.  It will really hurt us against better teams in the playoffs.  

  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Hermanator said:

Maybe Sark felt like Kentucky had no shot of beating us even without Quinn doing anything, but that's arrogant as hell. Once he fumbled and it was returned for a TD late in the 3rd it was a 10 pt game. 

This was my read of the situation from the stands.  I don't think he was concerned even after that play.  I also tend to think if it wasn't senior day maybe he sits Quinn.   Real test is going to be next week.  If ankle not healed and he is a sitting duck for that A&M rush D (I have zero doubt Elko will 100% be aggressive as hell and live with the results) does he turn to Arch?  I know he doesn't want a controversy but Quinn was night and day yesterday before and after injury. Post injury Quinn will not beat A&M.  You could see it immediately the play after it happened and for the rest of that drive.  I'm sure they weren't showing it on TV but bad body language trying to fight through it obviously hurting.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, dec3169 said:

My take is I remember a certain coach back in 2009 that decided to not really give the backup QB a lot of real game time - he completed 30 of 66 attempts on the year.  Then one of our greatest QBs went down in the title game.  The Backup tried, and even brought us to within 3 points - but 4 ints and a lost fumble later we lost.  Maybe that wasn't the best time to have to rely on a freshman with mostly mop-up duty when he could've had much more playing time in any of the games we ran away with.  https://fbschedules.com/2009-texas-football-schedule/

I don't get it.

 

 

Mad.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CycleTex87 said:

No doubt Sark wasn’t pulling QE from his last home game if he could just stagger onto the field. Goes back to DKR and the dance with the one that brung ya. 

That and he’s already got the fragile knock so leaving a game again would look bad. Though I’m pretty sure scouts can see his effectiveness after the injury and make their judgements accordingly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Skipper said:

Our kicking game is a joke.  Obviously not a coaching issue.  It's a talent issue.  We have a top 3 D and top 10 O and a bottom tier ST's.  We did a hell of a job overall with roster construction this year but dropped the ball here obviously.  Need to get better next year.   Those 10+ yards we are losing on average on each punt really adds up and has helped keep teams in games.  It will really hurt us against better teams in the playoffs.  

one of our shadow surlers has a personal connection to sideshow so i don't write what i really feel about him

i'm full mack scared to death he's going to cost us

the miss before halftime 2 years ago would have meant a win over gump

#19 is not hiding on the walk-on practice squad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Skipper said:

This was my read of the situation from the stands.  I don't think he was concerned even after that play.  I also tend to think if it wasn't senior day maybe he sits Quinn.   Real test is going to be next week.  If ankle not healed and he is a sitting duck for that A&M rush D (I have zero doubt Elko will 100% be aggressive as hell and live with the results) does he turn to Arch?  I know he doesn't want a controversy but Quinn was night and day yesterday before and after injury. Post injury Quinn will not beat A&M.  You could see it immediately the play after it happened and for the rest of that drive.  I'm sure they weren't showing it on TV but bad body language trying to fight through it obviously hurting.

it was absolutely evident and visible with the light of 1000 suns

i was shocked sark gambled to avoid a qb controversy

he can't do that this week

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Skipper said:

Our kicking game is a joke.  Obviously not a coaching issue.  It's a talent issue.  We have a top 3 D and top 10 O and a bottom tier ST's.  We did a hell of a job overall with roster construction this year but dropped the ball here obviously.  Need to get better next year.   Those 10+ yards we are losing on average on each punt really adds up and has helped keep teams in games.  It will really hurt us against better teams in the playoffs.  

Mind blowing to me they came into this season not upgrading the talent here.  The shittiest sub .500 sec teams have punters that put ours to shame. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Hagbard Celine said:

one of our shadow surlers has a personal connection to sideshow so i don't write what i really feel about him

i'm full mack scared to death he's going to cost us

the miss before halftime 2 years ago would have meant a win over gump

#19 is not hiding on the walk-on practice squad

gump?

Navigating the endless nicknames is such a beating.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm amazed y'all haven't put together that Sark knew by end of Q1 that we were no doubt winning this game, so he told QE to play up the "injury" and make it appear worse than it is.  Now, The Elk will be thinking that QE is hurt and have to plan for both QE and Manning.  When QE shows up  at The Station completely healthy it may give us just enough advantage to make the game competitive. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, mdmost said:

Wisner with 158 and Blue with almost 100 yards? That's how you beat aggy. It doesn't all have to be on Quinn. aggy is so vulnerable to the run. 

Blue can’t touch the ball that much. At this point those fumbles are mental. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, mdmost said:

Wisner with 158 and Blue with almost 100 yards? That's how you beat aggy. It doesn't all have to be on Quinn. aggy is so vulnerable to the run. 

Sark is gonna get creative because aggy is susceptible on the outside.   Gonna need to be some Wingo and Niblett plays to get them on the edge with their speed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 6th Street said:

Plenty of film of him holding the ball loosely. Now opponents are simply going for the strip every time. 

Yep. Meanwhile Wisner keeps two hands on the ball and just bounces off tacklers like it's nothing. Blue goes down on first contact. He's great in space but that's it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, NorthLoop said:

Yep. Meanwhile Wisner keeps two hands on the ball and just bounces off tacklers like it's nothing. Blue goes down on first contact. He's great in space but that's it. 

Blue was doing a good job getting through arm tackles (when he held on to the ball) on Saturday. It really may have been his best overall rushing performance if not for the fumble. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, babysdaddy said:

He is so fucking talented with the ball in his hands.  So frustrating he can't get that figured out

He is in space. He gets tackled very easily once contact happens so he's not very useful inside unless the line is blowing open big holes like Saturday. At this point 3 years in I think he is what he is going to be. A good receiver out of the backfield who fumbles like crazy. Gotta look to replace him next year even if it's in the portal. Hopefully Gibson grows out of his fumbling nonsense. That's the one I have no idea how that came to be. 

Edited by Hermanator
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...